Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > "SUFFERED IMPASSIBLY"  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
217 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/3/2004 7:03 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
So my sin doesn't make the Spirit feel bad? Aren't there examples in the Bible of God suffering before the incarnation as a result of sin? I think Christ does suffer "in his deity". When He flooded the world I believe He felt sadness. I think God does have feelings independent of a physical body, and the painful feelings subject Him to suffering or passion.


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/3/2004 7:10 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
You probably have no idea what his "deity" is like. You have never touched it, or held it in your hands, etc. But you CAN know him "personally." And that is revealed in Christ Jesus. Otherwise you would be saying that Christ is the perfect image of the Father's deity/essence; which you don't. You don't claim that. You do say that in Christ is seen "divine" virtues. But that is not the "deity" being talked of here.

While "Christ does suffer 'in his deity'" that does not mean, as the Fathers held, that "there was a Cross in the heart of God before the foundation of the world."

(And those dead guys don't care whether you like their word choice. Wink And neither do I. Viking)
Back to Top
 

John Earp
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1715
 
   Posted 8/3/2004 7:15 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
A thought provoking and strangely moving article.

http://www.biblical-theology.com/miscellaneous/suffer.htm



"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.

revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/4/2004 8:46 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
You probably have no idea what his "deity" is like. You have never touched it, or held it in your hands, etc. But you CAN know him "personally." And that is revealed in Christ Jesus. Otherwise you would be saying that Christ is the perfect image of the Father's deity/essence; which you don't. You don't claim that. You do say that in Christ is seen "divine" virtues. But that is not the "deity" being talked of here.
So I have held Jesus in my hands in His humanity? I have touched that? Unless your being firguritive, I don't understand. I do by the way say that Christ is the perfect image of the Father, essence and all. The biblical writers didn't put any stipulations on it, so neither do I.

Why is it that you think we can't know God's essence? Is it because God isn't powerful enough to create creatures that can know Him? I think that is obviously not true. So, it's not a question of what God can do; it's a question of what He wants to do. So is it because God is an introvert and doesn't like close relationships. Once again, I think that is obviously not true. So what am I missing? What is the reason that we can't know God's essence?


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/4/2004 8:48 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Oh yeah I forgot. I think those dead guys cared a great deal about wording. Look at the stupid filioque controversy that split the church.


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 7:30 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sahid: So what am I missing? What is the reason that we can't know God's essence?

PoW: You don't sound sincere.

Do you answer a guy who talks about "stupid. . .dead guys?"

Sahid, you say you ask sincerly, and that you put effort into what you ask, and want to know what other perspectives are. But stronger than those words are actions. I don't see any sincerity in "Is it because God isn't powerful enough." Only stray thoughts ("create a rock") and condesension ("God...introvert...doesn't like close relationships"). The best thing for you to do is read. And then to decide whether really want to "make sport," or to understand.

If you don't like what I'll offer this once, then look elsewhere.


These are my own words:
    The Trinity is of "one essence, and undivided." the Onlybegotten Son of the Father knows (loose speach here) the essence of the Father, as it is His. The Spirit also. They know IN essence (again, loose speach) from the inside. We know God only from outside the Trinity.

    It would be one false extreem to say that we dan "know God in essence": no creature can. But it is also a false exterem on the other end (And perhaps this is what some think the Orthodox mean--but this is an RCC view) to adpe a Thomist position of "created grace" as an intermediary between God and man. Orthodoxy does not say that. Aquinas' scholasticism said we can only know "about" God through reason.

    But Orthodoxy says that we CAN (depending on our purity) know God directly in his devine uncreated energies. We can experience God's energies in the form of His Light. (Very biblical.)


If that is not helpful, then see this (two parts, and by a leading authority, an Orthodox Bishop and Oxford scholar):


Show your sincerity -- I put a lot of work into this.

PoW
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 7:50 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

BEING RAISED IN BAPTIST SUNDAY SCHOOL I DID LEARN ABOUT MOSES FACE BEING RADIANT, AND CHRIST'S LUMINOSITY AT THE TRANSFIGURATION (In the East, that Feast is tommorow and Vespers tonight!), BUT WHAT I QUOTED (FROM WARE) ABOUT "LIGHT" MIGHT HAVE SOUNDED STRANGE TO ME TOO.

THEREFORE, THE FOLLOWING MAKES THIS ASPECT OF KNOWING GOD IN HIS ESSENCE MORE CONCRETE. THE FACT IS, THAT DAMAGED BY SIN WE MOSTLY DON'T, PREFERING TO KNOW OUR OWN FANTASIES INSTEAD. SO, FROM SOME OF THE BEST SOURCES--THE SAINTS--HERE IS GOOD REFERENCE MATERIAL:


quote:


Orthodox religious thought lays the utmost emphasis on the image of God in man. Man is a ‘living theology,’ and because he is God’s icon, he can find God by looking within his own heart, by ‘returning within himself:’ "The Kingdom of God is within you" (Luke 17:21). ‘Know yourselves,’ said Saint Antony of Egypt. ‘…He who knows himself, knows God (Letter 3 (in the Greek and Latin collections, 6)) ‘If you are pure,’ wrote Saint Isaac the Syrian (late seventh century), ‘heaven is within you; within yourself you will see the angels and the Lord of the angels’ (Quoted in P. Evdokimov, L’Orthodoxie, p. 88). And of Saint Pachomius it is recorded: ‘In the purity of his heart he saw the invisible God as in a mirror
(First Greek Life, 22).

(Same source cite and site. www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/history_timothy_ware_2.htm )
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 8:14 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.


FOR THOSE LIKE MYSELF, WHO ARE FAR FROM SAINTHOOD...


quote:



Glory to You, our God! Glory to You!

O Heavenly King, the Comforter, the Spirit of Truth; everywhere present and filling all things. Treasury of blessings and Giver of Life. Come and abide in us, and cleanse us from every impurity, and save our souls, O Good One.

Holy God! Holy Mighty! Holy Immortal! Have mercy on us! (3×)

Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, now and ever and unto ages of ages. Amen.

O most holy Trinity, have mercy on us. Lord, cleanse us from our sins. Master, pardon our transgressions. Holy One, visit and heal our infirmities for Your name's sake.

Lord, have mercy. Lord, have mercy. Lord, have mercy.

Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, now and ever and unto ages of ages. Amen.

Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be Your name. Your Kingdom come. Your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread; and forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. For Yours is the Kingdom, and the power, and the glory: of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, now and ever and unto ages of ages. Amen.

Come, let us worship God, our King! Come, let us worship and fall down before Christ, our King and our God! Come, let us worship and fall down before Christ Himself, our King and our God!



Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 10:14 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I was being sincere. If you weren't looking for insincerity, you wouldn't have found it. The accusations you hurl at me don't carry much weight, especially when you have to take out of context and rearrange my words to give them backing. I never called anyone stupid. That was your idea, not mine.

Now I know you think we can't know God's essence. I mostly understand what you believe. My question was why. Why can't we know God's essence? Why would it "be one false extreem to say that we dan 'know God in essence'"? Why can't any creature? That's all. I think I must be missing something, because I really don't see why someone would believe that. I just wondering what the reason is. The only reason I've heard is that it's just impossible. Then I ask why, and I get the same again. It's just impossible. Well, why would God make it impossible.


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 10:27 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
S: I was being sincere.

R: Good.


S: If you weren't looking for insincerity, you wouldn't have found it.

R: Take a clue as to how I say that I really do perceive you. Either interact with that, or post with someone else. I'm trying my best.
............

S: My question was why (we can't know God's essence). Why can't we know God's essence?

R: Then, as I said, read this -- the section "God and man": www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/history_timothy_ware_2.htm#n2 I am pointing you in the right direction. Read what he says about "God and man" and what he says about Trinity. The rest is up to you.

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 10:30 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

    But, Sahid, the most relevant question
    is how we can know God most fully in his divine light?


    (THAT is why I made the other two posts!)

    That fills Orthodox and Wesleyan hymns.

    And the corrolary question is, what is
    preventing us from...


Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 7:45 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel

S: My question was why (we can't know God's essence). Why can't we know God's essence?

R: Then, as I said, read this -- the section "God and man": www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/history_timothy_ware_2.htm#n2 I am pointing you in the right direction. Read what he says about "God and man" and what he says about Trinity. The rest is up to you.[/size=1]


I couldn't find anything on why they believe God's essence is unknowable. They just say it is. There has got to be some reason. Does anyone out there know it?


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

John Earp
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1715
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 8:12 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Sahid
I couldn't find anything on why they believe God's essence is unknowable. They just say it is. There has got to be some reason. Does anyone out there know it?


Prepare yourself for an appeal to "mystery," Sahid. As they say God in his essence is unknowable, they can't be expected to explain how this is unknowable.



"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.

revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/5/2004 9:00 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
For everything else they at least attempt to explain the reasons why.


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 3:31 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Don't look for a single sentence explanation or definition. Not about that. Here are some lines to think about. But by nature this sort of thing has to be come at from the edges.
  • 1. God is absolutely transcendent. ‘No single thing of all that is created has or ever will have even the slightest communion with the supreme nature or nearness to it (Gregory Palamas, P.G. 150, 1176c (quoted on p. 77)).

  • "God is not simply a single person confined within his own being, but a Trinity of three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, each of whom ‘dwells’ in the other two, by virtue of a perpetual movement of love. God is not only a unity but a union."


  • http://www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/history_timothy_ware_2.htm#n2

You don't "get access" to that union.

One of the Trinity "has to" share His with you. For this reason, even had there not been sin, some Fathers of the Church "opined that the incarnation would have been necessary even had the fall not happened; believing this out of their pious conviction that God loves us so much that he wants us in close fellowship with God, and believing also that this is part of our original design--which we can see in Christ Jesus.

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 4:12 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Interesting:
    Our positive statements about God — that He is good, wise, just and so on — are true as far as they go, yet they cannot adequately describe the inner nature of the deity. These positive statements, said John of Damascus, reveal ‘not the nature, but the things around the nature.’ ‘That there is a God is clear; but what He is by essence and nature, this is altogether beyond our comprehension and knowledge (On the Orthodox Faith, 1, 4 (P.G. 94, 800B, 797B)).
    www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/history_timothy_ware_2.htm#n2
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 5:06 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Following that notion of coming at things from the edges...EVERY bit of this is relevant:

Expect to find that God does everything in Trinity: The Father, through the Son, in the Spirit.
  • Thus, in the New Testament we have the full epiphany of God, the full manifestation of the Holy Trinity: the Father through the Son in the Spirit to us; and we in the Spirit through the Son to the Father.
    www.oca.org/pages/orth_chri/Orthodox-Faith/Doctrine/Holy-Trinity.html

  • Orthodoxy believes most passionately that the doctrine of the Holy Trinity is not a piece of ‘high theology’ reserved for the professional scholar, but something that has a living, practical importance for every Christian. Man, so the Bible teaches, is made in the image of God, and to Christians God means the Trinity: thus it is only in the light of the dogma of the Trinity that man can understand who he is and what God intends him to be. Our private lives, our personal relations, and all our plans of forming a Christian society depend upon a right theology of the Trinity. ‘Between the Trinity and Hell there lies no other choice (V. Lossky, The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, p. 66). As an Anglican writer has put it: ‘In this doctrine is summed up the new way of thinking about God, in the power of which the fishermen. went out to convert the Greco-Roman world. It marks a saving revolution in human thought (D. J. Chitty, ‘The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity told to the Children,’ in Sobornost, series 4, no. 5, 1961, p. 241).
    http://www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/history_timothy_ware_2.htm#n2

  • God is one and God is three: the Holy Trinity is a mystery of unity in diversity, and of diversity in unity. Father, Son, and Spirit are ‘one in essence’ (homoousios),...
      <MY COMMMENT: (You and I are not one in essence with them -- We DON'T. know them the way they know each other and themselves--so to speak. We ONLY know them as God has REVEALED Himself to us..)>

    http://www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/history_timothy_ware_2.htm#n2

  • The Incarnation is an act of God’s philanthropia, of His lovingkindness towards mankind. Many eastern writers, looking at the Incarnation from this point of view, have argued that even if man had never fallen, God in His love for humanity would still have become man: the Incarnation must be seen as part of the eternal purpose of God, and not simply as an answer to the fall. Such was the view of Maximus the Confessor and of Isaac the Syrian; such has also been the view of certain western writers, most notably Duns Scotus (1265-1308).
    http://www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/history_timothy_ware_2.htm#n2

  • ‘Partakers of the Divine Nature’

    The aim of the Christian life, which Seraphim described as the acquisition of the Holy Spirit of God, can equally well be defined in terms of deification. Basil described man as a creature who has received the order to become a god; and Athanasius, as we know, said that God became man that man might become god. ‘In my kingdom, said Christ, I shall be God with you as gods’ (Canon for Matins of Holy Thursday, Ode 4, Troparion 3). Such, according to the teaching of the Orthodox Church, is the final goal at which every Christian must aim: to become god, to attain theosis, ‘deification’ or ‘divinization.’ For Orthodoxy man’s salvation and redemption mean his deification.

    Behind the doctrine of deification there lies the idea of man made according to the image and likeness of God the Holy Trinity. ‘May they all be one,’ Christ prayed at the Last Supper; "As Thou, Father, art in me and I in Thee, so also may they be in us" (John 17:21). Just as the three persons of the Trinity ‘dwell’ in one another in an unceasing movement of love, so man, made in the image of the Trinity, is called to ‘dwell’ in the Trinitarian God. Christ prays that we may share in the life of the Trinity, in the movement of love which passes between the divine persons; He prays that we may be taken up into the Godhead. The saints, as Maximus the Confessor put it, are those who express the Holy Trinity in themselves. This idea of a personal and organic union between God and man — God dwelling in us, and we in Him — is a constant theme in Saint John’s Gospel; it is also a constant theme in the Epistles of Saint Paul, who sees the Christian life above all else as a life ‘in Christ.’ The same idea recurs in the famous text: "Through these promises you may become partakers of the divine nature" (2 Peter 1:4). It is important to keep this New Testament background in mind. The Orthodox doctrine of deification, so far from being unscriptural (as is sometimes thought), has a solid Biblical basis, not only in 2 Peter, but in Paul and the Fourth Gospel.

    The idea of deification must always be understood in the light of the distinction between God’s essence and His energies. Union with God means union with the divine energies, not the divine essence: the Orthodox Church, while speaking of deification and union, rejects all forms of pantheism.

    Closely related to this is another point of equal importance. The mystical union between God and man is a true union, yet in this union Creator and creature do not become fused into a single being. Unlike the eastern religions which teach that man is swallowed up in the deity, Orthodox mystical theology has always insisted that man, however closely linked to God, retains his full personal integrity. Man, when deified, remains distinct (though not separate) from God. The mystery of the ‘Trinity is a mystery of unity in diversity, and those who express the Trinity in themselves do not sacrifice their personal characteristics. When Saint Maximus wrote ‘God and those who are worthy of God have one and the same energy’ (Ambigua, P.G. 91, 1076C), he did not mean that the saints lose their free will, but that when deified they voluntarily and in love conform their will to the will of God. Nor does man, when he ‘becomes god,’ cease to be human: ‘We remain creatures while becoming god by grace, as Christ remained God when becoming man by the Incarnation (V. Lossky, The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, p. 87). Man does not become God by nature, but is merely a ‘created god,’ a god by grace or by status.

    http://www.fatheralexander.org/booklets/english/history_timothy_ware_2.htm#n2



There are some things to think about.

Pay particular attention to the Trinity, and to our becoming 'partakers of the divine nature' (2 Peter 1:3-5).

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 5:10 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I like seeing things "in a nutshell," so this is something that works for me:

    One of the Trinity has to share His with you.


Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 9:21 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
God is absolutely transcendent. ‘No single thing of all that is created has or ever will have even the slightest communion with the supreme nature or nearness to it (Gregory Palamas, P.G. 150, 1176c (quoted on p. 77)).
Gregory is flat out wrong here.
quote:
You don't "get access" to that union.
Why not?
quote:
One of the Trinity "has to" share His with you.
So why don't they? Because they can't or because they wont?
quote:
That there is a God is clear; but what He is by essence and nature, this is altogether beyond our comprehension and knowledge
Why?
quote:
You and I are not one in essence with them -- We DON'T. know them the way they know each other and themselves--so to speak. We ONLY know them as God has REVEALED Himself to us..
So why doesn't God reveal the truth about who He is essentially? I thought He wanted the closest possible relationship. It sounds like He won't let us get close, but in other places the article said He does want us to have a close relationship. He either wants close relationship or He doesn't. Why would He reveal Himself without revealing who He is? How is that not a contradiction? If we've seen the Son we've seen the Father. It doesn't say the Father's work or the Father's revelation but the Father Himself.
quote:
One of the Trinity has to share His with you.
I thought after reading the article that God's essence was unknowable to us, but this statement leads me to believe that God could reveal His essence if He wanted to. Which one is it?


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 11:58 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Show me sincere answers to your own questions and I will comment.

Back to Top
 

John Earp
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1715
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 12:08 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
John 17:21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. 22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one: 23 I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.

How are all followers of Christ one?

The Son of God prays that in the same way ("as thou") that the Father is in Him and that He is in the Father, his disciples would likewise be one.



"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.

revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 12:48 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
John is a Eucharistic book. Special, and different in nature than the other three gospels.

And in many places, in both the old and new testements a "partative exegesis" of recongizing both the humanity and divinity of Christ is necessary, and a capacity by us to focus on the purpose for which a passage is written. Christ had the Spirit rest on him, and comparatively so do we. Yet we aren't God. Depending on how we handle a text we can get it wrong. The purpose of the text matters. I'd start with some of the things I know, like that Dave and I being one in the Body is different than me being in Christ; but that they are related to.

John asked, "How are all followers of Christ one?" I have two parts to the answer I'd like to give. First, we are one in that all of us have died in Christ and are raised with him: we share the same life. And second, we are one in that by nature we are not "individuals" but "persons" in "communion." And those two parts go together, as we share Christ's love, the Love of the Trinity with one another.

John reminds: "The Son of God prays that in the same way ("as thou") that the Father is in Him and that He is in the Father, his disciples would likewise be one." I think this is absolutely vital. Yet I would venture that the other way around would be a different thing. We share the "same" as what the Father and Son share -- devine love. But the Father and the Son do not have other characteristic of relationship as what individual humans do.

Many analogies of persons, such as what Gregory of Nyssa used about persons successfully in the case of the Incarnation had to be dropped when the subject turned to the Trinity -- as the analogy led to unbiblical notions. (Or was it the other way around.)

PoW
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 1:15 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
We can "become by grace

what He is by nature."



That is near an answer to what Sahid may have been asking.

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 2:36 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sahid, are YOU working on this?

Just in case, here's something:
quote:
The Destiny of the Race of Man
An Orthodox Christian Understanding
By Dcn. George Zgourides

According to Meyendorff's Byzantine Theology, at the heart of the Byzantine understanding of humanity's destiny is the doctrine of participation in God, termed deification, or theosis (163). Along these lines, Meyendorff quotes Maximus the Confessor as follows:

    In the same way in which the soul and the body are united, God should become accessible for participation by the soul and, through the soul's intermediary, by the body, in order that the soul might receive an unchangeable character, and the body, immortality; and finally that the whole man should become God, deified by the grace of God become man, becoming whole man, soul and body, by nature, and becoming whole God, soul and body, by grace. (164)


In other words, man is called to participate and share in the deified humanity of Christ, not merely in imitation of Jesus' moral and virtuous acts, but to actual life in Christ, particularly through the sacraments (164). The whole person, then, participates fully in the divine nature of the whole God (164). Ware, in his The Orthodox Church, adds that humans, created in the image of God, fully acquire God's likeness and in the process become deified (219). Because God became human that we might be made god (21, quoting St. Athanasius), humans become a created god, a god by grace or by status (232; c.f. John 10: 34-35). And as the three members of the Trinity dwell one in another, so are humans called to dwell in the God-head (231). Hence, theosis enables Christians to become by grace what God is by nature (21). For the Orthodox faithful, then, to be saved and redeemed is to be deified (231).

The doctrinal foundation of deification rests in the hypostatic union between the human and divine natures of Christ (Meyendorff 164). This human-divine hypostasis belongs to Christ alone (164), while the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are said to be three persons [hypostasis] in one essence [ousia] (Ware 23). There is, however, communication between the energies of Christ's hypostatic natures, and those who are in Christ also share in this communication (Meyendorff 164).

Union with God is union with His divine energy (actions, operations, power) but not His divine essence (nature, inner being). . . .

http://www.westernorthodox.com/destiny
" target="_blank">http://www.westernorthodox.com/destiny



P.S.: Imaginatively, think of falling headlong into a black hole. Inviting" Do we go into the inner being of God. Or does he share his love with us? (Loosely speaking.) And rather than accusing God of being stingy ("It sounds like He won't let us get close...") understand that as creatures WE have our limitations. And the Incarnation was necessary to address them. But they remain, and Christ remains incarnate! So, what we CAN do, through Christ, is "to dwell in the God-head" by grace, as Christ does by nature.

Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/6/2004 7:14 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sure, we have limitations, but God is the one who gave us those limitations. So why should I think that He gave us this particular limitation?


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
217 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:27 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads