Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 7/29/2011 10:39 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
An Orthodox friend directed me to this:
 
 
Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

Starkman
Registered Member




Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 1747
 
   Posted 7/30/2011 12:11 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
An excellent read, Tom? Man, it's a sad read. The poor fellow hasn't a clue as to what open theism is. He got off on all this mish-mash stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with open theism (at it's core). And I don't fault him, necessarily; I fault whomever he was researching. I mean, for pete's sake, when is it that this idea of God limiting his knowledge is ever going to be thrown out the door where it belongs? And all that stuff about the incarnation.

At any rate, it was sad. Not because it was the typical rebuttal stuff (thank heavens it wasn't), but because it only showed the fellow didn't have a clue...still, after all this time that the subject has been out in the open (no pun intended).

Well, that's my thought, anyway.

Thanks,

Starkman
Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 7/30/2011 8:55 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I did think it was interesting that he mentions Moltmann using the concept of Tzimtzum and it's roots in Kabbalah. I actually think something like this is the case...


Tzimtzum (Hebrew צמצום ṣimṣūm "contraction" or "constriction" )is a term used in the kabbalistic teaching of Isaac Luria, explaining his concept that God began the process of creation by "contracting" his infinite light in order to allow for a "conceptual space" in which a finite and seemingly independent world could exist. This contraction, forming an "empty space" (חלל הפנוי) in which creation could begin, is known as the Tzimtzum.

Because the Tzimtzum results in the conceptual "space" in which the physical universe and free will can exist, God is often referred to as "Ha-Makom" (המקום lit. "the place", "the omnipresent" )in Rabbinic literature. Relatedly, olam—the Hebrew word for "world" or universe—is derived from the root word עלם meaning "concealment". This etymology is complementary with the concept of Tzimtzum, in that the physical universe conceals the spiritual nature of creation.

...

A commonly held understanding in Kabbalah is that the concept of Tzimtzum contains a built-in paradox, requiring that God be simultaneously transcendent and immanent.

On the one hand, if the "Infinite" did not restrict itself, then nothing could exist—everything would be overwhelmed by God's totality. Thus existence requires God's transcendence, as above.

On the other hand, God continuously maintains the existence of, and is thus not absent from, the created universe. "The Divine life-force which brings all creatures into existence must constantly be present within them... were this life-force to forsake any created being for even one brief moment, it would revert to a state of utter nothingness, as before the creation..." . This understanding is supported by various biblical teachings: "You have made the heaven... the earth and all that is on it... and You give life to them all" (Nehemiah 9:6); "All the earth is filled with God's Glory" (Numbers 14:21); "God's Glory fills the world" (Isaiah 6:3). Creation therefore requires God's immanence.


Here's how I see it: The uncreated, "infinite" light (God Himself working on Creation's behalf perceived by hesychasts in theoria and the Tabor Light; the ultimate ground of all Creation; the light that is always shining in the void) is hidden from Creation "to conceal from created beings the activating force within them, enabling them to exist as tangible entities, instead of being utterly nullified within their source." This uncreated, infinite light CAN be perceived and participated in by persons who love God and, by Grace, have purified the eye of the soul (ala asceticism).


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Post Edited (One Love) : 7/30/2011 10:16:47 AM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 7/30/2011 9:36 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
On a different (UR) note. Check out this blog. Sweet!

http://www.julieferwerda.com/

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 7/30/2011 9:37 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Her husband's parents were friends of mine in Beirut years ago. Great people.

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 7/30/2011 9:40 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I noticed the EO blog on open theism above mentioned Bruce McCormack's article on open theism which MANY believe delivered a knock out blow to OV. I started working on a response to McCormack couple years ago but never finished it. He's beholded to Barth, and his whole critique depends upon his reading of Barth. I'm not into Barth so much. The more one appreciates EO the less one needs Barth. But anyhow.

Have you read McCormack's critique D? Keith?

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 7/30/2011 9:49 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
If you're interested, you can go here (https://www.dropbox.com/invite_register?email=opentheist%40hotmail.com&k=63c7e8e96fbaa2ac8f915d78b075348d&cont=/invite%3Fk%3D63c7e8e96fbaa2ac8f915d78b075348d). Just quickly sign up for a Dropbox account (free and supper easy), then you can store files online for other people to read (and open and comment on). I also have a bunch of Greg's Trinity&Process on there (the first chapter or two I think). McCormack's essay has a folder there too. All pdfs that you can download.

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 7/30/2011 10:14 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
No, I haven't read that, Tom.  But I will check it out now (thanks.) Didn't you say before that McCormack was the one who stood in front of Catholic priests and said that theosis was NOT true?  Hmmm...


Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 7/30/2011 11:35 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Yeah, something like that. The same guy. Heh. Greg and he were at Princeton at the same time. Greg had some convos with him but he was heading Barth-ward at the same time Greg was moving toward Hartshorne. Different worlds.

T


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:59 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads