Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
59 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Corey
Five with a Four-wing




Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1893
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 7:36 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tyler helped me get a copy of the article that Tom has mentioned, and I've scanned it and made it available here:
http://www.spti.org/files/Jesus%20-%20the%20one-natured%20God-man.pdf
If I get some time later I'll do an OCR version, which will be lighter weight and easier to read.


Before God, in grace, we will with all our power to be that which He shows us we are.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 7:39 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks much, Corey. ;-)


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 7:41 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Wow.

He's saying that Chalcedon was wrong. (It' s in the summary paragraph at the top.)

No WONDER Tom's been on what he's been on. And no WONDER we've been clashing like we have for all these months!!

Sheesh... rotfl

Can't wait to read this.

 

 


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 

Corey
Five with a Four-wing




Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1893
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 7:50 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
FYI, the original version I posted had part of the page cut off. I've replaced it with a better copy.


Before God, in grace, we will with all our power to be that which He shows us we are.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 8:23 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Immediate thoughts.  Just scanned though...
 
 
I'm interested in Leigh's idea of "...it may not be necessary to be omniscient in order to be God."
 
For this reason...
 
Greg's view of "divine existence" involves infinite, eternal, ever-moving perception, appreciation, and satisfication by beautiful personal experience. (one's personal love relationship with the Triune God).  "Unsurpassably intense aesthetic satifaction" from God's own self-awareness, self-choosing, and self-loving.  What's interesting is that, given dispositional ontology, it is NOT IMPOSSIBLE for two dispositions (one divine, one non-divine) to "converge" in one CREATURELY act.  The Incarnate Word, AS HUMAN BEING with non-divine concrescence, could be experiencing divine reality in fully "indwelling" his humanity.  Said another way...Jesus, being the Son, had an "unsurpassably intense aesthetic satifaction" from his love relationship with the Father in/and the Holy Spirit.  His human will functioned like it was supposed to...and his humanity was DEIFIED.
 
(Freaky part: Jesus was STILL "unsurpassably intensely aesthetically satisfied" even IN THE MIDST of all the depths of the suffering. (For the joy set before him, he endured the Cross, right? biggrin ) STILL following God's will to the uttermost.  Never breaking the Great Commandments.  Never ceasing to be fully God or fully human.) 
 
But all this shows is that human beings really CAN experience divine life.  There is enough similarity in the analogy that makes this possible.  Human and divine personal existence are NOT mutually exclusive in every way, experientially speaking.  And that makes sense to me.
 
This does not show that the two-natures/two-wills thing is wrong.  From my perspective (right now), the two natures perspectives is ultimately meant to shield from MONOTHELITISM...basically, at least functionally, ending up where because there's only ONE PERSON (and that person MUST be the ONLY BEGOTTEN UNCREATED DIVINE PERSON, The Eternal Son and Image of the Father)...who uses their ONE WILL (No TWO wills, divine and human (6th Ecumenical Council) )...of the ONE DIVINE PERSON to save humanity.
 
If this is true, then Jesus was NOT a human "just like we are".  He would FUNCTIONALLY be God in a human "flesh suit" , from what I would understand...
 
Anyways...just immediate thoughts...more reading...
 
reading 


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 9:28 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Unless Christ is *what we are* (hence: "without mixture or change";-) he can not be our salvation.


(o)

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 9:44 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Hopko mentioned the western tradition of beginning with the concept of a divine nature and then introducing differentiation of perosns by the variences in relationships.

But biblically, and according to tradition, the divinity of God is founded on the one Father, hence the One God\... "and His Son... (who is also difine) ... and his Spirit (who is also divine) -- not three Gods.

.

The Son chose to do everything according to his humanity, that, according to Irenaus of Leon, Christ might save all of humanity ad creation. But he never ceased to be divine. (Sooooo.... I think the author of figure 4 is too scholastic, like the Heidelberg Confession that believes that right now Christ is limited to one "place" that is heaven, and that Communion is only by the spirit raising our spirits up to Him, as they believe the other impossible, for some reason. Christ is not limited in omnicience or omnipotence, but he did "bow the heavens down to the earth.")


(o)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 9:55 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Bruce:
Unless Christ is *what we are* (hence: "without mixture or change" ), he can not be our salvation.

Exactamundo. ;-)


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 11:12 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Leigh says that he's not an monophysite, (Note 27 on Pages 133-134) and in that, I think that he's correct.

But...

He is obviously a miaphysite  (NOT a dyophysite ), which, I believe, inevitably leads to monothelitism.
And that's important for the purpose of OUR SALVATION. (What is not assumed is not healed)

He dodges one heresy...but then falls smack dab into another.

Just my opinion...  icon_bandit
 
Your thoughts, Tom?


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Post Edited (Love's Child) : 8/5/2008 11:17:54 AM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 11:33 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Maybe this is the question...

Can one be a miaphysite WITHOUT being a monothelite?

I don't see it being possible. But I'm definitely open to seeing something different.

Tom?


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 2:09 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Well?


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 2:13 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I'll have to re-read it. It's been at least 10 years. But as I remember, it's not so much that Chalcedon was wrong substantially. He agrees for example that Christ possessed all those natural attributes constitutive of divinity as well as those constitutive of humanity. THAT'S the point. Leigh just says it makes better sense to say these attributes coinhere in one nature (given what a 'nature' is). I'll have another look.

Tom
Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 2:30 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Introductory Blurb--Christian Scholar's Review, page 124

Like Stephen T. Davis, Ronald W. Leigh responds here to the challenge presented by the formula of Chalcedon: Jesus Christ, truly God and truly man, is one person with two natures, divine and human. His provocative solution is that Chalcedon is wrong; neither Scripture nor sound theology requires the two-nature model of Jesus Christ. Mr. Leigh teaches at Fort Wayne Bible College.


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 2:34 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
See...THIS is why you were saying all that "one spirit, two natures-in-Christ" stuff before, Tom...AND why you weren't fazed about Chalcedon possibly being WRONG. Remember all that?

THIS had been the model you'd been going by.

Man...NOW things make sense with why you've been saying what you were...
 
yeah


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 3:31 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
His point is that Chalcedon is wrong to deny that the unity of those kind-essential attributes belonging to divinity and those kind-essential attributes belonging to humanity combine in one nature. He doesn't deny that Jesus is fully divine and fully human. He's orthodox in THAT respect. You do see this don't you?

Tom
Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 3:33 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
D: I'm interested in Leigh's idea of "...it may not be necessary to be omniscient in order to be God."

Tom: Interestingly, Ed Moore, a Greek Orthodox priest, said the same thing to me. He said he's moving toward a kenotic view of the incarnation. "Something's gotta give," I think is what he told me. I'm not saying I agree. Just wondering where that places him within the EO.

T
Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 4:39 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom:
His point is that Chalcedon is wrong to deny that the unity of those kind-essential attributes belonging to divinity and those kind-essential attributes belonging to humanity combine in one nature. He doesn't deny that Jesus is fully divine and fully human. He's orthodox in THAT respect. You do see this don't you?

I understand his point. Yes, he's miaphysitic, which is NOT monophysitism. And miaphysitism is NOT totally incompatible with the idea of Jesus being fully divine and fully human.  I've said that already.  But that still doesn't help the monothelitism.  He doesn't even ADDRESS that issue. Don't YOU see that, Tom?


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 10:18 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom said...
His point is that Chalcedon is wrong to deny that the unity of those kind-essential attributes belonging to divinity and those kind-essential attributes belonging to humanity combine in one nature. He doesn't deny that Jesus is fully divine and fully human. He's orthodox in THAT respect. You do see this don't you?

Tom
No, that looks confusing. Can you say it again. Thanks.


(o)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 10:37 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Bruce,

Tom is saying that Leigh's point is this: the 4th (and correspondingly, the 6th) Council concept of Christ having two distinct natures (corresponding to two distinct wills) is unnecessary to say that Jesus is fully God and fully human.  And to Leigh and Tom, THAT claim of Jesus' full divinity and humanity forms the "essentials" of Chalcedon.  (Which is why miaphysites will strongly object to being considered heretical in that sense)   A single "nature" can be possessed by God the Son that has the "kind-essential attributes" (or defining characteristics) of both divinity and humanity. This is just another way about talking about miaphysitism. Jesus has one "nature" (The God-Human nature) where divine traits/characteristics and human traits/characteristics are united in that one nature without confusion or separation in a single "individual-essential" expression.

Just straight miaphysitism. Tom says it himself in a quote on another thread...

-------------------
 

Wiki: In recent theological discourses, some Eastern Orthodox...have begun to embrace this Christology [miaphysitism] as being consistent with, though different from, the Chalcedon formulation.

 

Tom: Yes. Different in the manner of expression and formulation, but not contrary to the essentials being affirmed.

 

Ronald W. Leigh, “Jesus: The one-natured God-man.” Christian Scholars Review 11, no. 2: 124-137. It’s fun. Give it a try!

 


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Post Edited (Love's Child) : 8/5/2008 10:45:08 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/5/2008 11:07 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
The Sixth Ecumenical Council. 
 
-----------------------------------------------
 
Following the five holy Ecumenical Councils and the holy and approved Fathers, with one voice defining that our Lord Jesus Christ must be confessed to be very God and very man, one of the holy and consubstantial and life-giving Trinity, perfect in Deity and perfect in humanity, very God and very man, of a reasonable soul and human body subsisting; consubstantial with the Father as touching his Godhead and consubstantial with us as touching his manhood; in all things like unto us, sin only excepted; begotten of his Father before all ages according to his Godhead, but in these last days for us men and for our salvation made man of the Holy Ghost and of the Virgin Mary, strictly and properly the Mother of God according to the flesh; one and the same Christ our Lord the only-begotten Son of two natures unconfusedly, unchangeably, inseparably indivisibly to be recognized, the peculiarities of neither nature being lost by the union but rather the proprieties of each nature being preserved, concurring in one Person and in one subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons but one and the same only-begotten Son of God, the Word, our Lord Jesus Christ, according as the Prophets of old have taught us and as our Lord Jesus Christ himself hath instructed us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers hath delivered to us; defining all this we likewise declare that in him are two natural wills and two natural operations indivisibly, inconvertibly, inseparably, inconfusedly, according to the teaching of the holy Fathers.  And these two natural wills are not contrary the one to the other (God forbid!) as the impious heretics assert, but his human will follows and that not as resisting and reluctant, but rather as subject to his divine and omnipotent will.  For it was right that the flesh should be moved but subject to the divine will, according to the most wise Athanasius.  For as his flesh is called and is the flesh of God the Word, so also the natural will of his flesh is called and is the proper will of God the Word, as he himself says:  “I came down from heaven, not that I might do mine own will but the will of the Father which sent me!” where he calls his own will the will of his flesh, inasmuch as his flesh was also his own.  For as his most holy and immaculate animated flesh was not destroyed because it was deified but continued in its own state and nature (ὄρῳ τε καὶ λόγῳ), so also his human will, although deified, was not suppressed, but was rather preserved according to the saying of Gregory Theologus:  “His will [i.e., the Saviour’s] is not contrary to God but altogether deified.”

We glorify two natural operations indivisibly, immutably, inconfusedly, inseparably in the same our Lord Jesus Christ our true God, that is to say a divine operation and a human operation, according to the divine preacher Leo, who most distinctly asserts as follows:  “For each form (μορφὴ) does in communion with the other what pertains properly to it, the Word, namely, doing that which pertains to the Word, and the flesh that which pertains to the flesh.”

For we will not admit one natural operation in God and in the creature, as we will not exalt into the divine essence what is created, nor will we bring down the glory of the divine nature to the place suited to the creature.

We recognize the miracles and the sufferings as of one and the same [Person], but of one or of the other nature of which he is and in which he exists, as Cyril admirably says.  Preserving therefore the inconfusedness and indivisibility, we make briefly this whole confession, believing our Lord Jesus Christ to be one of the Trinity and after the incarnation our true God, we say that his two natures shone forth in his one subsistence in which he both performed the miracles and endured the sufferings through the whole of his economic conversation (δἰ ὅλης αὐτοῦ τῆς οἰκονομκῆς ἀναστροφῆς), and that not in appearance only but in very deed, and this by reason of the difference of nature which must be recognized in the same Person, for although joined together yet each nature wills and does the things proper to it and that indivisibly and inconfusedly.  Wherefore we confess two wills and two operations, concurring most fitly in him for the salvation of the human race.


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Post Edited (Love's Child) : 8/5/2008 11:16:46 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 8/6/2008 2:09 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I'll try to download it today. Does Leigh even talk about two wills? I think he never even brings it up.

I wonder where he's at today on this, 'cause the article was written some time ago.

T
Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 8/6/2008 4:30 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Well, read through it. I remember liking this article years ago. I still like it. I think from the standpoint of classification and nomenclature he's right on. But however we phrase/classify our description of Christ, we're still left with problems; like omniscience. Leigh has to toss that as unessential to divinity. I can't do that.

Oh well. If we're still asking these questions without any really good answers after 2,000 years, I don't see the point in pursuing it. Cop out? Perhaps. But I have to invest the little time I have left in living, not chasing white rabbits.

T
Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/6/2008 7:02 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
D: I'm interested in Leigh's idea of "...it may not be necessary to be omniscient in order to be God."

Tom: Interestingly, Ed Moore, a Greek Orthodox priest, said the same thing to me. He said he's moving toward a kenotic view of the incarnation. "Something's gotta give," I think is what he told me. I'm not saying I agree. Just wondering where that places him within the EO.


I don't know if the EO would have that much of a problem with the Kenotic view...

The Emptiness of Christ

The Emptiness of Christ

 

St. Paul speaks of Christ “emptying” Himself in His voluntary sacrifice for us all (Philippians 2:5-11). It is the only place in the New Testament that speaks of this particular action of Christ - at least as an “emptying” (kenosis) but the concept has always played a large role in the Church’s understanding of Christ’s death on the Cross.

It is interesting to me that Father Sophrony, in his writings, takes this idea of kenosis and applies it as well to the “not-I-but-the-Father” sayings: “I live by the Father” (Jn. 6:57; cf 5:30, 7:18, 15:15).

Fr. Nicholas Sakharov says of Father Sophrony’s point:

Christ, though the incarnate God, avoids any “divine action” of his own, so much so that the Father’s hypostasis [Person] is manifest absolutely through the absolutely “transparent screen” of Christ’s self-emptied hypostasis. Through this kenosis it becomes the “express image of the Father” (Heb. 1:3).

This, it seems to me, says much to us about what it means to become “like Christ.” The moralist approach (which I was taught as a child) is fraught with constant attention to “what would Jesus do?” in a moral calculation that can never end in anything but failure or delusion.

When St. Paul speaks of conformity to the image of Christ it is always clear that this is not something we accomplish, but something that is accomplished within us by God. In particular he says:

I am crucified with Christ, nevertheless I live, yet not I, but Christ liveth in me. And the life that I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God who loved me and gave Himself for me (Gal. 2:20).

Here is our own kenosis or emptying. “Not-I-but-Christ.” And thus we become transparent and finally transparent such that we are His image. This is not an effort of moralism, but a self-offering to God. And so St. Paul writes:

I appeal to you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that you may prove what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect (Romans 12:1-2).


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Post Edited (Love's Child) : 8/6/2008 7:05:16 AM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/6/2008 7:12 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom:
Well, read through it. I remember liking this article years ago. I still like it. I think from the standpoint of classification and nomenclature he's right on. But however we phrase/classify our description of Christ, we're still left with problems; like omniscience. Leigh has to toss that as unessential to divinity. I can't do that.

Oh well. If we're still asking these questions without any really good answers after 2,000 years, I don't see the point in pursuing it. Cop out? Perhaps. But I have to invest the little time I have left in living, not chasing white rabbits.


Sooo...

Does this mean you are gonna stop saying that I'm NESTORIAN because of my holding to the 4th and 6th Councils? And does this mean that you will admit that your miaphysitism NECESSARILY LEADS to monothelitism (where Christ-the-Logos is only seen to have ONE will corresponding to his ONE "nature" )? You and I have been going around this bush for about a year, homie. I'd like to know where we stand on this. Can you at least see that I have the proponderance of evidence for my own belief in Christ's two-wills or his two-natures...instead of miaphysitism?


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/6/2008 7:38 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
It's now no wonder why Christians begin to convert to Historic Orthodoxy the more they find out about it.

It MAKES SENSE of Judeo-Christian belief of the Bible...where (in my opinion) the significant Protestant DESACRALIZATION and MORALIZATION of the Christian worldview drives people to craziness and unending hypocrisy.

Damn.

;-)


See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know him. Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.  All who have this hope in him purify themselves, just as he is pure.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
59 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 4:23 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads