Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Ethics, etc. > War! (What Is It Good For?)  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 9/26/2008 11:07 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

War! (What Is It Good For?)

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 9/26/2008 11:09 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Does anyone doubt that Senator McCain lives by a warrior narrative?

 

This is the most consistent theme in his campaign. For him the world is clearly divided into us and them.

Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 9/27/2008 1:14 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
"Yes. I think that a nuclear armed Iran is not just a threat to us, it's a threat to Israel. And it is a game changer in the region. It's unacceptable. And that's why I've said that I won't take any options off the table, including military, to prevent them from obtaining a nuclear weapon... I do think that it is important for us to use all the arrows in our quiver. And we have not applied the kind of tough diplomacy over the last eight years that I think could have made a difference."

Sure, McCain killed civilians in exchange for money. Yes, this is very bad. But for all his rhetoric, what is the concrete difference that people expect from Obama? He talks tough about nuclear war in order to win votes. Not as sick and twisted as what McCain used to do for a living, but still pretty sick and twisted.


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 9/27/2008 12:31 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sahid said...
Sure, McCain killed civilians in exchange for money. Yes, this is very bad. But for all his rhetoric, what is the concrete difference that people expect from Obama?

Most Christians I’ve heard, including right wing political pundits, applauded McCain’s description of evil as he described it at the Saddleback forum.   The following quotes, that I emphasize, show a stark contrast between these two candidate’s philosophical and theological definition of evil.

 

WARREN: OK, we’ve got one last time — I’ve got a bunch more, but let me ask you one about evil. Does evil exist? And if it does, do we ignore it? Do we negotiate with it? Do we contain it? Do we defeat it?

OBAMA: Evil does exist. I mean, I think we see evil all the time. We see evil in Darfur. We see evil, sadly, on the streets of our cities. We see evil in parents who viciously abuse their children. I think it has to be confronted. It has to be confronted squarely, and one of the things that I strongly believe is that, now, we are not going to, as individuals, be able to erase evil from the world. That is God’s task, but we can be soldiers in that process, and we can confront it when we see it.

Now, the one thing that I think is very important is for to us have some humility in how we approach the issue of confronting evil, because a lot of evil’s been perpetrated based on the claim that we were trying to confront evil.

REV. RICK WARREN, SADDLEBACK CHURCH: In the name of good.

OBAMA: In the name of good, and I think, you know, one thing that’s very important is having some humility in recognizing that just because we think that our intentions are good, doesn’t always mean that we’re going to be doing good. `

 

WARREN: How about the issue of evil. I asked this of your rival, in the previous debate. Does evil exist and, if so, should ignore it, negotiate it with it, contain it or defeat it?

MCCAIN: Defeat it. A couple of points. One, if I’m president of the United States, my friends, if I have to follow him to the gates of hell, I will get bin Laden and bring him to justice. I will do that. And I know how to do that. I will get that done. (APPLAUSE). No one, no one should be allowed to take thousands of American — innocent American lives.

Of course, evil must be defeated. My friends, we are facing the transcended challenge of the 21st century — radical Islamic extremism.

Not long ago in Baghdad, al Qaeda took two young women who were mentally disabled, and put suicide vests on them, sent them into a marketplace and, by remote control, detonated those suicide vests. If that isn’t evil, you have to tell me what is. And we’re going to defeat this evil. And the central battleground according to David Petraeus and Osama bin Laden is the battle, is Baghdad, Mosul, Basra and Iraq and we are winning and succeeding and our troops will come home with honor and with victory and not in defeat. And that’s what’s happening.

And we have — and we face this threat throughout the world. It’s not just in Iraq. It’s not just in Afghanistan. Our intelligence people tell us al Qaeda continues to try to establish cells here in the United States of America. My friends, we must face this challenge. We can face this challenge. And we must totally defeat it, and we’re in a long struggle. But when I’m around, the young men and women who are serving this nation in uniform, I have no doubt, none.

 

I content that the lens McCain’s views evil through is dangerously flawed in many ways, including theologically, morally and ethically.


"Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint, dill, and cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith. It is these you ought to have practiced without neglecting the others."

Post Edited (Truth Aficionado) : 9/27/2008 12:36:13 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 9/27/2008 12:35 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Just my impressions from the statements...

Obama seems to think more about defeating the evil WITHIN through exhibiting humble self-reflection in order to work with God to fight evil.

McCain seems to think more about defeating the evil WITHOUT through powerful self-assertion and conquest.
 
This seems to align well with their LEADERSHIP and DIPLOMATIC tendencies.

Do you see this, too, T.A.?



God is love. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in them.

"I love, therefore I am in I Am."

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 9/27/2008 12:48 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
One Love said...

Just my impressions from the statements...

Obama seems to think more about defeating the evil WITHIN through exhibiting humble self-reflection in order to work with God to fight evil.

McCain seems to think more about defeating the evil WITHOUT through powerful self-assertion and conquest.
 
This seems to align well with their LEADERSHIP and DIPLOMATIC tendencies.

Do you see this, too, T.A.?
I would say, Obama better understands the following:
Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his power. 11 Put on the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For our struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. 13 Therefore take up the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to withstand on that evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm. 14 Stand therefore, and fasten the belt of truth around your waist, and put on the breastplate of righteousness. 15 As shoes for your feet put on whatever will make you ready to proclaim the gospel of peace. 16 With all of these, take the shield of faith, with which you will be able to quench all the flaming arrows of the evil one. 17 Take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. -Ephesians 6:11-17


"Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint, dill, and cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith. It is these you ought to have practiced without neglecting the others."

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 9/27/2008 12:50 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Agreed, bro.


God is love. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in them.

"I love, therefore I am in I Am."

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 10/11/2008 8:16 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Iraq and the destruction of Christianity since the invasion by America

The American invasion was meant to install democracy and fresh hope.  However, democracy is a long way away and secular law, which protected the rights of Christians, women, minorities, and others, during the reign of Saddam Hussein, was replaced by Islamic Sharia law.  Therefore, the Christians of Iraq have not only been betrayed by the American led coalition but they have also seen their legal status diminish.  So why did America pave the way for the destruction of Christianity in Iraq?

 

Today.... 

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- At least 900 Christian families have fled Mosul in the past week, terrified by a series of killings and threats by Muslim extremists ordering them to convert to Islam or face possible death, officials said Saturday.

…A week ago, leaflets were distributed in several predominantly Christian neighborhoods, threatening families to "either convert to Islam or pay the jizyah or leave the city or face death," said the Interior Ministry official. Historically, jizyah is a tax paid by non-Muslims in exchange for protection.

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 10/11/2008 8:19 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Jokerman

Standing on the waters casting your bread
While the eyes of the idol with the iron head are glowing.
Distant ships sailing into the mist,
You were born with a snake in both of your fists while a hurricane was blowing.
Freedom just around the corner for you
But with the truth so far off, what good will it do?

Jokerman dance to the nightingale tune,
Bird fly high by the light of the moon,
Oh, oh, oh, Jokerman.

So swiftly the sun sets in the sky,
You rise up and say goodbye to no one.
Fools rush in where angels fear to tread,
Both of their futures, so full of dread, you don't show one.
Shedding off one more layer of skin,
Keeping one step ahead of the persecutor within.

Jokerman dance to the nightingale tune,
Bird fly high by the light of the moon,
Oh, oh, oh, Jokerman.

You're a man of the mountains, you can walk on the clouds,
Manipulator of crowds, you're a dream twister.
You're going to Sodom and Gomorrah
But what do you care? Ain't nobody there would want to marry your sister.
Friend to the martyr, a friend to the woman of shame,
You look into the fiery furnace, see the rich man without any name.

Jokerman dance to the nightingale tune,
Bird fly high by the light of the moon,
Oh, oh, oh, Jokerman.

Well, the Book of Leviticus and Deuteronomy,
The law of the jungle and the sea are your only teachers.

In the smoke of the twilight on a milk-white steed,
Michelangelo indeed could've carved out your features.
Resting in the fields, far from the turbulent space,
Half asleep near the stars with a small dog licking your face.

Jokerman dance to the nightingale tune,
Bird fly high by the light of the moon,
Oh. oh. oh. Jokerman.

Well, the rifleman's stalking the sick and the lame,
Preacherman seeks the same, who'll get there first is uncertain.
Nightsticks and water cannons, tear gas, padlocks,
Molotov cocktails and rocks behind every curtain,
False-hearted judges dying in the webs that they spin,
Only a matter of time 'til night comes steppin' in.

Jokerman dance to the nightingale tune,
Bird fly high by the light of the moon,
Oh, oh, oh, Jokerman.

It's a shadowy world, skies are slippery gray,
A woman just gave birth to a prince today and dressed him in scarlet.
He'll put the priest in his pocket, put the blade to the heat,

Take the motherless children off the street
And place them at the feet of a harlot.
Oh, Jokerman, you know what he wants,
Oh, Jokerman, you don't show any response.

Jokerman dance to the nightingale tune,
Bird fly high by the light of the moon,
Oh, oh, oh, Jokerman.

Post Edited (Truth Aficionado) : 10/11/2008 8:24:21 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 10/13/2008 10:44 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Only dead men can tell the truth in this world.

 

The War Prayer by Mark Twain

Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 10/13/2008 11:15 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I love The War Prayer. Excellent.
Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 10/14/2008 3:37 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
TA: The American invasion was meant to install democracy and fresh hope. However, democracy is a long way away and secular law, which protected the rights of Christians, women, minorities, and others, during the reign of Saddam Hussein, was replaced by Islamic Sharia law.

Tom: What law protected Kurds and Shi'ites against Sadam gasing and exterminating them? Come on.

Secular law hasn't been replaced by Islamic law at all. What's happening is that local religious finatics are attempting to usurp established law and enforce Islamic law, and they're doing so outside the democratic process.

TA: Therefore, the Christians of Iraq have not only been betrayed by the American led coalition but they have also seen their legal status diminish.

Tom: The legal status of Christians hasn't diminished in Iraq. Their legal status if fine. It's enforcement of established law that's the problem.

TA (News reports): A week ago, leaflets were distributed in several predominantly Christian neighborhoods, threatening families to "either convert to Islam or pay the jizyah or leave the city or face death," said the Interior Ministry official. Historically, jizyah is a tax paid by non-Muslims in exchange for protection.

Tom: The Interior Ministry was merely reporting on the event. They weren't in fact adopting the position that Christians had either to convert, pay jizyah, or leave. The Ministry in fact argues against all three options, which are options that only local religious zealots are pushing.

T
Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 10/14/2008 9:36 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom said...
Secular law hasn't been replaced by Islamic law at all. What's happening is that local religious finatics are attempting to usurp established law and enforce Islamic law, and they're doing so outside the democratic process. 

 
Tom, I hope you find the following informative:

America Making Iraq Safe For Sharia Law

Sharia Law, which has been incorporated in to the Iraqi Constitution is antithetical to our Western concept of Democracy, or more accurately a Representational Republic style of government, where minority rights are protected, and you have true freedom of the press (no true freedom of the press when you can’t blaspheme Mohammed or the Quran), freedom of speech, and other rights of Civil Liberty guaranteed (the loss of which accompanies the implementation of Sharia law).

While the Iraqi Constitution contains western style guarantees of freedom:

  1. No law that contradicts the principles of democracy may be established.
  2. No law that contradicts the rights and basic freedoms stipulated in this constitution may be established.

They have/are/will be abrogated and superseded by what is contained within Article 2 of the Constitution:

  1. First: Islam is the official religion of the State and it is a fundamental source of legislation:
  2. A. No law that contradicts the established provisions of Islam may be established.

In Afghanistan, with its similarly styled Sharia Law constitution and Western style guarantees of freedom, abrogation of those freedoms has already occurred in the case of Muslim apostate Abdul Rahman, who was forced to flee the country for Italy after converting to Christianity and facing the death penalty for doing so.

The fact that, as Diana West(Sharia & liberty don’t mix) notes, Afghanistan's constitution's preamble talks up the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, whose Article 18 guarantees freedom of conscience; and yes, Article 2 in the Afghan constitution guarantees limited freedom for non-Muslim-born Afghans, meant nothing. Both were superseded by Article 3 in the Afghanistan constitution: "no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam."

Sharia law trumped Western style democracy.

Post Edited (Truth Aficionado) : 10/14/2008 9:45:04 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 10/17/2008 4:20 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom said...
TA: The American invasion was meant to install democracy and fresh hope. However, democracy is a long way away and secular law, which protected the rights of Christians, women, minorities, and others, during the reign of Saddam Hussein, was replaced by Islamic Sharia law.

Tom: What law protected Kurds and Shi'ites against Sadam gasing and exterminating them? Come on.

Please explain two things for me.

1.     What was our true objective for waging war in Iraq?

2.     What exactly is our interest there today that rationalizes a continued presence?

Post Edited (Truth Aficionado) : 10/17/2008 6:30:08 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 10/18/2008 11:16 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks for the info re: Iraq’s Constitution. I’m familiar with it, and still I’ll disagree with you that the Constitution represents a wholesale embracing of Sharia law. The portions you quoted don’t say that. The more specific question (which I was speaking to) of whether the terrorizing of Iraqi Christians by Muslim fundamentalists is sanctioned by the Constitution is also answered in the negative. Those terrorizing Iraqi Christians do not act legally given the provisions of the Iraqi Constitution.

We can go round and round. I’m not saying the Constitution will survive, or that it’s a model for other Muslims who wish to embrace democracy, or that it’s even particularly a good document. I’m just saying that the case is not as you claim, namely, that the Constitution makes Sharia law the law of the land, that whatever counts as “Sharia” becomes Iraqi law by virtue of the portions you quoted. That is not the text’s meaning.

Islamists, modernists, and liberals who authored the Constitution went round and round in debates on whether the new Iraq would be an Islamicist “Sharia” state. In the end Sharia was not NOT officially embraced. Each faction got in something of what they wanted into the text, something they’ll want to see expanded on in the future. As it stands, the Islamists are happy with what they got, namely, a document which doesn’t outlaw the Sharia (which one could argue a real democratic vision WOULD do), so that SHOULD an attempt be made, say, to compel Christians who refuse to convert to pay the ‘jizya’ (tax), no one opposing the move will be able to do so on the basis of the text of the Constitution per se. But that’s not the same as saying that just because the jizya is Sharia law that it becomes Iraq’s national law. Specific laws will have to become law in the specified manner, and a proposal to make the ‘jizya’ tax a law may in fact fail that process.

What the provision stressed by the portion you quoted aims to prevent is a law stating that the ‘jizya’ tax shall not be employed because it’s illegal. The Constitution forbids the passing of laws which themselves outlaw the Sharia. It does not make all Sharia law the law of the land in one fell swoop.

--------------------------

TA: The American invasion was meant to install democracy and fresh hope. However, democracy is a long way away and secular law, which protected the rights of Christians, women, minorities, and others, during the reign of Saddam Hussein, was replaced by Islamic Sharia law.

Tom: What law protected Kurds and Shi'ites against Saddam gassing and exterminating them? Come on.

TA: Please explain two things for me.
1. What was our true objective for waging war in Iraq?
2. What exactly is our interest there today that rationalizes a continued presence?

Tom: I’m disinclined to oblige your request for any such explanation. It has nothing to do with my objection to what you said. You said that (1) under Saddam minorities were protected. That's clearly not true. And you said that (2) all the so-called protections minorities enjoyed under Saddam have been “replaced by Sharia law,” which is also simply not true.

I’m not defending US presence or the Iraqi Constitution. I’m just disagreeing with you that the Constitution amounts to a wholesale embracing of Sharia law, and that minorities enjoyed full democratic rights under Saddam. Neither is actually the case.

I actually don’t hold out much hope for democracy in Iraq (or any Muslim country). I think Islam and democratic values are inherently incompatible. If I’m wrong, there’s certainly no Muslim state I know of that demonstrates that I’m wrong and much about every Muslim state to suggest I’m right.

In the end, it doesn’t matter what the text of a Constitution says. That’s the whole problem. The Iraqis could adopt virtually unchanged our own Constitution. In the end they have not as a society assimilated the values that make it possible for a society to bind themselves to such a document when the nation enters the furnace of trial and tribulation. They don’t SEE themselves and the world democratically and so cannot LIVE with themselves and others in it democratically. There are exceptions, but not enough to stay the tide.

Heck, look at Lebanon. They’ve got a Constitution that guarantees religious freedom and equal rights for minorities in the sense we westerners think of it. And I know of Muslim converts who have won in court. The State there HAS respected its own laws. So far as ‘constitution’ and ‘law’ are concerned, you have as good a foundation in Lebanon as any. The problem is that there’s no telling what will happen to the convert when he leaves the courtroom. Likely he’ll be killed. And just like what happens in other Middle Eastern countries, nothing will be done. They won’t try and convict a Muslim for acting consistently with Sharia law (not here in the Middle East at least), but that’s not to say they make following Sharia legally incumbent either. There’s no law in Lebanon that requires converts be killed, and while there are laws the grant converts legal status and protection, no real action is taken to protect the convert out in the world.

The problem is that westerners assume that if they can just get the Iraqis (or others) to sign off on a document of rights and values and good laws, etc., that they’ll secure REAL freedom and democracy out on the streets and in homes and neighborhoods where it counts. That’s the problem. The text of a good constitution will only be as predictably stabilizing a force as do the people choose to be ruled by it. And people only choose to be ruled by it if they value it, and I’m sorry to say that Muslims by in large do not value it. Muslims in America value it for themselves and others so long they themselves are a minority. But look at history. Once in the majority, Muslim sentiments and their vision of the world either changes or reveals itself for what it always was.

Sorry to be so negative about it. But I’ve no reason I can see to be positive about Islam. I’ve lived out here too long.

T

Post Edited (Tom) : 10/18/2008 1:19:52 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 10/18/2008 11:30 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
TA-

Are you a pacifist? The thread's title suggests as much, though I haven't followed up on your opening link. I mean, if you are, then you'll always view war as the more evil option, and thus never good for anything (even securing a less evil outcome). But if you're not a pacifist, then you grant that there are cases when war is the least evil option, in which cases war is good for something (namely, securing the least evil outcome). I suppose if you asked Jewish survivors of the Holocaust, they'd suggest that war can sometimes be good in this sense.

T
Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 10/18/2008 11:38 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Jewish survivors of the Holocaust are not a monolithic group when it comes to this issue.
Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 10/18/2008 1:24 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sure. Look, it's possible to find supporters and believers in EVERY conceivable point of view. Are there Jews who think the Allied invasion of Germany to stop Hitler and the death camps was a WORSE evil than not invading and letting Hitler succeed at gassing every Jew he got his hands on? Hey, I wouldn't be surprised.

T
Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 10/20/2008 2:45 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom said...
TA-
Are you a pacifist? The thread's title suggests as much, though I haven't followed up on your opening link. I mean, if you are, then you'll always view war as the more evil option, and thus never good for anything (even securing a less evil outcome). But if you're not a pacifist, then you grant that there are cases when war is the least evil option, in which cases war is good for something (namely, securing the least evil outcome). I suppose if you asked Jewish survivors of the Holocaust, they'd suggest that war can sometimes be good in this sense. T

No, I’m absolutely not a pacifist, Tom.  However, you could say I’m a pacifist sympathizer when It comes to dumb and avoidable wars.  cool

I appreciate your empirical knowledge of the conditions in Iraq, Tom.  Understandably, I suspect we all have some level of bias towards the war in Iraq.  My perspective, on justifying the Iraq war, dramatically changed earlier this year when I suddenly found myself holding a more vested love interest, please let me explain.  

 

Five months ago, my nineteen year old son, Preston, ascribed to the Generation Kill mentality.  He was on the verge of being sworn into the Army National Guard as a Calvary Scout.  Most likely, he would have been stationed in Iraq, on dangerous front lines searching for explosives, sometime within a year.  Fortunately before making a final decision, I intercepted his plans and convinced him to talk with some veterans that persuaded him to take a firsthand look at the Air Guard.  My wife and I are relieved that he eventually signed with the Air National Guard, 133rd Airlift Wing.  I'm proud to say he will be successfully completing the first phase of medical training in Taxes later this month and will soon be starting a nine month internship at an Air Force base in Ohio, this will complete his training as a Radiologist Technician.  Preston might then be part of the next mission, if the need arises for a aeromedical evacuation.  

 

As far as your other post, I will respond as soon as I can.  In the meantime, you might find it useful to read a little bit about the co-founder of the Baath Party... Michel Aflag.  His Christian influence in Iraq, before Operation Iraq Freedom, could prove useful to my argument since the Baath party had a significant number of  Arabic-speaking Christians among its founding members.

Post Edited (Truth Aficionado) : 10/20/2008 3:06:32 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 10/20/2008 3:06 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I'm happy your son Preston opted out of a combat orientation. I know a little how you feel. My nephew (we're close), finished college, and at 22 surprised everybody (informing and counseling with nobody) showed up one day having signed with the Marines. He's a gunner on his way out here, and definitely has the GK mentality. I don't get it. He went to Liberty U in VA!

Blessings,
T
Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 10/24/2008 10:13 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Tom: I actually don’t hold out much hope for democracy in Iraq (or any Muslim country). I think Islam and democratic values are inherently incompatible. If I’m wrong, there’s certainly no Muslim state I know of that demonstrates that I’m wrong and much about every Muslim state to suggest I’m right.

 

Mark: Thanks Tom for all your input on this matter, it brings some clarification to the conditions in Iraq, as well the Muslim world.   BTW, It sounds like most Iraqi Christians fled to Jordan.  What do you think of Jordan?   Their constitution requires that the Jordan Parliament seats eight Christians in the House of Representatives.   I recently watched an interview with the Queen of Jordan, she seems to give reason, for at least a glimmer of hope, that freedom of religion can take place in Jordan.  

 

 

Our American freedom should instill an attitude of gratitude.   Keep hope alive, our Triune God of love and truth will prevail.

 

Thanks,

 

Mark

 

 

p.s. We need more prayer warriors and less wars.  May God guide and protect your nephew as well as all of God's children.

 

Post Edited (Truth Aficionado) : 10/24/2008 10:19:11 AM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Truth Aficionado
Registered Member




Date Joined Dec 2003
Total Posts : 1544
 
   Posted 10/26/2008 9:33 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Christians face growing attacks in eastern India -Violence has left at least 38 people dead and as many as 30,000 homeless

In this corner of the eastern state of Orissa, it's hard to find a Christian who isn't afraid.

Bloody anti-Christian riots broke out here in late August, rampages by Hindu hard-liners that since then have left at least 38 people dead, as many as 30,000 homeless and dozen of churches destroyed. The worst of the violence ended after a week or so, when authorities finally deployed soldiers to set up checkpoints and relief camps.

But nearly every day since then, the trouble has continued: a house burned, a carload of people beaten, a soldier hacked to death. Repeatedly, Christian villagers say, they have been told they must convert to Hinduism.

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 4:41 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads