 |
| Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > Baptism (take three) | Forum Quick Jump
|
 |  Sahid Megistered Rember

Date Joined Jun 2004 Total Posts : 2013 | Posted 7/21/2004 8:32 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Nicene Creed: "We look forward to the resurrection of the body." 1 Corinthians 15:21 -- "For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man."
I agree. You're arguing against something that I didn't say. quote: PoW -- We believe these two things: that a person is a UNITY of body and soul. And any notion that a replacement body and not that person's resurrected body is automatically called into question. "Make stuff" does not make me comfortable.
Then be uncomfortable with the Bible. If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things have passed away; behold, new things have come. quote: That Christ willingly suffered, And willingly. volitionally died on the cross is important. That his body was 'one of ours,' but yet he did not have to die is important. His 'innocent death' truly makes him worthy. And his resurrection without sin means that he literally conquered sin and death.
Who are you arguing with? Not me. I never disagreed with any of that. quote: We not only have a "sin problem" but we have a "death/mortality" problem too. Baptism is not just about sin and forgiveness -- though that is part of it; for Peter talks about a good conscience. Baptism is mainly and centrally about Christ's death and resurrection. And death is more a problem than we think. Its not just that someone may not have "sinned yet" (If so, baptism could be postponed until that "first sin" -- What would the celebratory party look like?) but they are still part of the community and sin is not just an individual thing. Psalms 51 even says "In sins has my mother conceived me" (Not "in sin" as Augustine wanted to read it--in latin cause he didn't know Greek.) But not only is sin a communal problem, the fall also brings a mortality problem. Replacements don't cut it, kuz they would not amount to the same person. You need YOUR body resurrected, better than new. Christ's incarnation, passion and resurrection ARE NECESSARY. We need to meditate on that until we at least begin to understand it! Christ submitted his own body to the curse, the CONSEQUENCES of our sins and our death-curse. The natural consequences of our actions, that were NOT natural to his own body were "laid on Him" and he brought them to death with him, and smashed them. And his own body was glorified in resurrection and ascension, making him worthy of being "judge." The consequences of our sin (death) was healed (as Athanasias points out!) in his body. He became the "medicine of immortality." And being "fed on him" we are not anihilated but are restored. "our life is in Him." We do not recieve some subsequent replacement life. No rehab. We receive just what we were always meant--before the fall and had it not happened--to have: God in us, God with us, by Him and in Him and through Him, Emanuel!!!
So Jesus' body would have lived forever? Really? I thought he became one of us. My mistake. quote: How can any body be "immperishable" and yet not be connected to the Vine. There is NO immortality of the body. But there is a resurrection from the dead, IN CHIRST.
I don't think you're listening to what I'm saying. The infant is connected to the vine. That is why he or she doesn't need to be re-connected. You're arguing against a straw man. I don't hold the position you're arguing against. When did I say infants are disconnected from Christ?
Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Sahid Megistered Rember

Date Joined Jun 2004 Total Posts : 2013 | Posted 7/21/2004 8:42 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: PoW: I like the phrasing "at-one-ment." The incarnation would have been necessary evenwithout sin, in order for the degree of fellowship that we were designed for and God desires to have with us. That's the Church's traditional view. "At-on-ment" means that restoration of relationship that in necessary. And Christ is the One Mediator, whether we have sinned or not.
But when God created man things were very good. God and man were together. Nothing was lacking. Gen 2:2. God was done with His work and He took a break. quote: Tradition regards the Blessed Virgin Mary as having not sinned, ever. But she STILL DIED as a consequence of Adam and Eve's sin. And She still needed a resurrection based on Christ's. (Orthodoxy has negative regard of the RCC idea of "immaculate conception", to say it mildly--and that means no "assumption" but a "dormition"/falling asleep.) Mary, with no sin, required her Son's suffering and death. Everyone else does too.
As is too often the case, tradition is wrong. It assumes two things, both without the support of scripture. 1. Mary never sinned. 2. She required her Son's suffering and death. Tradition doesn't impress me. The Bible does. quote: Christ's assumed humanity. Death is the main problem. And the fallen world has become the domain of the devil. But the cosmos belongs to Christ, and through the Church Chirst "takes back" his creation. The waters of baptism are blessed. What would be a symbol of death and danger becomes the washing of regeneration: a tomb and a 'mother.' (poetically)
No. Sin is the problem. We are made for relationship with God. Sin screws that up. Death is what happens when sin matures. Jesus died for us, because He wants to restore that relationship. Victory over death isn't any good without victory over sin. Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 7/22/2004 5:17 AM (GMT -6) |   | S: So Jesus' body would have lived forever? Really? I thought he became one of us. My mistake. P: That's a hypothetical thing, because that was not the plan. We know that his body did not "suffer corruption" in the grave--did not begin to rot. Ye we assume that a carpenter/mason bled a lot. Doctrinally we say that he "willingly" suffered. He "became" like us in all respects like us except sin. What would have happened to Adam an Eve without sin? Yet he chose to suffer as we did. His death was not as a result of any sin. "He who was not sin became sin for our sake." (2 Cor 5:21) He did not sin, yet he took the consequences of sin upon himself. Were his death to be his own, he would not have saved us. But his death was not his own, but "ours." So, he bacame the savior of the world.
quote: quote: -------------------------------------------- How can any body be "immperishable" and yet not be connected to the Vine. There is NO immortality of the body. But there is a resurrection from the dead, IN CHIRST. -------------------------------------------- S: ...The infant is connected to the vine. That is why he or she doesn't need to be re-connected. When did I say infants are disconnected from Christ?
P: There is original sin.
quote: -------------------------------------------- That's the Church's traditional view. "At-on-ment" means that restoration of relationship that in necessary. And Christ is the One Mediator, whether we have sinned or not. -------------------------------------------- S: But when God created man things were very good. God and man were together. Nothing was lacking. Gen 2:2. God was done with His work and He took a break.
P: Christ reveals what mankind is meant to be. God indwelling man. Its only the opinion of tradition, but tradition holds that the sort of intimacy between God's uncreated trinitarian essence and our creaturliness requires a mediator. That is we are "In Christ" and not "in the Trinity." The goal of Christianity is that we participate by grace (read: THROUGH Christ the Vine--not juridically but in reality) in that which Christ participate in by nature (Trinitarian love, life, etc.) That's as far as I'll explain it. The learning curve for me was a slow one--maybe for you too.
quote: -------------------------------------------- Mary, with no sin, required her Son's suffering and death. Everyone else does too. -------------------------------------------- S: As is too often the case, tradition is wrong. It assumes two things, both without the support of scripture. 1. Mary never sinned. 2. She required her Son's suffering and death. Tradition doesn't impress me. The Bible does.
PoW: But you don't quote the bible. That Mary never sinned is pious tradition. That she along with the rest of us required salvation by her son is fact.
That infants somehow are not in need of a savior is your own error.
quote: -------------------------------------------- Christ's assumed humanity. Death is the main problem. And the fallen world has become the domain of the devil. But the cosmos belongs to Christ, and through the Church Chirst "takes back" his creation. The waters of baptism are blessed. What would be a symbol of death and danger becomes the washing of regeneration: a tomb and a 'mother.' (poetically) -------------------------------------------- S: No. Sin is the problem. We are made for relationship with God. Sin screws that up. Death is what happens when sin matures. Jesus died for us, because He wants to restore that relationship. Victory over death isn't any good without victory over sin.
1. Of course victory over death without also over sin wouldn't be any good--it would be demonic. 2. Jesus not only died to restore that relationship (sin) but rose too (death). 3. Death BEGAN to happen the moment sin began. That's what God told them would happen. 4. Death IS the problem too. Did you read the Original Sin According to Saint Paul paper? http://www.romanity.org/htm/rom.10.en.original_sin_according_to_st._paul.01.htm
------------
Anything further, Zach, and we will have to do it by e-mail.
Thanks.
PoW | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 7/23/2004 6:26 AM (GMT -6) |   | I found this: quote: According to the teaching of the Orthodox Church (from the first centuries and up to our days), all men are subject to original sin - all, including also the Mother of God. And all have to be redeemed by the sacrifice of the Son of God. The Most Holy Virgin herself numbers herself among the saved, calling God her Saviour: "Šand my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour" (Luke 1:47). Sacred Scripture knows only one man who did not partake of original sin - the God-Man Christ Jesus, Who was conceived in a supernatural manner - by the Holy Spirit.
The Catholic view on original sin and on its consequences contradicts the clear testimonies of the word of God that point out the damage [caused] to man's very nature through the sin of our progenitors and the consequences of this sin, which show the violation of the natural order of human life. The Apostle Paul says: "For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. I find then a law that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: but I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members" (Romans 7:19-23). www.stjohndc.org/Homilies/9609a.htm
It also has some useful comparisions between Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism, and Protestantism. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 7/23/2004 6:38 AM (GMT -6) |   | In this post found on beliefnec.com can be found another aspect -- that the fall affected ALL of creation. And we can't help but be affected then, just by living. (As "Joy to the World" says "far as the curse is found..."): quote: The Orthodox view is that it is not a stain of sin or guilt that we are born with. Rather, when we are born, we enter a world that has been corrupted by sin. It's in the very air we breathe, so to speak. No one is immune from it, and thus, we all suffer the consequences of sin...i.e. death, tendency to sin, etc..
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 7/23/2004 9:43 AM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
 | 107 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 3 4 5 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 6:23 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|