Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 11/29/2010 10:37 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Love alone defines things. So the true definition of a thing is what love considers it to be, and the value of a thing the beauty which love perceives in it. All other definitions and evaluations will prove in the end to be false and illusory.
 
 
What d'ya think?


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 11/29/2010 11:59 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Not that this is related to the above so much, but it's interesting reading:

 

http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=2291

 

Edward Beecher (History of Opinions on the Spiritual Doctrine of Retribution), quotes Thomas of Mopsuestia (Book V of De Creatura) as saying:

“God knew that men would sin in all ways, but permitted this result to come to pass, knowing that it would ultimately be for their advantage. For since God created man when he did not exist, and made him ruler of so extended a system, and offered so great blessings for his enjoyment, it was impossible that he should have not prevented the entrance of sin, if he had not known that it would be ultimately for his advantage….Therefore God divided the creation into two states, the present and the future. In the latter he will bring ALL to immortality and immutability. In the former he gives us over to death and mutability.”

Thomas of M. is also quoted by Hosea Ballou (From the Time of the Apostles to the Fifth General Council) as saying:

“The wicked who have committed evil the whole period of their lives shall be punished till they learn that, by continuing in sin, they only continue in misery. And when, by this means, they shall have been brought to fear God, and to regard Him with good will, they shall obtain the enjoyment of His grace. For He never would have said, ‘until thou hast paid the uttermost farthing,’ [Mat. 5:26] unless we can be released from suffering after having suffered adequately for sin; nor would He have said, ‘he shall be beaten with many stripes,’ [Luke 12:47] and again, ‘he shall be beaten with few stripes,’ [vs. 48] unless the punishment to be endured for sin will have an end.”

Interesting, eh?

 

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 11/30/2010 9:24 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
yep


(o)

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 12/1/2010 4:30 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tom:
Love alone defines things. So the true definition of a thing is what love considers it to be, and the value of a thing the beauty which love perceives in it. All other definitions and evaluations will prove in the end to be false and illusory.

Yessir. Perhaps this is why only seeing with the eyes of Love leads to seeing Creation rightly.


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:43 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads