 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 5/9/2003 6:48 AM (GMT -6) |   | Question- how did God decide to put together the human body if he did not know in great detail how it would work beforehand? Theists like to argue that the intricacy of not only the universe but the human body points to an intelligent design, and, following that, Designer. But if you are designing, you have a plan, you work from detail. Sure, you may not get it right, and you go by trial and error. But I can't see that god created the universe and us by trial and error. He must have known what he was doing.
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds, and the pessimist fears this is true." - James Branch Cabell | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 5/9/2003 6:53 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote:
Question- how did God decide to put together the human body if he did not know in great detail how it would work beforehand?
You're confusing mechanical with moral. God designed the human body with comprehesive fore-knowledge of how it would mechanically work. Morally, He knew all possible ways we could choose. The actual decisions, well, we create those ourselves. If we didn't, why wouldn't He just run the entire creation scenario through His mind, why bother creating it in actuality?

Even though the skies are blue, don't they let the sunshine through? | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 5/9/2003 6:59 AM (GMT -6) |   | I'm not confused. I'm saying if there's a possibility of knowing a future state before deciding to create, then we have to concede that the future is knowable. In order to design human life, there must be many factors in the environment that are JUST SO - physical laws governing them. A very precise and intricate process. The brain was created. It is what creatures use to analyze and make decisions. God had to know beforehand how creatures would use those brains before he made them. If God knew exactly how the process of determination would before before creation, why couldn't he know the results of those processes?
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds, and the pessimist fears this is true." - James Branch Cabell | | Back to Top | | |
 |  might-be-don Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 830 | Posted 5/9/2003 7:05 AM (GMT -6) |   | ReasonableDoubt,
Just tuck in the back of your mind the thought that the open theist folks around here don't say God doesn't determine anything, only that He doesn't determine everything.
peace and love, don
--- "No Rules, just Right" Outback Steakhouse | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 5/9/2003 7:07 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote:
I'm not confused. I'm saying if there's a possibility of knowing a future state before deciding to create, then we have to concede that the future is knowable. In order to design human life, there must be many factors in the environment that are JUST SO - physical laws governing them. A very precise and intricate process. The brain was created. It is what creatures use to analyze and make decisions. God had to know beforehand how creatures would use those brains before he made them. If God knew exactly how the process of determination would before before creation, why couldn't he know the results of those processes?
Animals act in mechanistic ways like that. Humans don't. Why Satan chose to rebel, that's not rational. Why Adam and Eve chose to disobey God, that's not rational. Mechanistic determinism will never explain the irrationality of sin.
Again, God can predict all possible outcomes but the actual decisions are ours. That's the "spark of life".
Also:
quote:
many factors in the environment that are JUST SO - physical laws governing them
Look at how nature works. It's resilent and adaptable based on fluctuating conditions. How did a dynamic system come from the mind of a static God?

Even though the skies are blue, don't they let the sunshine through?
Edited by - Laika on 05/09/2003 12:23:08 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 5/9/2003 11:25 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: ReasonableDoubt
Question- how did God decide to put together the human body if he did not know in great detail how it would work beforehand? Theists like to argue that the intricacy of not only the universe but the human body points to an intelligent design, and, following that, Designer.
But if you are designing, you have a plan, you work from detail. Sure, you may not get it right, and you go by trial and error. But I can't see that god created the universe and us by trial and error. He must have known what he was doing.
This reminds me of an essay that Gregory Naz. wrote in his Theological Discources. It it he asked, pointed out that if we can't make much headway in understanding the world God made, how we might expect to understand God. In many ways and to many degrees of measure we have learned a lot since the third century. But in many other ways we have not -- like meaning. But the structure of his question Is relevant here. In talking about how God can make a universe we find that we also have to try speculating about who and wahat God is. And in so doing we come up squarely against the wall of our own limits. And limited in knowing God as God himself does, we discover more of the limits of our knowing the world -- at least through rationalism alone, without approaching the world as a doxology of praise. And limited in knowing the world we find more limits on our knowing the Creator.
What we have to learn to do is to approach the world the Creator made in a grand doxology to Him who made it and placed us to "till" and "tend" it.
THAT way we can make progress in understanding IT more, and through it and through that ordained doxology...to "know" the Creator more too.
 | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Tom Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 10353 | Posted 5/10/2003 12:58 AM (GMT -6) |   | RD: I'm saying if there's a possibility of knowing a future state before deciding to create, then we have to concede that the future is knowable.
Tom’s two cents plus change: Whether the future is “knowable” has never been a matter of debate between open theists and non-open theists. The issue has always been, What’s the future? Define the future and you can then say what it is God knows or doesn’t know.
I completely believe in the possibility of God’s knowing future states before creating. As far as I know, the open view is the ONLY view that believes in this possibility. Molinism comes close, but no prize.
God is free right? He could have created any number of different types of worlds. Right? This world wasn’t the only option, right? Or he could have chosen not to create at all, right? So, at least before settling on what sort of world he would create, the future was open for God. God faced possibilities. Creating worlds A, B, C, or D were all equally possible as far as God was concerned. Or creating no world at all was equally possible. So far so good?
Would you concede, RD, that before deciding to create, God faced more than one possibility? Even if THIS world was the only possible world God could have created (which you might want to claim) you still have to concede that God was free NOT to create at all and that this means that before creating God faced at least TWO possibilities: Creating this world or not creating at all. So at this point, the future was OPEN.
Once God chooses to create a specific world, the nature of future states of affairs known to God (and God MUST know these states infallibly if he’s omniscient) depends upon the TYPE of world God decides to create. He could have created world A, an exhaustively determined world in which God alone decides all that comes to pass. In this world God gets everything he wants, takes no risks, and knows the future only as what “shall” and “shall not” come to pass. Had God chosen THIS type from among the POSSIBLE worlds he was free to create (or not), God’s facing possibilities would have come to an end with the decision to create. Open theism simply asks, Why believe that creating the world brought an end to God's freedom? Why think that the choice to create meant God was no longer free to face possibilities?
Another possible world God was free to create was world B, a world not exhaustively determined by God, a world of limited possibilities, all perfectly foreknown by God, but one in which God’s freedom to act and choose does NOT end with his choice to create. God remains free AFTER creation if the world he creates is a world OF possibilities.
Worlds have metaphysical price tags. The price tag for creating world A (an exhaustively determined world) is: No love is possible. The advantage (if you wish to call it that) of world A is: God always gets what he wants (except for being worshiped, glorified, and loved by choice).
The price tag for creating world B (a perfectly foreknown world of possibilities) in which love is possible is: We may choose not to love God. The advantage is: Love exists.
RD: In order to design human life, there must be many factors in the environment that are JUST SO - physical laws governing them.
Tom: Exactly! They are MANY. But they are less than ALL.
RD: The brain was created. It is what creatures use to analyze and make decisions. God had to know beforehand how creatures would use those brains before he made them.
Tom: This would be true only if God exhaustively determines all things. You’re assuming what you want to prove. But our moral choices are not reducible to chemical reactions in the brain. Chemical reactions are part of what influences our choices, but in the end our morally responsible choices are not reducible to the influences that act upon the will.
RD: If God knew exactly how the process of determination would before before creation, why couldn't he know the results of those processes?
Tom: Because a) creating a world not exhaustively determined by physical processes was one of the possible worlds God was free to create when he created, and b) we now know from science that physical processes are not universally determinative. Identical input yeilds different outcomes. So it sure looks like God chose to create that world which was not exhaustively determined by physical processes. And how thankful we ought to be that God went with this option! It means that when my kids tell me they love me I can know this means more than "Chemical reactions in our brains over time together with societal influences have determined that our brains would trigger our mouths to open at this particular time and spit out the words, 'I love you Daddy.'"
Tom 
Edited by - TGB on 05/10/2003 06:18:13 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Matthew Timothy Short Huh?

Date Joined Apr 2002 Total Posts : 635 | Posted 5/10/2003 3:44 AM (GMT -6) |   | Hey, I think I understand open theism now , geez I am slow. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 5/12/2003 3:17 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote:
Hey, I think I understand open theism now , geez I am slow.
Oh, Darth Vader was Luke's father!!!!
And Rosebud was the name of Kane's sled!!!

Even though the skies are blue, don't they let the sunshine through? | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Tom Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 10353 | Posted 5/12/2003 4:38 AM (GMT -6) |   | Tim-
What was it you understood? What clicked? And now that your understand, what will you do?
Tom 
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Tom Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 10353 | Posted 5/12/2003 4:43 AM (GMT -6) |   | I'm convincing myself! You know, the more I think about it, the more it appears to be true that theological determinism spells the END of God's freedom. Not only are WE not free to do other than we do, but the freedom God enjoyed before creation (to do other than he does) ENDED with the decree to create an exhaustively determined world (and an exhaustively determined eternity). God gets sucked in and freezes forever.
Think about it.
Tom 
Edited by - TGB on 05/12/2003 09:46:36 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 5/12/2003 6:53 AM (GMT -6) |   | Tom: This would be true only if God exhaustively determines all things. You’re assuming what you want to prove. But our moral choices are not reducible to chemical reactions in the brain. Chemical reactions are part of what influences our choices, but in the end our morally responsible choices are not reducible to the influences that act upon the will.
I'm not assuming what I'm trying to prove, I guess I'm meant that GOd knew before creating how the physical processes of the brain would work, just as he knew how the eye would work, the heart, or any other part. So if that is so, how much of a jump is it to say that God also knew how the physical processes in the brain would create thoughts, and what those thoughts would be.
It's just a matter of primary,s econdary, etc influences on our brain. Chemical reactions are necessary for us to do absolutely anything. Care to tell me how you deliberate in making a choice without engaging your brain? There are other causes in the chain that influence those reactions as well.
If you look at someone who is brain damaged, or has Alzheimers- where doctors can see physical damage to the brain, it definitely influences that person's ability to make any type of choice, moral or not.
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds, and the pessimist fears this is true." - James Branch Cabell | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Tom Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 10353 | Posted 5/12/2003 7:51 AM (GMT -6) |   | RD: Care to tell me how you deliberate in making a choice without engaging your brain?
Tom: Believe me, you DON'T wanna hear the answer to THAT! 
TGB
Edited by - TGB on 05/12/2003 12:52:38 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 5/12/2003 7:53 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote:
RD: Care to tell me how you deliberate in making a choice without engaging your brain?
What about the brainless man who chooses to just lie there on the floor?

Even though the skies are blue, don't they let the sunshine through? | | Back to Top | | |
 |  ReasonableDoubt Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 655 | Posted 5/12/2003 9:20 AM (GMT -6) |   | Are you kidding? I am missing the joke....
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds, and the pessimist fears this is true." - James Branch Cabell | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Matthew Timothy Short Huh?

Date Joined Apr 2002 Total Posts : 635 | Posted 5/12/2003 3:36 PM (GMT -6) |   | Tom: Tim-
What was it you understood? What clicked? And now that your understand, what will you do?
Me: Oh, I don't know, I forgot . . . | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 5/13/2003 3:02 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote:
Are you kidding? I am missing the joke....
Yes, it was just a joke. I'm still trying to think of a purely arbitrary choice, thanks alot. You may as well have told me "whatever you do today, do NOT think of pink elephants".

Even though the skies are blue, don't they let the sunshine through? | | Back to Top | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 1:15 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|