Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > Jesus in Islam (Video)  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
143 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5  6 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/16/2011 12:09 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Maybe I need to know these things:

1) Is there anything wrong about the argument as I present it (ie the texts themselves, the commentaries, etc)? From what I gathered yesterday from the professor dude (more on that later), the Maududi commentary was a very good reference, as Maududi's views on Islam are top-rank. And he agreed that the content of the commentary (specifically what marks the true Torat and Injeel) was accurate and representative of general Islam.

2) If there is nothing wrong with it, then are we just saying that many (most) Muslims are inconsistent with some inherent realities of their faith (ie. not taking their veneration of Isa/Jesus comprehensively)?  It amazes me about how so much veneration and honor can be bequeathed upon Jesus as Messenger, Servant, and Prophet of God...without any real understanding of WHAT HE SAID from the Torat as such.  I'm almost like: why have authoritative commentaries if you're not gonna even follow the truth of those to USE in discerning the Quran stated Holy Books?  Hmmm..
 
Besides all that, I don't see how the inner inconsistency of the Qur'an negates my line of thinking at all.  Either the Great Commandments and Jesus' teaching about them are good candidates with the specifications of authentic Torat and Injeel per Maududi...or not?  If they are, then sheesh...


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/16/2011 11:36:13 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/16/2011 12:35 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

If we were able to have an unbiased person who had no emontional, religious attachments to either Christianity or Islam, and was just to look at the argument itself with all of the information...do you think she would agree with the logic of this?

Major Point:
Qur'anically speaking, a person cannot be a true, faithful Muslim without obeying Jesus/Isa's Torah-Injeel teaching about "loving the neighbor as oneself". 
 
Discussion of Major Point:
According to Hammudat Abd Al-Ati's summary of the fundamental articles of Islamic faith--found in his work "Islam in Focus"---true, faithful Muslims are obligated by their faith to believe what can be reasonably discerned as authentic, uncorrupted Torah (Torat) and Gospel (Injeel) teaching from the Holy Books of the "people of the Book", namely Jews and Christians.  This is explicitly affirmed within the Qur'an.  (Surahs 2:136, with cross referencing of 3:1-4; 3:84; 4:163-165; 6:84-87.)  Moreover, true Muslims are to fully obey the divinely revealed teaching of God's Messenger and Prophet, Isa/Jesus (Surah 43:63-64), as Jesus' teaching was "confirming the Torah" which antedated him. (Surah 61:6-7) 
 
Given all this, if it is true that Deuteronomy 6:4-6 and Leviticus 19:9-18 (The Great Commandments of Jesus ala Matthew 22:34-40) are good candididates for authentic Torat and Injeel material--per meeting the specifications of accepted Islamic commentaries, such as those produced by Maulana Maududi--then, from Abd Al-Ati's perspective and others like Sohaib N. Sultan --, the "true Muslim" absolutely must believe in those passages as genuine revelation from Allah and live them out faithfully.  To do otherwise is to implicitly break faith with Allah and rebel against Allah's truth as revealed by a divinely-sent Messenger, Prophet, and Messiah, Isa/Jesus. 
 
Implications of Major Point and Discussion:
Muslims and Christians are bound by mutually-held belief in Jesus/Isa as Allah's Mesenger and Prophet and his teaching of the "Great Commandments" such that both groups are committed by their own holy books to obey Jesus/Isa's commands to "love your neighbor as yourself."
 
--------------------------------------
 
It's one thing if people aren't consistent with their faith. (Look at Christians!)  It's another thing to say that just because most people are inconsistent with their faith, that such inconsistencies can't be pointed out!


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/16/2011 12:38 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom:
When I hear or use the language of "worship" or "faith-based obedience" I'm talking about that manner of relating to God that we have access to by means of the gospel. "Worship" is what we're redeemed in Christ to do and enjoy. In other words, the worship of God is an effect of the gospel. So you can see why I'm not going to agree to use such language to describe what Muslims and Hindus do. I'm trying to think it through from within the logic of the NT proclamation. That proclamation offers the true worship of God to the world.


I need to know:
1) In your view, what is the relationship(s) between worship of God and the Great Commandments?
2) In your view, what is the relationship(s) between the Gospel of Jesus and the Great Commandments?

Gimme all you got on these, bro.

Whole thread


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/16/2011 1:19 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Jesus Through Muslim Eyes

Is this "folk" Islam, Tom?  And Is this statement accurate, Tom?

For Shii Islam, which dominates Iran, the martyrdom of Husayn, the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), in 682 A.D. is a central spiritual event. And for Shii Islam in particular, the life and death of Christ is a parallel spiritual event. The Christ/Husayn analogy is ever present in the religious sensibility of Shi'i Islam.


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/16/2011 12:23:00 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/16/2011 2:54 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hmm...

yeah...


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/16/2011 2:09:17 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/16/2011 5:40 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
The few Shi'ites I've talked to take the standard orthodox (Sunni) approach to Jesus and DENY that he was crucified. I'm surprised to hear that Shi'ites believe Jesus was violently murdered/crucified at all.

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/17/2011 5:09 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
D: Major Point: ....
Discussion of Major Point: ....
Implications of Major Point and Discussion: ....

T: I'm down with the argument as it stands, Bro. My beef was with the separate argument/assumption that Muslims who believe Jesus was sent by God as a prophet and that they are duty bound to obey his command to love are thereby "approaching God worshipfully." I wouldn't use that language to describe your major point and how it functions in setting the hook in a Muslim's heart/mind.

I've gone back and forth through the years between using the Quran as a starting point with Muslims or just leaving that aside and presenting the gospel within its own NT context. The former approach (which you represent) hasn’t demonstrated itself to be obviously better. It works better for some, i.e., those who are educated enough to have understood the arguments for it and already bought into it, etc. But with the first approach I often found myself having first to educate Muslims into being better Muslims so that I could present the gospel to them in terms of their own book. And to be honest, Muslims who hadn’t already bought into viewing their own book that way were more often than not suspicious of a Western Christian telling them what their religion really entails. I’m not saying it can’t or doesn’t work as an approach. I’m just saying it ain’t as simple as drawing straight lines to connect a few dots here and there.

I say it’s best to be as prepared as we can to make sense of the gospel as best we can given the education, beliefs, suspicions, context/ect., of the Muslim we’re in dialogue with.

Does that make sense?

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 9:37 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom:
I'm down with the argument as it stands, Bro. My beef was with the separate argument/assumption that Muslims who believe Jesus was sent by God as a prophet and that they are duty bound to obey his command to love are thereby "approaching God worshipfully." I wouldn't use that language to describe your major point and how it functions in setting the hook in a Muslim's heart/mind.

I trust that God knows people's hearts. If C.S. Lewis' "Tash" idea has anything to it, then, the E.U.R., Post-mortem evangelism, "Gates-are-never-closed", All-Loving God that WE BOTH believe in will look at each heart and do what's right. Me? I guess I'll just "hope all things, believe all things." biggrin

*************************

Tom:
I've gone back and forth through the years between using the Quran as a starting point with Muslims or just leaving that aside and presenting the gospel within its own NT context. The former approach (which you represent) hasn’t demonstrated itself to be obviously better. It works better for some, i.e., those who are educated enough to have understood the arguments for it and already bought into it, etc. But with the first approach I often found myself having first to educate Muslims into being better Muslims so that I could present the gospel to them in terms of their own book. And to be honest, Muslims who hadn’t already bought into viewing their own book that way were more often than not suspicious of a Western Christian telling them what their religion really entails. I’m not saying it can’t or doesn’t work as an approach. I’m just saying it ain’t as simple as drawing straight lines to connect a few dots here and there.

If this is what's going on, then it seems like the best way to make a good impact is to work with the educated Muslim teachers and instructors (from the East and West) and then let them help their own Muslim brothers and sisters "into being better Muslims." If they won't listen to "Western Christians", then maybe they will listen to people that they can acknowledge authoritatively and identify with. I know that's easier said that done. But that dang sure doesn't mean it ain't worth trying.

I will say this though: It's been my experience though this process that there seems to be a lot of subjective emotional baggage that deters Muslims AND Christians from seeking more common ground.  So much so, that some of both sides hesitate to look at FACTS.  It's silly and disheartening.


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/18/2011 8:41:45 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 9:48 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Theologians discuss reconciliation

Professors Miroslav Volf and Ingrid Mattson discussed Christian and Muslim theologies on Wednesday.

Professors Miroslav Volf and Ingrid Mattson discussed Christian and Muslim theologies on Wednesday.

Mattson explained that Muslim and Christian individuals’ lack of knowledge regarding the two religions impedes the theological discussion of the varying views toward God.

“Most people in the world begin, not in a blank state, but from a situation of what Islamic scholars call complex ignorance, which is a distinction from simple ignorance,” Mattson said. “Simple ignorance is simply not knowing about something — complex ignorance is where you think you know something, but you don’t, and I think most of us in the world are in a situation of complex ignorance.”


DAMN RIGHT!!!!  yeah


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 9:51 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Dude, maybe I should try to talk to Joseph Cumming or the Yale people or something.  I'm looking through all their stuff (I'm e-getting this one. )  It could just be me, but I don't see them putting forth the same thought as I am.  I hear them basically saying what John Piper said:
 
"You have a Prophet that said love your neighbors...and we have a Prophet that said love your neighbors, so we can use the principle of loving your neighbors that is venerated by both as the ground and basis of all further interaction."

Basically, the common ground is taken as "loving God and loving the neighbor" as sheer principle. It feels this way as I read all the material on the Yale site and some stuff from the "A Common Word" book.  I was for sure they'd have done it in there...but I hadn't seen it yet.  They talk about what Jesus means by "loving your neighbor" and mentions that it's a reaffirmation of Torah. Plus they talk about how this is binding on how Christians should act towards Muslim/Christian dialogue.  They do a good job of that.

BUT...

They do NOT talk about the implications of Jesus' "love your neighbor" teaching as being AUTHORITATIVE for Muslim life per his being Prophet and Messenger from God...and they do NOT emphasize the common ground of Jesus being Prophet and Messenger from God in BOTH Christian and Islamic religious belief. And I think this is very fair to talk about, ESPECIALLY with educated Muslims who want to be in dialogue. If this could be discussed, then it would place responsibility on Muslim teachers like Professor Mattson to TEACH these things, particularly when talking comprehensively about who Isa is Quranically speaking and WHAT prophetic message he brought to the "Children of Israel." 


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/18/2011 9:25:11 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 10:27 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
In a situation of "complex ignorance", it seems right to help people become LESS IGNORANT about their own faith. I know that would do wonders for American Evangelical Christians with no real knowledge of Eastern Christianity!


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 11:03 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Emailed Joseph Cumming. Let's see what happens.  biggrin


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 11:23 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
He's an A/G boy!

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 11:33 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Just for kicks, I'ma send Professor Ingrid Mattson one too.

This is gonna be GREAT!!!!


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 11:43 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

D: It's been my experience though this process that there seems to be a lot of subjective emotional baggage that deters Muslims AND Christians from seeking more common ground.

 

T: For sure.

 

D: Basically, the common ground is taken as "loving God and loving the neighbor" as sheer principle. It feels this way as I read all the material on the Yale site and some stuff from the "A Common Word" book.  I was for sure they'd have done it in there...but I hadn't seen it yet.  They talk about what Jesus means by "loving your neighbor" and mentions that it's a reaffirmation of Torah. Plus they talk about how this is binding on how Christians should act towards Muslim/Christian dialogue. They do a good job of that. BUT they do NOT talk about the implications of Jesus' "love your neighbor" teaching as being AUTHORITATIVE for Muslim life per his being Prophet and Messenger from God.

 

Tom: It would be easy to apply to Muslims the implications of Jesus’ teaching on love IF it jived with everything else Muhammad taught. But it doesn’t. That’s part of the problem. Sure, Muhammad accepted Jesus as a prophet and endorsed his teaching as authoritative for Muslims. But did Muhammad really grasp Jesus’ teaching? No. Not if Muhammad’s LIFE is evidence for what he grasped as authoritative about Jesus for HIS OWN SELF.

 

So what you have is Muhammad believing he stood in line as final heir of God’s program from OT prophets to Jesus, etc., carrying on all their teachings to the next level. And he WANTS that continuity. Why does he want it? The charitable answer would be he really believed that the way of life he was offering was the fulfillment of what had gone before. A less charitable answer might be that he saw the political advantage and marketing strategy of being able to offer a new religion which wasn’t in fact new at all but which was the budding flower of previous revelation. Maybe it’s a bit of both.

 

But my point is this, D. For Muslims, the actual life of Muhammad is this authoritative precedent for what right action is. Whatever else we might want to say about right acting based on Jesus’ love teaching, in the end the prophet Muhammad embodies the fullness of right acting. If he killed, then killing is right for Muslims in this or that situation. Muhammad IS the hermeneutical key to applying Islam AS the fulfillment of everything Jesus taught.

 

But what happens when you show Muslims that Muhammad himself acted in less than loving ways? Well, they will THEN simply conclude that whatever it is in the teachings of the OT or NT that call Muhammad’s ethics and behavior into question is just one more example of reasonably dismissing OT and NT content as unacceptable because corrupted or at the very least as abrogated. Muslims are bound to live by whatever is in the OT and NT which a) can be reasonably demonstrated as not having been corrupted AND (as importantly) which b) can be embraced and lived consistently with the FINALITY of Muhammad’s message and life-example. If Jesus, say, really does embody pacifism (for example), then pacifism is OBVIOUSLY abrogated by Muhammad (the way Jesus abrogated aspects of the OT law). See? Whatever Muhammad was and did is by definition right and it abrogates any previous revelation.

 

I’m not making it up. I’ve had Muslims tell me this. Muhammad’s life IS the paradigm. He IS the archetypical man and human being. If his lifestyle conflicts with Jesus’ love teaching (and it absolutely does), then so much the worse for Jesus’ love teaching.

 

This is the problem with trying to establish "self-sacrificial love for neighbor" as the COMMON ground between Xty and Islam. It displaces Muhammad's LIFE (his lived example) as THE interpretive paradigm for understanding the Quran and living out Islam. This is crucial!

 

In other words, D, are you going to accept that the actual life Muhammad lived embodies Jesus' love teaching? A Muslim has to say Muhammad is this, for Muhammad is the ground of any authority the Quran has in standing opposite Xty in dialogue. Muhammad decides what is "common" between the two. This is a non-negotiable for Muslims. I'll poop in my pants if Joe C. disagrees. The point is that the TEXT of the Quran and the TEXT of Muhammad's life are--if they aren't one and the same--inseparable in confirming the will of God and in establishing the authority of Islam. So yes, Muhammad affirmed Jesus and his message and authoritative for Muslims. But Muhammad's life is understood to be the clearest demonstration possible of what a person's life looks like when she applies all that is authoritative from Moses and Jesus. In the end, MUHAMMAD embodies what is common to both Xty and Islam. Don't let Joe C or Volf tell you otherwise, hehe. (But don't worry, they won't! Or they shouldn't!)

 

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Post Edited (Tom) : 2/18/2011 11:07:15 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 12:04 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
So, you mean to tell me that between...

1) My line of argumentation (the Torat-Injeel teaching of Isa as revered messenger and prophet of God)

PLUS

2) the Sahih Mulsim and Sahih Al-Bukhari hadiths (which supposedly reports Muhammed's thought authoritiatively)

NEITHER OF THESE would work at all?  They would just ignore ALL THAT?

Then hell, why bother?


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 12:08 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
sheesh...


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 12:12 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
It might work. Hopefully what its "working" will do is shed light on the life of Muhammad in comparison to Jesus' in light of what the Muslim agrees is common to both, viz., loving your neighbor as yourself. There is not a snowball's chance in hell that Jesus' life can be seen to conflict with this law of love. Ahhh, but what of Muhammad now? How does HE fair? Not so well. Yes, he reformed the treatment of women and orphans. He was a social reformer, no doubt, and that requires compassionate motivation. But the embodiment of a love ethic? Not even close.
 
And therein lies the problem. For the Muslim who ends up seeing that Muhammad is NOT the embodiment of Isa's law of love, he has to choose--either Jesus or Muhammad. But it was on the basis of Muhammad's authority as a prophet that WE asked him to embrace love as 'common ground'. And now WE are asking him to choose between Jesus and Muhammad. What happens to the authority of Muhammad when he is shown to have failed to embody it? Well, HOPEFULLY the Muslim will be overcome by the beauty of Jesus and bow his knee...in which case your approach worked!
 
But we run the risk of showing our "hand" (i.e., of wanting Muslims to abandon Muhammad wherever Muhammad is incompatible with Jesus, the opposite of which is exactly the Muslim's approach, viz., abandon any content in Jesus' message which cannot be made compatible with Muhammad's teachings AND LIFE EXAMPLE). So if a choice has to be made beween Islam and Xty based on the genuine love exemplified by Jesus and Muhammad respectively, then 'love' really ISN'T common to both is it? Not for Muslims who hold on to their belief that the text of the Quran (and its authority) and the text of Muhammad's life are equivalent.
 
;o)


KIXYTΘEMTA

Post Edited (Tom) : 2/18/2011 11:55:51 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 3:20 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Looking at the "text" of Muhammad's life...

Ghazawat (Battles) of the Prophet

Islamic Military Jurisprudence

Battle of Badr


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 3:24 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
As I'm looking at this, Muhammad just seems like he does "eye for an eye" (reciprocal justice) like in the Torah...but with more compassion.
 
----------------------------------

Indeed, We sent down the Torah, in which was guidance and light. The prophets who submitted [to Allah ] judged by it for the Jews, as did the rabbis and scholars by that with which they were entrusted of the Scripture of Allah , and they were witnesses thereto. So do not fear the people but fear Me, and do not exchange My verses for a small price. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the disbelievers.

And We ordained for them therein a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds is legal retribution. But whoever gives [up his right as] charity, it is an expiation for him.* And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the wrongdoers.

And We sent, following in their footsteps, Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming that which came before him in the Torah; and We gave him the Gospel, in which was guidance and light and confirming that which preceded it of the Torah as guidance and instruction for the righteous.

And let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient.

Surah 5:44-48

* You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth". But I say to you, do not resist an evildoer. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/18/2011 2:33:47 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 3:46 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
So, with....

1) My line of argumentation (the Torat-Injeel teaching of Isa as revered messenger and prophet of God)

2) the "reciprocity" statements in the Sahih Mulsim and Sahih Al-Bukhari hadiths
 
3) the "reciprocity" statements in the Quran (like that above)

and...

4) the "reciprocal justice" and "compassionate motivations" seen in Muhammad's military behavior...

there's just too friggin much there to ignore this totally.  Even with just points 2-4...which is probably WHY the 138 Muslims who composed "A Common Word" wrote what they wrote in the FIRST PLACE!

--------------------------------------------------------

LOVE OF THE NEIGHBOUR IN ISLAM

          There are numerous injunctions in Islam about the necessity and paramount importance of love for—and mercy towards—the neighbour. Love of the neighbour is an essential and integral part of faith in God and love of God because in Islam without love of the neighbour there is no true faith in God and no righteousness. The Prophet Muhammad r said: “None of you has faith until you love for your brother what you love for yourself.”xviiiAnd: “None of you has faith until you love for your neighbour what you love for yourself.”xix

            However, empathy and sympathy for the neighbour—and even formal prayers— are not enough. They must be accompanied by generosity and self-sacrifice. God says in the Holy Qur’an:

It is not righteousness that ye turn your facesxx to the East and the West; but righteous is he who believeth in God and the Last Day and the angels and the Scripture and the prophets; and giveth wealth, for love of Him, to kinsfolk and to orphans and the needy and the wayfarer and to those who ask, and to set slaves free; and observeth proper worship and payeth the poor-due. And those who keep their treaty when they make one, and the patient in tribulation and adversity and time of stress. Such are they who are sincere. Such are the pious. (Al-Baqarah 2:177)

            And also:

Ye will not attain unto righteousness until ye expend of that which ye love. And whatsoever ye expend, God is Aware thereof. (Aal ‘Imran, 3:92)

          Without giving the neighbour what we ourselves love, we do not truly love God or the neighbour. ^


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Post Edited (One Love) : 2/18/2011 2:58:33 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 4:05 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Go for it then! Rock on!

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 4:19 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Let's see what J. Cummings has to say. Oh, by the way, I tried to post the 2.5 paragraph argument just like I have here onto a certain big Islamic discussion board (which shall remain nameless). It was up for a day...and got 1 person to give some interest. The next day I logged in, I found that I had been BANNED from the site FOR LIFE. The reason they gave? Spam. I had ONE post on ONE thread...and it was spam?

Yeah, right...icon_bandit


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 4:31 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Ha! I'm telling ya. There's the Islam of the BOOKS, the academic Islam. Then there's the Islam of the STREETS and HOMES where people live. They aren't the same Islams.

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 2/18/2011 5:33 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
D: Muhammad just seems like he does "eye for an eye" (reciprocal justice) like in the Torah...but with more compassion.

T: So Muhammad is practically speaking closer to Jesus than Moses.

Keep reading. That's all I can say. You'll find stuff in Muhammad's life that is downright murderous. Now, you might say, "So was Moses and the Torah? The Old Testament is anything but loving," and I suppose that would be RIGHT since Jesus himself CONTRASTS his "loving way" with what had gone before (what else does "but I say to you" mean?). And so the argument goes, if Moses and the OT eye4eye are less than the love that Jesus calls for, why can't we place Muhammad on the same level as Moses?

But by your own premises, D, Muhammad sees the whole "love your neighbor" thing AND he understands that this is Jesus' basic message. So he's got to be BEYOND the whole eye4eye thing. He's on this side of Christ and furthermore he KNOWS it. He can't just be Moses rehashed, for he comes after Christ and believes he's saying something NEW, completing all the best that's preceeded him. What IS that new? I've asked Muslims and never received a clear or satisfactory answer. Muhammad is supposed to be ushering in and establishing the consummate ethic, something that will never require further improvement or revelation. So when Muhammad slaughters the Banu Qurayza or other Jewish denouncers of his prophethood (and he was ruthless on those who defied his calling, calling opening for their assassination), he's not just compassionately trading a tooth for a tooth.

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
143 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5  6 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 9:52 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads