Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Violin for God
Luke, I am your father. --Nooooooooo!!!!!




Date Joined Dec 2004
Total Posts : 690
 
   Posted 6/7/2006 3:25 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I just got the link to this debate from Bill Craig and apparently Bart Ehrman isn't permitting publication of it, so this can only be passed around by "word of internet". This took place around April or so. It's about the historical evidence for the resurrection of Jesus.
 
 


[As Bill and Ted approach Socrates]:
Bill: "Yo Ted, say something profound, dude." 
Ted: "Oh, yeah. Right.  All we are...is dust in the wind dude."
Bill: ..."Dust".... "Wind" ... "Duuuude".
Socrates: (gasping in awe) "Like sands through the hour glass, so are the days of our lives."

Post Edited (Violin for God) : 6/7/2006 3:36:53 AM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 6/17/2006 9:15 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks, VFG. After reading some of it, I can see why Bart doesn't want it published. I understand his insistence that historical method has to be inclusive in the academic world. But I don't understand why he can't see that a person has to consider evidence in light of his/her whole world-view, unconstrained by the metaphysics of others.


 

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 6/18/2006 9:02 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Yeah, read it. Cool. It's clear that for Ehrman "methodological naturalism" is the only way to do valid history.

Tom


 

Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 7/9/2006 8:59 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
In this debate, Ehrman says at one point that there's no evidence that the apostles died for their faith. Craig had used the fact that apostles died and were willing to die for their faith as evidence that they really believed what they were preaching.This makes me wonder if Ehrman thinks the accounts of persecution in the book of Acts are pretty much fabrications. Does anyone know what the consensus scholarly opinion on that is?


 

Post Edited (jefscott) : 7/9/2006 9:03:27 AM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 11:14 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads