Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > John the hater ...  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 4/18/2012 4:52 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
http://www.darwins-god.blogspot.com/2012/04/bloomberg-doubles-down-on-evolutionary.html
 

[2:28] In the case of the book of Revelation, however, it’s a toss-up I think, when you read the ramblings of St. John the divine, on whether he was in fact doing it with hallucinogenic drugs, which was a common practice, even people celebrating ceremonies, religious ceremonies, in more primitive societies, or whether he was a paranoid schizophrenic. I favor the latter. And I’ve talked with psychiatrists who discuss what kind of rambling he did—what kind of dreams he had—they were fantastic, they were jumbled, they were reflective of his likes and hatreds and so on. …

Now I know that recent historical, history-oriented, interpretations of St. John the divine, would like to put it that John was using an elaborate metaphor and symbolic way of attacking Rome, seven, you know, heads, crown heads of the serpent and so on, for the seven Ceasars, and that may be true, it may also be true that John was suffering from the residue of the catastrophe of the destruction of Jerusalem which had occurred only something like 38 years before he wrote the Revelations, that may be very true, but nonetheless it has all the appearance of a paranoid hallucination, and that is I believe the correct way to look at it, rather than to constantly mine it as have evangelical organizations, and others, mine it for deep meaning about the future, the history and future, of humanity.


 

Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 4/18/2012 8:21 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Let's say John was 20 when Christ died. Wouldn't that mean that John, by Wilson's reckoning, was about 95 when he wrote the revelation? Taking that supposed age of John, all the obvious parallels to OT propehtic texts and genre in the revelation, plus the same incredible parallelisms in the revelation that are characteristic of the rest of the bible, PLUS the sheer difficulty of explaining away the alleged miracles that accompanied the rise of Christianity in the Roman empire, PLUS the great resistance to Christians by the pagan world (and the indications that resistance/persecution has for the allegations of miracles), PLUS the sheer difficulty of the Christian life (and the indications that difficulty has for the allegations of miracles during the rise of Christianity), Wilson's inference is radically implausible.


 

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 11:00 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads