Sorry about that, Brandon. I saw it on Bill's site, too, and got confused. And yeah, Tom, I saw Behe's book. I intend to get it eventually.
It had never dawned on me to think of those poll results in terms of O'leary's take. But it does seem to make a lot of sense. Kind of a Hugh Ross approach. Like they're saying humans "as we know them" seemed to have showed up about 10,000 years ago when all the evidences of architecture, etc. showed up--yet not denying that there were other "humans" theretofore. Makes you wonder if that's what many of them are actually saying.
|