Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > What is it like to think?  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
32 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

markporter
Fire over Oxford




Date Joined Oct 2003
Total Posts : 263
 
   Posted 3/30/2009 6:25 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom: Well, the only thing I’m actually ‘conscious’ of is the resultant meaning

Mark: OK, but here we come full circle again - I can't *feel* this meaning, I can't *see* it, I can't *imagine* it, there's nothing in my consciousness which I can latch onto and say "look, meaning"
Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 3/30/2009 7:08 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
You definitely feel it. If I say "apple pie" you feel one thing If I say "a bucket of crap" you feel another. If I say "God is love" (very abstract, right?) you feel one thing. If I say "child abuse" you feel another. It's not physical sensation (feeling). It's psychological. The meaning and associated feelings are 'perceived' and can (if the history is right) even be experienced all over again (fear, trauma, etc.). Or if I say "Come on Mark, you're not being honest here. Stop being disingenuous," you feel one thing. If I say, "I can really appreciate the struggle you're having with this issue," you feel another. I'm not sure there is any meaning apart from feeling. And push come to shove, I might say the truest and most primary form of meaning IS feeling.

T
Back to Top
 

markporter
Fire over Oxford




Date Joined Oct 2003
Total Posts : 263
 
   Posted 3/30/2009 3:44 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom: Come on Mark, you're not being honest here. Stop being disingenuous

Mark: I'd have to agree with you to some extent, because there is a degree to which I know these things must be all the things I'm denying they are, but it's one of those things that I'm trying to get a handle on.

Tom: If I say, "I can really appreciate the struggle you're having with this issue,"

Mark: I'd also have to agree, because I think you'd probably agree with some of the issues at stake here - we can't pinpoint these feelings in the same way we can others, in fact they're *really* hard to put a finger on. You might also agree that there's something weird having a thought that means "water" without anything particularly watery going around anywhere in your imagination or sensations.
Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 3/30/2009 4:28 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hey Mark, when I said "If I say, 'Come on Mark, you're not being honest here. Stop being disingenuous'," you know I didn't meant that. I was just trying to drum up something on the mean end to hold beside something on the nice end.

;o)
Back to Top
 

markporter
Fire over Oxford




Date Joined Oct 2003
Total Posts : 263
 
   Posted 3/30/2009 5:09 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Heh, of course I know you didn't exactly mean the things, but I thought each had a faint whiff of something about them that could be injected back into the conversation
Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 3/31/2009 12:48 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Mark: I thought each had a faint whiff of something about them that...

Tom: Ha! See? You're feeling the meanings.
Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 3/31/2009 6:23 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
And even if our distinctions are so vague as to merely "know" that a described sense/emotion is pleasurable or painful, or that aesthetic beauty is different than sympathetic pleasure, or hearing is different than seeing, or loud is different than soft, these distinctions can work for the intended meaning even at that vague of a level. We don't have to have a REAL and INTENSE sensory/emotional experience to get meaning from language about sensory/emotional experience.


 

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
32 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 6:04 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads