Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > Where have some of the "old" members gone?  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
130 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5  6 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 6/13/2004 8:53 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by TGB

quote:
Originally posted by moon_river_j
I have learned from how others relate on this board. I appreciate Laika's keen insights, as well as T.G.B's and John's and Laika's sense of humour. God Bless,
Jo-Anne
Darn it. I want to be insightful, not funny. Laika is funnier than I am. So I think I should be the insightful one.

Bandit


You get to be the foreign, exotic one; Lebanon, Cohibas, the crazy, wild uncle who flys into town and turns it upside down once a year.

Crybaby.....



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 6/13/2004 11:17 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Laika: You get to be the foreign, exotic one; Lebanon, Cohibas, the crazy, wild uncle who flys into town and turns it upside down once a year.

Tom: OK, I can live with that! Foreign and exotic. Wild and destructive (once a year).

Tom Bandit
Back to Top
 

GregBoyd
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 1818
 
   Posted 6/13/2004 9:10 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I'm pleased to hear that the board has been helpful to some in thinking through their theology. Someone asked what it is I'm working on (which is partly why I've had to back down from the board). Here's the skinny:
* It was Seeing is Believing. Just came out.
* It was Repenting of Religion. It just came out. (Free advertisement: Buy it! Read it!)
* Just finishing up Escaping the Matrix with Al Larsen -- on theology, neuroscience and mind self-control. (TNT stuff). Should be out next spring.
* Presently working on The Jesus Legend with Paul Eddy. Hope to be done by end of summer. Should be out by next fall.
* Always working on Myth of the Blueprint. Should have been done 2 years ago!
* Working on Logic of Future article with TGB and Alan Rhoda. (The Hexagon Rocks!)


THAT is largely why I've been gone, and will have to remain mostly absent for some time.

By the way, has anyone else noted that I get KILLED on Amazon.com and Barne's and Noble.com ratings on books? How come my detractors are so active and my supporters so quiet? hmmmmm?Black Eye

Love ya'll. Later

Keep talk'n
IN LOVE

Greg


"The responsibility is with the chooser -- God is blameless." Plato, Republic, 10.

Back to Top
 

quest for truth
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 479
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 2:05 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Someone asked what it is I'm working on (which is partly why I've had to back down from the board).

That someone was me -- QuestforTruth.Shy Thanks for filling us all in.

Dr. Boyd, are you still working on the book about "Three's and the Trinity"? Your books are great so I do not understand the rating???


BTW, Greg, I posted a question that you may not have seen on this thread. I will post it again in hopes of getting a response. Thank you.
quote:
Greg Boyd: The very universality of a web site concerns me. ANYONE can talk to ANYONE. There is a wonderful possibility in this, but there's also a real danger. Some of the people who have logged onto this site are scary, at least in terms of their demeanor. IN real life, we self-select our fellowship. Here, its a bit more difficult. Of course, people can choose simply not to respond. Once you're "hooked" in a discussion, its difficult.

This has been on my mind ever since I read it. I am concerned that people would feel a need to self-select who they will interact with. As far as a fellowship... I don't view my interaction here as a fellowship in the same way as one would in person. Anyway, the reason I am concerned is because we are to be about sharing the gospel message with ALL and the Internet is one possible means of doing just that. As Christians (unless you are a weary soldier for a time being) we are called to hang out with the down and out. The christian walk is not about comfort but love for ALL. The above comment didn't come off to me like a loving statement in fact it came off a little judgmental. Dr. Boyd, would you mind expanding? The comment has my heart very grieved but perhaps I am misunderstanding....
Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 3:43 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by quest for truth

quote:
Greg Boyd: The very universality of a web site concerns me. ANYONE can talk to ANYONE. There is a wonderful possibility in this, but there's also a real danger. Some of the people who have logged onto this site are scary, at least in terms of their demeanor. IN real life, we self-select our fellowship. Here, its a bit more difficult. Of course, people can choose simply not to respond. Once you're "hooked" in a discussion, its difficult.

This has been on my mind ever since I read it. I am concerned that people would feel a need to self-select who they will interact with. As far as a fellowship... I don't view my interaction here as a fellowship in the same way as one would in person. Anyway, the reason I am concerned is because we are to be about sharing the gospel message with ALL and the Internet is one possible means of doing just that. As Christians (unless you are a weary soldier for a time being) we are called to hang out with the down and out. The christian walk is not about comfort but love for ALL. The above comment didn't come off to me like a loving statement in fact it came off a little judgmental. Dr. Boyd, would you mind expanding? The comment has my heart very grieved but perhaps I am misunderstanding....Disapprove


QFT,
I will speak for myself and say that I have backed down on this board in the past because some people have come off as being a little “scary”. Religious fanatics can be real scary Knifeand some here are quite bent in their religious convictions of what they consider to be God’s law and their interpretation of Scripture. Of course they hear God’s voice talking to them and even instructing them to carry out His will. Couple this with people being anonymous and secretive with their profiles and it even becomes scarier since the enemy Evil is the father of deception.

Boo! Clown

Shalom,

Mark
Back to Top
 

1way
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 299
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 8:11 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
sparknheart - I assume that you have in mind believers that may be deceived, we typically don't have this shroud of ambiguity and doubt with those who are clearly not a believer.

God says to judge not __ by outward appearance (superficially), judge man obviously in a more godly and spiritual way, judge Him substantially. From the treasure of the heart one speaks/communicates.
quote:
Lu 6:45 "A good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart brings forth evil. For out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks.

Joh 13:35 "By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another."

And it's not just any old kind of love, it's only a righteous (judge rightly) sort of love. The following starts out with AGAPE that is turned into the sin of moral hypocrisy if you do not abhor evil (and cling to good, both). A godly righteous love MUST be just, or it is unjust and the sin of hypocrisy.
quote:
Ro 12:9 Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil. Cling to what is good.
So the idea that some folks dare have strong and clear bible convictions, and may or may not describe themselves in a profile, does not lend well to charging them as being "scary", i.e. worthy of being personally rejected.

What are we to do
I'd say that a better response might be to be like the noble Bereans, and search these things out in scripture to see if they are true or not. Count it a blessing to have your otherwise comfortzone Christian beliefs objectively cross examined, always be willing to share the reason for your faith, encourage, exhort, edify one another.

Who is judging who
Do you really understand these so called scary people so well as to suggest treating them with personal rejection? You say "back down" your involvement on this forum, but by your contextual development, that implies, back away from the "scary" people, and perhaps remain in contact with those you are more "comfortable" with, after all, the devil is the father of deception, so we want to stay away from these scary, perhaps devilishly deceptive, people.

Nonspecific generalizations are specifically indefensible
Making such claims should be made known in specific terms, otherwise you may have half the board wondering if you are talking about them. Besides, so much generalization is not very helpful unless you have specific examples to substantiate your claims. Let us not work secretly, but openly expose and reprove such things.

I suggest that this may be acting in unmitigated fear, thus acting in the flesh.
quote:
1Jo 4:18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves torment. But he who fears has not been made perfect in love.
So generally speaking, if brethren have strong convictions and consistently and respectfully present their faith by the word of God, I think we should see that as a sign of Christian maturity, especially if they are not teaching contrary things. The Christian faith has a very positive outlook and is a reasonable faith that should have no problem witnessing the truth to those in error.

It is the standard of conforming to, or being apostate from, God's word that should matter more than whether or not some may seem ,,, scary.

Knife Evil Clown

Blush
Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 8:32 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hmmm, sometimes our love is not as "accepting" as we would like it to be. Sometimes (as I have often stated) it needs to be "judgmental." Eyebrow
Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 11:24 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Non-believers and so called believers can be equally scary, remember, even the devil believes in God. Historically, many so called believers (Christians) have been responsible for wars and murder. Some priest/pastors have been known to be quite scary. A few abortion doctors’ family might want to contest to the word scary. The truth is we don’t know who we are dealing with on the internet and that can be somewhat scary. It’s not judgmental to be cautions, to step back and ask who I’m I dealing with here.


Here are a few questions you can ask yourself if you are wondering about being one of the “scary” ones.

1. Are you or have you ever been a member of a Religious Cult?
2. Do you think that God speaks to you directly?
3. Do you believe God sends evil messengers to do his work?
4. Are you bent on certain topics even when you find most people differ with your opinion?
5. Do you think the end always justifies the means?
6. Are you paranoid that someone else is stealing God’s glory?
7. Is it common for you to cling to certain interpretations of Scripture finding yourself holding a minority view?
8. Are you taking flight instruction and showing very little interest with the landing procedures?
9. Have you ever asked someone you’re witnessing to, “let’s keep this a little secret”?
10. Do you have inside knowledge of God’s mysteries that justifies some secret purpose for a greater good?


If you find yourself answering yes more often then not, well then maybe it was you that I was talking about! If so, could you please submit a complete and comprehensive profile of yourself? Thanks.

Peace,

Mark

Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 11:47 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I try to take everything a person says about themselves with a grain of salt...scary, not scary, whatever. Its the ideas that count (if they are scary, I simply ignore them).
No one CAN steal God's glory when I'm around...Big Smile
Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 12:28 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by sparknheart
Here are a few questions you can ask yourself if you are wondering about being one of the “scary” ones.

1. Are you or have you ever been a member of a Religious Cult?


0-point Calvinism.
quote:

2. Do you think that God speaks to you directly?


YES!!!! So does the neighbor's dog.
quote:

3. Do you believe God sends evil messengers to do his work?


No, I'm the founder of M.A.D.D. and an honorary (ovaryless) member.
quote:

4. Are you bent on certain topics even when you find most people differ with your opinion?


DID ADAM AND EVE HAVE BELLY BUTTONS!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Angry
quote:

5. Do you think the end always justifies the means?


My mere whim justifies the means.
quote:

6. Are you paranoid that someone else is stealing God’s glory?


There's another god?!?!
quote:

7. Is it common for you to cling to certain interpretations of Scripture finding yourself holding a minority view?


This other god has a book?!?!?!?
quote:

8. Are you taking flight instruction and showing very little interest with the landing procedures?


LOL We're triplets separated at birth, me and you and me.
quote:

9. Have you ever asked someone you’re witnessing to, “let’s keep this a little secret”?


<hilarious joke pulled due to "questionable" content>
quote:

10. Do you have inside knowledge of God’s mysteries that justifies some secret purpose for a greater good?


If I can't explain it, it's a "mystery".
quote:

If you find yourself answering yes more often then not, well then maybe it was you that I was talking about! If so, could you please submit a complete and comprehensive profile of yourself? Thanks.


I would but can't, paper isn't allowed in here. Edges too sharp.




inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 12:51 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by TGB

quote:
Originally posted by moon_river_j
I have learned from how others relate on this board. I appreciate Laika's keen insights, as well as T.G.B's and John's and Laika's sense of humour. God Bless,
Jo-Anne
Darn it. I want to be insightful, not funny. Laika is funnier than I am. So I think I should be the insightful one.

Bandit



Well, EX-CUUUSE MY Grammar!!! Big Smile You are insightful TGB

That sentence should read, "I have learned from how others relate on this board. I appreciate Laika's keen insights, as well as T.G.B's and John's (Note the comma properly inserted this time...changes everything! Clown, and Laika's sense of humour." (See, had you pegged right the first time!)

God Bless (hope you're feeling more insightful now and less funny!)

Jo-Anne Eyebrow (Somehow that sentence doesn't work well even yet).


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 1:03 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Laika

No, I'm the founder of M.A.D.D. and an honorary (ovaryless) member.
[quote]




I guess if you're the "founder" you can stay,even if you don't have the required "ovaries." Were they required? I don't remember what the qualifications were??? (Honestly, I don't even remember the Acronym...could you please refresh my memory, if you remember? Something about being against deviant doctrine?)

Thank goodness we don't have to "qualify" for the Kingdom, aside from the "price of entrance" of course. Viking

Jo-Anne


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 1:04 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by moon_river_j
(Somehow that sentence doesn't work well even yet).


Let me help.

"I appreciate Laika's insights and humor and humility and pithy quotations dredged up from the bowels of the internet.

And then there's Tom."

That better?



You're welcome.




inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 1:07 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by moon_river_j

quote:
Originally posted by Laika

No, I'm the founder of M.A.D.D. and an honorary (ovaryless) member.
[quote]




I guess if you're the "founder" you can stay,even if you don't have the required "ovaries." Were they required? I don't remember what the qualifications were??? (Honestly, I don't even remember the Acronym...could you please refresh my memory

Mothers Against Deviant Deity

"Mothers", hence the reference to "ovaries".
Pssst! That the proper term for those 'things' that babies come from?



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 2:21 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Laika

quote:
Originally posted by moon_river_j

quote:
Originally posted by Laika

No, I'm the founder of M.A.D.D. and an honorary (ovaryless) member.
[quote]




I guess if you're the "founder" you can stay,even if you don't have the required "ovaries." Were they required? I don't remember what the qualifications were??? (Honestly, I don't even remember the Acronym...could you please refresh my memory

Mothers Against Deviant Deity

"Mothers", hence the reference to "ovaries".
Pssst! That the proper term for those 'things' that babies come from?




Yup...you definitely win the humour award, AND you've passed Anatomy 101 with flying colours!!

Jo-Anne Big Smile


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 3:06 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by moon_river_j
Yup...you definitely win the humour award, AND you've passed Anatomy 101 with flying colours!!

Jo-Anne Big Smile


Well thanks for the compliments and encouragement and your insights and for living in the Yukon (someone has to). I'll have to tell you my Alcan story someday (yep, I been through Whitehorse).



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 5:34 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Laika

quote:

1. Are you or have you ever been a member of a Religious Cult?
0-point Calvinism.


hmmm, does Calvinism come with points?
quote:

2. Do you think that God speaks to you directly?
YES!!!! So does the neighbor's dog.


Thanks, I will sleep better tonight listening to my neighbor's barking dog.
quote:

3. Do you believe God sends evil messengers to do his work?
No, I'm the founder of M.A.D.D. and an honorary (ovaryless) member.


It is comforting to know you, and your shoulder.Approve
quote:

4. Are you bent on certain topics even when you find most people differ with your opinion?
DID ADAM AND EVE HAVE BELLY BUTTONS!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Angry


You're not going to start up with that again are you?Furious
quote:

5. Do you think the end always justifies the means?
My mere whim justifies the means.


Sure I know your type, top dog Cooluntil the wife (the master) gets home, then you run with your tail between your legs and go lay down by your dish.
quote:

6. Are you paranoid that someone else is stealing God’s glory?
There's another god?!?!


sssssh, it's a secret.
quote:

7. Is it common for you to cling to certain interpretations of Scripture finding yourself holding a minority view?
This other god has a book?!?!?!?


Yes, special editions.
quote:

8. Are you taking flight instruction and showing very little interest with the landing procedures?
LOL We're triplets separated at birth, me and you and me.


Wow you fly, do you have a color preference.
quote:

9. Have you ever asked someone you’re witnessing to, “let’s keep this a little secret”?
<hilarious joke pulled due to "questionable" content>


I hope it wasn't a little boy.Shock
quote:

10. Do you have inside knowledge of God’s mysteries that justifies some secret purpose for a greater good?
If I can't explain it, it's a "mystery".


I also like a good mystery.
quote:

If you find yourself answering yes more often then not, well then maybe it was you that I was talking about! If so, could you please submit a complete and comprehensive profile of yourself? Thanks.

I would but can't, paper isn't allowed in here. Edges too sharp.

Good, that will keep your imagination sharp making toy paper planes.
Wink
Back to Top
 

quest for truth
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 479
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 6:55 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Laika, Sparknheart, and Jo-Anne, you guys are so funny!Big Smile


1way
quote:
Who is judging who
Do you really understand these so called scary people so well as to suggest treating them with personal rejection? You say "back down" your involvement on this forum, but by your contextual development, that implies, back away from the "scary" people, and perhaps remain in contact with those you are more "comfortable" with, after all, the devil is the father of deception, so we want to stay away from these scary, perhaps devilishly deceptive, people.

That is my concern. I am concerned that when Dr. Boyd said we "self-select" whom we will converse with.... I began to think this contrary to the teaching of Jesus. Jesus did NOT reject someone because they were "needy" or "scary" Jesus accepted people where they were at and lovingly entered into their world in order to lead them to truth. We are to reach out to ALL in love. There is nothing to fear if we are walking with Jesus Christ and holding to the truth.

I hope EVERYONE has a right to speak and freely express their views on this board. I do, however, believe people need to be respectful yet if someone is not respectful I do not see how this is "scary". If a poster is not respectful one has to wonder if the person is hurting inside and thus needs to be treated with patience and gentleness. We are to minister to the hurting not reject them because they are outside our comfort zone.

I believe that if the board is about secluding people then it inevitably will be a judgmental place to hang out. I am HOPING Dr. Boyd might expand on what he posted so that I can better understand what he meant by the statement.
Back to Top
 

1way
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 299
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 7:27 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
shewww, man, I just found out that I have a bio (it's been years since I entered it), however skimpy, so that is one piece of solid evidence that perhaps I am not part of the scary, potentially devilish deceptive, to be avoided, people/ogres.

I have a question for POW or those who know POW. Is he a sound bit poster, you know, does he tend to post very small posts or no? He has like about twice as many post

4157 = POW !

compared to the top contenders!

2529 = TGB
2407 = DLW
2109 = GregBoyd
2044 = Laika
1482 - John Earp

and so on.

Wow, now I feel even more special, I've been responded to by several of the top listed posters, John Earp, TGB, and POW (also Starkman too, but he just mysteriously stopped posting all of a sudden).
Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 8:39 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Laika

quote:
Originally posted by moon_river_j
Yup...you definitely win the humour award, AND you've passed Anatomy 101 with flying colours!!

Jo-Anne Big Smile


Well thanks for the compliments and encouragement and your insights and for living in the Yukon (someone has to). I'll have to tell you my Alcan story someday (yep, I been through Whitehorse).





Wow! From the Sahara to the Yukon - quite a trip! I'd like to hear the Alcan story someday.

God Bless,
Jo-Anne


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

John Earp
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1715
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 8:52 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by 1way

shewww, man, I just found out that I have a bio (it's been years since I entered it), however skimpy, so that is one piece of solid evidence that perhaps I am not part of the scary, potentially devilish deceptive, to be avoided, people/ogres.



I don't think Dr. Boyd's comments were directed at you, 1way. They obviously were directed at some people here. It is not clear precisely which people Dr. Boyd views as "scary," nor precisely what he means by that.

quote:
I have a question for POW or those who know POW. Is he a sound bit poster, you know, does he tend to post very small posts or no? He has like about twice as many post

4157 = POW !

compared to the top contenders!


PoW posts a lot. Many of his posts are just pictures he feels relate somehow to the topic. Many others of his posts consist of long quotes from various theologians (mainly Eastern Orthodox and Reformed theologians).



"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.

revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

1way
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 299
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 9:25 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quest for truth - Thanks for the mention, and I agree with your concerns, great posts. Here is that part of Mr Boyd's post that you quoted.
quote:
Greg Boyd: The very universality of a web site concerns me. ANYONE can talk to ANYONE. There is a wonderful possibility in this, but there's also a real danger. Some of the people who have logged onto this site are scary, at least in terms of their demeanor. IN real life, we self-select our fellowship. Here, its a bit more difficult. Of course, people can choose simply not to respond. Once you're "hooked" in a discussion, its difficult.
I find it strange that Mr Boyd views written communication with so much open disdain. And that, coming from a successful author and pastor.

I find that in general, a person's beliefs and personality may be in some ways more thoughtfully (and thus accurately) represented by written communication as opposed to talking live in person, simply on the basis that you have so much more contemplation time to say exactly what you mean to say. What really counts is the content of our beliefs. So I think that writing should be viewed in great value in terms of valuable personal communications.

Why should the point of concern be how to eliminate communication in relationships? Why not look on the bright side and say that you are concerned to be able to find and establish new and/or better relationships? The glass is half full.

Should I consider myself as being one of the undesirable-elements that the inner circle has in mind?

Should most of the people who may not feel like a well-accepted part of this forum's grass roots feel like they are who is the problem at hand?

To me, from the outside looking in, this seems like a shady running rumor serving to generally attack some unspecified person or people for some unspecified reason or reasons. I join you in hoping specifically for less generalizations and more objective review over a written venue. I also vote for being able to get a full night's sleep in an hour instead of 8 hours, but that is simply not likely to happen. It's amazing that My Boyd has taken the time to post here at all as busy as I'm sure he is.

sparknheart - Thanks for the link tip!

John Earp - Thanks for the responses. Ok, ya, it is rather like a rumor issue about these undesirable elements, also, it seems obvious that it's not just Mr Boyd who feels this way. I commented about the profile because of sparknheart's comment on not having a profile as an indicator of being potentially a scary person. It is precisely this generalization aspect, coupled with the chosen few aspect, that makes us outsiders looking in, wonder who what and where is going on. Thanks for taking the time, much appreciated.
Back to Top
 

1Heart
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2004
Total Posts : 1128
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 9:57 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by 1way

quest for truth - Thanks for the mention, and I agree with your concerns, great posts. Here is that part of Mr Boyd's post that you quoted.
quote:
Greg Boyd: The very universality of a web site concerns me. ANYONE can talk to ANYONE. There is a wonderful possibility in this, but there's also a real danger. Some of the people who have logged onto this site are scary, at least in terms of their demeanor. IN real life, we self-select our fellowship. Here, its a bit more difficult. Of course, people can choose simply not to respond. Once you're "hooked" in a discussion, its difficult.
I find it strange that Mr Boyd views written communication with so much open disdain. And that, coming from a successful author and pastor.

I find that in general, a person's beliefs and personality may be in some ways more thoughtfully (and thus accurately) represented by written communication as opposed to talking live in person, simply on the basis that you have so much more contemplation time to say exactly what you mean to say. What really counts is the content of our beliefs. So I think that writing should be viewed in great value in terms of valuable personal communications.

Why should the point of concern be how to eliminate communication in relationships? Why not look on the bright side and say that you are concerned to be able to find and establish new and/or better relationships? The glass is half full.

Should I consider myself as being one of the undesirable-elements that the inner circle has in mind?

Should most of the people who may not feel like a well-accepted part of this forum's grass roots feel like they are who is the problem at hand?

To me, from the outside looking in, this seems like a shady running rumor serving to generally attack some unspecified person or people for some unspecified reason or reasons. I join you in hoping specifically for less generalizations and more objective review over a written venue. I also vote for being able to get a full night's sleep in an hour instead of 8 hours, but that is simply not likely to happen. It's amazing that My Boyd has taken the time to post here at all as busy as I'm sure he is.

sparknheart - Thanks for the link tip!

John Earp - Thanks for the responses. Ok, ya, it is rather like a rumor issue about these undesirable elements, also, it seems obvious that it's not just Mr Boyd who feels this way. I commented about the profile because of sparknheart's comment on not having a profile as an indicator of being potentially a scary person. It is precisely this generalization aspect, coupled with the chosen few aspect, that makes us outsiders looking in, wonder who what and where is going on. Thanks for taking the time, much appreciated.




God just asks us to use what He has given us for Him - whatever that may be, and however small it may seem to us. I value being able to communicate this way with others. It is an opportunity to communicate thoughtfully, to encourage and to learn from others. That is how I see it. I have not, quite frankly, met anyone here that I would consider scary. I've met one or two wounded people, but they weren't scary either.

If we just remember who we are in Christ and confidently trust in Him with all that we are - then we can relate to others from a cup that is half full (at least) instead of half empty. Just kidding, our cups are more than half full.

If only we could see ourselves as He sees us, and not buy into the enemy and his tactics to cause us to doubt who we are and what we have in Christ. If only we could relate to others, see them the way Christ sees them. Come to think of it, it's possible. More than possible. Maybe we could do it, just one post at a time.

Night and God bless you all,
Jo-Anne Bandit


"Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."

Back to Top
 

1way
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 299
 
   Posted 6/14/2004 10:34 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
moon river j - Thanks much, very well stated.


...The grace is sufficient.

...We are more than conquerors.

...Our cup runuth over.


Perhaps (?) the perceived disdain against written
forums is not as bad as it at appears on the surface...

Blessings...
Back to Top
 

might-be-don
Registered Member


Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 830
 
   Posted 6/15/2004 1:50 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by 1way

Perhaps (?) the perceived disdain against written
forums is not as bad as it at appears on the surface...
One of the things I enjoy about the Doc is his lack of sacred cows, anything is fair game. Even his own message board. His statement appeared to me to be saying that we can never just take things for granted, we must dig deep into everything we do and validate them for our lives. Don't accept this ( internet ) way of doing things just because it's the way we do things.

peace, don


"Life is a gift from God, but the years have weight in them."
Terry Scott Taylor

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
130 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5  6 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 11:24 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads