 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > General Chat > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 1/27/2008 9:57 AM (GMT -6) |   | | By God's Lovingkindness...
There is Metanoia...unto...Nepsis.
Repentance of mind...unto...Sobriety and Wakefulness.
Living a "neptic" life is living "awake" to the truth of Reality...instead of living in the daydream of the "this present evil age."
A Neptic one is an Awakened One.
Interesting.
Some concidences...
Buddha literally means "Awakened One"
From the word "bodhi" meaning "awakened" or "knowing"
and a person gets to "bodhi" experiences perfect lovingkindness, compassion, empathetic joy, and equanimity...
because they live in Nirvana (Sanskrit for "to cease blowing" ). This is the state of equanimity (what we would call "apatheia" )
This is when the unawakened mind is free from klesas (what we would call "passions" )
and left to follow it's true svabhava (what we would call "logos" )
to demonstrating Tathagatagarbha (which, as the Buddha states is "Lovingkindness") in all it's ways.
Now...those are some interesting coincidences.
So God created human beings in his own image, in the image of God he created them... | | Back to Top | | |
 |  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 1/27/2008 2:29 PM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
  |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/28/2008 6:31 AM (GMT -6) |   |
feelinahole said...I believe it was CS Lewis who stated that since all men are created by God, we should not be surprised to see some truth in all religions.
Interesting, H.
.
D., my hesitation is that mere terms ussually have world views behind them, that shape a term in one way here, and another way there. I don't know much, but I can look at what I've read of pre-Christian Helenic culture and how Christianity transformed terms and culture.
So I'm hesitant about taking Hindu and Buddism terms and treating them as Christian.
Further, I'm really concerned that you might desire to create a "unified theory" of all religions. I'm concerned about that becuase Christianity presents that nothing is understood outside of Christ.
All this philosophy and compound-worded terms to stand in for grace, communion and love make me uneasy.
| | Back to Top | | |
  |  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 1/28/2008 9:02 AM (GMT -6) |   | Feelin: I believe it was CS Lewis who stated that since all men are created by God, we should not be surprised to see some truth in all religions.
Yeah. It's just sensible. Not mention the ubiquitous work of the Spirit in the world. This book is fire!
 Amos Yong is is cool dude and a great theologian! (I'm kinda sorry he left Bethel though! ) *********************************************** Bruce: D., my hesitation is that mere terms ussually have world views behind them, that shape a term in one way here, and another way there. I don't know much, but I can look at what I've read of pre-Christian Helenic culture and how Christianity transformed terms and culture.
So I'm hesitant about taking Hindu and Buddism terms and treating them as Christian.Of course, the worldviews between Christianity and Buddhism are different. That is not to say that, once someone really looks at the views, that there are not striking similiarities in some of the things that occur, particularly when talking about the process of "awakening". (Hmmm...that reminds me. Amos Yong was really big on Christian/Buddhist dialogue dealing with a new pneumatological view of a theology of relgions within an evangelical framework. He's been working with this for some time. It's possible to do so...and still maintain core Christian conviction. ) So again, I'm not trying to EQUATE Christianity and Buddhism. That would be disrepectful (at least) to both. I'm pointing out significant similarities that are RIPE for opening up pan-faith discussions and "redemptive analogies" (Don Richardson's "Peace Child" thing ) that open the way for relational evangelism. *********************************************** Bruce: Further, I'm really concerned that you might desire to create a "unified theory" of all religions. I'm concerned about that becuase Christianity presents that nothing is understood outside of Christ.If you get a chance, please read "Beyond the Impasse: Toward a Pneumatological Theology of Religions." That could go a longer way into illustrating some of my thinking. But I will say this: Christ is absolutely center in my PERSONAL LIFE, not just my theological worldview. I think that you of all people, Bruce, have SEEN my Christocentricity increase over time here...especially in my theologizing on this board. Maybe I'm silly with this, but I keep expecting the changes I'm demonstrating (and the testimonies I've given) to authenticate things as far as my centrality on Christ. Maybe I need to give up on that... Look at the FRUIT, man. Fruit don't lie, right? ****************************************** Bruce: All this philosophy and compound-worded terms to stand in for grace, communion and love make me uneasy.You have the right idea. Pray to the Father about it. He'll give you what you need to help you discern what's what. And pray for me too while you're talking to Him!  ********************************************** Corey: This sort of talk is where I still say you're being quasi-gnostic. Salvation is through attaining a certain secret knowledge.Amazing...
So God created human beings in his own image, in the image of God he created them... Post Edited (Imago Dei) : 1/28/2008 8:11:18 AM (GMT-6) | | Back to Top | | |
  |  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 1/28/2008 9:14 AM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
   |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/28/2008 9:20 AM (GMT -6) |   |
Imago Dei said... "If You Don't Know Me By Now"
"...you will never, never, never know me." I know that I can't always be sure that you aren't lumping things together, based on an entertaining hyperactivity of yours. (or something like that)
It's a communication thing...
(o) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/28/2008 9:25 AM (GMT -6) |   |
Imago Dei said... Read up on the terms and see how their are used in their respective contexts...and see what you think. That's all you have to do. Does "upekkha" really cohere with the more Christian concept of "perfect equilibrium" or "apatheia"? Just search it out and see. Don't ask your reader to examine two worldviews at the same time. Bad pedagogy.
Using outside instnaces to point to or define things in Christianity is useful. Using Christianity to distinguish tipping points in other religions does, by contrast, help to also define and illumine Christianity.
But don't do "multivariable calculus."
.
You can ignore me. I wasn't telling you what to do. I was just saying how it affects me.
(o) | | Back to Top | | |
   |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/28/2008 9:31 AM (GMT -6) |   |
Imago Dei said...Bruce: I know that I can't always be sure that you aren't lumping things together, based on an entertaining hyperactivity of yours. (or something like that) It's a communication thing...Then let's take a breather and regroup. We've done the clarification and re-clarification thing here. Just like on the other thread. So, given all the convo that's gone on...where DO you think I am, as far as orthodox theology? Am I within good bounds of orthodoxy in your view...or not? From what I got from Fr. Proctor, I thought I was. What's your impression?
"...where DO you think I am..." --------- I don't want to be responsible for that
"where DO you think I am, as far as orthodox theology" --------- I'm not one to ask. I wouldn't know if you have a mixtuer of various orthodoxies or not. Not really my business. Nor my expertise. (Ask me about your coffeecup though, and I know something about that.) I'm not going to judge you, at all.
"Am I within good bounds of orthodoxy in your view...or not?" --------- Table that issue until you've had more face-to-faces with your local.
(o) | | Back to Top | | |
  |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/28/2008 11:01 AM (GMT -6) |   |
Corey said... This sort of talk is where I still say you're being quasi-gnostic. Salvation is through attaining a certain secret knowledge.
What I"m seeing laid out in Behr's book is that ANYTHING (evn scripture--remember the Jews had the Torah, and that was not enough) is insufficient...WITHOUT...the preaching of the Gospel of the Cross and Grace of Jesus Christ. Behr pointed out that the SOLUTION to our sin problem (the preaching of Christ) comes to us before we can grasp the extent of our missery, sin problem, shatteredness, etc. (my own groping terms). The nature of the solution (He who IS life) defines the problem (death).
But of the Cross of Christ it was "hidden" and not some "secret." Out of plain sight (again in the scriptures even) it was revealed when the time came.
Not "knowledge" but meeting Christ through the preaching of the Word and the Spirit.
(o)Post Edited (PotOnWheel) : 1/28/2008 10:07:05 AM (GMT-6) | | Back to Top | | |
  |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/28/2008 12:49 PM (GMT -6) |   |
might-be-don said...poTonwHeeL, You seem to indicate that "preaching" is a pregnant word. Fill me in, what is preaching if not just proclaiming what the scripture portrays? peace, don
Yeah, that's it: "proclaiming whar the scripture 'portrays.'" Exactly.
But in history there have been passages that had to wait until their full meaning was revealed. Some of those, we see, were revealed in scripture itself. Others have been uncovered in preaching. (which of course is a conciliar discernment --2 or 3, with no guarantee of infalability and being open to challenge, as is then the challenger. ...e.g., Luther tried to challenge James, but Luther is challenge in that!)
(o) | | Back to Top | | |
  |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/29/2008 9:53 PM (GMT -6) |   |
might-be-don said...Ok... give me one example of a scripture that had to "wait" for a "preacher" to reveal the full meaning. peace, don
Revealed by Christ Himself:
Matthew 12: 26Now about the dead rising—have you not read in the book of Moses, in the account of the bush, how God said to him, 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob' [d]? 27He is not the God of the dead, but of the living. You are badly mistaken!" (to the Sadducese)
And Luke 24:
13Now that same day two of them were going to a village called Emmaus, about seven miles [a] from Jerusalem. 14They were talking with each other about everything that had happened. 15As they talked and discussed these things with each other, Jesus himself came up and walked along with them; 16but they were kept from recognizing him.
17He asked them, "What are you discussing together as you walk along?"
They stood still, their faces downcast. 18One of them, named Cleopas, asked him, "Are you only a visitor to Jerusalem and do not know the things that have happened there in these days?"
19"What things?" he asked.
"about Jesus of Nazareth," they replied. "He was a prophet, powerful in word and deed before God and all the people. 20The chief priests and our rulers handed him over to be sentenced to death, and they crucified him; 21but we had hoped that he was the one who was going to redeem Israel. And what is more, it is the third day since all this took place. 22In addition, some of our women amazed us. They went to the tomb early this morning 23but didn't find his body. They came and told us that they had seen a vision of angels, who said he was alive. 24Then some of our companions went to the tomb and found it just as the women had said, but him they did not see."
25He said to them, "How foolish you are, and how slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! 26Did not the Christ[b] have to suffer these things and then enter his glory?" 27And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself.
28As they approached the village to which they were going, Jesus acted as if he were going farther. 29But they urged him strongly, "Stay with us, for it is nearly evening; the day is almost over." So he went in to stay with them.
30When he was at the table with them, he took bread, gave thanks, broke it and began to give it to them. 31Then their eyes were opened and they recognized him, and he disappeared from their sight. 32They asked each other, "Were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the Scriptures to us?"
33They got up and returned at once to Jerusalem. There they found the Eleven and those with them, assembled together 34and saying, "It is true! The Lord has risen and has appeared to Simon." 35Then the two told what had happened on the way, and how Jesus was recognized by them when he broke the bread.
(o) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 1/29/2008 10:15 PM (GMT -6) |   | Then fine. Let's preach Christ.
But we can't preach Christ without living the Great Commandments: Total love of God, self and neighbor.
To preach Christ without the Great Commandments demonstrated through the Spirit's power is to infuse the Gospel with lies.
Period.
So God created human beings in his own image, in the image of God he created them... Post Edited (Imago Dei) : 1/29/2008 9:33:00 PM (GMT-6) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 1/29/2008 10:46 PM (GMT -6) |   |
Imago Dei said...Then fine. Let's preach Christ. But we can't preach Christ without living the Great Commandments: Total love of God, self and neighbor. To preach Christ without the Great Commandments demonstrated through the Spirit's power is to infuse the Gospel with lies. Period.
I don't know why you are saying that. I don't know where that is coming from. I don't know how to take that.
(o) | | Back to Top | | |
  |  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 1/30/2008 7:47 AM (GMT -6) |   | Bruce said: What I"m seeing laid out in Behr's book is that ANYTHING (evn scripture--remember the Jews had the Torah, and that was not enough) is insufficient...WITHOUT...the preaching of the Gospel of the Cross and Grace of Jesus Christ. Behr pointed out that the SOLUTION to our sin problem (the preaching of Christ) comes to us before we can grasp the extent of our missery, sin problem, shatteredness, etc. (my own groping terms). The nature of the solution (He who IS life) defines the problem (death).
But of the Cross of Christ it was "hidden" and not some "secret." Out of plain sight (again in the scriptures even) it was revealed when the time came.
Not "knowledge" but meeting Christ through the preaching of the Word and the Spirit.
Imago said: Then fine. Let's preach Christ. But we can't preach Christ without living the Great Commandments: Total love of God, self and neighbor. To preach Christ without the Great Commandments demonstrated through the Spirit's power is to infuse the Gospel with lies. Period.
Just for clarity...
**************************************************
Sahid: I am amazed by certain similarities but I've been looking at Taoism. The Spirit moves where it will, and the Lord is not only Lord of Jerusalem. Still, I am specifically Christian. Whereas we see fruit sprouting in unexpected places, Jesus is the root. Certain religions speak truth, but Jesus IS truth in the flesh.
Exactamundo, homie.
So God created human beings in his own image, in the image of God he created them... | | Back to Top | | |
 | 29 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 4:20 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|