Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > Unconditional love?  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Modes of Thought
Registered Member


Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 817
 
   Posted 8/12/2003 4:36 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Pretend you are in sunday school. Let's say, 9th grade. Maybe confirmation if you were raised in a tradition that did that...

A student asks, "What does it mean that God is Love?" What does the pastor say?


The answers are not complete but they move in a certain direction, pick one that best represents what you remember or what you would expect to hear from your tradition. This is to help resolve (thought it certainly doesn't formally prove anything, right John? Wink) a question that came up about whether "unconditional love" is a fair representation of the traditional/classical/historical view of God's love.


"I don't feel a real urgent burden to get all the details of my ethics worked out until I've got the profundity of my love worked out in a Christ-like way." --doc

Back to Top
 

John Earp
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1715
 
   Posted 8/12/2003 5:38 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by ModesofThought
This is to help resolve (thought it certainly doesn't formally prove anything, right John? Wink) a question that came up about whether "unconditional love" is a fair representation of the traditional/classical/historical view of God's love.



With respect to the traditional/classical/historical view, this poll proves what precisely?

The view of God's love as unconditional derives not from any tradition other than late 20th century pop psychology.



"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.

revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

ReasonableDoubt
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 655
 
   Posted 8/12/2003 5:59 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I'm not voting, since I do not have a strong opinion, but funnily enough, I was confirmed a Lutheran. SO I looked in the Luther's Small Catechism to see if there was anything about this. THere was nothing about God being love, in fact, the closest thing I could find relevant to the discussion was the following:

"What does God say about all these commandments? He says, "I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments."

What does this mean?

God threatens to punish all who transgress these commandments. Therefore we should fear his anger and not disobey what he commands."

Here we go again - with God saying that he shows love to those who love him and keep his commandments.
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/13/2003 1:38 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by ReasonableDoubt

I'm not voting, since I do not have a strong opinion, but funnily enough, I was confirmed a Lutheran. SO I looked in the Luther's Small Catechism to see if there was anything about this. THere was nothing about God being love, in fact, the closest thing I could find ...


Let me contribute along the same line.

First, the Orthodox liturgies ubiquitously contain phrases like these:
quote:
For thou art a good God who lovest man, and unto thee do we send up glory, to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, now and ever, and unto ages of ages.
. . .

Pardon every sin committed by them in word or deed or thought, for thou art a good God and Lover of man, for there is no man that liveth and sinneth not, for thou only art without sin and thy righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, and thy word is truth.
. . .



Second, the Heidelberg Catechism (Reformed) has these lines:
quote:
A 28. We can be patient when things go against us, thankful when things go well, and for the future we can have good confidence in our faithful God and Father that nothing will separate us from his love. All creatures are so completely in his hand that without his will they can neither move nor be moved.

A 92. God spoke all these words: ... You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.


With the Catechisms it sould be noted that they are following a topical outline with leading questions. A question like "what does the fifth commandment teach us?" can only cover just so much territory.

But, even though the Reformed tend to make too much of election (or too little in the right way) the ussage in the Heidelberg might temper what we expect to see. And that temper is this: God LOVES and HATES, and it is we who have to learn what the ussage of those terms is. They don't have to be understood as contradictory--or so I think.

Judgement does not have to lack love; it can be corrective. And Punishment can be self-inflicted; even hell.

I think that if you get a Lutheran, a Reformed and a "unconditional love" person in a room, and they talk long enough, they will sort it out.

(But, then, that is what we are doing here...)


"Time is the freedom to love."
(from Ware's "The Inner Kingdom")

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/13/2003 1:42 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
So then...

Here's a colateral question:

  • DOES GOD WHO LOVES UNCONDITIONALLY
    HAVE WRATH?



"Time is the freedom to love."
(from Ware's "The Inner Kingdom")

Back to Top
 

Electra
Registered Member




Date Joined Feb 2002
Total Posts : 611
 
   Posted 8/13/2003 5:34 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by ReasonableDoubt

I'm not voting, since I do not have a strong opinion, but funnily enough, I was confirmed a Lutheran. SO I looked in the Luther's Small Catechism to see if there was anything about this. THere was nothing about God being love, in fact, the closest thing I could find relevant to the discussion was the following:

"What does God say about all these commandments? He says, "I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments."

What does this mean?

God threatens to punish all who transgress these commandments. Therefore we should fear his anger and not disobey what he commands."

Here we go again - with God saying that he shows love to those who love him and keep his commandments.
ReasonableDoubt, thanks for bringing the Small Catechism into the conversation. I was not raised Lutheran, but I took a course at a Lutheran Seminary where one of the requirements was memorizing the Catechism. Even though I initially resented the assignment, the process of memorizing the Catechism gave me a whole new appreciation of the Commandments, Apostles’ Creed, Lord’s Prayer, and Sacraments.

Regarding Luther’s explanation of Exod. 34:6–7 (cf. Num. 14:18; Neh. 9:17; Ps. 86:15; 103:8, 17; 145:8; Jer. 32:18–19; Joel 2:13; Jon. 4:2; Nah. 1:3a):

1) The ethical use of the law is to preserve social order—the good of the whole. Consequences (i.e. punishment) for breaking the law by lying, killing, stealing, dishonoring, adultery, etc. are ethically justified, because breaking the law hurts people, at least potentially. We know from experience that the consequences of this hurt endure and extend beyond the individuals directly involved to friends, children, extended families, and even strangers.

2) Luther also believed in a theological use of the law. The theological use is to help us understand our own failure to keep the law perfectly, and thus, our need for grace. The law was meant to “drive us to Christ” to receive forgiveness rather than the punishment prescribed by the law—which is ultimately death.

3) Both the ethical and theological uses of the law meant that rather than backing away from language of consequences for disobedience, Luther intensified it. There is precidence for such intensification in Jesus’ own teachings. The point was not to impose an even more rigorous legalism, but rather to bring people to a position of honesty and humility before God—to resort to God’s grace rather than our own righteousness, and to receive forgiveness from Jesus. And note, however much God’s anger toward those who transgress the law is emphasized, God’s steadfast love always outruns it a thousand-fold.

Conclusion: Though Luther’s Small Catechism does not deal explicitly with God’s unconditional love, the theme of grace—unmerited favor—pervades his explanation of the Creed and the Lord’s Prayer. From creation to redemption to sanctification, God is clearly the initiator. Examples:

1) The explanation to the first article says, “I believe that God has created me and all that exists. He has give me and still preserves my body and soul with all their powers…All this he does out of fatherly and divine goodness and mercy…” God’s acts of creating and sustaining are not predicated on whether or not we deserve it, but rather out of God’s own nature.

2) Here is how the Catechism describes Jesus Christ’s act of redemption: “At great cost he has saved and redeemed me, a lost and condemned person…not with silver or gold, but with his holy and precious blood and his innocent suffering and death.” This loving act is not conditioned in any way by the state of our characters. Christ paid this price for us while we were lost and condemned.

Conclusion: Once again, Luther’s Small Catechism reaffirms that there is nothing about our characters that conditions the love God has already freely offered to us in creation and redemption. There is nothing about God’s character that leads him to selectively withdraw these gifts from some people, and apply them to others. No matter how wicked your character becomes, it cannot undo what Christ did on the cross for you.

Electra


Love in action is a harsh and dreadful thing. ~ Dostoevsky

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 12:53 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads