 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  Mephi2K Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 713 | Posted 6/12/2002 10:46 AM (GMT -6) |   | Here is a question.
I keep hearing that the Bible should be analyzed through JESUS CHRIST because Jesus is the supreme revelation of God. Cool. But on some level, I can't help thinking that there are different IMAGES of the Jesus described in the Gospels being used. Such that when you talk about "Jesus", one is really talking about some type of IDEALIZED figure while using some Scripture references. I personally think that the Jesus represented in the Gospels is a LOT more rude, confrontational, and "not-so-nice" than some other people might. Even at some points, aloof and conflicting. Definitely not a Dalai Lama or anything like that. So, won't this affect my view of God correspondingly? Hmmm...
At any rate, what I want here is for people to depict THEIR views of Christ. If YOU were to describe Christ as depicted in the Gospels, how would YOU do so? Use as much Scripture as you feel is necessary. Why? Because, perhaps, we will see how different people looking at the same text can come away with differing views of Christ. Because, perhaps, we're going to see how much of our views of Christ are READ INTO the text by OUR wishes, OUR contexts, and OUR personal experiences. Was your Jesus a benevolent soul bent only on doing good? Was Jesus a self-accepted authority sometimes pressing his luck? Was Jesus a taoist-in-training? What? Shoot it off. 
Looking forward to it,
 | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Seymour Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2002 Total Posts : 105 | Posted 6/12/2002 10:10 PM (GMT -6) |   | I need help finding my verse. Where is that passage where Jesus talks about a slave serving a master and the slave really knocks himself out for the master and after all of that work the slave doesn't get a break because he is still a slave and the master is still a master?
anyone know the passage i'm talking about?
Some folks dance cool, all angels and swaying hips, Sensual as all get out and in. Me, I'm a hick, and I dance like one, I just kinda jump around and grin. --Greg Brown | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Mephi2K Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 713 | Posted 6/12/2002 10:52 PM (GMT -6) |   | For Seymour...
Luke 17:7-10
"Suppose one of you had a servant plowing or looking after the sheep. Would he say to the servant when he comes in from the field, 'Come along now and sit down to eat'? Would he not rather say, 'Prepare my supper, get yourself ready and wait on me while I eat and drink; after that you may eat and drink'? Would he thank the servant because he did what he was told to do? So you also, when you have done everything you were told to do, should say, 'We are unworthy servants; we have only done our duty.'" | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Seymour Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2002 Total Posts : 105 | Posted 6/13/2002 12:29 AM (GMT -6) |   | Oh yes thank you Mephi, that's the one. And that's my view of Christ, as a master to whom I worth nothing. Nohting that is, save my duty to him, a slave driver who would not let me sid down with him and eat.
Some folks dance cool, all angels and swaying hips, Sensual as all get out and in. Me, I'm a hick, and I dance like one, I just kinda jump around and grin. --Greg Brown | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 6/13/2002 4:28 AM (GMT -6) |   | Seymour, aren't you being a bit EASY in your treatment. Normally I'd say "lighten up", but this time not.
As Bonhoeffer said:
"Wenn Jesus ruff ein man, er ruff Ihm 'komm und sterben.'"
(When Jesus calls a man, He bids him 'Come and die.')
So, I'll point you to the other verses that applies here:
"Lay up for yourself treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor (agricultural) rust can destroy."
"In My Father's house there are many mansions. If it were not so I would have told you." ......so, therefore you should...... "Let not your heart be troubled. You believe in God; believe also in me."
Edited by - PotOnWheel on 06/13/2002 11:38:01 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Seymour Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2002 Total Posts : 105 | Posted 6/13/2002 5:26 AM (GMT -6) |   | POW, I don't get anything you're saying here.
Some folks dance cool, all angels and swaying hips, Sensual as all get out and in. Me, I'm a hick, and I dance like one, I just kinda jump around and grin. --Greg Brown | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Starkman Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1747 | Posted 6/13/2002 10:32 AM (GMT -6) |   | A friend. A gentle but firm friend. Patient. Oh, so patient. But He's a friend who is fuzzy to me; I can't really get a clear focus of who He is. I can't really see Him as I wish. Leaves a lot to be desired, then, about my view of Jesus--how I see Him.
He's smart, loving, strong, clear, concise, patient (heavy emphasis on that one, for sure), and wise. But . . . I don't really see Him--something about Paul's statement of looking through glass darkly makes a lot of sense to me, not just in my Christian walk, but in my view and imagery of Christ; for though I've walked with Him for 25 years now, I still have more haziness than clarity of a view of Him. I therefore continue in the "viewing" of Him by which I have obtained already: in the personalness of my own walk and in view of His Words.
But, one day I'll be with Him. Then I'll see Him. And then, I'll not only see Him clearly, but, amazingly, in a manner I really don't understand, I'll be like Him. Somehow, someway.
For a view of Him,
Starkman
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 6/13/2002 12:34 PM (GMT -6) |   | For Seymour
To where you said, "my view of Christ, as a master to whom I worth nothing. Nohting that is, save my duty to him, a slave driver who would not let me sid down with him and eat." I smerked, "Normally I'd say "lighten up." I said "normally" becasue I then quoted "Jesus ...bids... 'Come and die'", which is a whole lot more costly than not being given a seat.
That is the gist of it.
Then I ended my post with some quotes both positive and constructive -- or however they should be described.
It was the oportunity for the quip that made me post.
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 6/13/2002 7:43 PM (GMT -6) |   | Dear friends Mephi2K and Seymour, I'm going to try an actually participate a little bit here. (surprise )
ITS A GREAT TOPIC, MEPH!
I've been reading a lot of things lately, but two that are pretty far out there for me have been; "The Sacred and tthe Profane: The Nature of Religion -- The significance of religious myth, symbolism, and ritual within life and culture" (Harper Torch) by Mercea Eliade (finished today); and Spirit of Truth: The Origins of Johannine Pneumatology, by John Breck. I put the Breck down a while back because relating John to Zarethustra and helenistic Judaism would have definitely pulled a brain-muscle for me. But after the Eliade (My minor in college was Cultural Anthro.) I'm as ready as I'll ever be! Here is a quick comment from Breck. See if this doesn't get your attention!:
we can affirm that the end-time effusion of the Spirit predicted by the prophet Joel stands in full continuity with the more primitive picture of ruach presented in passages such as I Kings 22:2 Iff, where God sends a "lying spirit" into the mouths of Israel's prophets.
Breck mentions how hard it is for many today to handle the sort of thing that Electra likes to post from the Psalms.
Especially against the sort of taxonometry that Mercea Eliade lays out of how archaic societies change their religion when the go from migrating to agricultural societies (M.E. quotes an Omaha indian's refusal to plow earth (tear into his mother, thus forfetting the possibility of her accepting him at his burial--from wence he hopes for rebirth); or harvesting grain (cutting his mother's hair). Both 50-year-old comments in 1950. Lunar dieties with their life-death-life cycle (phases of the moon) differ from solar dieties (which are always light--TRUTH)(which rise and set--illustrating both TRUTH/LIFE AND FALSEHOOD/DEATH--NON-BEING).
That is why Breck mentions that across the course of the OT Text one does not (and should not try to force there to be) a consistant picture of -- as it is His Topic -- the Holy Spirit.
And as Christianity, as Judaism before it took up and "baptized" religious forms that preceeded it (e.g., leverite marriage, images fo what angels look like, etc.) -- and baptism is one in itself! -- it should not be surprising if the same variety of "forms" can be found for images of Christ -- not just in the NT, but as the Church continued even. (In my high school days -- the 70s -- we used to sing "Amen, Jesus is my friend. He sticketh closer than a brother; he is a friend to me.")
But first, for those who actually have an education in this sort of thing (Mepyh, Electra, etc.), here is a quote from Breck:
quote: Students of the Old Testament often fail to appreciate the fact that basic theological concepts developed in Hebrew thought over a time-span of more than a thousand years. Studies on the Spirit, for example, typically weave together evidence from various strata of Israelite tradition, irrespective of their chronological relationship to one another. As a result, they tend to overlook the significant development that took place in Israel's religious consciousness, and specifically in the understanding and presentation of Spirit, which occurred during the period from the earliest historical writings to the oracles of the post-exilic prophets.
To trace the growth of the spirit-concept in Hebrew thought, it is important to distinguish between the various strands of tradition worked into the Pentateuch and historical writings. This is because revelation is progressive: God reveals His person and will in stages. The renewing, quasi-sacramental activity of the Spirit proclaimed in the oracles ofEzek-iel was utterly unknown to the "Yahwist," the author of the most ancient strata of the Hebrew Bible. By recognizing the progressive character of God's self-disclosure, however, we can easily come to terms with ancient images of the God of wrath and capricious judgment, just as we can accept the maledictions called down by the psalmists on the heads of their enemies. For we understand that the "primitive" Hebrew mind perceived God through eyes that were culturally and historically conditioned. (The same, of course, must be affirmed of every generation, including our own.) Accordingly, we can affirm that the end-time effusion of the Spirit predicted by the prophet Joel stands in full continuity with the more primitive picture of ruach presented in passages such as I Kings 22:2 Iff, where God sends a "lying spirit" into the mouths of Israel's prophets.
That done with, I'll get back to Christ.
Either in Mercea Eliade or in another book I found mentioned that the Pantocrator image of Christ draws from the tradition of how ZEUS is conceived. A sky god with thunder, and terrible when provoked, mighty when in wrath. M.E. mentions many African cultures that call on their agrarian gods (akin to Ashtar and Baal) in normal times. These where the god's that took car of normal essentials like rain and fertility; and their worship could include wild excesses. The sky god was, in those African tribes felt to be far off and uninterested. BUT, when things completely fell apart, guess who they would call on--when they had nothing else to loose!!! Sound familiar???
How many DIFFERENT images of Christ are alive and functioning in the Church today?
.....no joke.....these are not just here to put them here....
 Pantocrator -- Ruler of All
quote: This icon is from the Church of Christ the Saviour in the Chora. The gesture of the hand is typical of the Pantocrator, but this is also Christ the Land of the Living. The Bible speaks of the Righteous dead going to the "bosom of Abraham" and icons show Abraham holding the souls of the righteous in the fold of his robe. The image we see here in the dome of one of the church's two narthexes is a smaller version of the magnificent mosaic above the main doorway: as you gaze up at the Pantocrator, his arm stretches his robe wide to encompass you - He is the Land of the Living, inviting us to dwell in Him.
The image of the Pantocrator proclaims Jesus of Nazareth as the same person as the Eternal and Almighty Word of God. The Pantocrator is the Creator, the Sustainer and the Great Judge of the Universe. Here he appears as also the Land of the Living, the One in whom is the Life which is the light of all humanity.
![]()
 Man of Sorrows/Extreem Humility
 Teacher, Word
 Willingly giving his life -- it not being taken from him!
quote: The Savior (6th c.)
The bust of the Savior is life sized, a common feature of early icons, and shows a traditional monumental image of Christ holding a Gospel book in his left hand while blessing with his right. The icon has been amazingly well preserved in the dry air of the Sinai Peninsula. The Savior presented on the Sinai icon has a very forgiving, tender face. There is a slight asymmetry in the eyes, which draws the viewer's attention to them.
I've read a critique of this icon that pointed out how the difference in right and left sides might be in order to portray hwo the two natures were united 'without mixture or confusion' in Christ (interesing).

quote: This is a dogmatic icon. It shows Christ as both God and man. The right hand side of His face is eternally serene, powerful, all-merciful, unchanging; the left shows the Man of Sorrows, a human being sharing and deeply afflicted by human suffering. And yet the face is a single person, Jesus Christ. http://www.arimathea.co.uk/incarnat.htm
 Raising US up. (Anastasis)
Edited by - PotOnWheel on 06/14/2002 01:41:05 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 6/13/2002 8:24 PM (GMT -6) |   | Back when I used to teach Ancient through Medieval Art History to visual communication majors... I used to show a bunch of slides fo faces of Christ, without commentary, AND THEN I would solicit THEIR feelings and thoughts. I dare say that most of my Chicagoland suburban students would like the second image more than the first:


As I remember..... they would probably like the first one MORE than some others of similar type. MY STUDENTS DIDN'T WANT TO SEE PICTURES OF CHRIST LO0KING SCARY.
Further, they wanted pictures of Christ to look like them. (Foreigh dudes scared them, I think.)
The second picture is from the 500s or 600s too! | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 6/13/2002 8:36 PM (GMT -6) |   | If I HAVE to ahve a favorite image of Christ, then THIS is it. (Its from the Hilandar Monastery in Serbia, but resides on Mt Athos in Greece)

I want to tell a quick story. This is the image that I choose a few years ago to make a slide of for the Tenabre/MaundyThursday (combined if you can imagine) service at our Christian Reformed Church. I projected this ICON to about ten feet tall and all of us looked at it while singing "Fairest Lord Jesus." At least one of the girls in the high school youth group was very, very moved by it and recounts that moment as significant in the development of her walk with Christ. (Any of those of you Presbyterian or Reformed, you know the subtext of this.)
=====================================
Here are a collection of other images off the web.
Pretent you are in my art history class.
. Which catch your attention? 2. What do you want to share about what you see, and your response?












+ + +
I'm done. The next person gets to send this thread where they will...
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 6/13/2002 9:03 PM (GMT -6) |   | Cool.

Christ is the centre where all lines converge., Maximus the Confessor, Mystagogia

The Ancient of Days (1794). William Blake (1757-1827). Relief etching. Europe: A Prophecy. PMA:J99.1956. Blake's illustration of Proverbs 8:22-27 represents "the first emanation of the true but hidden and nameless God."
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  markus Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2002 Total Posts : 100 | Posted 6/14/2002 2:47 AM (GMT -6) |   | God is spirit, and the Word. And the Word became flesh, Jesus, the incarnation of God the spirit.
How can we have just one external, objective view of a personification of spirit that is, at the same time, everything?
The Bible is not a book. It is a collection of words through which God speaks to us when we pray those words. And through those words Jesus becomes to each whatever they need Jesus to be, or whatever Jesus wants to be for them, at any particular time.
What do I need Jesus to be for me today? A gentle guardian? a prayer warrior? a bringer of peace for my soul? a fighter, remorselessly splitting family ties asunder? a courageous, invincible, double-edged sword against evil attacking me? a cool wisdom-giver on the nature of heaven? a comforter on the assurance of salvation? a shoulder to lean on when my own strength fails? a redeemer of my own failings? an example of justifed anger towards actions against God?
Surely, Jesus is whatever we spiritually need Him to be for us, now, today, tomorrow, always - changing and yet unchanged. For me, one thing - for you, another.
So many faces, they put even Barbie and Ken in their shade.
Markus
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Mute Registered Member
 Date Joined May 2002 Total Posts : 6 | Posted 6/14/2002 3:57 AM (GMT -6) |   | I take a very incarnational view of Jesus. I know nothing of him, except for what is in him in other people who I know. I learn the peace of Jesus from this one, I learn the kindness of Jesus from another one, and so on. There is no single person who provides a complete view of Christ, and there is no person for whose image of Christ is not occulted in some area due to sin, but he is there in each one we meet for those who have eyes to see him and ears to hear him.
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  lucia Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2002 Total Posts : 11 | Posted 6/15/2002 12:39 AM (GMT -6) |   | Thanks Mute!
That was a great description. I'm much like you in the way I see Jesus.
bless you for sharing, lucia | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Empiress Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2002 Total Posts : 363 | Posted 6/15/2002 10:02 AM (GMT -6) |   | There is no one way to depict Christ from the Gospels, and I don't believe there ought to be. However...
Meph said:
quote:
Because, perhaps, we will see how different people looking at the same text can come away with differing views of Christ.
Well of course!
quote: Because, perhaps, we're going to see how much of our views of Christ are READ INTO the text by OUR wishes, OUR contexts, and OUR personal experiences.
YES, of course this is the case!
:-)
I don't see Jesus as "meek and mild," I see him as having an unquenchable thirst for righteousness with a zealousness that "burned him up." (Jn 2:17). Jesus stood against the injustice and hypocrisy of the elite, particularly the religious elite, but he had radical mercy and compassion for the downtrodden and the ordinary man and woman just trying to live rightly. (Sermon on the Mount) He really did come for "the sick," because only those who know they need a "physician" are open to God's grace, Spirit, healing, and mercy. Only those who do not deem themselves righteous are open to recieving God's "cure," which is Jesus. (Matt. 9:10-13)
I also see Jesus as the incarnation of God and God's will...sort as a way to "set the record straight" once and for all about God's intentions and feelingss about humanity: one of abundant love and fervent desire.
And Mute is right, we can see Jesus in everyone if we look. 
Peace, Empiress
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Modes of Thought Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 817 | Posted 6/17/2002 6:46 AM (GMT -6) |   | Mephi! Guess what? Yup. "You got mail."
"Christianly understood, truth is obviously not to know the truth but to be the truth. Despite all modern philosophy, there is an infinite difference here..." SK | | Back to Top | | |
 |  graygirl Registered Member
 Date Joined Aug 2001 Total Posts : 78 | Posted 6/24/2002 2:13 PM (GMT -6) |   | Jesus? How do i see him?? Good question!
He's talked about alot. Sometimes I get weird sensations listening to certain people talk about him. Sometimes I have no idea who they're referring to. Sometimes it resonates.
I can't say I have a first hand image of him but I see him as an individual with an edge. I cannot imagine Jesus like pictures I see around. all expressionless and stoic and holy lookin' (although holy he is). I see him having a knowing glint in his eyes. Totally REAL and down to earth. Able to get down the the boys and heal fragile hearts. The kind of guy that doesn't have a pretentious bone in his body but isn't a pushover. Someone that I could approach with confidence. Someone that would let me believe that I'm a superstar. I guess the biggest thing is the edge.
As cheesy as this is going to sound (put your cheese guards on)....I think Jesus is much like my superbuddy, mike. Mike has tattoos and hoop earings. People look at him and think he's this rock star who's been around so they confidently approach him with their junk. Mike is a geninuley, from the gut, loving person and his love is shown to all without prejudice. But Mike has edges, rawness, anger sometimes, strength and tenderness. (Okay cheese guards can go down)
I think Jesus is much the same, except that he doesn't sin.....and he's absolutley pure and free of the enemy's influence/falleness.
Above all I see Jesus as *Raw* *Real* and *Loving*
GG | | Back to Top | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:44 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|