Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 12/9/2004 12:16 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom and I are looking for people who would like to participate in a forum dedicated to discussion from an open view perspective.

If you're interested, please send e-mail to

cheesrool@yahoo.com



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 12/9/2004 12:45 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
You left me out.

Boo hoo hoo. Sad Sick Sad

Tom
Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 12/9/2004 12:48 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by TGB

You left me out.

Boo hoo hoo. Sad Sick Sad

Tom


LOL

HERETIC!!!!

anthrepecent...

antrohecent....

anthrowpacent...

anythrowpillow....

anytrowelcentric....

anteaterpocentric....

ah nuts

Evil Tongue



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

Sisters of Cain
Registered Member


Date Joined Mar 2004
Total Posts : 431
 
   Posted 12/9/2004 12:49 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
You left me and the Moderator's Second Cousin out as well.

They'll be hell to pay at the next family reunion....

Furious
Back to Top
 

Mayflower
Registered Member


Date Joined Mar 2002
Total Posts : 445
 
   Posted 12/9/2004 1:37 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

.
Greetings, Brother:

Um, could you have meant: 'M-a-y-f-l-o-w-e-r'?
If so, I'll send my current email address...
.

Laika wrote:
quote:
Mayflour


Peace & blessings,
<><
.
Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 12/9/2004 3:00 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Mayflower
.
Greetings, Brother:

Um, could you have meant: 'M-a-y-f-l-o-w-e-r'?


Oops, sorry.

Meiflower, got it.




inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

orphan child
Registered Member


Date Joined Nov 2004
Total Posts : 68
 
   Posted 12/9/2004 4:15 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
<bump>


illegitimate child (now orphaned) of Miss Manners (now deceased)

Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 1:43 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
<set>



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 2:08 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Laika: Tom and I are looking for people who would like to participate in a forum dedicated to discussion from an open view perspective.

Due to CVM's status, it may well be the successor to this forum.

Tom: Little quick there Bro on CVM's status. Hmm. I'd be happy to discuss the open view elsewhere with folks who want to, but successor?

Duude. What are you thinking?

Tom
Back to Top
 

spenlake
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 1050
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 2:16 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Pardon my expression, but this thread seems like a dog putting its tail between its legs. In the "prophetic movement" when there were unanswerable questions, the answer was, "My prophetic stick is bigger than yours, Whack Whack." While gratefully I don't find that here, it appears like you just take your marbles and go home.

It doesn't seem like a very strong response to sincere challenges.


Spen Lake

Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 2:37 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by TGB
Tom: Little quick there Bro on CVM's status. Hmm. I'd be happy to discuss the open view elsewhere with folks who want to, but successor?

Duude. What are you thinking?


You're right, it was entirely presumptuous.

<insert joke, here>

Black Eye



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

JEE
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 1466
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 2:51 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I really think we should just make a section of this board (CVM) into a ("OVers Only") section (or at least a "no determinists/Calvinists" section), and proceed on an honor system for people to abide by the rules. It would take a little more policing, but I have seen precisely this approach work on other boards over similar concerns (i.e., an "Arminians Only" section on one board I was involved with once). There would be no need for any special registration by those who are already CVM board participants, and anyone disrespecting the rules could be banned. (Such bannings and moderation would be necessary in any forum you set up).

This proposal would have many advantages over trying to start up a completely new board and/or discussion listserv.

2c more,

John


http://revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

rossfadeinout
Registered Member




Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 428
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 7:29 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I'm with John here, couldn't we just have a "Free Will" only section here?

I would like to see productive discussion without having to argue again and again about foundations with determinists. So if there is a new forum started up, count me in. My e-mail address is parkerross@gmail.com . Send me some info.

Peace, Ross


"Let us remember how common the folly is of going from one faulty extreme into the opposite." -Thomas Reid

Back to Top
 

AtTheWell
Registered Member


Date Joined Nov 2004
Total Posts : 133
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 8:17 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Greetings all,
What would the parameters of something like this "Open View Only" be?
I am fairly new to the Open View theology, I am definitely not a determinist, but I still have questions. Would that be ok? Or is this only for those who are established in this forum? Honestly it comes off on here like a mutual admiration society. No offense intended, seriously, I'm not a confrontational person at all! Just an honest observation as a "new poster".Blush



Peace,
ATW

Back to Top
 

JEE
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 1466
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 9:48 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hi ATW,

I think the main concern that Tom and others have expressed is that he would like to be able to discuss the Open View sometimes without constantly having to field questions and arguments from determinists. Not that he doesn't want to be challenged (he's willing to do that at times also), but simply that at this point in his OV "journey," if you will, he's burned out on the perpetual debates with determinists. But it's not meant as a mutual admiration society, but instead as a kind of safe haven.

John


http://revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 10:09 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
ATW-

Email the address at the top of this thread. You'll have to undergo a prostate exam to join, but that's all. It's done quickly, and online!

If...if if if...we're not able to accommodate something private on this forum, and something new gets started up, then you would, I should think, be welcome. Raise one determinist thought to the sky, however, and you're booted!! Eyebrow

Seriously, I hope it's clear that we're not talking about a secret club where open theists get together and tell each other how swell their theology is. Not by a long shot. The point is to discuss family-related issues without having to defend the basic claim that the future is open, that libertarian free will exists, etc. You sound like you'd qualify, ATW. Send a money order for...just kinddin.

Take care,
Tom
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 10:53 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
An OLD gray-bearded thought.

What MADE this board was all the graduate students who KNEW that they were willing to "flip-flop" their positions several times before settling--momentarily--on anything. THAT gave this board its zest, character, and dynamism.

Doesn't it sound like y'all each want your own little 'safe' rist-free boxes? Not exactly--but over in that direction. Hmmm....


Y'ALL JUST NEED A NEW CROP OF STUDENTS!
Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 11:18 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel
What MADE this board was all the graduate students who KNEW that they were willing to "flip-flop" their positions several times before settling--momentarily--on anything.
Y'ALL JUST NEED A NEW CROP OF STUDENTS!



Sign me up!
Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 11:23 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Well, PoW, I've expressed as best as I can what it is I'm frustrated with and how I wish to spend the time I have online. I no longer wish to spend it arguing about:

a) whether libterarian free will exists or is coherent.
b) whether God is temporal or outside of time.
c) whether or not the future is partly open
d) whether or not God determines everything unconditionally
e) whether or not God takes risks
f) whether monergism or synergism is right

I think there IS a place and time to discuss these things. And I wouldn't object to this site being that place and time. Really. I just no longer wish to spend any of MY time in THAT place arguing with determinists about these things. Interpret that as you will. I'm worn out. Tired. It's not about constructing some illusion of safety from arguments I'm secretly convinced really DO defeat the open view. It's about not wanting to waste time arguing with people over things I and they know we're not gonna change on. If I wanted saftey, I wouldn't have stayed around this long dueling with determinists.

Where are the people you speak of who started this site? They're gone, PoW. I still talk to them, but they long ago decided the board wasn't where they could or wanted to spend their time. Ask them why.

Doc? Modes? Chelsea? Mephi? (and others). Ask 'em why they've left, PoW. Ask away. All left because of the very frustration I've been describing. Some also left partly because of how I moderated as ataraxia back in February over the "Carlie" thread. (Yeah, ya'll, now ya know. Oh well. It gives me an opportunity to say a huge heartfelt thanks to Greg and the Committe for putting up with my less than perfect job of moderating. I enjoyed it. Learned a lot.)

Springs, Semeia, Iconoclast, Shell...I've totally missed your voices since February.

PoW, you can question us who are tired and want a different venue (whether on this board or elsewhere) if that makes you feel better. Go for it. Whatever.

Just think guys, all of you who have complained for months and months (years!) that we open theists are narrow minded, blind, mean-spirited heretics will have the satisfaction of knowing we won't be around to do any more damage. I hope that's some consolation to you.

Tom
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 1:21 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
What that meant, Tom, is that you can't step into the same river twice, and you can't force things to happen. And, BTW, I don't think you have any shortness in realizing any of that. I just tried to point to what seemed to be a major ingredient in what "HAPPENED" (past tense). No suggestion that it would happen again.

Another element was the proximity in time to the BGC thing, and R. Olson and Modes (effectually) getting kicked off the Edgren Fellowship discussion site.

Hold a renunion, if you didn't already.

(Hope you enjoy my home state.)

PoW
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 1:28 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I think to the Smells and Bells thread. Our very own woman priest was in the early stages of working through some things and figuring out how to implement others. It was a ripe moment. It seems that the "on the cusp" element is necessary to the brew. Later, it is only when "chemestry" acts as a catalyst that a settled matter is reenergized.

But then growing old has its graces too.

PoW

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 1:31 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by sparknheart

quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel
What MADE this board was all the graduate students who KNEW that they were willing to "flip-flop" their positions several times before settling--momentarily--on anything.
Y'ALL JUST NEED A NEW CROP OF STUDENTS!



Sign me up!





KEY TO THE LOGIC OF THE FLIP-FLOP: http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/marbles/flipflop.html

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 1:51 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
BTW -- It alway seemed to me that some ideas expressed and identified with "OV" had little to do with "Christus Victor" (Though a nineteeth or early twentieth century phrase. . . it is most present in Eastern Orthodoxy. 'Christ the Victor', as in the Eikon of the Anastasis: "trampling down death by death and in the tombs bestowing life." Some of the theologial curiousity and directions of inquiry sometimes seemed to run counter to that victory.

Thought I'd mention that.
Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 12/10/2004 4:55 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
JEE: I really think we should just make a section of this board (CVM) into a ("OVers Only") section (or at least a "no determinists/Calvinists" section), and proceed on an honor system for people to abide by the rules.


I agree. I really need that little cigar-smoking guy to do my posts properly!!Bandit


wjs

Back to Top
 

AtTheWell
Registered Member


Date Joined Nov 2004
Total Posts : 133
 
   Posted 12/13/2004 7:38 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thank you to TGB and JEE. I think I am understanding you now. Sounds like a great idea, especially the prostate exam-- yuck!!! Or was that prostrate?????Tongue
But since I'm a Kisses I shant worry either way.WinkBig Smile

Seriously, bless your efforts.



Peace,
ATW

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:06 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads