Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > The nature of _R_E_V_E_L_A_T_I_O_N_ Eph 3:3 & 3:9  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
103 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 8/1/2004 3:27 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
1WAY,

quote:
I couldn't find who squint is. Thanks for the compliment.


I think his whole user name is "sometimesisquint," or something like that. But he's another excellent wordsmith like you!Smile


wjs

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/1/2004 3:37 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by 1way

Oh, so at first it's quoting large sections of the bible as though it is your "personal response/answer"


The CONTENT of those three scripture passages, all related, deny/refute the core of your thesis. Quoting them is enough.

HERE ARE THE CITATIONS:

    Genesis 15:6

    Hebrews 11:1-40

    Romans 3:21-31

    Romans 2:28-29

    Romans 4:1-25


-----

Scripture speaks for itself.
Back to Top
 

1way
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 299
 
   Posted 8/1/2004 5:09 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW

Don't you remember? I trumped your lesser citation by giving you the whole bible as my refutation against your view.

Oh ye of little memory... Simp_Grandpa

And don't you remember, just like you suggest, I need not do anything more than quote the bible in order to substantiate my view (and thus refute yours)!

I like this form of POW-ish non-argumentation, everything is settled so nicely. (...I win...) Cool
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/1/2004 5:18 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Typical 1Way tacktic, boast that you will discuss, but only pontificate from false premesis. But then when an arguement is posed, turn tail and deny its existance at the same time.

I posted to things: (1) a series of scriptures; and (2) the question of what the "nature" of God's revelation to us is.

I'll interact with you about either, and hopefully both.

Get off the turn-tail tactics.
Back to Top
 

1way
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 299
 
   Posted 8/1/2004 8:22 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW

And so I suppose that you will answer my two things right?

1) I offered you the entire bible for my view against yours, and 2) I offered you my understanding of the nature of the revelation for this dispensation in my first two posts.

Only, I offered that a long time ago. Well, except for the entire bible bit, but then again, we don't argue against God's word, do we? We discuss God's word and we disagree with each other. Or do you propose that we should have a disagreement with
God's word? Simp_Janitor
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/2/2004 6:25 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
1Way says: "If the nature of the revelation for this dispensation is truly unique compared to all other revelation, then all these opposing arguments become beside the point."

The inverse is perhaps also true. If the "nature" of the Gospel for which the preaching to the Gentiles Paul was entrused with it is the ONE Gospel of Jesus Christ, and of course if Peter, James, etc., also preached that same Gospel to a different audience within a different culture and religious tradition, then what 1Way is saying is unique is just hubris.

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/2/2004 7:16 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
First, let me just say that you said nothing about what the "nature" of the revelation (the nature of the revealing--a verb) of God is. THAT needs attention.

-----


But on to what you said in your first two posts in this thread...

1Way, I read your two posts. I've read your posts, it seems, for years now. And caught all the details and the gist. But it is still plain as day that the Acts-9 Dispensational Theory DOES NOT HOLD WATER!!!

All this leads to the theory that proof-texting is the first step on the road back to illiteracy.

I just LOVE all the scripture passages you posted. And I just want to shout "Let the text speak." But your two postings did not accomplish that. I much prefer letting the text speak, reading it as something written, and not treating it as an instrument in a spy operation.
quote:
Because I already understand ... the unique message ... so these things make natural sense to me, but the average Christian would not appreciate such things
quote:
if you grant the uniqueness of the revelation that was given to him (Paul).
quote:
that this dispensation was delivered in hidden mystery, and is called "the fellowship of the mystery".
quote:
I say it's because the nature of the revelation of these mysteries are more deep than that.
quote:
So, become a workman, rightly dividing the word of truth, and be a wise investor in the things of God by seeking the veiled and hidden things.
quote:
keep searching for the hidden matters
quote:
preach boldly the hidden revelation from God!
quote:



Sounds quite cultish.

1Way, I see where you say: "Notice, even though it is an uncomfortable idea for most, God through Paul stipulates this new revelation as including the teachings about Christ which are not according to previous revelation, but were first given to Paul."

But Paul himself says: "...Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery kept secret since the world began 26 but now has been made manifest, and by the prophetic Scriptures has been made known to all nations, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, for obedience to the faith" St. Irenaeus preached "Christ according to the Scriptures." And Paul says: "For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures,... (1 Corinthians 15:3)." And those SCRIPTURES are the Old Testement Law, Psalms and Prophets which spoke of Christ!!!!!!!!!

Paul says it, and what he says is that the "Scriptures" held the mystery all along; but that the "reveal"-ation, the uncovering to our eyes of what has always been there to those with eyes to see (Abraham "saw" His Day...) is the Gospel of salvation in Christ Jesus.

Proof-texting does seem to be the first step back to illiteracy.

Let the Holy Text speak!


There is lots more to notice in your post; but even more to notice in what Paul is saying in the scriptures.

Back later.

- PotOnWheel
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/2/2004 7:29 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Oh, here's Paul again:
    "...that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,..." (1 Corinthians 15:4)
Back to Top
 

1way
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 299
 
   Posted 8/3/2004 5:41 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW

You quoted many things I said out of context, one quote even has no words in it, actually, you supplied NO context at all, other than your insulting comments, and you expect to be taken seriously.

You quoted some text, which started out saying
quote:
"...Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery kept secret since the world began 26 but now has been made manifest,
and, instead of allowing that text to speak for itself for itself, you said
quote:
Paul says it, and what he says is that the "Scriptures" held the mystery all along; but that the "reveal"-ation, the uncovering to our eyes of what has always been there to those with eyes to see (Abraham "saw" His Day...) is the Gospel of salvation in Christ Jesus.
You just made that up. However, the scriptures says that it was "not" previously revealed until given to Paul (Ro 3:21, 16:25, 1Cor 2:7, Eph 3:5,8, 9, Col 1:26, 2Tim 2:10). Instead of accepting God's word on the matter, you violated it with your own thinking. And you did not just alter it, you contradicted it in this mannor. Scripture says that this revelation was hidden in God, not revealed to man ... until has now been revealed, and given to Paul to give to us.

Your lack of reflective cogent point/counterpoint exchange is sadly complimentary to your ad hominem style of non-argumentation and fictional generalizations. So much for; personal arrogance, context ripping, generalizations and mal content.

Here's more on the nature of the revelation for this dispensation.
  1. kept secret since the world began Ro 16:25, Eph 3:5

  2. now revealed Ro 3:21, Eph 3:5, Col 1:26, 2Tim 1:10

  3. Paul, (an apostle, teacher) to the gentiles Ro 11:13, 1Tim 2:7 2Tim 1:11

  4. Hidden teaching/wisdom 1Cor 2:7, Eph3:9, Col 1:26,

  5. mystery revelation Ro 11:25, Ro 16:25, 1Cor 2:6-10, 1Co 4:1, 1Co 15:51, Eph 1:9-10, 3:3-9, 6:19, Col 1:26-27, 2:2, 4:3, 1Tim 3:9,

  6. Paul is our pattern, we are to imitate, follow him Phl 3:17, 1Th 1:6, 2Th 3:7, 3:9, 1Tim 1:16, 2Tim 1:13, 3:10
In summary, the nature of the revelation is not according to other revelation, it is thus accordingly different revelation, it is not the same as other teachings elsewhere.

Take your own good Smile advice, let God's word speak, don't violate it in order to protect your own views.

Until next time.
If we have to...
By His way, truth and life,

1Way
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/3/2004 6:29 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
ALL THIS READS STRAIGHT FORWARD!

Eph 1:7 In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace 8 which He made to abound toward us in all wisdom and prudence, 9 having made known to us the mystery of His will, according to His good pleasure which He purposed in Himself, 10 that in the dispensation of the fullness of the times He might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth--in Him. 11 In Him also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestined according to the purpose of Him who works all things according to the counsel of His will, 12 that we who first trusted in Christ should be to the praise of His glory. 13 In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.

"In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace 8 which He made to abound toward us in all wisdom and prudence" THIS IS THE SAME FOR ALL, FROM ADAM TO...WELL, NOT BORN YET. AND IT IS WHAT PETER AND JAMES, AND... PREACHED AS WELL. SAME/SAME!


Eph 3 "...the grace of God ... which in other ages was not made known to the sons of men, as it has now been revealed by the Spirit to His holy apostles and prophets... '

ANYONE SAYING THIS WAS UNIQUE TO PAUL HAS TO DEAL WITH THE PLURALITY OF APOSTLES AND PROPHETS.


Eph 3 "the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, of the same body, and partakers of His promise in Christ through the gospel..."

SAME/SAME. GENTILES AND JEWS, FELLOW HEIRS.


Eph. 3 "I became a minister ... that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ, 9 and to make all see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the ages has been hidden in God who created all things through Jesus Christ;"

Paul had a job to preach that mystery (which Peter and the others also preached) that was "hidden in God" that is Christ Jesus' economy of salvation.


Eph 6:18 praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, being watchful to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints-- 19 and for me, that utterance may be given to me, that I may open my mouth boldly to make known the mystery of the gospel, 20 for which I am an ambassador in chains; that in it I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak

PAUL IS PRAYING FOR ALL THE MINISTRY THAT GOD HAS ENTRUSTED HIS HANDS TO' PRAYING FOR "ALL THE SAINTS," AND HOPING TO BE BOLD.


I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might show all longsuffering, as a pattern to those who are going to believe on Him for everlasting life.

PAUL KNOWS THAT HE IS AN EXAMPLE. THE "IN ME FIRST" BIT REFERS TO HOW MUCH A SCOUNDRAL HE HAD BEEN, AND NOW A POSTERBOY.


1Ti 1:16 However, for this reason I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might show all longsuffering, as a pattern to those who are going to believe on Him for everlasting life.

SAME!


Ro 16:25 Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel-and-the-preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery kept secret since the world began 26 but now has been made manifest, and by the prophetic Scriptures has been made known to all nations, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, for obedience to the faith--

THE GOSPEL IS OF CHRIST JESUS ('of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery kept secret since the world began'), NOT OF PAUL!


Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 1:35 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW,

quote:
But Paul himself says: "...Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery kept secret since the world began but now has been made manifest, and by the prophetic Scriptures has been made known to all nations, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, for obedience to the faith"


You're assuming that "prophetic Scriptures" refers to the OT instead of Paul's epistles. How could you prove that?


wjs

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 4:37 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by jefscott

POW,
quote:
But Paul himself says: "...Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery kept secret since the world began but now has been made manifest, and by the prophetic Scriptures has been made known to all nations, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, for obedience to the faith"


jefscott: You're assuming that "prophetic Scriptures" refers to the OT instead of Paul's epistles. How could you prove that?



YES I CAN !



BECAUSE that is the way the WHOLE of the NT and all the other contemporary writing spoke of the OT and Apocrapha. When Jesus read the scriptures it was the OT. Same for Paul. Peter. James.


BUT NOTICE ESPECIALLY WHAT PAUL REFERS

TO AS BEING "THE SCRIPTURE."

(BibleGateway.com includes

the citations where Paul found them!)


AND ALSO NOTICE THAT PAUL'S SCRIPTURE

IS THE SAME AS JAMES AND PETER.




  • Matthew 21:42 Jesus said to them, "Have you never read in the Scriptures..."

  • Matthew 26:54 But how then would the Scriptures be fulfilled that say it must happen in this way?"

  • Mark 12:10 Haven't you read this scripture:

  • Luke 4:21 and he began by saying to them, "Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing."

  • Luke 24:27 And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself.

  • Luke 24:45 Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.

  • John 2:22 After he was raised from the dead, his disciples recalled what he had said. Then they believed the Scripture and the words that Jesus had spoken.

  • John 5:39 ...These are the Scriptures that testify about me,

  • John 7:42 Does not the Scripture say that the Christ will come from David's family and from Bethlehem, the town where David lived?"

  • John 17:12 While I was with them, I protected them and kept them safe by that name you gave me. None has been lost except the one doomed to destruction so that Scripture would be fulfilled.

  • John 19:37 and, as another scripture says, "They will look on the one they have pierced."

  • John 20:9 (They still did not understand from Scripture that Jesus had to rise from the dead.)

  • Acts 1:16 and said, "Brothers, the Scripture had to be fulfilled which the Holy Spirit spoke long ago through the mouth of David concerning Judas, who served as guide for those who arrested Jesus–

  • Acts 8:32 The eunuch was reading this passage of Scripture: "He was led like a sheep to the slaughter, and as a lamb before the shearer is silent, so he did not open his mouth.

  • Acts 8:35 Then Philip began with that very passage of Scripture and told him the good news about Jesus.

  • Acts 17:2 As his custom was, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures,

  • Acts 17:11 Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.

  • Acts 18:28 For he vigorously refuted the Jews in public debate, proving from the Scriptures that Jesus was the Christ.


  • Romans 1:2 the gospel he promised beforehand through his prophets in the Holy Scriptures


  • Romans 4:3 What does the Scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness."


  • Romans 9:17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth."[ 9:17 Exodus 9:16]

  • Romans 10:11 As the Scripture says, "Anyone who trusts in him will never be put to shame."[ 10:11 Isaiah 28:16]

  • Romans 11:2 God did not reject his people, whom he foreknew. Don't you know what the Scripture says in the passage about Elijah–how he appealed to God against Israel:

  • Romans 15:4 For everything that was written in the past was written to teach us, so that through endurance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.

  • 1 Corinthians 15:3 For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance[ 15:3 Or you at the first] : that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures,

  • 1 Corinthians 15:4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,

  • Galatians 3:8 The Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, and announced the gospel in advance to Abraham: "All nations will be blessed through you."[ 3:8 Gen. 12:3; 18:18; 22:18]

  • Galatians 3:16
    The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say "and to seeds," meaning many people, but "and to your seed,"[ 3:16 Gen. 12:7; 13:15; 24:7] meaning one person, who is Christ.

  • Galatians 3:22 But the Scripture declares that the whole world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised, being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe.

  • 1 Timothy 4:13 Until I come, devote yourself to the public reading of Scripture, to preaching and to teaching.

  • 1 Timothy 5:18 For the Scripture says, "Do not muzzle the ox while it is treading out the grain,"[ 5:18 Deut. 25:4] and "The worker deserves his wages."[ 5:18 Luke 10:7]

  • 2 Timothy 3:15
    and how from infancy you have known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.


  • 2 Timothy 3:16
    All Scripture is God­breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,


  • James 2:8 If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, "Love your neighbor as yourself,"[ 2:8 Lev. 19:18] you are doing right.

  • James 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled that says, "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,"[ 2:23 Gen. 15:6] and he was called God's friend.

  • James 4:5
    Or do you think Scripture says without reason that the spirit he caused to live in us envies intensely?[ 4:5 Or that God jealously longs for the spirit that he made to live in us; or that the Spirit he caused to live in us longs jealously]

  • James 4:6 But he gives us more grace. That is why Scripture says: "God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble."[ 4:6 Prov. 3:34]

  • 1 Peter 2:6 For in Scripture it says: "See, I lay a stone in Zion, a chosen and precious cornerstone, and the one who trusts in him will never be put to shame."[ 2:6 Isaiah 28:16]

  • 2 Peter 1:20 Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation.

  • 2 Peter 3:16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.


Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 2:29 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW,

Obviously I agree that the OT is scripture. I'm asking if you can prove that Paul is referring to the OT in Romans 16. Consider the following:

3:14 Therefore, dear friends, since you are waiting for these things, strive to be found at peace, without spot or blemish, when you come into his presence. 3:15 And regard the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as also our dear brother Paul wrote to you, according to the wisdom given to him, 3:16 speaking of these things in all his letters. Some things in these letters are hard to understand, things the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they also do to the REST of the scriptures.

It seems that Peter considered Paul's epistles as scripture, so why can't Paul have been assuming that his own epistles were prophetic scriptures as well? And if so, then why can't Paul be referring to his own epistles in Romans 16?


wjs

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 4:00 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
jefscott: I'm asking if you can prove that Paul is referring to the OT in Romans 16.

POW: Interesting. Lets look.


jefscott: "3:15 ... our dear brother Paul wrote to you, according to the wisdom given to him, 3:16 speaking of these things in all his letters. Some things in these letters are hard to understand, things the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they also do to the REST of the scriptures."

POW: This distinguishes his letters from the "rest of" (therefore some other) scriptures.


jefscott: It seems that Peter considered Paul's epistles as scripture, so why can't Paul have been assuming that his own epistles were prophetic scriptures as well? And if so, then why can't Paul be referring to his own epistles in Romans 16?

POW: Romans 16:25-27 "Now to him who is able to establish you by my gospel and the proclamation of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery hidden for long ages past, 26 but now revealed and made known through the prophetic writings by the command of the eternal God, so that all nations might believe and obey him-- 27 to the only wise God be glory forever through Jesus Christ! Amen."

"Gospel" is an interesting word. I trust Paul Tarazi's commentaries because his focus is on what the text says and means in the setting it was written -- not what people later tried to lay on it.
quote:
http://www.svots.edu/Faculty/Paul-Nadim-Tarazi/Extracts/Introduction-to-Mark.html

". . . In these epistles the word "gospel" refers not to a written document but to Paul's teaching about the Messiahship (divine Sonship) of Jesus and its significance for both Gentiles and Jews. "The gospel" in this context is essentially a synonym for "the faith," as is most obvious in Galatians . The agreement reached among Christian leaders at Jerusalem and described in this letter (2:1-10) bears witness to the fact that the lack of interest in a written gospel evident in Paul's epistles is not unique to him: no one during this early period spoke of "a gospel" or "the gospel" as a written document and thus as a part of scripture. There was in fact no "New Testament" as we now know it, and more importantly, there was no discernible sense that something was amiss because of that lack. Indeed, our term "Old Testament" presumes there is a "New" counterpart, but such was not the case at this time. The Old Testament as scripture was considered complete and sufficient throughout those first 30 years.

This was no less true among Gentile believers than it was among Jewish ones; the scripture consisting solely of the Old Testament was considered applicable equally and directly to all believers, Jew and Gentile alike (though Paul's opponents interpreted certain portions of it differently than he did). That even Paul's Gentile converts had to adopt the Old Testament as their own no less than Jews did is clear from the way Paul's epistles assume his Gentile readers have thoroughly assimilated its contents. And the Old Testament's authority extended even to practical issues in Gentile communities, as can be seen in 1 Corinthians: even when Paul addresses matters peculiar to the Gentile nature of those communities -- matters which would not have been issues at all among Jews -- he consistently appeals to the Old Testament writings as a final authority containing solutions to "Gentile" problems no less than strictly "Jewish" ones.
. . .
"The gospel" itself remained an oral proclamation, something outside of written scripture, and we find no evidence in Paul's epistles that oral preaching ever came to be considered inadequate as a vehicle to convey the content of this gospel. Nowhere in Paul's epistles does he hint at any sense of discomfort about the absence of a comprehensive or systematic written version of the content of his preaching. For Paul, the gospel was in its essence brief, and it always pointed back to the scriptures of the Old Testament, as can be seen from his summary of the Thessalonians' response to his preaching: they "turned to God from idols, to serve a living and true God, and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, Jesus" (1 Thess 1:9b-10).

So long as Paul was alive, his teaching was itself "the gospel" and was not replaced or supplemented by any written works that could be called "a gospel" or "gospels." Paul did offer defenses and explanations of his gospel in written form within his epistles, but there was no attempt at a systematic literary exposition, no attempt to create a writing that could itself be called a gospel.
"


SO...
    according to the revelation of the mystery hidden for long ages past. . .by the command of the eternal God. . .
  • my gospel and the proclamation of Jesus Christ

  • revealed and made known through

  • the prophetic writings

1. Paul's gospel and presentation is his message!
2. "revealed and made known through" is something that you probably WANT to mean that it is new. But it is what follows, the prophetic writings (Which actually is in three parts: the Law (books), the Psalms and the Prophets) that have always been there, but were "revealed and made known" through the "gospel and proclaimation of Jesus Christ." Christ is in every book of the Bible!!!
3. We covered "revealed and made known through."


jefscott REPEAT: And if so, then why can't Paul be referring to his own epistles in Romans 16?

POW: Paul refers to his ""gospel and proclaimation" (which we can treat as a well-lauded single thing: his preaching/proclaiming/explaining -- VERBALLY. His preachign CAN be called "Gospel," as can Peters, etc.

Paul also mentions "the prophetic writings," and it is THESE that the Gospel gives "revelation" and have up until the Day of Pentacost been "the mystery hidden for long ages past" dispite being copied faithfully in scrolls and read in the temple and synagogue.


Thanks for the questions.

PoW
Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 4:15 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW,

quote:
jefscott: "3:15 ... our dear brother Paul wrote to you, according to the wisdom given to him, 3:16 speaking of these things in all his letters. Some things in these letters are hard to understand, things the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they also do to the REST of the scriptures."

POW: This distinguishes his letters from the "rest of" (therefore some other) scriptures.


It does indeed "distinguish" them from the "REST of" scripture, but it also implies that Paul's epistles ARE scripture. So I still don't see how one could prove that Paul is not referring to his own epistles in Romans 16 when he speaks of "prophetic scriptures."


wjs

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 4:51 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by jefscott

I still don't see how one could prove that Paul is not referring to his own epistles in Romans 16 when he speaks of "prophetic scriptures."


1. It is SO "forced" and contrived. Except that you have an ulterior motive you would never think that. To me it just sounds rediculous. And, of course, anyone can tell you that you cannot prove that it is. (Which is as lightweight as your arguement, but true.)

2. Am I to consider Paul's letters to be, in his mind, "prophetic writings?" How akward to use such a phrase when the stock-in-trade basis for scriptural authority is called the same thing. I do not see it. Consider where Paul writes: "that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures." (Corinthians 15:3). See how that sounds; its direct. And the dynamic is that one thing is confirmed by another. Were Paul to say that of his own letters, it would lack that dynamic, and be "hokey."
"
Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 2:36 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW,

quote:
1. It is SO "forced" and contrived. Except that you have an ulterior motive you would never think that. To me it just sounds rediculous. And, of course, anyone can tell you that you cannot prove that it is. (Which is as lightweight as your arguement, but true.)


I would contend just the opposite. The context is about a mystery that has been hidden for ages and was only THEN revealed by prophetic scriptures. When you compare that to the verse in Colossians where Paul says it was given TO HIM to fill up the "word of God," even the "mystery," it not only seems reasonable, but eminently reasonable to assume he's speaking of his own epistles as those scriptures which "manifest" that mystery.


wjs

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 2:40 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by jefscott

I would contend just the opposite. The context is about a mystery that has been hidden for ages and was only THEN revealed by prophetic scriptures. When you compare that to the verse in Colossians where Paul says it was given TO HIM to fill up the "word of God," even the "mystery," it not only seems reasonable, but eminently reasonable to assume he's speaking of his own epistles as those scriptures which "manifest" that mystery.


Well, he didn't. But if he had he would have refered to his preaching (the Gospel), of which any of Peter, James, John, Barth. ALL could have done of their own preaching too. It ALL fit the bill you are describing equally well. Their preaching (the Gospel) revealed what had been in the Prophets, Psalms, and Law all along, but hidden.
Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 2:51 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW,

The logical conclusion of your argument seems to be that if we chunked Paul's epistles, we will have lost no revelation. I will remain a heretic and politely disagree.Bandit


wjs

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 3:57 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by jefscott

POW,

The logical conclusion of your argument seems to be that if we chunked Paul's epistles, we will have lost no revelation. I will remain a heretic and politely disagree.Bandit


It is beyond me to even wonder why you would think that I want to "chunk" any of God's Word! I love the epistles of Paul.

What gain did you accomplish with that remark?

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 4:08 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
From Wesley's Notes. [b]"The last words of this epistle exactly answer the first, chapter i. 1 - 5."


Chapter I
1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ - To this introduction the conclusion answers, Romans 15:15, &c. Called to be an apostle - And made an apostle by that calling. While God calls, he makes what he calls. As the Judaizing teachers disputed his claim to the apostolical office, it is with great propriety that he asserts it in the very entrance of an epistle wherein their principles are entirely overthrown. And various other proper and important thoughts are suggested in this short introduction; particularly the prophecies concerning the gospel, the descent of Jesus from David, the great doctrines of his Godhead and resurrection, the sending the gospel to the gentiles, the privileges of Christians, and the obedience and holiness to which they were obliged in virtue of their profession. Separated - By God, not only from the bulk of other men, from other Jews, from other disciples, but even from other Christian teachers, to be a peculiar instrument of God in spreading the gospel.
2 Which he promised before - Of old time, frequently, solemnly. And the promise and accomplishment confirm each other. De 18:18; Isa 9:6,7; 53:1; 61:1; Jer 23:5.
3 Who was of the seed of David according to the flesh - That is, with regard to his human nature. Both the natures of our Saviour are here mentioned; but the human is mentioned first, because the divine was not manifested in its full evidence till after his resurrection.
4 But powerfully declared to be the Son of God, according to the Spirit of Holiness - That is, according to his divine nature. By the resurrection from the dead - For this is both the fountain and the object of our faith; and the preaching of the apostles was the consequence of Christ's resurrection.
5 By whom we have received - I and the other apostles. Grace and apostleship - The favour to be an apostle, and qualifications for it. For obedience to the faith in all nations - That is, that all nations may embrace the faith of Christ. For his name - For his sake; out of regard to him.



Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 4:21 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
www.ccel.org/fathers/NPNF1-11/Chrysostom/Romans/Rom-Hom27.html

Homily XXVII. Romans 16:25-27
(St. John Chrysostom)


quote:
Now to Him that is of power to stablish you according to my Gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, but now is made manifest, and (Mss. te which Sav. omits) by the Scriptures of the Prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith: to God only wise, to Him be glory through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.


Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 4:26 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
INTERESTING:

quote:
www.pfrs.org/commentary/rom16_25.html

Romans 16:25-27
Revelation of the Mystery




    Romans 1:1-5 (NKJV) ............ Romans 16:25-27

  • the gospel of God ............ my gospel and Jesus Christ's preaching


  • which He promised before through His prophets in the Holy Scriptures ............ made apparent through the prophetic Scriptures


  • for obedience to the faith for all nations ............ was made known for all nations for the obedience of faith
Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 4:32 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW,

quote:
From Wesley's Notes. "The last words of this epistle exactly answer the first, chapter i. 1 - 5."


I agree, but I find the "answer" or correspondence as one of contrast - the first referring to what was known from the OT and the last what had been revealed by Paul's epistles.


wjs

Back to Top
 

1way
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 299
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 5:36 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Jefscott, you said
quote:
I would contend just the opposite. The context is about a mystery that has been hidden for ages and was only THEN revealed by prophetic scriptures. When you compare that to the verse in Colossians where Paul says it was given TO HIM to fill up the "word of God," even the "mystery," it not only seems reasonable, but eminently reasonable to assume he's speaking of his own epistles as those scriptures which "manifest" that mystery.
I totally agree, and well put! Yet, for someone like POW, the response against the biblically derived teaching is,

it's not true. Sick

Yet God's word King says
    Colossians 1:25 Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfill the word of God;
To me for you, that seems pretty specific and restricted and clear to me how it is that the teachings for this dispensation was delivered to us. How can that mean that it was actually given to all the bible writers indiscriminately? The same specific channel for the revelation for this dispensation was also specified "to me for you" in Eph 3:2, yet for some reason (manmade tradition maybe), such bible teachings are not very convincing.

So God through Paul taught that the dispensation of the grace of God (the dispensation of the mystery), was given to Paul by God to "fulfill the word of God", AND Paul's contemporaries had no qualms speaking about Paul's writings which were NOT canonized yet(!!!) Shock as scripture, yet when you read POW's remarks or listen to 90% of the Christians out there, you'd think this entire idea (which is plainly taught in scripture) is unscriptural.

It is sometimes painful to see just how much people honor manmade thinking that even contradicts God's word. Didn't the reformation teach us anything about hundreds of years of tradition and that it is worthless when compared to the authority and truth from scripture, especially as it contrasts against scripture. It sometimes boggles the mind how a believer can hear a teaching from scripture and with so much single-minded determination, work against it.

One of the first lessons I learned as a Christian, was to pay less attention to what man says, and pay more attention to what God says (in the bible). He actually speaks to us in His word, and yet many people not only do not listen when He speaks, they do not want to hear it, and worse than that(!!!) if God says

yes,


this (entire) dispensation is according to a revelation that was "not revealed" until "now", having been specifically commissioned to Paul to give to us, and he is the first as our pattern for salvation, and we are to follow his life and teachings, we do not have the standing to pick and choose which apostle/bible teacher to go by, God said to follow Paul, teach what he teaches. God says all that and much more, yet

then they say

no,
Evil Tongue

God did not do that, or no, Paul did not consider his own writings to be scripture (God's word, Jesus' teachings), as though such a thought is simply wrong, even though Paul's gospel and apostleship and dispensational teachings was given to him directly by revelation from our ascended savior!

How would Paul not consider these teachings and his commission to this dispensation a thing not of the word of God??? It only seems reasonable that he considered it God's word (and thus equivalently scripture).

Please keep up the good work! My new job is coming along well enough but is keeping me quite busy so I will have little time here for a while. My thoughts and prayers are with you, and POW and the other traditionalists. Scripture is the way to go, thank goodness for those who teach and preach scripture. Cool

Blessings
Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
103 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 4:46 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads