 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
  |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/17/2006 6:11 PM (GMT -6) |   | | The aspect of "Eikon" is key there. (In a baptist church where communion hardly means anything, this might be another matter. Sadly.)
In Byzantium, women were deaconesses -- a role higher than deacon, but lower' than priest, and different...specialized.
| Women and the Priesthood |
|
|

Thomas Hopko, ed. | |
 |
|
More than fifteen years have passed since the original publication of Women and the Priesthood. This new edition presents the essays of the authors who are no longer with us, Fathers Alexander Schmemann and Nicholas Afanasiev, and Prof. Georges Barrois, together with the editor's reflections on the debate at that time. The living contributors to the first edition have all written new essays. An article by Dr. Nonna Verna Harrison is also now included.
The authors search for explanations and reason why the Orthodox Church has never in its history ordained women to serve as bishops and priests. All agree that the Church has women deacons, and that careful consideration must be given to this office as it existed in the past and as it may once again exist in the Orthodox Church.
No author in the present volume calls for the ordination of women as bishops and priests. All authors agree, however, that the greatest care much be exercised in dealing with this complicated and delicate issue. The Orthodox Church has no infallible magisterium. Church leaders and theologians may be wrong. The Holy Spirit acts within the whole body of believers bringing to remembrance what Christ teaches and guiding the faithful into all truth. If but one member of the Church is inspired to argue from the Bible and Church Tradition that certain women may be qualified to serve as bishops and priests, he or she must be heard with dignity and respect. Those who believe that only certain believing men are qualified for these ordained ministries must be heard in the same manner and spirit. Whatever one thinks of the thoughts of the contributors, this new edition of Women and the Priesthood serves as a model for the debate among the Orthodox.
ISBN 0-88141-146-9 6 x 9 260 pp Price: US $15.95 |
(o) Post Edited (PotOnWheel) : 1/17/2006 5:16:02 PM (GMT-6) | | Back to Top | | |
  |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/17/2006 6:41 PM (GMT -6) |   | Eikon means that the object that is 'imaging' another (picture of your dauighter) is given veneration (fond looks, or even kisses, and receives from remembrances and responsible feelings) which is then passed on "through" (un-essential spatial reference, just because we are human and that's how we think and talk sometimes) the eikon and unto the subject imaged by the eikon.
So, to no point so far has any visible part of the one, holy, catholic and appostalic church EVER appointed women to stand-in for the Father's image (the Father's image is Christ.)
This is NO deminution of women.
In fact, priesthood is a lower calling. It is a helping (husbanding, in my words) of the whole congregation of laity. (We are all lay-priests.) Women are naturally more embracing, as is seen in the "orans" icon.
And, parexalance, Mary is "more honorable than the seraphim and by far more glorious than the cherubim." She is the queen mother. The panahia. All that without any intermediary necessary.
Further, there is higher accountabilty of clergy than laity before God. BUT, no less honor or importance of the "priesthood of the laity." Significantly, ONLY when the congregation is there can an Orthodox priest possibly celebrate the divine liturgy. (RCC is wrong in having personall masses, says the Bible..."2-or-3 gathered"...)
The imaging of Christ for the dialogical (reeiving and giving) actions in the Lord's Supper require a man.
This has nothing to do with any contemporary lord-it-over wackynesses. None. Mary Magdalene is revered as "equal to the appostles." Martyrs are revered most of all. None of the currency of modern power politic matters for those serving Christ only.
(o) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 1/17/2006 7:21 PM (GMT -6) |   | Ok. Interesting stuff. 'Nother question.
What does EO think about "male headship" in the FAMILY household? Is the man the "priest of the household" for his family...or something to that effect? I know that the man and woman are "king and queen" of the household or something. But is the man the head honcho, as it were?
Thanks VERY much for the direct answers, POW. I really do appreciate it, man. 
The newest mantra:
God graciously FINDS us meaningful when God doesn't need to do it and we, in ourselves, can't do it.
"Hmm. Why not? What the hell. Let's try it." --God
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/17/2006 7:48 PM (GMT -6) |   |
MephEternal said... What does EO think about "male headship" in the FAMILY household?
I'm guessing that the answer to that is in the book an Orthodox man wrote, called (What was that now? Oh, yeah.) -- Ephesians. "Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave Himself up for her..." (vs.5:25) And how that is pictured is pretty much in this "Bridegroom" icon.
What marriage teaches us and does to us men is teach us to die. For women to embrace and support. Each giving and lessening, and becoming "more" in the union. Decreasing that He (Christ and his Body) might increase. Marriage is "equal" to monastic life, as it truly is that in another forum. The "mono" being the one flesh that is an icon of the mystery of the union of Christ and His Church.
Every day. Humbly. Imperfectly, with repentance...getting up...walking...repeating... Being shaped together into the image of Chirst.
(o) | | Back to Top | | |
  |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/17/2006 8:09 PM (GMT -6) |   |
MephEternal said... Ok. I'm just trying to get very specific here. I understand the concept of the self-sacrificial nature of the Christ-like servanthood. I'm just trying to find out if there is indeed a "divine authority" from God about male/female relationships in marriage within the EO framework. Are not men supposed to be seen as the head of women like Christ is the head of the church...or something like that?
Do you get what I'm asking?
I live in the same world you do... so of course I get what you're asking.
So it should make you happy that I think all the corporation-speak jargon about "servant leadership" is just an excuse for bossy people to put a spin on their excesses. And then churches hire consultants... (Christians should read the Bible and pray more, and fast.)
So, NO, I was not talking about "self-sacrificial nature of the Christ-like servanthood" as it gets packaged.
I'm talking about taking up the Cross and being male and being female, and doing your best.
As to "divine authority" I would not think that men in any traditionally Orthodox countries would have tried to beat their wives over the head with a Bible to get control. (Not one's with living motherinlaws...) But what do I know. I'd just think that men being men are hopelessly lost in the drama of wanting to guide or tweek things -- unless someone stops them in time. And we are what we are. We don't imitate what we are not. Boys play with balls. Ask any woman.
But it is what we DO with our maleness that is the sacrifice.
And women and men are not all that different. We can both do pretty much the same things. Women are better at most. Except being men. And so that should be left to us....to work on.
And work on it we must.
(o) | | Back to Top | | |
  |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/17/2006 8:51 PM (GMT -6) |   | D.
I teach in a Franciscan Convent, with women bosses. I attend a Dutch Reformed church. I'm Swedish American. What can I really say, definitively, about Russian or Greek or Lebanese men? I just won't give a "definitive" (I think that's what you are considering "clear." ) answer. I'm not the one to ask.
"Being the man" is to be contrasted to "men-are-this" pop-philosophies. We simply ARE. Asking "what does 'x' mean" sounds like the pop-philosophy category. I'm to old for those.
Besides, what if you ask instead, "what does marriage mean in the context of being a man?" Maybe that's better!
For an "EO position" ask an Aleut or an Inuit.
(o) Post Edited (PotOnWheel) : 1/17/2006 7:58:21 PM (GMT-6) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 1/17/2006 8:56 PM (GMT -6) |   | I....I....darnit...
Just forget it all, man. For real.
No worries.
Later.
The newest mantra:
God graciously FINDS us meaningful when God doesn't need to do it and we, in ourselves, can't do it.
"Hmm. Why not? What the hell. Let's try it." --God
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/17/2006 8:57 PM (GMT -6) |   | So I'm busy asking "what does marriage mean in the context of being a man?" and thereby focusing on marriage. And your preoccupied with asking "what does 'being a man' mean in the context of marriage?" Follwing, it seems to me, the tendency of "letting the world squeeze you into its mold" of narcicism.
But what do YOU, D., think about all these matters....IRRESPECTIVE of whether there are Orthodox or not.
What do YOU say?
(o) Post Edited (PotOnWheel) : 1/17/2006 8:01:51 PM (GMT-6) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/17/2006 9:26 PM (GMT -6) |   | |
Here's some of the things in the article. (And there are other things that would go over your head.)
- He taught the spiritual equality of men and women and blessed that equality by saying, "for this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife and they shall be one flesh."
- There is, however, no argument from St. Paul about the fact that women have the right to rule in the political and vocational order.
- There is, however, in the Bible, St. Paul’s teaching that women should not lead in the worship of the church.
- In the letters to the Ephesians and Corinthians, St. Paul speaks of the ordained man as being a presbyter, which means an older man or elder or ruler. He believes that only men should lead or rule in the Christian family. He believes that equal rulership with men would eventually cause confusion in the human family as well as in the church by preventing singleness of purpose in decision-making.
- We Orthodox Christians declare that while men and women are equal in the eyes of God and under the secular law, they are very different in their human nature because God has created them for different functions.
(o) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 1/17/2006 9:27 PM (GMT -6) |   | POW: So I'm busy asking "what does marriage mean in the context of being a man?" and thereby focusing on marriage. And your preoccupied with asking "what does 'being a man' mean in the context of marriage?" Follwing, it seems to me, the tendency of "letting the world squeeze you into its mold" of narcicism.
The only reason I used the "being a man" language was as a take-off of the following sentence...
And women and men are not all that different. We can both do pretty much the same things. Women are better at most. Except being men. And so that should be left to us....to work on.
So, I said to myself, "Ok, let me phrase the question in that vein"...but THAT didn't work either. So, fine, what does marriage mean in the context of being a man AS CONTRASTED WITH marriage in the context of being a women? YOUR preferred question.
If this doesn't work...
***********************************
POW: But what do YOU, D., think about all these matters....IRRESPECTIVE of whether there are Orthodox or not.
What do YOU say?
This ain't about what I think right now. I'm trying to figure out some general information on women in Eastern Orthodox thought. I figured I could just ask you. I got a more clear handle on the women/ministry thing. NOW, I wanted to get a handle on the women/marriage thing.
Post Edited (MephEternal) : 1/17/2006 8:32:21 PM (GMT-6) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 1/17/2006 9:31 PM (GMT -6) |   | POW: Here's some of the things in the article. (And there are other things that would go over your head.)
I read the article, POW. I know what it says. That's why I was asking YOU was this stuff accurate, to your knowledge. I figured you may know if the author's position was MORE individual to the author or if it was REPRESENTATIVE of Eastern Orthodox positions on the matter.
The newest mantra:
God graciously FINDS us meaningful when God doesn't need to do it and we, in ourselves, can't do it.
"Hmm. Why not? What the hell. Let's try it." --God
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/17/2006 9:35 PM (GMT -6) |   | |
MephEternal said... ...what does marriage mean in the context of being a man?
PoW: OK. What does that question evoke from YOU?
MephEternal said... I'm trying to figure out some general information on women in Eastern Orthodox thought.
PoW: Ask one.
MephEternal said... I'm I wanted to get a handle on the women/marriage thing.
Don't we all.
It is impossible to understand either the New Testament doctrine on marriage, or the very consistent practice of the Orthodox Church without seeing Christian marriage in the context of the Eucharist... The very notion of marriage as a sacrament presupposed that a man is not only a being with physiological, psychological, and social functions, but that he is a citizen of God's Kingdom, i.e., that his entire life'and especially its most decisive moments'involve eternal values and God Himself.
— John Meyendorff, from the book
(o) Post Edited (PotOnWheel) : 1/17/2006 9:02:34 PM (GMT-6) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/17/2006 9:39 PM (GMT -6) |   | You made promises, D.
Now you shouldn't bail, just because something is more work than you want it to be.
As to "clear" versus "definitive" I think you go fishing for short round answers with no rough edges that prevent their being reused in different ways.
Me, I am content to locate an issue well, and settle for it taking a day before I even understand the issue... and then several more before I maybe, maybe have part of an answer. Then I stick with it until I have some notion of how partial or full, simple or complex an answer I'm looking at.
Then I ask what it means to me.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gotta go serve my wife. She's tired from making more money than I do, and having more responsibilites -- unless you include my helping the kids with homework, cooking, taking out the trash.....
(o) Post Edited (PotOnWheel) : 1/17/2006 9:07:05 PM (GMT-6) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/25/2006 11:23 PM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 4:34 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|