 |
| Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > more about James' bone box | Forum Quick Jump
|
| 
¡Que Payaso!
Registered Member
Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 108
| Posted 11/1/2002 8:04 PM (GMT -6) |   | Here are a few pieces I found which address the ossuary (bone box) of St. James. If you don't have the time or energy to read the articles in their entirity, I bolded and changed the color of the statements I thought were specially interesting.
The first article is by Todd Bolen written in response to a number of inquiries about this discovery. He is an instructor at IBEX in Israel. The second article appeared in the illustrious Daily Lobo, a daily paper published by the University of New Mexico. Finally, you can read a news report at the link below about how the ossuary was seriously damaged while being transported to a museum in Canada. You can also find some nice shots of the box on this page. story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=524&u=/ap/20021102/ap_wo_en_po/canada_jesus_inscription_6&printer=1"
Payaso 
==================================================
The Ossuary of James?
I have received a FLOOD of emails in the last 12 hours since this discovery was announced – and for good reason. This appears to be one of the most important archaeological discoveries related to the New Testament.
Coverage of the story includes that by CNN and the New York Times. But the original source for the story is Biblical Archaeology Review.
In brief, a box used for collecting the bones of the dead (ossuary) was found with an inscription which reads, “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.”
Analysis: this seems to be the ossuary of Jesus’ brother, James. Everything published thus far about this find accords with what we know from history. In addition, the author of the article is Andre Lemaire, a very highly respected scholar. The magazine it is published in, Biblical Archaeology Review (BAR), is also a respected publication. The article quotes several other scholars who are the best in the field, and these do not question the authenticity of the box. The biggest problem with this discovery is that it was not made in a proper archaeological excavation, but was instead purchased from the antiquities market. Thus the location and context cannot help to support or deny the genuineness of this find.
In conclusion, I agree with BAR editor’s assessment: “The James ossuary may be the most important find in the history of New Testament archaeology.” But I would add that it doesn't really change anything for believers, as there was never any doubt that these three figures existed or were related.
by Todd Bolen
==================================================
Daily Lobo - Opinion
Issue: 10/30/02
COLUMN: Coffin evidence questioned
by Craig A. Butler, Daily Lobo Columnist
This week, Andre Lemaire, a paleographer at Sorbonne University, released news of his discovery of an ossuary, a type of coffin common in 1st century Judea, that bears the epitaph, "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus." The inscription has created revived the age-old debate over whether Jesus Christ had siblings.
Although there is no way to positively link the ossuary with the James mentioned in the Bible, researchers have dated it to approximately the middle of the 1st century A.D. Ossuaries of this kind were uncommon after the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 and the style of the Aramaic script prevents it from having been created too much earlier than that. Since the Biblical James was stoned to death in A.D. 62 and presumably interred in his ossuary in 63, the newly discovered ossuary seems to fit the right time period.
Although the names Jesus, Joseph and James were all common ones in Judea at the time, it is unlikely that all three would be mentioned in this relationship unless they were the biblical figures. Brothers' names were very rarely included in these epitaphs (only one other instance is known) and would have been reserved for cases where the brother was very well known, as Jesus was at the time of James's death.
Whether or not the ossuary can be positively tied to James, the suggestion of archeological evidence in favor of brotherhood between Jesus and James has raised hackles in many religious circles. Catholics have long held that Jesus was the only child of Mary and that she remained a virgin after his birth. The doctrine of the Virgin Birth was established at the Lateran Council of Pope Martin I in A.D. 649 (not to be confused with the later Lateran Councils).
In early Christian history, interpretations of the gospels varied widely from place to place. The Ecumenical Councils, beginning with the first Nicean Council in 325, helped codify and establish the official dogma of the Christian Church. Before 649, the belief in Mary's Eternal Virginity was not universally accepted.
One of the greatest difficulties in interpreting the original biblical texts is the problem of translation. For example, the word translated into English as 'brother' in the New Testament is the Greek word adelphos. This word is not restricted to sibling relationships but could also mean "half-brother," "cousin" or even "close friend." However, contextual clues can indicate that the specific relationship of brothers is meant, such as in Matthew 13:55, "Is this not the carpenter's son? Is his mother not Mary? And his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?"
The first mention of Mary as a virgin is in Isaiah 7:14. This book was originally written in Hebrew, and the word now translated as "virgin" was almah. This word actually means "young woman" and does not necessarily connote virginity. The Hebrew word bethulah is much closer to the meaning implied by "virgin".
Even so, this passage is quoted in Matthew 1:23 as being the prophecy of Mary's virgin birth. However, nothing in Matthew specifically states that Mary remained a virgin after the birth of Jesus. When Joseph discovers that his betrothed is pregnant (and not by him), he considers divorcing her (Matthew 1:18-20), but is told not to by an angel.
Then, Matthew 1:25 says that "And [Joseph] knew her [Mary] not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name Jesus." This implies that Joseph and Mary probably did have marital relations after the birth of Jesus, and perhaps had other children as well, since Jesus is referred to as their firstborn.
The other principal support for Mary's virginity appears in Luke 1:27, 1:31 and 1:34. While these seem to make clear Mary's virginity at the time Jesus was conceived, they say nothing about her relationship with Joseph afterward. The later references to Jesus' brothers and sisters (such as in Matthew 13:55-56) and specific references to James as a brother of Jesus (Galatians 1:19) strongly implies that Jesus was not an only child.
In addition to Biblical references, the secular Jewish historian Flavius Josephus reported the stoning of James in A.D. 62, referring to him as "the brother of Jesus the so-called Christ, James by name." This is our source for the specific date of James' death, and would agree with the dating of the newly discovered ossuary.
Despite all the circumstantial evidence, we will probably never be able to confirm as fact that this ossuary belonged to the biblical James, or that James was in fact a sibling of Jesus. Even so, it represents a powerful addition to the science of biblical archeology.
If nothing else, it will probably provoke a lot of interesting debates.
==================================================
Sources:
www.ibexsemester.com/ossuary.htm
www.dailylobo.com/news/304019.html
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve." - Bilbo Baggins
Edited by - payaso on 11/02/2002 01:06:05 AM
Edited by - payaso on 11/02/2002 01:16:11 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |
GregBoyd
Registered Member
Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 1818
| Posted 11/2/2002 2:57 AM (GMT -6) | | I just read that the ossuary was badly damaged in transition from Jerusalem to Canada. It's still in one piece, but with some bad cracks.
Must have flown Northwest.
Doc
"In Christ...the ONLY THING that matters is faith energized by love." Galatians 5:6 | | Back to Top | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 10:52 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3
dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|