Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > The Passion of Christ movie  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
155 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Tigress
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1252
 
   Posted 3/1/2004 10:20 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Wahoo

Tigress: Doc, does this movie show Christ's resurrection?

GregBoyd: Its clear Christ rises, but not a whole lot is done with it.

Borg: Perhaps “The Passion” is dishonoring God… all Hollywood can do is produce the man side of Christ, therefore we are diminishing Christ of His glory as God incarnate.

MephEternal: Why the crucifixion when the incarnation was the point? Its no wonder a righteous man would die when innocent people are killed everyday.

Stakman: He's (Gibson) not orthodox in his Christian theology… I don't think Mel has the slightest clue as to why Christ died… There's very little on the resurrection also, because, again, it doesn't (I don't believe) contribute towards what Gibson thinks really drives the meaning of the cross of Christ.

BBBCanada: Could not the true scandal of the Cross be obscured by such reflection on the physical suffering of Christ?

How did each of you come to understand the incarnation and the scandal of the cross? Didn’t the resurrection sound like a fairy tail until you understood?
Now when the centurion saw what had happened, he began praising God, saying, “Certainly this man was innocent.” Lk 23:47



I don't think this movie made the horror of what Jesus went through any more real to me than I already understood it. I knew that His wounds were much worse than past films portrayed them to be. Doesn't it say somewhere in the Bible, like in Isaiah, that the Messiah's face and body would be so badly wounded that He would be unrecognizable? Gibson did a good job of portraying that here.

The resurrection never really sounded like a fairy tale to me but this movie did a poor job of showing Christ in His resurrected glory. I think Gibson should have done a bit more with that. The only thing I liked about it was the peace that emanated from Jesus when He rose again. Everything was all quiet and the golden light was pouring into the tomb and He smiled and walked out. It showed how at last His suffering was done.


Tigress Tigress

"Name a shrub after me. Preferably one that's prickly and difficult to eradicate."

-Captain Jack Aubrey
"Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World"

Back to Top
 

Asher
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 477
 
   Posted 3/1/2004 12:33 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
No, it wasn't perfect, nor did it include everything that maybe should have been included, but then...I have to think about all the times I have presented the gospel to someone and then later thought, "Oh I wish I had included 'this aspect of my testimony' or 'that particular Bible verse'"

Was the film "good" or was it "bad" in relation to making the gospel known? I have to say that it was good. Christ was preached. The Holy Spirit can take an incomplete presentation of the gospel and work wonders with it. Will some go away from the film further from the gospel than they were before? Probably. Will anyone who doesn't know the full gospel account be interested enough to maybe read the Bible or ask someone in order to find out "the rest of the story"? Probably.

As for the resurrection scene, here's my thought:

You're caught up in the flow of the film. Via Delorosa, the Crucifixion, Christ's death, then blackness and a pause (covering from Christ's burial up to the Resurrection), the light and the Resurrected Lord. Abrupt film end. Bam! You're back to reality. And you have to be confronted with the question, "What about this man, Jesus?"

The Resurrection may not have taken much time in the film, but it's the last thing you are confronted with and then you are back to your own thought flow instead of following that of the film. I see the way it was handled as a good thing.
Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 3/1/2004 2:04 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I thought the simplicity of the resurrection was amazing. I loved it! Very artisitic.
Back to Top
 

PhilTheThrill
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 95
 
   Posted 3/2/2004 6:31 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I just saw this last night and I loved it. It was extremely aesthetically appealing (gore notwithstanding). It was a great marriage between the Bible as history and the Bible as literature. It's nice to see Christians creating fine art again.
Back to Top
 

Wahoo
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 142
 
   Posted 3/2/2004 7:51 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
"Jaques Dupuis...A Belgian Jesuit(Catholic to the layman)...may represent how far one(Mel Gibson) can go and remain within the bounds of orthodoxy."

Read Clark H. Pinnock on the "Correct Theology" thread.
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/2/2004 6:07 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
See this article in Books and Culture (a Christianity Today Co. magazine) called "The Meaning of Christ's Suffering" by Frederica Mathewes-Green.

www.christianitytoday.com/bc/2004/002/1.28.html
Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 3/2/2004 6:32 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW: read the article. Having read Green's The Open Door book found the article unsurprising. I will take Gibson's realism over Green's "awe" anyday.
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/3/2004 1:06 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by feelinahole

POW: read the article. Having read Green's The Open Door book found the article unsurprising. I will take Gibson's realism over Green's "awe" anyday.


I'd probably take THIS painting over Gibson's movie.

quote:



But the real point isn't about art. The real point is theology -- and lived theology. (the only kind, really) A friend at work liked the article; but said her Catholic dad has the same view as Anselm. A hit you up-side the head God. Fear, not Love.

You pick, feelinahole: Fear or Love?

As for Matthew's Green. She would see it as a choice between a movie in a theater and fourty days of fasting and prayer culminating in the midnight Paschal Divine Liturgy:

quote:
An Easter Sermon

Are there any who are devout lovers of God?
Let them enjoy this beautiful bright festival!

Are there any who are grateful servants?
Let them rejoice and enter into the joy of their Lord!

Are there any weary from fasting?
Let them now receive their due!

If any have toiled from the first hour,
let them receive their reward.

If any have come after the third hour,
let them with gratitude join in the feast!

Those who arrived after the sixth hour,
let them not doubt; for they shall not be short-changed.

Those who have tarried until the ninth hour,
let them not hesitate; but let them come too.

And those who arrived only at the eleventh hour,
let them not be afraid by reason of their delay.

For the Lord is gracious and receives the last even as the first.
The Lord gives rest to those who come at the eleventh hour,
even as to those who toiled from the beginning.

To one and all the Lord gives generously.
The Lord accepts the offering of every work.
The Lord honours every deed and commends their intention.

Let us all enter into the joy of the Lord!

First and last alike, receive your reward.
Rich and poor, rejoice together!

Conscientious and lazy, celebrate the day!
You who have kept the fast, and you who have not,
rejoice, this day, for the table is bountifully spread!

Feast royally, for the calf is fatted.
Let no one go away hungry.
Partake, all, of the banquet of faith.
Enjoy the bounty of the Lord's goodness!

Let no one grieve being poor,
for the universal reign has been revealed.

Let no one lament persistent failings,
for forgiveness has risen from the grave.

Let no one fear death,
for the death of our Saviour has set us free.


The Lord has destroyed death by enduring it.
The Lord vanquished hell when he descended into it.
The Lord put hell in turmoil even as it tasted of his flesh.

Isaiah foretold this when he said,
"You, O Hell, were placed in turmoil when he encountering you below."


Hell was in turmoil having been eclipsed.
Hell was in turmoil having been mocked.
Hell was in turmoil having been destroyed.
Hell was in turmoil having been abolished.
Hell was in turmoil having been made captive.

Hell grasped a corpse, and met God.
Hell seized earth, and encountered heaven.
Hell took what it saw, and was overcome by what it could not see.

O death, where is your sting?
O hell, where is your victory?

Christ is risen, and you are cast down!
Christ is risen, and the demons are fallen!
Christ is risen, and the angels rejoice!
Christ is risen, and life is set free!
Christ is risen, and the tomb is emptied of its dead.

For Christ, having risen from the dead,
is become the first-fruits of those who have fallen asleep.

To Christ be glory and power forever and ever. Amen!


+ + +


Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/3/2004 1:13 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 3/3/2004 4:04 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
To each his own, POW. From my perspective, Green (like most Orthodox), perfers to sanitize the earthiness of who Jesus was. Compare your icon with how Jesus looks at the end of the Passion. Stark difference. What Green wants is reverence. The Passion is a depiction of the suffering of Jesus. It wasn't pretty and no one was bowing down. Again, I perfer Gibson's stark reality to Green's (and your icon's) sanitizing. But thats me.
Fear or love? Have no idea what you are talking about. I see it as the difference between reality and a false loftiness.
FYI...I tend not to read long quotes...if its not in a person's own words I probably will not read it. Sorry (unless of course its an article by someone such as Pinnock).
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/4/2004 12:48 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by feelinahole

To each his own, POW. From my perspective, Green (like most Orthodox), perfers to sanitize the earthiness of who Jesus was. Compare your icon with how Jesus looks at the end of the Passion. Stark difference. What Green wants is reverence. The Passion is a depiction of the suffering of Jesus. It wasn't pretty and no one was bowing down. Again, I perfer Gibson's stark reality to Green's (and your icon's) sanitizing. But thats me.
Fear or love? Have no idea what you are talking about. I see it as the difference between reality and a false loftiness.
FYI...I tend not to read long quotes...if its not in a person's own words I probably will not read it. Sorry (unless of course its an article by someone such as Pinnock).


1. Haven't really read what we are talking about? (I can point to two consecutive paragraphs that nail it. Want me to say which two? Tell me.)

2. You seem to want a gory picture of Christ in heaven. Do you think Christ Jesus has open wounds in heaven? That's the comparison you make above. (Maybe you didn't realize that.) The icon of the resurrection is a dogmatice statement (theology in color) about OUR resurrection in Christ (of whom He is the "first fruits"). And as such he is "in the land of the living" (love that verse).

BTW - a Reformed pastor of mine once pulled a Ronald Reagan by trying to ad-lib his sermon. He thought that it might add 'drama' to say that Christ's flesh began to decompose in the tomb. Trouble is that it anti-scriptural.
quote:
Psalm 16
9 Therefore my heart is glad and my tongue rejoices;
my body also will rest secure,
10 because you will not abandon me to the grave,
nor will you let your Holy One see decay.
11 You have made known to me the path of life;
you will fill me with joy in your presence,
with eternal pleasures at your right hand.



When Christ died, he said "It is finished." And it was!

There was no torment in hell. (There was preaching liberty to captives.)

As an icon of OUR resurrection, the "anastasis" icon above shows Christ rescuing Adam and Eve. He brings His victory over sin and death to them.

Were the emphasis soley on the gore, Paul would not have written:

quote:
Romans 4:25 "He was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification."


Were salvation ONLY about the Cross, then perhaps gore would find a place in this picture.

But Christ is the "first fruits" of OUR salvation. And while laments are appropriate worship in Holy Week (with anticipitory joy!), come Easter the blackness of mourning comes off, revealing the reality of the Resurrection.

The icon shows that resurrection, not as a moving of a stone, but of the end results of having first smashed the gates of hell (shown as a cross where they overlap), and having loosened bonds -- smashed the locks. And standing triumphant above hell Chirst brings to safety Adam and Eve, undoing the curse.

In such a picture it would be unussual to show signs of the curse pursisting!!!

No gore. Just Victory!
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/4/2004 12:52 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
www.cyberhymnal.org/htm/y/e/yechoirs.htm

quote:
Ye choirs of new Jerusalem,
Your sweetest notes employ,
The Paschal victory to hymn
In strains of holy joy.

For Judah’s Lion bursts His chains,
Crushing the serpent’s head;
And cries aloud through death’s domains
To wake the imprisoned dead.


From hell’s devouring jaws the prey
Alone our Leader bore;
His ransomed hosts pursue their way
Where Jesus goes before.

Triumphant in His glory now
To Him all power is given;
To Him in one communion bow
All saints in earth and heaven.

While we, His soldiers, praise our King,
His mercy we implore,
Within His palace bright to bring
And keep us evermore.

All glory to the Father be,
All glory to the Son,
All glory, Holy Ghost, to Thee,
While endless ages run.
Back to Top
 

Wahoo
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 142
 
   Posted 3/4/2004 2:51 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel

The Lord has destroyed death by enduring it.
The Lord vanquished hell when he descended into it.
The Lord put hell in turmoil even as it tasted of his flesh.

Isaiah foretold this when he said,
"You, O Hell, were placed in turmoil when he encountering you below."

Hell was in turmoil having been eclipsed.
Hell was in turmoil having been mocked.
Hell was in turmoil having been destroyed.
Hell was in turmoil having been abolished.
Hell was in turmoil having been made captive.

Hell grasped a corpse, and met God.
Hell seized earth, and encountered heaven.
Hell took what it saw, and was overcome by what it could not see.
-------------------------------------------
For Judah’s Lion bursts His chains,
Crushing the serpent’s head;
And cries aloud through death’s domains
To wake the imprisoned dead.

From hell’s devouring jaws the prey
Alone our Leader bore;
His ransomed hosts pursue their way
Where Jesus goes
before.
-------------------------------
1. Haven't really read what we are talking about? (I can point to two consecutive paragraphs that nail it. Want me to say which two? Tell me.)

2. You seem to want a gory picture of Christ in heaven. Do you think Christ Jesus has open wounds in heaven? That's the comparison you make above. (Maybe you didn't realize that.) The icon of the resurrection is a dogmatice statement (theology in color) about OUR resurrection in Christ (of whom He is the "first fruits"). And as such he is "in the land of the living" (love that verse).



POW,

That was a good article you posted and it shows how personal the subject matter of this film is to Christians, even Mel Gibson, as warped and twisted everyone makes him out to be. You sound like you are trying to point out some false statement of the film by compare/contrasting to some scripture and poems. But I don’t see where the message of the film departs from what you have presented.

How was victory attained without the cross?

How was Jesus portrayed as not victorious in the film?

Would you exclude yourself from the holy communion because it focuses on Jesus blood and his flesh?
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/4/2004 11:47 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
1. I didn't post the article to argue with anything that is in the film -- which I haven't seen. I decided not to see the film because I "don't need to." Church will do what needs doing just fine. And I don't want anything that might compete. And, really, I've got two homework laiden kids and a wife in a doc. program -- I'm too busy to go see an emotionaly exhausting move. Not profound...but true!

2. I do, though, think that the presence of the Passion throughout ALL of Christ's life should be reminded to us again and again!!! (I'm not suggesting that Gibson denies--or afirms--that because I just don't know; not having seen...)

3. So...I'm NOT "trying to point out some false statement of the film"

4. But I do want to pick up on one of the two comparision/contrasts Matthews-Green was showing us: through the indarnation AND the Cross Christ took our mortality and sin and accepting death caused our curse to die. (I reject Anselms theory.)

5. And as an artist, and a former college art history professor, I want to point to the other comparision congrast Fredricka refered to: that there became (in the 14th cent, eventually and pretty long after the 11th cent Anselm!) a different "look" and "religious experience" to how the crucifixion and death gets treated. The "Gothic" term is "pieta" (related to the English "pitty"), and it is a conscious effort to raise emotions ("pathos" as my high school English class taught) as the content of religion.

This is all around us. Its the center of Christian Rock. Seems so natural, because it is so familiar. But, then, what is the "older" alternative.

6, TAKING UP ONE'S CROSS, in Bible reading, prayer, and spiritual discipline (walking with the Lord, repenting, shunning evil, gathering together...) are the "alternative."

7. You asked THREE other questions:

    How was victory attained without the cross? ANSWER: IT WASN'T!

    How was Jesus portrayed as not victorious in the film? ANSWER: I didn't see the film.

    Would you exclude yourself from the holy communion because it focuses on Jesus blood and his flesh? ANSWER: NO WAY. IT IS THE "FOUNTAIN OF IMORTALITY."


I really USED TO post on this site. The article just seemed worth coming over to share. That's all.

PoW



quote:
Originally posted by Wahoo

POW,

That was a good article you posted and it shows how personal the subject matter of this film is to Christians, even Mel Gibson, as warped and twisted everyone makes him out to be. You sound like you are trying to point out some false statement of the film by compare/contrasting to some scripture and poems. But I don’t see where the message of the film departs from what you have presented.

How was victory attained without the cross?

How was Jesus portrayed as not victorious in the film?

Would you exclude yourself from the holy communion because it focuses on Jesus blood and his flesh?

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/6/2004 3:30 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel

to answer the question of what Christ DID on the Cross for us, one might need to ask the question "what needed fixing."

The Gothic tradition (14th cent.) of the passion (pieta) brought into public consciousness the message introduced (11th cent.) by Anselm, archbishop of Canterbury, England.

Sin: Infraction or Infection?
by Frederica Mathewes-Green
www.frederica.com/orthodox/infraction-infection.html

[quote] Anselm believed that God could not merely forgive us, because our sins constituted an objective wrong in the universe. It could not be made right without payment. No human could pay such a huge debt, but Jesus' blood was more than sufficient to pay it, which gave Jesus a “claim” on God the Father. “If the Son chose to make over the claim He had on God to man, could the Father justly forbid Him doing so, or refuse to man what the Son willed to give him?”



KLIK and see: www.frederica.com/orthodox/infraction-infection.html
Back to Top
 

Blood Washed Heretic
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 167
 
   Posted 3/13/2004 3:12 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Man, this movie raises some hackles, don't it? Find your favorite doctrine (or heresy, apparently) and watch a film through that lens, you're bound to find something that pisses you off...

Or better yet, prejudge and decide to ignore it. I bet it will go away, then...Eyebrow

Yessir.

I'm glad I hadn't an axe to grind when I saw it. I saw a moving portrayal of Catholic mysticism inspired by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and the apostle the Lord loved. Since I believe God uses art rather than logic or tradition to express the deepest truths, I was blessed by an acute awareness of Yahweh's love for us.

Anti-Semitic? Hardly.

Universalist? Who cares?

Idolatry? No, but then again I'm pretty keen on the richness of iconography... Sorry.

Well, continue your ridiculous bickering. Me, I'll see it again before Easter and reflect on the consummation of Incarnation once more. Powerful, beautiful stuff, kids. Don't get your undies in a bunch over it.


In essentials, unity; In matters of opinion, liberty; In all things, love.

Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 3/14/2004 5:42 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
But we like our ridiculous bickering...why would you want to take it away...you ole meanieEyebrow
Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 3/14/2004 7:04 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hello All,

I haven't been following this thread. The Passion hasn't been here yet, but I thought you would all appreciate reading this (sent to us from another pastor in our city).


One of the common objections to The Passion of the Christ movie is that it is too violent. One of the most common questions I‚m receiving asks, „Why was it so bloody? One scene that comes to mind is when Mary is soaking up Jesus‚ blood with a white towel. This scene shows not the vulgarity of blood, but the preciousness of Jesus‚ blood. Here is another true story that helps illustrate the preciousness of Jesus blood:

Several years ago in Oshawa, Ontario, George and Vera Bajenksi‚s lives were changed forever. February 16, 1989. A very normal Thursday morning. The phone rang at 9:15 a.m. „There‚s been an accident... It involved their son Ben.

As they approached the intersection of Adelaide and Simcoe Streets near the high school, they could see the flashing lights of the police cars and ambulance units. Vera noticed a photographer and followed the direction of his camera lens to the largest pool of blood she had ever seen.

All she could say was, „George, Ben went home˜home to be with his Heavenly Father! Her first reaction was to jump out of the car, somehow collect the blood and put it back into her son. „That blood, for me, at that moment, became the most precious thing in the world because it was life. It was life-giving blood and it belonged in my son, my only son, the one I loved so much.

The road was dirty and the blood just didn‚t belong there. George noticed that cars were driving right through the intersection˜right through the blood. His heart was smitten. He wanted to cover the blood with his coat and cry, „You will not drive over the blood of my son!

Then Vera understood for the first time in her life, one of God‚s greatest and most beautiful truths...why blood? Because it was the strongest language God could have used. It was the most precious thing He could give˜the highest price He could pay.

Through God‚s amazing love we were redeemed with the precious blood of Christ (1 Peter 1:18-19). May we never treat lightly nor trample underfoot the blood of God‚s Son (Hebrews 10:29).

Source: ˜Victor Knowles, Peace on Earth Ministries, Joplin, MO. George and Vera Bajenski minister with Global Missionary Ministries, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

God Bless You,
Jo-Anne
Flame2


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 3/14/2004 7:44 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
(FOR BORG AND TOM...catching up)

borg: ..but let's teach them to read so they can read the Bible huh?

Tom: Giving people the Scriptures in a language they can understand is what I spend most of my time doing. But for those who can't read it, or who can read but don't have the Scriptures in their language, can you stop coming down so pious on people who use every other means possible to communicate the Gospel?

(Jo-Anne) Tom, thank you for your post here. I realize I'm way behind, but am slowly catching up on this thread. Anybody remember the "Wordless Book?" (pages of black, red, white, green and gold?) I've known children who accepted Christ by understanding what the colours represent. And doesn't Romans tell us that even creation speaks of Him so that we are without excuse? Yes Borg, "faith comes from hearing and hearing from the Word of God." But remember who the Word is. It is not the literal written Word (though He is represented there as well). He is the Word. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." John 1:1 (NRV)

One more thought to All,

Borg, I agree with you. I joined this discussion board to be challenged and to grow in my faith, but most of all to know how this all practically applies to my life. That is the clencher for me. How does any or all of this increase my love for Christ and for others. That is what I am most concerned with. God is already using this movie for His glory. I haven't seen it, but have heard from people whose lives are being transformed. Transformation is what this journey is all about. "Be ye transformed..." So, as I read on I hope that I will see that you agree. I won't play into the enemy's hands. The Father desires to minimize evil and maximize good through this movie: people saved, lives transformed, healing, freedom..." I say, "Bring it on!" (And by the way, I will have a very hard time watching this movie, so pray for me please. I will see it, then take a friend that I have been sharing with for ten years. She has agreed to go).

Take Care and God Bless,
Jo-Anne

Flame2


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 3/14/2004 7:57 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
[quote]Originally posted by Wahoo

Passion opens in a couple hours and then we can all be better informed to the appropriateness or idolatry of the film.

(Wahoo) What is the criteria for idols? When does an image become worshipped?

(Jo-Anne) A thought on this as I'm reading along here. "When does an image become worshipped?" Circle the globe and you will see worship everywhere. The secular world worships. We all have an altar and what you worship is what is on the throne. WE know we are to worship in spirit and in truth. If this movie helps you do that, go for it! If it doesn't, read your Bible. Whatever it takes, or are we up for that? Just wondering.

God Bless,
Jo-Anne idea!


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 3/14/2004 8:06 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
[quote]Originally posted by borg

I breezed ove the article, sounded pretty good. His life is one of most intriguing curiosity. are you a Kierkegaard fan?
don't worry about saying anything to offend me. I'm use to it and to be honest, I don't really remember what you said. Think nothing of it my friend. and I to repent for anything harshly said or thought about you.


(Jo-Anne) BORG, I haven't read anything by Kierkegaard. I've heard his name mentioned several times on the board. What would you recommend of his to read first?

Thanks,
Jo-anneResearching


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 3/14/2004 8:20 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
[quote]Originally posted by BBBCanada

{"Clark Pinnock sent me his paper called, "Holy Spirit and Religious Pluralism." from ETS 2002. You'll find that his view and Mel's are very close to each other. Also, I think Terrance L. Tiessen's book, " Who Can Be Saved?: Reassessing Salvation in Christ and World" will be an interesting read."}

Brandon, could you send me this paper? I've heard it mentioned before. I read Flame of love. I'd like to read it.

Thanks,
Jo-Anne


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 3/14/2004 8:32 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hi All,

As I'm reading along (page 5 now), I am prompted by many of your posts. I've been surprised, disappointed, challenged and inspired by what you've written. But through it all, I'm learning and hopefully will always be one to encourage and love.

Brandon, yours is the one that sparked this comment. The cross was an act of war. It wasn't just about our salvation, but about defeating the enemy, redeeming mankind and restoring creation.

War is brutal, terrifying, bloody...hell! At least to all those who've been on the front lines, it looks like hell.

Mel Gibson may not be perfect in his theology (neither was the most righteous man God could find; Job), but I appreciate the man and his courage and his portrayal of this act of war. I also appreciate that he recognized that it was by his very own "hand" that our Saviour died.

I'd like to thank him. And I definitely want to stand ready to give a reason for the hope that is within me.

Jo-Anne


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 3/14/2004 8:54 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
[quote]Originally posted by Asher

No, it wasn't perfect, nor did it include everything that maybe should have been included, but then...I have to think about all the times I have presented the gospel to someone and then later thought, "Oh I wish I had included 'this aspect of my testimony' or 'that particular Bible verse'"

Was the film "good" or was it "bad" in relation to making the gospel known? I have to say that it was good. Christ was preached. The Holy Spirit can take an incomplete presentation of the gospel and work wonders with it. Will some go away from the film further from the gospel than they were before? Probably. Will anyone who doesn't know the full gospel account be interested enough to maybe read the Bible or ask someone in order to find out "the rest of the story"? Probably.

As for the resurrection scene, here's my thought:

You're caught up in the flow of the film. Via Delorosa, the Crucifixion, Christ's death, then blackness and a pause (covering from Christ's burial up to the Resurrection), the light and the Resurrected Lord. Abrupt film end. Bam! You're back to reality. And you have to be confronted with the question, "What about this man, Jesus?"

The Resurrection may not have taken much time in the film, but it's the last thing you are confronted with and then you are back to your own thought flow instead of following that of the film. I see the way it was handled as a good thing.

(Jo-Anne)
Asher, what a wonderful post. One of the finest I've seen here. You get it! This film (I haven't seen it yet) is already transforming lives.

Jo-Anne (Welcome to the board!)


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

Mayflower
Registered Member


Date Joined Mar 2002
Total Posts : 445
 
   Posted 3/15/2004 5:00 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Greetings, Jo-Anne:

I love this discussion board; however, I am not here as often as I would like. (My "calling" is advocacy, therefore -- my time is usually focused elsewhere...).
Typically, I must simply read -- and run.

I just wanted to quickly mention that I deeply appreciate your "way" with words, and the genuine manner in which you open your heart to us.

Your presence here is a blessing to so many.
Thank you, Sister...

<><

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
155 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 10:23 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads