Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
71 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/1/2010 2:45 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Yo D,

Do you have any idea what Hopko's PhD (Fordham, 1982) dissertation was on? Hehe. Try this:
"GOD AND THE WORLD: AN EASTERN ORTHODOX RESPONSE TO PROCESS THEOLOGY."

Yep.

Gotta order it. I'd like to find it FREE somewhere, but if not. Gotta cough up the $.

T


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/1/2010 2:59 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
You can get a preview here: proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=752840101&Fmt=14&VType=PQD&VInst=PROD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1265053108&clientId=79356

Just "print the pages" and you'll see them all in a single scrollable page. Save that.

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/1/2010 11:46 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Oooooh, God is doing something. Ha!

Thanks, Tom.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/1/2010 11:47 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Check it. A quote...

"From the point of view of the orthodoxy theology of the Christian East, many of the criticisms which process theology directs toward what it calls "classical theism" are necessary and right."

Dang...well, THAT's a good similiarity to know about, right?

----------------------------------------

"The thesis again is the same: We claim a theological conceptualization which escapes what we see as the errors of classical and neo-classical theism, while upholding and defending what we take to be the valid insights and desires of both.  Our conclusion is that there is a sense in which God is both actually eternal and unchanging, loving, personal, societal and free; and yet actually becoming, both within the Godhead in the timeless generation of the Son and the eternal procession of the Holy Spirit as well as in and through the uncreated divine actions and energies which flow eternally and essentially from the three divine persons; and also in the incarnation of the divine Son and Word as a real human being within the created processes of the world.  And there is also divine becoming within the world of God's making when human beings made in God's image and likeness partake of His divine nature and become ever more godlike in the gracious process of deification (theosis): becoming by grace all that God is by nature in an unending process of sharing God's divien being and life."

Oh, yeah!

You're right, dude.  Gotta cop this.  It seems, on the very surface, that Greg's trinitarian reconstruction of Hartshorne's dipolar theism dodges many (if not most) of the issues that Hopko will raise about relationality WITHIN God (God and the Trinity) and the God/world relationship (God and the World).  Greg's reconstructed process perspective has

1) God's uncreated triune interpersonal relationship being the aesthetically "satisfying factor" that makes God the UNIQUE being that God is

and

2)a non-necessary (Grace-ful), hypostatic (personally-willed) relationship between God and the world.

I'm betting that process theology's DI-polar scheme and NECESSARY God-world relationship that Hopko's gonna be gunnin' for.  Pretty sure.  He says...

In the third chapter we deal with the issue of divine personality.  Our position is that the Eastern Orthodox doctrine of the tri-hypostatic Godhead: the consubstantial and suprasubstantial Trinity of divine persons which functions both as the metaphysical exception to and the metaphysical exemplification of human interpersonal and communal relationships, presents a vision of God which is genuinely and authentically societal, without reference to the created world.

Greg's trinitarian reconstruction goes right along with this.   Completely.

If Greg's view dodges Hopko's essential problem with process theology...WHILE still having the similarities Hopkos asserts between process and Orthodoxy...that'd be hella nice.  Hella nice, indeed.

But I gotta see Hopko's diss to be sure.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/1/2010 11:29:26 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/2/2010 1:17 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Found this...

Conference paper, “Eastern Orthodox Theology and Process Thought,” Center for Process Studies, Claremont, CA, May 8-10, 1986. It is a response to Thomas J. Hopko, “God and the World: An Eastern Orthodox Response to Process Theology,” a paper also delivered at that conference, based on Hopko’s Ph.D. dissertation of the same title (Fordham Univer-sity, 1982). Griffin’s parenthetical page numbers without symbols refer to the dissertation. (A list of the papers delivered at this conference is given here.) Protopresbyter Hopko is the Dean Emeritus of St. Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary.

Posted November 14, 2009

It's by David Ray Griffin.  Yes.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/2/2010 4:50 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
By Griffin, right. Got it.

I'm downloading Hopko's diss as I type this.

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 2/4/2010 9:36 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks, Tom and Dwayne.
 
Very interesting.
 
 


(o)

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 2/4/2010 10:00 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Enjoyed reading what's there.

 

Awaiting your critique, Tom.

 

D? What do you predict?


(o)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/5/2010 8:29 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I have none, B. Let's just see what he says. ;-)

Sole Satisfier.

I loved this from Josemaría Escrivá
 
Once we recognise the insignificant and contingent nature of our earthly endeavours, the way is then open for true hope, a hope which upgrades all human work and turns it into a meeting point with God. ... Perhaps there is no greater tragedy for man than the sense of disillusionment he suffers when he has corrupted or falsified his hope, by placing it in something other than the one Love which satisfies without ever satiating.
 
Lord, help.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/5/2010 7:59:43 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/5/2010 10:19 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Try this.

Listen to this song while thinking about God's Grace as God Himself working "in you to will and to act according to his good purpose."

Isn't that amazing? Maybe I just never saw it like that before..
 
God is so worthy.  On everything.
 
 


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/5/2010 9:23:34 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/5/2010 11:11 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
John Wesley sermon. Good one.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/5/2010 11:49 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Wesley, yep. What a guy. I think his view of sanctification/perfection was spot on.

T


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/5/2010 11:51 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom:
I think his view of sanctification/perfection was spot on.

Me, too.  Glad we agree here.  ;-)

"Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God."


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/6/2010 2:23 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
The Goal: Unceasing Prayer as unconditional, ever-increasing means "acquiring" the Holy Spirit of Christ.

1   2

Becoming a "hypostasis"...just living prayer...


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/6/2010 1:35:50 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/6/2010 8:36 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hopko's diss?

It's good. Yeah. So far so GOOD.

Somebody we both know and love, D, needs to read this before he publishes his "all-forms-of-ancient-Christianity-are-awful" thesis. (That's probably unfair, but I think a lot are gonna see it as that unless he qualifies it BIG-TIME).

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/6/2010 7:11 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Agreed, Tom.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/6/2010 11:11 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Check your hotmail D. Some Hopko there.

T


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/7/2010 2:46 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Read it. Thanks for that, man. My appetite is definitely hightened!

;-)

Oh, yeah.  I was thinking about Theoria and the Beatific Vision.  Wanted to show you this...from a UMC.

The Completion of Creation:
Though what will be is veiled in mystery, we do know that God's intent for the world has not changed: we were meant to live and love in the midst of God's creation.  Thus, we seek for the beatific vision, whereby we will see God face to face, and subsequently see each other and all creation through God's eyes.  It is a vision of profound blessing and joy.

Nice, huh?  It makes sense though.  To see creation "through God's eyes" means to see all things through Christ's Holy Spirit.  The Spirit enables the pure-hearted to perceive more of the Beauty that God is.  First, I thought that it's interesting that Greg's whole deal is about BEAUTY...God being the Summum Bonum and all that.   I also thought it interesting that some people believe that the Beatific Vision is NOT POSSIBLE for this life, which is what the Hesychasts specifically tried to say was hooey.  Divine Glory was perceivable by human beings in this life, by God's Grace in the purified human heart.

Hmmm...


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/7/2010 1:55:20 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 2/7/2010 8:41 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
You have my email IF you want to share -- otherwise I understand.


(o)

Post Edited (PotOnWheel) : 2/7/2010 6:12:57 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/7/2010 5:48 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Gotcha, B. ;-)


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/8/2010 11:11 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thought:

I think that the Jesus Prayer could be a could a boundary of who is a "Christian" and who is not. In other words, it would be like this:

Regardless to what you "believe" denominationally, if "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner" has genuine spiritual meaning to you, you ARE indeed a Christian in at least a general sense.  It wouldn't matter if you were a Roman Catholic, Coptic Orthodox, Pentecostal, or Emergent.

At the same time, regardless to what you "believe" denominationally, if "Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner" has NO genuine spiritual meaning to you, you CANNOT be said to be a Christian in a significant sense.  Again, it wouldn't matter if you were RC, Orthodox, etc.

I don't know if this is true...but it feels right.

Tom?


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/8/2010 10:14:21 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/8/2010 12:06 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Does "Son of God" imply the deity of the Son? Is THAT the Jesus Prayer you mean? What about unitarians who pray the JP but take the phrase as merely a messianic title? I've been chatting with a unitarian (denies Trinity AND deity of Christ but looks to Jesus for salvation and forgiveness).

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/8/2010 12:38 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Actually, "Lord" or "Lord Jesus Christ" implies the deity of the Son. Even if someone wanted to take the "Son of God" as only a messianic title, they'd have to explain how a human being could be considered "Lord", by a monotheistic people who thought that only YHWH was Lord.

If you declare with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved. As Scripture says, "Anyone who believes in him will never be put to shame." For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, for, "Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved."


-----------------------------------

Now about the gifts of the Spirit, brothers and sisters, I do not want you to be uninformed. You know that when you were pagans, somehow or other you were influenced and led astray to mute idols. Therefore I want you to know that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God says, "Jesus be cursed," and no one can say, "Jesus is Lord," except by the Holy Spirit.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/8/2010 11:56:16 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/8/2010 12:43 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
From here...

Saint Seraphim of Sarov:
 
"Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me a sinner": let all thine attention and training be in this. Walking, sitting, doing, and standing in church before the divine service, coming in and going out, keep this unceasingly on thy lips and in thy heart. In calling in this manner on the name of God thou wilt find peace, thou wilt attain to purity of spirit and body, and the Holy Spirit, the Origin of all good things, will dwell in thee, and He will guide thee unto holiness, unto all piety and purity."

Jesus Prayer unto Acquisition of the Holy Spirit.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/8/2010 1:23 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
So Unitarians can't mean the prayer in any way that would include in your definition (as "Christian" ).

That's cool. I'm pretty uncomfortable with unitarianism.

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
71 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 4:47 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads