Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > Universalism and Scripture  Forum Quick Jump
 
In your opinion, which view is MOST viable, given all Scriptural and historical considerations?
13
Eternal Conscious Punishment/Torment - 56.5%
3
Annihilationism - 13.0%
2
Universal Reconciliation - 8.7%
5
I don't know right now - 21.7%

 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
113 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 7/3/2006 1:03 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Tom: Just a general warning--"you're gonna wish you were never born"--without saying anything about the eschaton per se.

Jeff: This leads me to think I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "eschaton." I tend to think of judgment being part of the eschaton--with the eternal state being beyond it. It sounds to me like you're saying the eternal state is the eschaton. Is that correct?


 

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 7/3/2006 1:30 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Yeah, I include the eternal state in the eschaton. Should I not?

Tom


 

Back to Top
 

Corey
Five with a Four-wing




Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1893
 
   Posted 7/3/2006 2:04 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I generally think of the eschaton as that economy which is inaugerated with Christ's return.

Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 7/3/2006 2:16 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom: Yeah, I include the eternal state in the eschaton. Should I not?
Jeff: No, but I thought you were differentiating between the eschaton and the time of judgment. You said, "Just a general warning--'you're gonna wish you were never born'--without saying anything about the eschaton per se." But I understood Corey to be referring to the judgment that happens at or after Christ's return. So by my view (and Corey's, I think), the time at which they will be wishing they had never been born will actually BE in the eschaton. So it's "about the eschaton" in that sense at least. But it can still be finite.
 
Maybe I was misunderstanding you. On the other hand, we can forget scriptural eschatology altogether and look at UR from the aspect of benevolence, alone. But I'm still curious as to how we could do that without at least talking about something like a Fall. What do you think?


 

Back to Top
 

Corey
Five with a Four-wing




Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1893
 
   Posted 7/3/2006 5:49 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Just to be a little "process" here... I don't view the eschaton as a static, final destination. It will have history and development of its own. I expect there to be phases or ages or whatever you want to call them within this larger category.
Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 7/3/2006 5:55 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Me too, Corey. I think that's probably what's implied by "unto the ages of the ages."


 

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 7/7/2006 8:14 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
How 'bout this new book: http://www.wipfandstock.com/bookStore.cfm?bookID=1413&do=detail

And the comments on it here: http://www.generousorthodoxy.net/thinktank/

Hmmm.

Tom


 

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 7/17/2006 12:05 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
jefscott said...

 But doesn't "this age" necessarily refer to a finite period of time?

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner, Jeff.   I’ve been very busy. 

 

Help me understand, are you positing other finite (to use Corey’s phrase) “phases” beyond our current reality?   Please, let me ask you how we could ever differentiate or define "finite" (if UR is true) because in essence all of us would currently be experiencing a phase of eternity? 


 Love is like a ball in a game of catch: throw it and it will come back to you; hold onto it and that ends the game.

Post Edited (sparknheart) : 7/17/2006 12:10:50 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Corey
Five with a Four-wing




Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1893
 
   Posted 7/17/2006 12:11 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Mark, I think Jeff mentioned somewhere that he'll be on vacation for a while.

For my part, I'm not understanding your question. Could you help me out?


 

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 7/17/2006 12:22 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Thanks for the update on Jeff, Corey.

 

I’m just asking the question on how one can differentiate between finite and eternal if UR is true.  It would just seem to me that life would end up consisting of nothing more then a delusion of eternal phases with no such thing as a finite period of time; we are all just destined for eternal bliss in a due manner of time.  For example, the shaker analogy that was used, where we our simply shook until we choose God and He will wait forever until we make a decision towards him.   This is one reason why I embrace the form of annihilation that Doc writes about in SATPOE, which by the way is not even a choice on this thread’s pole.

The bottom line is that Scripture speaks of two major “ages” and they are without question definitive.


 Love is like a ball in a game of catch: throw it and it will come back to you; hold onto it and that ends the game.

Post Edited (sparknheart) : 7/21/2006 8:56:51 AM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 7/22/2006 9:01 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Mark: The bottom line is that Scripture speaks of two major “ages” and they are without question definitive.

Jeff: As a premillenialist, I think the "major" future age referred to in scripture is mostly the "millenium." So, per my thinking, that future age doesn't even count an eternal state. As I told Corey, I tend to think there will be no eternal age--but that there will be ages UNTO eternity.


 

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 8/4/2006 9:55 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Jeff,

I don’t know.  Maybe I could agree with you from some conceptual, theoretical or philosophical viewpoint, I just find it very problematic from a Biblical perspective.  But then again who am I to say.   I’m just a one dimensional dot, trapped in time and space, conceivably passing through a single instance of some manifold dimensional universe.

 

 

Shalom,

 

Mark

Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 8/5/2006 9:37 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Me, too, Mark. Me, too!! :-) I'm just making my best guess given my hermeneutical assumption that scripture is logically consistent in the authors' intended meaning. Just keep the coffee hot 'til I get there, bro!


 

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
113 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 8:52 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads