 |
| Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > "Judge Not" and "Nicer than God" | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  selah Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1210 | Posted 6/19/2004 1:34 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by 1way
Selah - You don't seem very understanding of my viewpoint, God's teachings speak well what I believe.
selah: you are right, I don't understand.
1way: Judge with righteous judgment
selah: this seems to be speaking of discernment. God's teachings speak well of not judging.
quote: Lu 6:37 - "Do not judge, and you will not be judged; and do not condemn, and you will not be condemned; pardon, and you will be pardoned.
Mt 7:1 - "Do not judge so that you will not be judged.
Mt 7:2 - "For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you.
Selah re-posted
quote: 1way said: People who sin, they are in rebellion against God.
selah: (1) seriously 1way, I don't get it. when you speak of "people" who sin, how is it that you don't see yourself as one of "those people"?? I know I am...
(2) Ro 3:9 - What then? Are we better than they? Not at all; for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin;
(3) Ro 5:12 - Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned--
(4) Ro 5:20 - The Law came in so that the transgression would increase; but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more,
(5) Ro 6:10 - For the death that He died, He died to sin once for all; but the life that He lives, He lives to God.
selah added: I guess it seemed to me that throughout your posts you took great pleasure in highlighting other's sin...and in your/our duty to judge them. (At the very least, using cartoons and commenting on heaping coals on the heads of "sinners" seemed to me very unloving. I was going to pull quotes from your posts to prove my point, but I don't have it in me ...sorry)I was trying to say "Hey 1way, what about Loving our neighbor AS ourselves?" But, I didn't do a very good job. (I'm mostly in a rush when I visit this site...sorry again)
I was honest when I said Jo-Anne was/would be much more gracious than I in the way she relates on the board (I think she has more time too :) Anyway, I know I agree with her view so maybe I shouldn't have posted at all...sorry once more.
quote: (1Way) (1) Your presumption that I don't see myself as one who sins is rather insulting and potentially slanderous, although I simply deny that I ever even intimated any such notion. I would appreciate it if you would not invent some bad anti-scriptural ideas in me.
selah: As your sister in Christ, I love you 1way. I'm sorry for coming across presumptuous. I thought I was re-presenting what you said fairly. After all, it DID say "people who sin" -- "not when WE sin" right? Anyway, if you simply deny it, that's fine by me.
1way:quote:
I don't see a point in there except to say that in salvation, everyone who gets saved gets unmerited favor, our salvation is a wonderful thing. But were talking about people doing gross sin and evil, not if everyone needs to get saved or not.
selah: Well, I'm not into making points. Sometimes I just wonder about people who may be reading your "Scriptural" comments online. I was confused over what sins you were lifting out as "gross and evil" and what sins (rebellion against God) you were not...
1way:quote:
You posted a bunch of stuff that does not overturn the righteous commands and teachings and examples for us to abhor evil, abhor, the demonstratively harsher more intensive godly hatred!
Excommunication, righteous godly execution, personal heretical rejection, ridicule, rebuke, judging not outwardly but the inward man,
selah: this is a breathing break for those of us that need one here...
1way:quote:
capitol punishment is at the heart of the gospel,
selah: we could breathe again here. 1way, tell me you're kidding ...
1way:quote:
these are all godly teachings that do not contradict godly love, they all come from godly love (against evil and sin). There is no dichotomy between godly love and these sometimes-awful things. Please don't be ashamed of what God teaches us to believe.
selah: I just don't get it 1way. Are you saying that as much as we love, we should also hate, rebuke, ridicule the sinner - after we have judged the INNER man? (how do we judge the inner - man? I thought only God knew the heart. In my opinion,this is very confusing theology.)
1way:quote:
... So you have abhorrence, hatred, condemning judgment and rebuke, and then several layers lower than all that, you have discernment.
selah: Would you help me by showing me where you get this in scripture?
1way:quote:
Good luck with the rest. :)
selah: thanks.
"When we acknowledge that all of life is sacred and that each act is an act of choice and therefore sacred, then life is a sacred dance lived consciously each moment. When we live at this level, we participate in the creation of a better world."
Scout Cloud Lee | | Back to Top | | |
  |  selah Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1210 | Posted 6/19/2004 4:07 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by jefscott
Selah,
quote: Selah: 1way, here's my question: Since Scripture seems to say that all sin, where do we/you draw the line between "our" sin (the non-excommuting type) and "their" sin (the excommuting type)?? If you could answer this question it would help me a lot!!!!!!!!
Paul answered it this way:
1 Cor. 5:9 I wrote you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people. 5:10 In no way did I mean the immoral people of this world, or the greedy and swindlers and idolaters, since you would then have to go out of the world. 5:11 But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who calls himself a Christian who is sexually immoral, or greedy, or an idolater, or verbally abusive, or a drunkard, or a swindler. Do not even eat with such a person. 5:12 For what do I have to do with judging those outside? Are you not to judge those inside? 5:13 But God will judge those outside. Remove the evil person from among you.
Jefscott,
In short, consider this 1)Matthew 5:21-26 21 "You have heard that it was said to those of ancient times, "You shall not murder'; and "whoever murders shall be liable to judgment.' 22 But I say to you that if you are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to judgment; and if you insult a brother or sister,(verbally abusive?) you will be liable to the council; and if you say, "You fool,' you will be liable to the hell of fire. 2)Matthew 5:27-28 27 "You have heard that it was said, "You shall not commit adultery.' (sexually immoral) 28 But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart. ~NRSV
I have committed these sins. Who do you know who hasn't? When and where do we (the non-sexually immoral, non-greedy, non-verbally abusive etc) draw the line and refuse to associate with such people?
Further, who do you know in America who isn't guilty of Greed on a world wide scale? Idolatry? (come on!) drinking? swindling? {1. To cheat or defraud of money or property. 2. To obtain by fraudulent means: swindled money from the company.} How's your taxes??
can you hear me now? 
love selah "When we acknowledge that all of life is sacred and that each act is an act of choice and therefore sacred, then life is a sacred dance lived consciously each moment. When we live at this level, we participate in the creation of a better world."
Scout Cloud Lee | | Back to Top | | |
 |  selah Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1210 | Posted 6/19/2004 4:18 PM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 6/19/2004 4:22 PM (GMT -6) |   | Worth considering (though a long, scholarly read).
Mankind looks at the outside, and tries to fix that. God transforms the inside.
quote: Christos Yannaras, "Pietism as an Ecclesiological Heresy": Chapter 8 of The Freedom of Morality (St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, Crestwood, NY: 1984), pp. 119-136. jbburnett.com/resources/yannaras/yannaras_freedom08-pietism.pdf
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  1Heart Registered Member
 Date Joined Feb 2004 Total Posts : 1128 | Posted 6/19/2004 9:54 PM (GMT -6) |   | [quote]Originally posted by 1way
(You) As to being non-denom and I don't have to believe like you , man am I glad for that! I want a wonderful reception when I get to heaven, so I'm building my house of faith with the good and precious stuff. The way I believe is not that bad , and we need to work together towards a common united one mind faith, that is what God wants from us, so, to the extent that you are accepting of very diverse and even contrary views within Christianity, it is to that same extent that you risk violating God's word on the matter. Differences due to human inconsistencies is of course naturally tolerable, but entire systems of so called Godly doctrine that are at odds with each other, like judge not , verses the judge rightly deal, fundamentally represents a sort of liberty that God does not approve of.
(Me) 1 Way, I'm sorry. I wasn't implying that what you believe is bad and what I believe is good - just different. I think the basics are the same, and I believe that He will receive me with open arms as well in heaven. I'm sorry that you have judged me so quickly, but there is nothing I can do about that, and as is often quoted on this board - this is about ideas, not people. It is sad when people assume things, when they really do not have all the facts.
(You)Judge not is the hypocrites golden rule.
(Me) You have told me that I am a "judge not type" so according to this statement, I am a hypocrite as well. Thankfully I know who I am in Christ, and He is my righteousness.
(You)Shunning is not supposed to be polite and nice, you're supposed to reject them personally, turning them over to the devil, you wouldn't welcome a demon into your life, right. But I agree 100% that if they were to turn back in repentance, then open acceptance no doubt. Please consider my brown colored list in my post to Selah for further reflection and food for thought. Gotta run to the conference.
(Me) Enjoy the conference. No, I don't welcome demons. But, I haven't met any people lately that I would put in that class. I've already stated that there is a place for accountability, correction and even church discipline, with a view to restoration. I do not condone flogging or the rack.
(You) BTW, I love your tag line, but you can hold morality without being open view, but our morality seems way more meaningful because of authentic free will, yet an accurate Christian morality can be derived quite regardless of the open view. I love the open view big time, but I did not get it from these guys we keep hearing here at this web site.
(Me) Thank you, and neither did I. It was a personal journey that began with a book recommendation from a friend. The book was "God of the Possible."
I do not believe that I am someone that you would tolerate. Since that is the case, i don't think I would be sharing anything with you that is personal, such as why there is a hyphen in my name.
I wish you God's blessings, and hope that someday you might see we are part of the same team, not enemies. I don't believe that our conversation is a demonstration of loving one another. "By this shall all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." The litmus test of discipleship.
Perhaps that is a judgement on my part, and that should encourage you.
God Bless, Jo-Anne  "Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  selah Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1210 | Posted 6/20/2004 2:09 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by 1way (emphasis mine)
I am a believer in God, and I accept His word that being nice to an evil person is to concentrate heated bothersome trouble to his otherwise unbothered conscience.
or
Shunning is not supposed to be polite and nice, you're supposed to reject them personally,
Last thing 1way, which is it 1)"being nice" to an evil person is Godly or 2) ridicule, rebuke, shunning, and excommunicating?
quote: Now, it's harder to tell an advanced status nicer than God person, because, they have already learned how really intensely dumb it is to be a hypocrite. So instead of acting out their beliefs, they tend to avoid us not nicer than God folk, and keep their "nicer than God" "judge not" mentality to themselves. After all, it is terribly humiliating to act the hypocrite in front of all your friends. So they tend to withdraw, and so then you have to sort of read between the lines in order to find them out.
selah: I think I just fell off the "nicer than God" wagon...
why o why does this stuff bother me so?

I'd better go play video games for a few hours...
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  quest for truth Registered Member
 Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 479 | Posted 6/20/2004 3:19 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: selah: I think I just fell off the "nicer than God" wagon...
why o why does this stuff bother me so?
I'd better go play video games for a few hours...
Selah, retreating to vidoe games can be therapeutic. Sometimes Jesus also needed to retreat. What video game are you going to play? Let us know how it goes.
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Similitude Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2004 Total Posts : 4968 | Posted 6/20/2004 4:01 AM (GMT -6) |   | Selah,
quote: I have committed these sins. Who do you know who hasn't? When and where do we (the non-sexually immoral, non-greedy, non-verbally abusive etc) draw the line and refuse to associate with such people?
Further, who do you know in America who isn't guilty of Greed on a world wide scale? Idolatry? (come on!) drinking? swindling? {1. To cheat or defraud of money or property. 2. To obtain by fraudulent means: swindled money from the company.} How's your taxes??
Since the 1 Cor. passage AND the Matt. passage are BOTH true, they can't contradict. My way of resolving the apparent contradiction is to assume that adultery in 1 Cor. PROBABLY means actual, physical adultery, for we are not to judge people's heart. In addition, I assume that Paul is talking about one who habitually lives that way like the man who took his father's wife. If a person lives habitually and outwardly noticable in those ways without repentance, then we are to exercise church discipline. And since church discipline is a collective action, you will be acting with other's who also have to interpret the verses also. So it's not as though everything about church discipline is riding on one person's interpretation.
1 Tim. 6 and 2 Tim. give further advice as to which persons one is to avoid in one-on-one interaction. 2 Thessalonians gives another example of behavior that should be treated with church discipline. wjs | | Back to Top | | |
 |  selah Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1210 | Posted 6/20/2004 9:03 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by jefscott
Selah,
quote: I have committed these sins. Who do you know who hasn't? When and where do we (the non-sexually immoral, non-greedy, non-verbally abusive etc) draw the line and refuse to associate with such people?
Further, who do you know in America who isn't guilty of Greed on a world wide scale? Idolatry? (come on!) drinking? swindling? {1. To cheat or defraud of money or property. 2. To obtain by fraudulent means: swindled money from the company.} How's your taxes??
Since the 1 Cor. passage AND the Matt. passage are BOTH true, they can't contradict. My way of resolving the apparent contradiction is to assume that adultery in 1 Cor. PROBABLY means actual, physical adultery, for we are not to judge people's heart. In addition, I assume that Paul is talking about one who habitually lives that way like the man who took his father's wife. If a person lives habitually and outwardly noticable in those ways without repentance, then we are to exercise church discipline. And since church discipline is a collective action, you will be acting with other's who also have to interpret the verses also. So it's not as though everything about church discipline is riding on one person's interpretation.
1 Tim. 6 and 2 Tim. give further advice as to which persons one is to avoid in one-on-one interaction. 2 Thessalonians gives another example of behavior that should be treated with church discipline.
Well, I'm all for (well discerned and clearly needed) church discipline. What is hard for me Jeff, is that you and 1way seem to think this is paramount in the Christian life. I don't get it. You cite verses that prove you "get" to "do" church discipline (or in 1way's terms "shunning" "rebuking" and "ridicule") if it were me, I would dread doing that!
I guess I hoped Matthew 18 would come up as the loving way to work with someone ...or that the "excitement" over what we "get to do" would have been over RESTORING our brothers and sisters...rather than what has been said. In my opinion the focus is off...
Qft-snowboarding! Try it sometime it's so fun! love selah | | Back to Top | | |
   |  John Earp Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2002 Total Posts : 1715 | Posted 6/20/2004 4:18 PM (GMT -6) |   | Was Paul being unloving when he said the following?
2 Tim 4:2 preach the word; be ready in season {and} out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and instruction.
1 Tim 5:20 Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also will be fearful {of sinning.}
How might this God-ordained work of rebuke and discipline be put into practice in the context of a local body of believers? I am very aware that this is basically never practiced in modern evangelical churches, I'm just asking this sincerely--do we really want to be a New Testament church?
How does "sinning-all-the-time Christianity" line up with scriptural Christianity?
1 John 3:8 the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. The Son of God appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil. 9 No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
Finally, if sin is always inevitable and sinning is basically like breathing, how is God just for sending ANYONE to hell? Further, how does Paul NOT flatly contradict himself when he says, "Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? God forbid!"
I offer the above not to be combative, but sincerely as food for thought. I would sincerely like to hear what both sides in this discussion have to say about the above observations.
Thanks,
John
P.S.: The "judge not" crowd (also known of on this board as the "love, not judgment" crowd), judge those they think of as judgers. It happens constantly (like it is with 1way in this thread).
Psychologists tell us that everyone judges others all the time, even subconsciously. This being the case, it seems to me we must obey our Lord's directive to "judge righteous judgment."
I should add that I think everyone knows these facts deep down.
"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.
revivaltheology.net
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  selah Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1210 | Posted 6/20/2004 5:05 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by John Earp
Was Paul being unloving when he said the following?
2 Tim 4:2 preach the word; be ready in season {and} out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and instruction.
1 Tim 5:20 Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also will be fearful {of sinning.}
How might this God-ordained work of rebuke and discipline be put into practice in the context of a local body of believers? I am very aware that this is basically never practiced in modern evangelical churches, I'm just asking this sincerely--do we really want to be a New Testament church?
selah:
Hi John,
I think it's ok to (with much patience and instruction) reprove, rebuke, and exhort. But, don't we want to do this with someone who has already invited us in on their lives? The church back then was intimate. Many modern evangelical churches are not. As a New Testament Church today, I think we should do our rebuking with those we have a relationship with (that is the only way we can give much instruction right? Much instruction and patience presuppose we have TIME to do both...) Anyway, I don't want you to get the idea I'm against these things. I LOVE it when people (who are in on my life and KNOW me) exhort and rebuke my actions and help me with much patience and instruction! To be honest, I can't even imagine a genuine relationship where this isn't a part of it...on both sides.
quote:
How does "sinning-all-the-time Christianity" line up with scriptural Christianity?
1 John 3:8 the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. The Son of God appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil. 9 No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
selah: John, you sin. I sin. Help me draw the line between who is of the devil and who is not. All I'm asking you is...where is the line?
quote:
Finally, if sin is always inevitable and sinning is basically like breathing, how is God just for sending ANYONE to hell?
selah: GOD, who has all the knowledge of good and evil....and who knows the heart of man... ALSO knows where to draw the line. I don't think WE can say the same thing.
quote:
Further, how does Paul NOT flatly contradict himself when he says, "Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? God forbid!"
selah: Paul was talking to people who thought it was ok to sin because grace existed... I don't. God forbid. I would say to anyone (even if I was not in on their life) that sin is bad...avoid it.
quote:
I offer the above not to be combative, but sincerely as food for thought. I would sincerely like to hear what both sides in this discussion have to say about the above observations.
selah: I hope that made sense. I appreciate your comments.
quote:
P.S.: The "judge not" crowd (also known of on this board as the "love, not judgment" crowd), judge those they think of as judgers. It happens constantly (like it is with 1way in this thread).
selah: As an aside, I "get" the objection to the "judge-not" crowd. I see the problem with it. Perhaps it would be better to call these people (uh um...US) the "try not to judge because you don't know the whole story and would rather that your love cover a multitude of sins than mis-judge someone" crowd? THAT seems more fitting, if you ask me. Also, I pray 1way doesn't feel judged on this thread. Rather that he/she feels that I am wrestling with two very different theological concepts. One held by him/her. One held by others.
quote:
...I should add that I think everyone knows these facts deep down.
selah: I also know "deep down" that my flesh tends toward getting life from things in this world...does that mean that I should resolve myself to getting life from things of the world? OR, should I fight that tendency and keep telling myself who I am in Christ? I say fight it. The spirit says don't judge, the flesh judges. I have to fight continually to walk in the spirit... "When we acknowledge that all of life is sacred and that each act is an act of choice and therefore sacred, then life is a sacred dance lived consciously each moment. When we live at this level, we participate in the creation of a better world."
Scout Cloud Lee | | Back to Top | | |
 |  John Earp Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2002 Total Posts : 1715 | Posted 6/20/2004 5:22 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: How does "sinning-all-the-time Christianity" line up with scriptural Christianity?
1 John 3:8 the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. The Son of God appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil. 9 No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
selah: John, you sin. I sin. Help me draw the line between who is of the devil and who is not. All I'm asking you is...where is the line?
So we should just eliminate this passage from our Bibles?
The question is, "Is John (the Apostle) being hypocritical?" I don't think so. I also respectfully disagree with the implication/assertion that everybody sins all the time. The Scripture is clear that "he that practices sin is of the devil, and he that is born of God does not practice sin."
I should add that I do find that most people tend to define sin MUCH to ambiguously. My understanding is that sin is a (willful) transgression of a (known) law (moral obligation) - 1 John 3:4. 1 John also says "His commandments are not burdensome."
If it is true as Jesus and Paul and James and John said, that loving God and loving one's neighbor as oneself is the fulfilling of the law, and that as Scripture affirms, "His commandments are not burdensome" then it is clearly obligatory for all who call themselves Christians to "perfect holiness in the fear of the Lord" (2 Cor. 7:1) by loving God supremely and one's neighbor as oneself.
quote: Finally, if sin is always inevitable and sinning is basically like breathing, how is God just for sending ANYONE to hell?
selah: GOD, who has all the knowledge of good and evil....and who knows the heart of man... ALSO knows where to draw the line. I don't think WE can say the same thing.
But that's not the question I asked.
quote:
Further, how does Paul NOT flatly contradict himself when he says, "Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? God forbid!"
selah: Paul was talking to people who thought it was ok to sin because grace existed... I don't. God forbid. I would say to anyone (even if I was not in on their life) that sin is bad...avoid it.
But we CAN'T really be expected to avoid it consistently, now, can we? (According to your point of view).
Do you believe Jesus' words were inspired when He said, "judge righteous judgment?"
"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.
revivaltheology.net
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  John Earp Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2002 Total Posts : 1715 | Posted 6/20/2004 5:34 PM (GMT -6) |   | P.S.: I agree that we should be patient, gentle, and kind, even when we must judge, and that the NT epistles were addressed in the context of the loving relationships that made up the NT churches.
I also agree that we don't know enough about someone to judge someone (in the sense of ultimate condemnation); however, we do know enough to speak the truth IN LOVE, like Jesus, Paul, and all the Apostles and Prophets of the early church did.
"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.
revivaltheology.net
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  1Heart Registered Member
 Date Joined Feb 2004 Total Posts : 1128 | Posted 6/20/2004 8:47 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by John Earp
P.S.: I agree that we should be patient, gentle, and kind, even when we must judge, and that the NT epistles were addressed in the context of the loving relationships that made up the NT churches.
I also agree that we don't know enough about someone to judge someone (in the sense of ultimate condemnation); however, we do know enough to speak the truth IN LOVE, like Jesus, Paul, and all the Apostles and Prophets of the early church did.
John, I am not a cynical person, or a negative one, but what I see in the ministry is this: people gossip, the back bite, they judge with a legalistic judgement, or they withdraw because they are afraid of being hurt, and the reason they hurt is because people do not know "enought to speak the truth IN LOVE." That is what I see John.
What I don't see is: Christians speaking the truth in love, Christians walking alongside each other (bearing one another's burdens), Christians who are able to share their struggles openly without fear of condemnation. That is what I don't see.
Yes, there are exceptions. But they are rare.
You're right. Judgement is unavoidable. Perhaps the emphasis needs to be more on "how" we do it, rather than if we do it?
Jo-Anne "Sometimes all we can do is go back to the character of God, and drop anchor there."
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  selah Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1210 | Posted 6/20/2004 9:33 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by John Earp
quote: How does "sinning-all-the-time Christianity" line up with scriptural Christianity?
1 John 3:8 the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. The Son of God appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil. 9 No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
selah: John, you sin. I sin. Help me draw the line between who is of the devil and who is not. All I'm asking you is...where is the line?
quote:
So we should just eliminate this passage from our Bibles?
selah: nah, why do that?
quote:
The question is, "Is John (the Apostle) being hypocritical?" I don't think so. I also respectfully disagree with the implication/assertion that everybody sins all the time. The Scripture is clear that "he that practices sin is of the devil, and he that is born of God does not practice sin."
selah: well, I love John...so I'll say no, he's not being hypocritical. I didn't say everybody sins all the time. However, whenever we default to self-motives, self-focus/reliance, and self-ishness - we sin. Which means MOST of us SIN often! The only way to avoid that consistently is to have God/love and His motives at the center at all times.
quote:
I should add that I do find that most people tend to define sin MUCH to ambiguously. My understanding is that sin is a (willful) transgression of a (known) law (moral obligation) - 1 John 3:4. 1 John also says "His commandments are not burdensome."
selah: This sounds like a Wesleyan view of sin. Maybe I should ask if you believe it is possible to live a sin-less life?
quote:
If it is true as Jesus and Paul and James and John said, that loving God and loving one's neighbor as oneself is the fulfilling of the law, and that as Scripture affirms, "His commandments are not burdensome" then it is clearly obligatory for all who call themselves Christians to "perfect holiness in the fear of the Lord" (2 Cor. 7:1) by loving God supremely and one's neighbor as oneself.
selah: Amen! And, how is this possible? I think by realizing more and more who we are IN CHRIST... Though He noted how the world doesn't "get it", Jesus prayed that we would know true love (which is the only way we can have it for ourselves and give it to our neighbor - AS ourselves) in John 17:25"O righteous Father, although the world has not known You, yet I have known You; and these have known that You sent Me; 26and I have made Your name known to them, and will make it known, so that the love with which You loved Me may be in them, and I in them."
I think this is key. After all, if I "get" this, His commandments are certainly not burdensome.
quote: Finally, if sin is always inevitable and sinning is basically like breathing, how is God just for sending ANYONE to hell?
selah: GOD, who has all the knowledge of good and evil....and who knows the heart of man... ALSO knows where to draw the line. I don't think WE can say the same thing.
But that's not the question I asked.
selah: "how is God just for sending Anyone to hell?" He is just because He knows who's solified against Him in their heart. We, on the other hand, cannot know that...even if we know someone who sins all the live long day!
quote:
Further, how does Paul NOT flatly contradict himself when he says, "Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? God forbid!"
selah: Paul was talking to people who thought it was ok to sin because grace existed... I don't. God forbid. I would say to anyone (even if I was not in on their life) that sin is bad...avoid it.
quote: But we CAN'T really be expected to avoid it consistently, now, can we? (According to your point of view).
selah: Thanks for asking. Actually,to some degree, I do believe we can avoid it consistently. But, because of the interconnectedness of our being (the mind affects the body and sprit etc) it's a process. I will say this, as we persist in walking in love, our character solidifies. The more we do love, the less we sin... or biblically: Col 3:10 "we put on the new self" 2 Corinthians 3:18 But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as from the Lord, the Spirit. Galatians 5:13-17 13 For you were called to freedom, brothers and sisters; only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for self-indulgence, but through love become slaves to one another. 14 For the whole law is summed up in a single commandment, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." 15 If, however, you bite and devour one another, take care that you are not consumed by one another. 16 Live by the Spirit, I say, and do not gratify the desires of the flesh. 17 For what the flesh desires is opposed to the Spirit, and what the Spirit desires is opposed to the flesh; for these are opposed to each other, to prevent you from doing what you want.
quote:
Do you believe Jesus' words were inspired when He said, "judge righteous judgment?"
selah: Yes, discern with righteous judgement. Not "Judge", as is instructed in Romans... (do you believe the book of Romans is inspired?  )
0 But you, why do you judge your brother? Or you again, why do you regard your brother with contempt? For we will all stand before the judgment seat of God...12 So then each one of us will give an account of himself to God. 13 Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather determine this--not to put an obstacle or a stumbling block in a brother's way. 14 I know and am convinced in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself; but to him who thinks anything to be unclean, to him it is unclean. 15 For if because of food your brother is hurt, you are no longer walking according to love. Do not destroy with your food him for whom Christ died...19 So then we pursue the things which make for peace and the building up of one another...22 The faith which you have, have as your own conviction before God. Happy is he who does not condemn himself in what he approves. 23 But he who doubts is condemned if he eats, because his eating is not from faith; and whatever is not from faith is sin.
love selah "When we acknowledge that all of life is sacred and that each act is an act of choice and therefore sacred, then life is a sacred dance lived consciously each moment. When we live at this level, we participate in the creation of a better world."
Scout Cloud Lee | | Back to Top | | |
 |  selah Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1210 | Posted 6/20/2004 9:36 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by John Earp
P.S.: I agree that we should be patient, gentle, and kind, even when we must judge, and that the NT epistles were addressed in the context of the loving relationships that made up the NT churches.
I also agree that we don't know enough about someone to judge someone (in the sense of ultimate condemnation); however, we do know enough to speak the truth IN LOVE, like Jesus, Paul, and all the Apostles and Prophets of the early church did.
selah: ok. Amen. In small groups of people we know and love, perhaps. See, we agree! :)
Blessings and love, selah
"When we acknowledge that all of life is sacred and that each act is an act of choice and therefore sacred, then life is a sacred dance lived consciously each moment. When we live at this level, we participate in the creation of a better world."
Scout Cloud Lee | | Back to Top | | |
 |  John Earp Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2002 Total Posts : 1715 | Posted 6/21/2004 2:02 AM (GMT -6) |   | Originally posted by John Earp How does "sinning-all-the-time Christianity" line up with scriptural Christianity?
1 John 3:8 the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. The Son of God appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil. 9 No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
selah: John, you sin. I sin. Help me draw the line between who is of the devil and who is not. All I'm asking you is...where is the line?
John: So we should just eliminate this passage from our Bibles?
selah: nah, why do that?
John: Because it adamantly opposes the common view that sinning is inevitable. If sinning were inevitable, God is not just for condemning anyone for sinning. (And yet, that is precisely what the Bible says God does--He condemns people for sin).
The question is, "Is John (the Apostle) being hypocritical?" I don't think so. I also respectfully disagree with the implication/assertion that everybody sins all the time. The Scripture is clear that "he that practices sin is of the devil, and he that is born of God does not practice sin."
selah: well, I love John...so I'll say no, he's not being hypocritical. I didn't say everybody sins all the time. However, whenever we default to self-motives, self-focus/reliance, and self-ishness - we sin. Which means MOST of us SIN often! The only way to avoid that consistently is to have God/love and His motives at the center at all times. I completely agree.
I should add that I do find that most people tend to define sin MUCH to ambiguously. My understanding is that sin is a (willful) transgression of a (known) law (moral obligation) - 1 John 3:4. 1 John also says "His commandments are not burdensome."
selah: This sounds like a Wesleyan view of sin. Maybe I should ask if you believe it is possible to live a sin-less life?
John: My view is similar to the Wesleyan view, but it seems to me that the Wesleyan view does not go far enough. John Wesley believed that we were worthy of damnation just for being human, just like Calvin, Augustine, and most all western theologians, all of which were influenced by Augustine. Every one of the words in both Old and New Testaments translated "sin" or "transgression" denote willful activity.
I do believe we have libertarian free will, and that this means we have the power to will the contrary in any given moral situation; we are able to choose right if we are willing, with the Spirit's guidance and enablement. Moment by moment, we are able to choose life (righteousness) over death (sin). IF we sin, we have an Advocate with the Father, Christ Jesus the Righteous (1 John 2:1)
Do you believe we are worthy of hell simply for being human?
John: If it is true as Jesus and Paul and James and John said, that loving God and loving one's neighbor as oneself is the fulfilling of the law, and that as Scripture affirms, "His commandments are not burdensome" then it is clearly obligatory for all who call themselves Christians to "perfect holiness in the fear of the Lord" (2 Cor. 7:1) by loving God supremely and one's neighbor as oneself.
selah: Amen! And, how is this possible? I think by realizing more and more who we are IN CHRIST... Though He noted how the world doesn't "get it", Jesus prayed that we would know true love (which is the only way we can have it for ourselves and give it to our neighbor - AS ourselves) in John 17:25"O righteous Father, although the world has not known You, yet I have known You; and these have known that You sent Me; 26and I have made Your name known to them, and will make it known, so that the love with which You loved Me may be in them, and I in them."
I think this is key. After all, if I "get" this, His commandments are certainly not burdensome.
John: Great! I think we completely agree.
John: Finally, if sin is always inevitable and sinning is basically like breathing, how is God just for sending ANYONE to hell?
selah: GOD, who has all the knowledge of good and evil....and who knows the heart of man... ALSO knows where to draw the line. I don't think WE can say the same thing.
John: But that's not the question I asked.
selah: "how is God just for sending Anyone to hell?" He is just because He knows who's solified against Him in their heart. We, on the other hand, cannot know that...even if we know someone who sins all the live long day!
John: What I'm getting at is not character solidification but rather the basic, fundamental reason why anyone deserves God's righteous condemnation. People are not condemned for being human, for being relatively ignorant, etc. From Genesis to Revelation, "the wages of SIN is death." God sends people to hell because of sin. True, ultimate rejection of Him does in fact coincide with character solidification, but the grounds for our condemnation is because we have personally violated what we know to be right. (see Romans 1, 2,& 3 for the progression of total moral depravity).
As to the judge/discern distinction, I have said elsewhere that I agree completely with that distinction. The problem is, most professing Christians I've known have viewed ANY and all preaching/teaching against sin and for holiness (the basic message of the Bible) as "judgmental." We must first and foremost "judge ourselves, so that we not be condemned with the world" as Paul says in one of his letters.
I really appreciate your responses, selah. I find you candor quite refreshing. I hope you find my responses satisfactory. I will try and be back on the board later this evening.
God bless,
John
"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.
revivaltheology.net
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  1way Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 299 | Posted 6/21/2004 11:46 AM (GMT -6) |   | Repost from 6-18
John Earp - Wow, John Sanders and Greg Boyd, that would be most excellent, and only a 20 minuet drive from my place! I've personally met John Sanders and even Sat in on one of his classes where I was blessed to hear him do an absolutely wonderful job covering the whole hardening of Pharaoh's hart bit. We (a friend who lived nearer to the college) chatted with him after class, we chatted to his office, and somewhat after we got there too. We had a great time that day. It would be a great honor to be able to listen to Mr. Boyd and Mr. Sanders at that conference. That they have speakers on the open view is just plain exciting! Thanks for the info and suggestion, sounds great!
Repost from 6-19
John Earp - Ya, me too, conference details that is. Maybe some of us will be able to have a sort of get together, that would be great. And if your not sure about meeting me in person, ok, but when we get to heaven, I will not be so avoidable! 
I hope I am not on your excommunication list... Looking forward to your response. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  1way Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 299 | Posted 6/21/2004 12:06 PM (GMT -6) |   | Jo-Anne - That was somewhat personally harsh or denigrating. You do not reflect well with what I have been saying, nor my most recent post to you which was one of gladness and appreciation over your views including clarifications and some misunderstandings (where I gladly stood corrected).
It seems pretty clear that you are willing to judge against others even without sufficient information to well establish your conclusions/assumptions, good for you for judging, but might I suggest adding some patience and grace in between the reality that we may be getting "many things" in some way wrong.
I only had time to read your response quickly once, but it was far from corresponding to what I have been trying to say, and notably, I treat myself with the ideals as I treat anyone else. I was accepting of you and your explainations, and then you say I would not be accepting of you and your church, so I really don't understand where you are coming from with that sort of attitude. Also, I asked you to review the biblical teachings for my view, and I did not see you address them in that post. I am espousing a belief and obedience to God's word, I would hope you might at least appreciate that much...
I am writing this very quickly so I am sorry if I missed another post from you.
I don't really remember you asking much of me, you seemed pretty set in your judgments, and I especially remember the sense that you seem to not appreciate me for my views. So, if there is anything I can do to help that, I'd be glad to respond after I get back, which I do not expect will not be till sometime Friday or this weekend.
In the way truth and life | | Back to Top | | |
 |  1way Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 299 | Posted 6/21/2004 12:18 PM (GMT -6) |   | For everyone's sake, Jo-Anne's last post to me (that I read, long dialogue post) was not very corresponding to my side of the discussion, and in fact, seems to reflect a certain amount, even if a small amount, of personal animosity which is not in me. At this stage I would simply attribute this to simple misunderstandings that hopefully should be easily worked out. I just do not want anyone to get the wrong impression about me and my intentions.
I'll be back this weekend with particulars, until then, judge rightly and keep your love from hypocrisy, abhor evil, cling to good!
Blessings In the way truth and life, 1Way
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  selah Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1210 | Posted 6/21/2004 2:47 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by John Earp selah: This sounds like a Wesleyan view of sin. Maybe I should ask if you believe it is possible to live a sin-less life?
John: My view is similar to the Wesleyan view, but it seems to me that the Wesleyan view does not go far enough. John Wesley believed that we were worthy of damnation just for being human, just like Calvin, Augustine, and most all western theologians, all of which were influenced by Augustine. Every one of the words in both Old and New Testaments translated "sin" or "transgression" denote willful activity.
I do believe we have libertarian free will, and that this means we have the power to will the contrary in any given moral situation; we are able to choose right if we are willing, with the Spirit's guidance and enablement. Moment by moment, we are able to choose life (righteousness) over death (sin). IF we sin, we have an Advocate with the Father, Christ Jesus the Righteous (1 John 2:1)
selah: Often we rely on self, seek worth outside of that which Christ has already given (through status, attention, things of this world), and/or become self serving rather than self sacrificing. Do you think these are examples of sin? How about the times we are not loving? Those are often, indeed.
quote:
Do you believe we are worthy of hell simply for being human?
selah: Nope. If that were true Jesus would be guilty...
quote:
John: Great! I think we completely agree.
selah: Amen :)
quote:
selah: "how is God just for sending Anyone to hell?" He is just because He knows who's solified against Him in their heart. We, on the other hand, cannot know that...even if we know someone who sins all the live long day!
John: What I'm getting at is not character solidification but rather the basic, fundamental reason why anyone deserves God's righteous condemnation. People are not condemned for being human, for being relatively ignorant, etc. From Genesis to Revelation, "the wages of SIN is death." God sends people to hell because of sin. True, ultimate rejection of Him does in fact coincide with character solidification, but the grounds for our condemnation is because we have personally violated what we know to be right. (see Romans 1, 2,& 3 for the progression of total moral depravity).
selah: OK, I think we are viewing sin differently. You seem to be saying that it is centered around "sinful actions" while I am saying it is more about the god of self...
quote:
As to the judge/discern distinction, I have said elsewhere that I agree completely with that distinction. The problem is, most professing Christians I've known have viewed ANY and all preaching/teaching against sin and for holiness (the basic message of the Bible) as "judgmental." We must first and foremost "judge ourselves, so that we not be condemned with the world" as Paul says in one of his letters.
selah: I agree that being against sin and being for holiness are necessary things. I do not, however, believe this is the basic message of the Bible. The basic message of the Bible (in my view) is this: love God, love yourself as He loves you, and love others. If one does all these things, everything that needs getting done, gets done (GB). Decreased sin and holiness are natural by-products of living a life of love. This, in my view is the basic message of the Bible.
quote:
I really appreciate your responses, selah. I find you candor quite refreshing. I hope you find my responses satisfactory. I will try and be back on the board later this evening.
selah: Well, this is just so sweet. Thank you very much John. I appreciate your willingness to allow me to be myself and just speak from my guts. I'm also thankful for your answers (which are more than satisfactory) and for the opportunity to process this stuff out loud.
Bless you too, love selah "When we acknowledge that all of life is sacred and that each act is an act of choice and therefore sacred, then life is a sacred dance lived consciously each moment. When we live at this level, we participate in the creation of a better world."
Scout Cloud Lee | | Back to Top | | |
  | 122 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 3 4 5 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:37 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|