Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

geebob
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 94
 
   Posted 6/7/2002 4:16 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
A Jewish fella posted this verse arguing against Jesus' Fulfillment of the sacrificial law. Jesus was crucified once for all so I don't see how he can fulfill verse 18.

Supposing we go the openness route, I don't see God changing his mind regarding this later because I assumed he planned the sacrifice of his son long before Jeremiah was around and possibly as soon as Man first sinned.

Any ideas?

Jeremiah 33:17
For this is what the LORD says: `David will never fail to have a man to sit on the throne of the house of Israel,
18 nor will the priests, who are Levites, ever fail to have a man to stand before me continually to offer burnt offerings, to burn grain offerings and to present sacrifices.'"

I will gladly pay you teusday for a hamburger today.

-Wimpy
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 6/7/2002 6:02 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Hmmm....

You could throw at him the fact that Abraham received a promise from God BEFORE the Law was given. That is significant. The Temple practices came later.

But concider that Christ is CONTINUALLY before the Father as OUR HIGH PRIEST!

That is sufficient.
Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 6:50 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads