 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  Empiress Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2002 Total Posts : 363 | Posted 8/24/2003 5:14 PM (GMT -6) |   | Our Epistle lectionary text today was from Ephesians:
Eph 5:22-23: Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
My students and I wrestled with this text this evening and the student leading the discussion said he was really upset by it and felt it was simply "sexist." I'm inclined to agree (I would have agreed wholeheartedly in the past), but I've felt there is more to it than meets the eye.
I'm wanting to know how you all understand these verses today. Are they merely revealing Paul's cultural conditioning from a patriarchal society or is there something deeper here? How do we pastorally preach on these verses? I'm not looking for a debate, I just want to hear people's honest thoughts.
Thanks, ~e | | Back to Top | | |
 |  John Earp Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2002 Total Posts : 1715 | Posted 8/24/2003 5:36 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by Empiress
Our Epistle lectionary text today was from Ephesians:
Eph 5:22-23: Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
Has it become "sexist" or somehow out-of-date to expect Christ's people to submit to Him?
That said, I think many people read this and think "doormat," when in fact nowhere in the New Testament does Christ treat his church as a doormat. I should hasten to add that I don't think that the verses above were originally meant to say that wives should submit to a husband who was abusive. Christ certainly is not and never has been a wife-beater.
To the extent that the Christian husband's heart is like Christ's, the wife who is submitted to Christ will have no problem submitting, and the husband will not take advantage but will "love her, cherish her, strengthen her, and give himself for her," just as Christ did and does for the Church.
"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.
revivaltheology.net
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Paul5388 Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2003 Total Posts : 295 | Posted 8/24/2003 5:51 PM (GMT -6) |   | Empiress,
I agree with John and would argue that it is all tied into the creation order. There is a clear "chain of command" mentioned in I Cor 11 where there isn't any mention of cultural aspects being any part of determining that hierarchy. Culture isn't mentioned anywhere in I Cor 11 nor is it mentioned in Ephesians 5.
If anyone is "sexist" it is God, Who created the sexes and determined the areas of responsibility for each. | | Back to Top | | |
  |  honorman Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2002 Total Posts : 1137 | Posted 8/24/2003 7:54 PM (GMT -6) |   | | When a scripture is interpreted through our "me first" len, of course it isn't going to come out looking very pretty. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  anewbeginning Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2002 Total Posts : 88 | Posted 8/25/2003 12:58 AM (GMT -6) |   | Hi Emiress:
I really like the way this text is dealt with in "Hard Sayings of the Bible" IVP. Here's the author's opening paragraph.
"The difficulty of Ephesians 5:22 is not in understanding the rather straightforward language, but it's meaning. Since the patriarchal norms of the Greco-Roman world, built into the ruls and regulations for everyday life and relationships, clearly demanded a wife's submission to the authority of the husband, is Paul simply advocating the continuance of conventional norms? If so, why would this be necessary? Does the qualifying phrase "as unto the Lord" introduce a radical new dimension into the nature and form of submission (or subordination)?"
He argues that this verse does not advocate the contemporary form of submision but rather a radical new form of mutual submission. Verse 22 is gramatically linked to verse 21. Verse 22 actually supplies the verb "to submit" for 21. Verse 21 actually reads "Wives, to your husbands as to the Lord". Many bibles incorrectly separate the two verses by beginning a new paragraph at verse 22, doing injustice to the structure and grammar of the original author. The author states:
"Ephesians 5:21 is therefore transitional, both belonging to what precedes and setting the agenda for what follows. Thus the kind of radical self-submission to one another which evidences the fullness of the spirit is now explored in terms of it's implications for husbands and wives. That is, what does this self-submission, modeled in Jesus, look like in marriage?" | | Back to Top | | |
 |  might-be-don Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 830 | Posted 8/25/2003 1:21 AM (GMT -6) |   | Another one to add to my list... "chain of command".
peace, don | | Back to Top | | |
 |  One Love Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2003 Total Posts : 13888 | Posted 8/25/2003 3:52 AM (GMT -6) |   | Sup, Miss E 
My take. All creative rationalization aside? Paul is definitely talking about “chain of command” here. It would seem to fit his m.o. (Do I even NEED to mention 1 Tim 2, Colossians 2 or 1 Peter 3?) But in the context of a MUTUALITY that is incumbent upon Christians. An equality of STATURE and IMPORTANCE, but not ROLE. Backup? First, let’s not forget the Scripture right before verse 22…
Eph. 5:21 Be subject to one another out of reverence for Christ.
Nice transition from his previous topic to dealing with marriage.
Moreover, look at Paul dealing with masters and slaves…
Eph. 6:5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, in singleness of heart, as you obey Christ; 6 not only while being watched, and in order to please them, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart. 7 Render service with enthusiasm, as to the Lord and not to men and women, 8 knowing that whatever good we do, we will receive the same again from the Lord, whether we are slaves or free.
Eph. 6:9 And, masters, do the same to them. Stop threatening them, for you know that both of you have the same Master in heaven, and with him there is no partiality.
See, this is what the White slaveowners of the past OBV IOUSLY missed in their attempts to biblically justify African slavery. Even though Paul is sanctioning the institutions as they are seen in the society, he introduces a RADICAL sense of equality through MUTUAL SERVICE. Why? Simple. Because the presuppositions is that BOTH parties are Christians. And their being in Christ means that IN their roles they will SERVE one another as Christ served US, even though his ROLE was far greater than any of us.
Here’s the nutshell. And WE should get this too. If we are truly brothers and sisters in Christ (even if we are married!) and LOVE OUR NEIGHBOR as the self, it won’t MATTER what institutional or societal roles that we find ourselves in. We will be loving members of Christ’s body and understand that we are ALL under Christ, no positions of authority will be ABUSED. So, even in a very patriarchal society, the manipulation, control, and abuse would not be a factor…IF the male is being Christ like.
My two cents.
Mad love, boo.

"I've been converted three times. The first was to traditional Christianity; the second to honesty and the third was to the Love of God and man (humanity) The third was the real conversion. The first two were preliminary."
--Nels Ferre, a theologian speaking of his spiritual journey with the Triune God
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Tigress Registered Member
 Date Joined Feb 2003 Total Posts : 1252 | Posted 8/25/2003 5:30 AM (GMT -6) |   | What does a wife submitting to her husband actually look like in practice, though? I think the roles are pretty obvious, but the carrying out of those roles is what confuses people.
Obviously, if a woman's life is threatened because the husband's abusing her, she is allowed to step out of that situation. But, I have heard of some husbands getting saved through their wives' staying with them throughout the abuse. I think those might be rarer cases, though. One I know of in particular was a married couple who did not have children. I suppose if kids are factored in, it would be best for the wife and children to leave.
But, in the more normal marriage relationships where no abuse or infidelity is going on, where does the wife have to draw the line? I strongly believe that the husband is only supposed to guide the family in the way he believes that GOD wants them all to go and not the husband's will. But, if the wife believes that God is telling her something different for the family to do, does she still have to submit to her husband's decision about God's Will for the family? This is my understanding - that even if she believes that her husband's understanding of what God is telling them to do is mistaken, she can give her input and her husband has to listen to her and seriously pray about and consider what she said, but ultimately the wife and children must go with what the husband thinks God is telling them all to do, even if the wife knows in her heart that he's mistaken.
Do you think this is correct?
A second question I have is this: What if the wife is a pastor in a church, while her husband is not. He obviously attends her church and must submit to her leadership there, but does that get "turned off" in their own marriage outside of the church? Tigress 
"Name a shrub after me. Preferably one that's prickly and difficult to eradicate."
-Captain Jack Aubrey "Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World" | | Back to Top | | |
  |  Tigress Registered Member
 Date Joined Feb 2003 Total Posts : 1252 | Posted 8/25/2003 6:02 AM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
 |  Paul5388 Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2003 Total Posts : 295 | Posted 8/25/2003 8:17 AM (GMT -6) |   | Laika,
I could tell my wife to write about what being a submissive wife entails, but I will ask her instead. Even if I told her to write, recognizing who I believe to be an extraordinarily submissive wife, would that act be abusive or would it violate any scriptural principle? *******************
Tigress,
Why would anyone be in a church where the teaching elder is a woman? How can you have a biblical solution to an unbiblical situation? | | Back to Top | | |
   |  Tigress Registered Member
 Date Joined Feb 2003 Total Posts : 1252 | Posted 8/25/2003 8:53 AM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
 |  Laika Registered Member

Date Joined Mar 2003 Total Posts : 2433 | Posted 8/25/2003 9:16 AM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
  |  Paul5388 Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2003 Total Posts : 295 | Posted 8/25/2003 10:09 AM (GMT -6) |   | Laika,
Why did you think it was a joke? When I showed her this thread, she said, "Why do I have to write what I have already written?" It's about 4 pages on Word Perfect, but it covers several subjects on obedience/submission. From the pen of Mrs. Paul5388 5/25/94 (no copyright even though it has been published)quote: TO OBEY OR NOT OBEY? (IS IT EVEN A QUESTION?)
God demands obedience. Jesus Christ obeyed God (and HE WAS GOD!--obeyed even to dying!) He even obeyed His parents. Today we say we don't have to do anything anyone says, because we (as non-Christians) are our own gods or we (as Christians) have LIBERTY! But for the Christian obedience is a must! It is so ludicrous that we don't have to do what even God HIMSELF had to do! To receive the blessings and PROTECTION of God we must obey! In the scriptures He laid down the rules for obedience. Who to obey, why to obey and when to obey. Let's take a look at what HE says:
Obey GOD: "And Samuel said, Hath the LORD [as great] delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey [is] better than sacrifice, [and] to hearken than the fat of rams. For rebellion [is as] the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness [is as] iniquity and idolatry..." (1 Samuel 15:22-23a) "Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you." (James 4:7)
One of the ways we obey God is by obeying the ones He told us to obey. Not because they are right, or because we respect them, but because when we obey, we are obeying God.
Obey our PARENTS (as children): "Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right." (Ephesians 6:1)
In John Charles Ryle's book "Duties of Parents", written in 1888, he writes on the many facets of Proverbs 22:6: "train up a child in the way he should go and when he is old he will not depart from it". The following section of his book is very noteworthy on the subject of obedience. He states: "This is an object which it is worth any labour to attain. No habit, I suspect, has such an influence over our lives as this. Parents, determine to make your children obey you, though it may cost you much trouble, and cost them many tears. Let there be no questioning, and reasoning, and disputing, and delaying, and answering again. When you give them a command, let them see plainly that you will have it done.
"Obedience is the only reality. It is faith visible, faith acting, and faith incarnate. It is the test of real discipleship among the Lord's people. "Ye are My friends if ye do whatsoever I command you" (John xv. 14). It ought to be the mark of well-trained children, that they do whatsoever their parents command them. Where, indeed, is the honour which the fifth commandment enjoins, if fathers and mothers are not obeyed cheerfully, willingly, and at once?
"Early obedience has all Scripture on its side. It is in Abraham's praise, not merely he will TRAIN his family, but 'he will COMMAND his children, and his household after him' (Gen. xviii.19). It is said of the Lord Jesus Christ Himself, that when 'He was young He was SUBJECT to Mary and Joseph' (Luke ii 51). Observe how implicitly Joseph obeyed the order of his father Jacob (Gen. xxxvii.13). See how Isaiah speaks of it as an evil thing, when 'the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient' (Isaiah iii. 5). Mark how the Apostle Paul names disobedience to parents as one of the bad signs of the latter days (2 Tim iii. 2). Mark how he singles out this GRACE of requiring obedience as one that should adorn a Christian minister: 'a bishop must be one that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity.' And again, 'Let the deacons rule their children and their own houses well' (1 Tim. iii 4,12). And again, an elder must be one 'having faithful children, children not accused of riot, or unruly.' (Tit. i. 6)
"Parents, do you wish to see your children happy? Take care, then, that you train them to obey when they are spoken to,--to do as they are bid. Believe me, we are not made for entire independence,--we are not fit for it. Even Christ's freemen have a yoke to wear,--they 'serve the Lord Christ' (Col. iii 24). Children cannot learn too soon that this is a world in which we are not all intended to rule, and that we are never in our right place until we know how to obey our betters. TEACH THEM TO OBEY WHILE YOUNG, OR ELSE THEY WILL BE FRETTING AGAINST GOD ALL THEIR LIVES LONG, AND WEAR THEMSELVES OUT WITH THE VAIN IDEA OF BEING INDEPENDENT OF HIS CONTROL.
"Reader, this hint is only too much needed. You will see many in this day who allow their children to choose and think for themselves long before they are able, and even make excuses for their disobedience, as if it were a thing not to be blamed. To my eyes, a parent always yielding, and a child always having its own way, are a most painful sight;--painful, because I see God's appointed order of things inverted and turned upside down;--painful, because I feel sure the consequence to that child's character in the end will be self-will, pride, and self-conceit. You must not wonder that men refuse to obey their Father which is in heaven, if you allow them, when children, to disobey their father who is upon earth.
"Parents, if you love your children, let obedience be a motto and a watchword continually before their eyes."
Obey our HUSBANDS (as wives): "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so [let] the wives [be] to their own husbands in every thing." (Ephesians 5:22-24)
In Bob Mumford's book "Living Happily Ever After", he brings out a very encouraging point for those who are afraid to follow and obey their husbands. "The wife does not submit to her husband because she thinks he is strong and trustworthy in his own right, but because she believes that GOD will lead the family through her husband. She is fitting in with GOD'S order for marriage. Remember Sarah was not trusting Abraham to get her out of that harem--SHE WAS TRUSTING GOD!" God does not let us down. When HE tells us to do something HE has no loop holes. We just do it and let HIM do the rest.
Obey our GOVERNMENT (as citizens living in a country): "Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme;" (1 Peter 2:13) "1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. 2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. 3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: 4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to [execute] wrath upon him that doeth evil. 5 Wherefore [ye] must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. 6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing." (Romans 13:1-6)
It does not say if they are a Godly government, or fair government, or if we agree. Many governments are put over a country for the purpose of punishment. It is still God in control. The only out we have is if they ask us to disobey God.
Obey our ELDERS OF THE CHURCH (as part of a church body): "Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that [is] unprofitable for you." (Hebrews 13:17)
This is missing in our churches today and everyone does as he pleases. As we do so, we have many who are disgracing the name of the Lord. Many lost people are unwilling to listen to the Gospel because the Christians are no different than they are. The elders were given the responsibility of ruling over us and requiring obedience to God's Word to make a pure and holy bride for the Lord. As they teach and demand of us obedience to what the Word says, they also give us a better and more rewarding life. For where God's Word and principles are observed there is life more abundant. When we disobey, even in a few areas, we soon disobey in more and more areas until we are no different than the world around us.
Obey our MASTERS (as servants or employees): "Servants, be obedient to them that are [your] masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ;" (Ephesians 6:5) What business can operate without obedience to the hours, rules, instructions, directions? The successful business is the business where the employees are all obeying. This saves money also, in the lack of necessity of arbitrators and UNIONS. The employee needs to realize that he has sold HIS TIME to this business for the employer to use as he wants to use it. If he cannot do this he needs to leave, not cause dissension and disruption in the business. His is merely to obey, just as the child's place is to obey and keep the home running smoothly.
God never said in His Word to obey parents, husbands, governments, elders, businesses when they are fair, right, lovely, just, or if we agree. He said OBEY and let Him take care of the rest. If you take a look at the military you can have a good idea of why obedience is required. If the soldiers do not obey the commands of the leaders, whole troops or the whole country could be lost. It is the same thing in our world: home, country, jobs. If people do not have to obey and can do what THEY feel is right, homes break up, children are lost to rebellion, children lead other children into rebellion, and businesses operate in chaos. When we are not obeying God our whole Christian lives fall apart! God gave a book of commands not to put a burden on us and mistreat us, but to give us the guidance to live by so we can survive and have a good life with God's richest blessings poured out on us. Everything must operate in order or there is chaos. Our bodies must work in order. If some part of the body rebels against the other and doesn't obey the body's commands then we get sick, or hurt, or die. If the laws of nature were broken (nature disobeying God) we could have a hard freeze in July and ruin everything. If one of the planets decided to disobey and move over just an inch the whole universe would explode. Is it any wonder that homes are exploding anymore? No one is obeying and no one is following the rules.
God offers us only one exception to mandatory obedience: "We ought to obey God rather than men." (Acts 5:29) If we are called on to disobey God's commands by what we are asked to do, then we must obey God rather than those over us. This is the ONLY reason He has given us for DISOBEDIENCE.
"Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth [it] not, to him it is sin." (James 4:17)
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  honorman Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2002 Total Posts : 1137 | Posted 8/25/2003 10:13 AM (GMT -6) |   | | Mrs Paul5388, interesting name...I would continue with this thread but my wife won't let me... | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Paul5388 Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2003 Total Posts : 295 | Posted 8/25/2003 10:26 AM (GMT -6) |   | Honorman,
I just have to protect her real identity from people who would disagree in a violent or harassing manner. Oh, she does prefer to be called Mrs. instead of by her given name (does that make sense, since I gave her the Mrs.?) ***************************
BTW, did I mention that she was raised in a Southern Baptist Convention environment, like I was? | | Back to Top | | |
  |  Paul5388 Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2003 Total Posts : 295 | Posted 8/25/2003 10:41 AM (GMT -6) |   | Tigress,
I think it was covered in the last paragraphquote: God offers us only one exception to mandatory obedience: "We ought to obey God rather than men." (Acts 5:29) If we are called on to disobey God's commands by what we are asked to do, then we must obey God rather than those over us. This is the ONLY reason He has given us for DISOBEDIENCE.
| | Back to Top | | |
   |  Paul5388 Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2003 Total Posts : 295 | Posted 8/25/2003 10:55 AM (GMT -6) |   | Tigress,
Since when is the protection of children not primarily the responsibility of the father?
What does brains have to do with anything? Men and women both have brains. However, as Paul said in I Timothy, it was the woman that was deceived, not the man. | | Back to Top | | |
 | 82 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 3 4 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 3:19 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|