Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/7/2010 5:16 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Basically, it's a question...
 
What is the relationship of a "fully human" being to the Holy Spirit?    I don't mean being "merely" human, like just being a living, breathing, walking, enculturated human being.   I mean "fully human" in the sense that Jesus was "fully human."  What is the critical relationship between being "fully human" and the Holy Spirit of Jesus...and if so, what does that relationship consist of?  My hunch is that an aspect of being in God's image implies that participation in the Holy Spirit is potential and natural to wholistic human spiritual functioning as it is for the Triune God...sans any effects of sin.  But that's my thought.
 
See what I'm asking? 


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 3/7/2010 9:06 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
PhD dissertation...Christology. You own it baby.

As you know, I think the key is knowing where to seek the similarities between us and Jesus and where to expect differences. The fundamental difference is that we don't have the emergence of non-divine personhood in Jesus' case as we do in our case. And so we have to posit a difference in the manner of relating to account for this difference in person(s). God and world relate inter-personally (divine hypostasis to non-divine hypostasis) in our case. But in Christ's case the relationship is inter-nature (divine nature to human nature within the one divine hypostasis). You know what a big thing this is for me. It's at one and the same time how and why we're neither monists nor dualists.

THEN we account for the similarities. I'm going to argue that the logoi are God's (divine acts of God) gift of being and otherness, and that this is the best place to seek an answer for what it means to be 'fully human'. It's going to mean the logoi are (and are becoming) all they are intended to be. That means that as 'fully human' we are God's act fully 'acted' (or fully 'acting'), i.e., being and doing the will of God in its fullness--no disparity between what God wills and the way the world is. Complete conformity. This is when we are (as Hart likes to describe us) "the surface of being" upon which God is reflected back to himself. We're FULLY HUMAN when God sees himself reflected in us.

The second piece that I'd argue that that 'the surface of being' upon which God is reflected IS our personal creative existence; us interpreting the themes of love. God's the 'score'...totally and utterly. The scores of created being are just the logoi of created being. But scores prescribe a range of creative movements all of which equally reflect God back to God. So we reflect God is doing and being the KIND of personal being God is...relating creatively and freely in love.

Putting it together. We have to specify what we mean when we say "fully human." Do we JUST mean "a full human nature" (a full slate of human natural capacities)? Or do we mean a fully personalized human nature. If the former, then we and Jesus are the same. If the latter, then we're a bit different, because where Jesus' human nature is personalized (made fully personal) by being taking up into the divine person of the Son and made THAT person's nature...our human natures are not personalized in exactly the same manner. And we've talked about how and where the difference is...how human natural capacities are "let go" so as to permit the emergence of personal identity IN US in a way NOT permitted in Jesus' case. That how Jesus is the one divine person of the Son and we are persons in the Person, having our identities as the surface of created being by relating interpersonally to the source of that being.

I love Bonaventure's description of the Son as "Ars Patris" (the complete "art of the father" ). All we need to do is keep in mind the difference between divine vs created being and this aesthetic approach to "fullness of being" gets expressed well. Fully human being is fully creative and finite being fully conformed to God's will.

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 3/7/2010 10:35 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
D: My hunch is that an aspect of being in God's image implies that participation in the Holy Spirit is potential and natural to wholistic human spiritual functioning as it is for the Triune God...sans any effects of sin. But that's my thought.

J: I agree. It seems that the truly volitional-becoming phase of our existence was meant to be finite only. It provides a kind of novelty for the godhead. But insomuch as it involves certain amounts of inevitable suffering, I can't imagine that God intended it to be eternal. Indeed, novelty, by definition, seems to imply a kind of transient duration. The corporeal aspect of our eternality (including that of the Son, it seems) may not have anything to do with novelty for God. For God may not get any truly novel pleasure from experiencing corporeal beings that He couldn't get from merely imagining them. But maybe the novel pleasure derived from true CONTINGENT and SIGNIFICANT (significant in the sense of involving BECOMING) volitional activity is something God can ONLY experience non-imaginatively.


 

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 7:42 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Tom:
We have to specify what we mean when we say "fully human." Do we JUST mean "a full human nature" (a full slate of human natural capacities)? Or do we mean a fully personalized human nature.

We mean the latter.


*************************************

Tom:
If the former, then we and Jesus are the same. If the latter, then we're a bit different, because where Jesus' human nature is personalized (made fully personal) by being taking up into the divine person of the Son and made THAT person's nature...our human natures are not personalized in exactly the same manner. And we've talked about how and where the difference is...how human natural capacities are "let go" so as to permit the emergence of personal identity IN US in a way NOT permitted in Jesus' case. That how Jesus is the one divine person of the Son and we are persons in the Person, having our identities as the surface of created being by relating interpersonally to the source of that being.

I'm with all this, yeah.  I think what I'm saying is that neither Incarnation nor Theosis would be possible without the Uncreated Holy Spirit being somehow "natural" to "fully personalized human nature."  Sure, human beings fall into an UNnatural state where perception of God is negated by "greiving the Spirit"...but that just shows the point.  Repentence brings the human heart to HEALTH, in the natural state of living in God's Creation.

**************************************************

Tom:
I'm going to argue that the logoi are God's (divine acts of God) gift of being and otherness, and that this is the best place to seek an answer for what it means to be 'fully human'. It's going to mean the logoi are (and are becoming) all they are intended to be. That means that as 'fully human' we are God's act fully 'acted' (or fully 'acting'), i.e., being and doing the will of God in its fullness--no disparity between what God wills and the way the world is. Complete conformity. This is when we are (as Hart likes to describe us) "the surface of being" upon which God is reflected back to himself. We're FULLY HUMAN when God sees himself reflected in us.

I agree completely. Really. My question is this: Is the Holy Spirit of Jesus a sine qua non of the actualization of this human possibility...and if so, in what way(s)?  Asked a slightly different way, concerning what you're already doing, how are the logoi of God (and their perception by human beings) grounded in the Holy Spirit of Jesus?  I think the two questions are two facets of the same reality.

I'm thinking that it's impossible for human beings to fully actualize total conformity to God's will WITHOUT God's Spirit. Just thinking biblically. The prophecies. (Listed below) God talking about renewing hearts and giving His people His Spirit to empower and enable them to do his commands. Jesus' giving of the Spirit at Pentecost and what that entailed. It seems that accurate perception of God's possibilities for one's own particular human existence is impossible without the Holy Spirit who IS Divine Presence...which makes sense. It is only by the Holy Spirit that the thoughts of God are known, right? ;-)  So, if human beings were originally designed to have a "know and be known" relationship with God, fully personalized humanity would have to have an integral relationship with the Holy Spirit, the only means by which God and Creation can be truly "known."
 
And this may be presumptuous...but maybe that's why the Incarnation was necessary.  The Divine Person of God the Son is inseparable from the Holy Spirit, both being Divine Persons of the One Triune God.  When "the Word became Flesh", the Holy Spirit was part and parcel of that, fully indwelling particularized human nature, making it image and likeness...as it was truly meant to be.  The Incarnate Word took on human nature, already possessing the Holy Spirit, which is the very thing that COMPLETES human nature, making it "fully alive."

Bam.  Jesus, the perfect ikon of God.

So, the Father sends us Jesus' Holy Spirit...and we take on "the mind of Christ" by His Spirit...as Christ's Body and Bride.

Yeah...


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 3/8/2010 7:38:39 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 8:13 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
"The time is coming," declares the LORD,
"when I will make a new covenant
with the house of Israel
and with the house of Judah.

It will not be like the covenant
I made with their forefathers
when I took them by the hand
to lead them out of Egypt,
because they broke my covenant,
though I was a husband to them, "
declares the LORD.

"This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel
after that time," declares the LORD.
"I will put my law in their minds
and write it on their hearts.
I will be their God,
and they will be my people.

No longer will a man teach his neighbor,
or a man his brother, saying, 'Know the LORD,'
because they will all know me,
from the least of them to the greatest,"
declares the LORD.
"For I will forgive their wickedness
and will remember their sins no more."

This is what the LORD says,
he who appoints the sun
to shine by day,
who decrees the moon and stars
to shine by night,
who stirs up the sea
so that its waves roar—
the LORD Almighty is his name:

"Only if these decrees vanish from my sight,"
declares the LORD,
"will the descendants of Israel ever cease
to be a nation before me."

This is what the LORD says:
"Only if the heavens above can be measured
and the foundations of the earth below be searched out
will I reject all the descendants of Israel
because of all they have done,"
declares the LORD.


-----------------------------------------------------
 
"Therefore say to the house of Israel, 'This is what the Sovereign LORD says: It is not for your sake, O house of Israel, that I am going to do these things, but for the sake of my holy name, which you have profaned among the nations where you have gone.  I will show the holiness of my great name, which has been profaned among the nations, the name you have profaned among them. Then the nations will know that I am the LORD, declares the Sovereign LORD, when I show myself holy through you before their eyes.
 
" 'For I will take you out of the nations; I will gather you from all the countries and bring you back into your own land.  I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you will be clean; I will cleanse you from all your impurities and from all your idols.  I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh.  And I will put my Spirit in you and move you to follow my decrees and be careful to keep my laws.  You will live in the land I gave your forefathers; you will be my people, and I will be your God.  I will save you from all your uncleanness. I will call for the grain and make it plentiful and will not bring famine upon you.  I will increase the fruit of the trees and the crops of the field, so that you will no longer suffer disgrace among the nations because of famine.  Then you will remember your evil ways and wicked deeds, and you will loathe yourselves for your sins and detestable practices."
 
------------------------------------------------------
 

"And afterward,
       I will pour out my Spirit on all people.
       Your sons and daughters will prophesy,
       your old men will dream dreams,
       your young men will see visions.
  Even on my servants, both men and women,
       I will pour out my Spirit in those days.
 I will show wonders in the heavens
       and on the earth,
       blood and fire and billows of smoke.
 The sun will be turned to darkness
       and the moon to blood
       before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD.
 And everyone who calls
       on the name of the LORD will be saved;
       for on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem
       there will be deliverance,
       as the LORD has said,
       among the survivors
       whom the LORD calls.
 
 
-----------------------------------------------------

Now there was a man of the Pharisees named Nicodemus, a member of the Jewish ruling council. He came to Jesus at night and said, "Rabbi, we know you are a teacher who has come from God. For no one could perform the miraculous signs you are doing if God were not with him."

 In reply Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again."
 
 "How can a man be born when he is old?" Nicodemus asked. "Surely he cannot enter a second time into his mother's womb to be born!"
 
 Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again.' The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit."
 
"How can this be?" Nicodemus asked.
 
"You are Israel's teacher," said Jesus, "and do you not understand these things?

-----------------------------------------------------

Are we beginning to commend ourselves again? Or do we need, like some people, letters of recommendation to you or from you? You yourselves are our letter, written on our hearts, known and read by everybody. You show that you are a letter from Christ, the result of our ministry, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 3/8/2010 7:25:49 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 8:58 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Similtude:
The corporeal aspect of our eternality (including that of the Son, it seems) may not have anything to do with novelty for God. For God may not get any truly novel pleasure from experiencing corporeal beings that He couldn't get from merely imagining them. But maybe the novel pleasure derived from true CONTINGENT and SIGNIFICANT (significant in the sense of involving BECOMING) volitional activity is something God can ONLY experience non-imaginatively.

I think that you are right. There is a true, but unnecessary (gracious?) beauty that God appreciates about the demonstration of raw "eros" of a free sentient creature who wholeheartedly continually "turns it's eyes unto" the Lord, it's Creator...a contingent, significant beauty that cannot be felt as mere possibility because it deals with the Present and creaturely DECISION. It can only be experienced in the realm of CHOICE...which is not in mere possibility. Living in the "leap of faith" happens in the Now. I'd go out on a limb and say that God cannot fully experience the beauty of human "acts of faith" done in creature-to-Creator love non-imaginatively. An actual Abraham and Mary makes a difference to God's appreciation of all reality.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 9:03 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thought I'd find this...

"In Greek Patristic literature, it was a prevailing view that the state of human being as it exists in the natural environment includes the body, soul (including the dianoia as an analytical part of the soul), and spirit, which had never been dissociated from the Holy Spirit. Human spirit stands here for the nous (spiritual intellect, the organ of faith), linking the human person to its dynamic relationship to God and to the world. It is natural congeniality with God, which is articulated by the presence of the Holy Spirit in human being. But the Holy Spirit is the creator of both body and soul, whose unity forms a particular human person. The presence of the Holy Spirit in human constitution thus makes the human person open upward through it's calling to the Divine as its destiny. Without the Spirit, the Greek Fathers assert, the human being is incomplete and imprisoned through the conditions of the created nature. [Vladimir] Lossky reaffirms this point by saying that "the distinction between person and nature reproduces in humanity the order of divine life, expressed by the dogma of the Trinity."

Alexei Nesteruk
Light from the East
page 266, note 33.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 9:17 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Let's zone in a little more...

Tom:
The second piece that I'd argue that that 'the surface of being' upon which God is reflected IS our personal creative existence; us interpreting the themes of love. God's the 'score'...totally and utterly. The scores of created being are just the logoi of created being. But scores prescribe a range of creative movements all of which equally reflect God back to God. So we reflect God is doing and being the KIND of personal being God is...relating creatively and freely in love.

Let's say that it is the human "heart" that is the domain of "interpreting the themes of love"...it is the place from whence our choices emerge. The human heart is the seat of our creativity and freedom (or lack thereof).

My question would be this: Can the human "heart" interpret the themes of love accurately without God Himself working in that human heart via the Spirit? I really don't think so. I think the human spirit is "blind" without God's activity. At the same time, it seems to me that should God design a creature he INTENDS to be interpersonally relational to Him, it wouldn't make sense for that creature to be fundamentally DEVOID of the necessary MEANS to be interpersonally relational to God. In other words, if God designs humanity to be able to "know the Lord"...then there has to be some fundamental link between "fully personalized humanity" and the Holy Spirit, who is the only way the thoughts of God are known...and this link, I believe, is found in the Archetype of Humanity, Christ.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 9:20 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
In the writings of all of the Fathers, we find a noticeable difference which St. John of Damascus describes: "'After His likeness' means likeness in virtue." The tradition is very explicit and ever strong: after the Fall, "the image" remained unchanged, but was reduced to ontological silence, ineffective because all capability of "likeness" to God had been destroyed, so "likeness" because radically inaccessible to man's natural powers. St. Gregory Palamas states this precisely: "In our being 'in the image' (of God) man is superior to the angels; but it is 'after the likeness' that he is inferior, because he is unstable." "After the Fall, we rejected the likeness, but we did not cease being, 'in the image.' " Christ restores power to human acts, re-establishes the likeness, which, in turn, liberates the image; and its radiance can be perceived in saints and children. St. Gregory of Nyssa gives us his anthropological kerygma (proclamation): a being is a human being only when moved by the Holy Spirit, then such a being is a "resembling image." The image is constituent and normative; it can never be lost or destroyed. In is function of conforming ot the divine, it makes these words come true: "You must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect" (Mt 5:48). When "God will be all in all" (1 Cor 15:28), His human temples will be like the presence that fills and animates them. The scriptural notion of "sonship" excludes any concept of legal adoption; Christology shows that in Christ, the sons and daughters are really similar to the Father. While God is beyond compare, the human heart, which only God can sound, contains--as St. Gregory of Nyssa states so well--something unique which can be compared: "something that makes on similar to God, for in order to share in God it is vital to possess in one's being something that corresponds to what is shared." To the statement "God is love" (1 Jn 4:16) corresponds the human being's Amo, ergo sum ("I love, therefore I am" ).
--Evdokimov


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 9:39 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hence, the importance of...

The human task before God is to become what it is: "bearer" of Image, Likeness, and Spirit of God.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 9:49 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.

For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.

Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.

Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them
.

-----------------------------------------

This, I would say, is evidential of what happens when human beings "greive the Holy Spirit" through idolatry of Creation (including self-idolatry) , and therefore fail to "retain the knowledge of God." Something every human being is, in some way, guilty of...well, save Jesus.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 9:56 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

D: My question is this: Is the Holy Spirit of Jesus a sine qua non of the actualization of this human possibility...

 

T: By “Holy Spirit of Jesus” you mean THE Holy Spirit?

 

D: …and if so, in what way(s)?

 

T: Not sure. But whatever those ways are in Jesus’ case, there’re not in every aspect identical to how they function in our case, for the difference in how divine and human relate in Jesus (on the one hand) and us (on the other) is what accounts for the suppression (maybe not a good word) of the emergence of a ‘personal’ other in his case and yet its emergence in each of ours.

 

So my question is, given this ‘personal otherness’ that obtains between us and God but not between Christ and God is rooted/maintained in how the Spirit is at work ‘this way’ in us and ‘that way’ in Jesus, what calculus is guiding us in drawing out and identifying the similarities and differences? In other words, what conclusions do we hope to gain and apply to us from studying Jesus IF we admit at the outset that only ‘some’ of what fulfills Christ’s human nature will transfer to us?

 

D: Asked a slightly different way, concerning what you're already doing, how are the logoi of God (and their perception by human beings) grounded in the Holy Spirit of Jesus? I think the two questions are two facets of the same reality.

 

T: Ah, OK. I see. What’s the Holy Spirit’s role in God’s standing in the event that is ME and call me (my logos) continuously into being as a person? And how’s this similar to and different from God’s standing in the event that is the hypostatic union? In other words, what’s similar and different about the Spirit’s role in personalizing Jesus’ human nature (on the one hand) and personalizing our human natures (on the other)? There HAVE to be similarities (or else Jesus’ is a human being LIKE us), but there also HAVE to be differences (or else each of us is, like Jesus, ‘the’ Son of God incarnate, the hypostatic union repeated over and over in each of us).

 

My hunch would be to say that the explanation is located in the fact that where each of us has ‘a’ logos grounded in ‘the’ Logos that expresses the fulfillment of his/her being, Jesus has no such logos in the Logos-incarnate (Toronen and Tollefson, remember?). There can be no logos that can prescribe for the Logos what the fulfillment of its human nature should look like. This is why and how you have a hypostatic union in Christ that you don’t have in our case, and how human nature in Christ is personalized in a way different than in us—yet with similarities. There’s no logos that subsumes the Logos in this instance (as there is in ours). Christ is God standing in human nature articulating his own personal “I am,” while in us God invites us to stand within our logos (within this space God creates for us to emerge) and articulate our own “I am” in-relation-to God.

 

D: I'm thinking that it's impossible for human beings to fully actualize total conformity to God's will WITHOUT God's Spirit.

 

Tom: Totally agree.

 

D: Maybe that's why the Incarnation was necessary. The Divine Person of God the Son is inseparable from the Holy Spirit, both being Divine Persons of the One Triune God. When "the Word became Flesh", the Holy Spirit was part and parcel of that, fully indwelling particularized human nature, making it image and likeness...as it was truly meant to be. The Incarnate Word took on human nature, already possessing the Holy Spirit, which is the very thing that COMPLETES human nature, making it "fully alive."

 

T: Yeah, this is a question I really struggle with. How is the incarnation necessary to our being fully personalized? That’s the question. Forget sin and healing its effects. We want to say that God’s incarnation was always a necessary step in our becoming all we were intended to be. HOW does that work? What is it about human and divine being that makes human being’s perfection impossible apart from God’s taking human being into his own personal identity (via the Son’s incarnation). My problem with grasping this necessity is based on the fact that we already posit God intimately present in/with the world, and perceivable by us as image-bearers. What more is needed than for me to dispose myself toward this? Why MUST God be incarnate (sin aside)?

 

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 9:59 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hey, Tom. Just had a random thought. Stephen's speech...

“You stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist the Holy Spirit. As your fathers did, so do you. Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they killed those who announced beforehand the coming of the Righteous One, whom you have now betrayed and murdered, you who received the law as delivered by angels and did not keep it.”


All open theism has to say is this: We believe that it is genuinely possible for the human heart to "resist" the Holy Spirit...as in actively work against God Himself working in us. We believe that God has created a world where, when receptive of Grace, a human heart can freed to choose to NOT resist the Holy Spirit. Calvinism both explicitly and implicitly denies both of these ideas.


Make sense?


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 10:04 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
D: Asked a slightly different way, concerning what you're already doing, how are the logoi of God (and their perception by human beings) grounded in the Holy Spirit of Jesus? I think the two questions are two facets of the same reality.

Tom: My hunch would be to say that the explanation is located in the fact that where each of us has ‘a’ logos grounded in ‘the’ Logos that expresses the fulfillment of his/her being, Jesus has no such logos in the Logos-incarnate (Toronen and Tollefson, remember?). There can be no logos that can prescribe for the Logos what the fulfillment of its human nature should look like. This is why and how you have a hypostatic union in Christ that you don’t have in our case, and how human nature in Christ is personalized in a way different than in us—yet with similarities. There’s no logos that subsumes the Logos in this instance (as there is in ours). Christ is God standing in human nature articulating his own personal “I am,” while in us God invites us to stand within our logos (within this space God creates for us to emerge) and articulate our own “I am” in-relation-to God.

Ok. I'm with this. Just being sure though. Possessing a human spirit does NOT require having a human "logos", right? This gets to the heart of the Apollinarius/Nestorius mess.  In other words, it is not the case that:
 
one human "heart <=> one human "logos"
 
...but rather the human "heart" is a natural function of human particularized existence that God the Son took upon himself in taking on human flesh.  For every human being, you will have a human "heart."  Jesus is the one human heart not grounded in a human "logos"
 
Right?


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 3/8/2010 9:08:20 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 10:25 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom:
How is the incarnation necessary to our being fully personalized? That’s the question. Forget sin and healing its effects. We want to say that God’s incarnation was always a necessary step in our becoming all we were intended to be. HOW does that work? What is it about human and divine being that makes human being’s perfection impossible apart from God’s taking human being into his own personal identity (via the Son’s incarnation). My problem with grasping this necessity is based on the fact that we already posit God intimately present in/with the world, and perceivable by us as image-bearers. What more is needed than for me to dispose myself toward this? Why MUST God be incarnate (sin aside)?

Perhaps there needed to be an indissoluble link between the Life of God (found in the Father's Spirit) and human existence...and Jesus was that link. Jesus, being a human image-bearer of God, was at the same time the DIVINE image bearer of the Father (hence all of Jesus' "If you see me, you've seen the Father" talk... ) and he clearly demonstrated that both of those activities could be done at the same time in the same HUMAN body. And how did this happen in Jesus of Nazareth? Only through the interaction of Jesus' human spirit with the Holy Spirit. No other way. Look at it like this. Could Jesus have fully actualized the Cross, if it were not for the Spirit of God upon him that lead him into and through the Wilderness experience? Nope. Could Jesus have so given himself to the Father in Gethsemane if it weren't for the Spirit upon him? Nope. But the Spirit WAS upon him...because it "rested" upon him naturally and uniquely as the Eternal Word and Son of God.


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Post Edited (One Love) : 3/8/2010 9:31:37 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 10:54 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom:
Christ is God standing in human nature articulating his own personal “I am,” while in us God invites us to stand within our logos (within this space God creates for us to emerge) and articulate our own “I am” in-relation-to God.


'I am returning to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'
--Jesus (John 20:17)

Hart talks about (i think) Gregory's insight on this...and it was huge. God does articulate his own personal "I am" in Jesus' human nature. (Before Abraham was, I am.) At the same time, there is a real dimension of "I am" in-relation-to-God in the self-understanding of the God-human Jesus...as is indicated above. Jesus required the Holy Spirit in order to "know" himself as the Son uniquely beloved of the Father...and a human spirit to "know" himself as "suffering servant" of God in real solidarity with Creation.

But again, the "I-am-in-relation-to-God" sense can be integral to creaturely spirituality itself (an experienced in the human spirit) rather than specifically necessitating this be from a human "logos"


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 5:02 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
D: God does articulate his own personal "I am" in Jesus' human nature. (Before Abraham was, I am.) At the same time, there is a real dimension of "I am" in-relation-to-God in the self-understanding of the God-human Jesus...

T: If you mean the Son relates his 'human' nature (and the experiences of that nature) to God in terms of its being of a nature/kind OTHER than divine (i.e., other than the experience of a divine nature), then yeah. Fine. God the Son is having a non-divine experience as a human being. But I'd be uncomfortable expressing the non-divine aspect of this is 'personal' terms, i.e., as if there is an "I" other than the divine "I" of the Son.

T


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 3/8/2010 8:39 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
D: God does articulate his own personal "I am" in Jesus' human nature. (Before Abraham was, I am.) At the same time, there is a real dimension of "I am" in-relation-to-God in the self-understanding of the God-human Jesus...

T: If you mean the Son relates his 'human' nature (and the experiences of that nature) to God in terms of its being of a nature/kind OTHER than divine (i.e., other than the experience of a divine nature), then yeah. Fine. God the Son is having a non-divine experience as a human being.


That's all I mean, really.

******************************

Tom:
But I'd be uncomfortable expressing the non-divine aspect of this is 'personal' terms, i.e., as if there is an "I" other than the divine "I" of the Son.

I feel you. As you see now, that's not what I'm trying to say. ;-)


Lord Jesus, have mercy.

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 5:32 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads