Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > If Jesus saves, does God matter?  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
44 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

lock
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 701
 
   Posted 8/8/2004 5:13 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by John Earp

quote:
Originally posted by lock

[quote]Originally posted by John Earp

Harold,

In quoting the Christian Scriptures that I did, I assume that we are talking about the God who is revealed in those Scriptures.

John
[/quote
]

There are many who look at the christian scriptures and do not see a triune God.

Lock



True. So?



In respect to feelin's request, this subject should maybe be started up in another area.

Lock


His achievement are we, being created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God makes ready beforehand, that we should be walking in them.

Back to Top
 

quest for truth
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 479
 
   Posted 8/8/2004 6:00 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
What might help answer your question is seeing the differences between the 2 evangels in Galatians 2:7-10. The evangel to the Circumcision (Which John the Baptist and Jesus (Rom. 15:8) started, and then in Acts was entrusted to Peter) is different then the evangel to the Uncircumcision which was given to Paul.

I am sorry but I am a bit dense so I am not sure what you are saying.Blush Could you explain it again for me? I'd appreciate it.Shy
Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/8/2004 11:20 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Here's a question for you that I have wrestled with for some time. Let's say that someone has been raised all of their life with a religion that is not based on the bible. Let's say they are preached the gospel but because of their deep roots to this religion they are reluctant to change their religious beliefs and values. I know that if someone came to me and said that Christianity is not the truth and tried to persuade me to believe their religion I would not be able to sway so how would it be different for those who have been raised with an entirely different religion? Could these people (if their hearts are genuinely to love) be accepted into heaven despite their inability to change their beliefs?
I think it's very doubtful, but I don't claim to know. I do know that I was an adminant Christian before my crisis of faith, so I think it is possible for sincere believers in any religion to rethink their beliefs.


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

lock
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 701
 
   Posted 8/8/2004 6:18 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by quest for truth

quote:
What might help answer your question is seeing the differences between the 2 evangels in Galatians 2:7-10. The evangel to the Circumcision (Which John the Baptist and Jesus (Rom. 15:8) started, and then in Acts was entrusted to Peter) is different then the evangel to the Uncircumcision which was given to Paul.

I am sorry but I am a bit dense so I am not sure what you are saying.Blush Could you explain it again for me? I'd appreciate it.Shy




John the baptist came declaring, "repent, the kingdom is at hand." Jesus followed with the same message. Jesus then commissioned the 12 to do the same and made it clear that they only go to the "lost sheep of Israel". This is the evangel of the Circumcision. The kingdom from heaven is the kingdom Christ will set up when He returns (The millennial reign of the messiah)and then Isreal will takes it's place as the priests of God and they will sheperd the nations with Christ. But the people of Israel rejected the Messiah and crucified Him. Later they rejected the proclamation of Jesus' discples and finally the nation is locked up in stubborness by God (Acts 28:28). Paul is commissioned to go to the gentiles. In Gal. 2:7-10 we see that the evangel of the Circumcision was entrusted to Peter and the evangel of the Uncircumcision was entrusted to Paul. The differences can be seen in the letters written by the apostles of Jesus and His half-brothers written to Israelites and the letters Paul wrote to the Gentiles. James could write faith without, works is dead (2:17); and Paul could write that we are justified by faith alone (Romans 4, 5). A majority of the bible is written concerning God's chosen people Israel, and only a small part is written concerning Gentiles. I hope I have explained this well without being too wordy.

lock


His achievement are we, being created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God makes ready beforehand, that we should be walking in them.

Back to Top
 

lock
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 701
 
   Posted 8/8/2004 6:22 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I think it's very doubtful, but I don't claim to know. I do know that I was an adminant Christian before my crisis of faith, so I think it is possible for sincere believers in any religion to rethink their beliefs.


Sahid-if you don't mind me asking, what was your crisis of faith, and what has been the product of it?

Lock


His achievement are we, being created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God makes ready beforehand, that we should be walking in them.

Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 8/8/2004 7:15 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sahid: (Big Smile). You convinced me to share a little of what I am struggling with. Some say the Trinity is not required, others say it is, BUT it seems to me that part of our salvation is to know God (I am talking about the general way of salvation, those who have access to a Bible, can talk to others about God, etc. not the exception to the rule, such as those who have never heard of God, or are ignorant of the scriptures, which is a different subject).
Now John made the statement that to get our theology correct is a lifelong process, and I would agree to an extent. However, I view knowing God like knowing my wife: I may not know everything about her but I do know WHO she is.
Also John made the statement that we should know who the God of scriptures is, yet he seemed very hesitant to identify who, exactly, that person is.
It would seem that to know who God is, in some fashion, is important to salvation, because it seems very important to Jesus. However, I do not see much profit for me in this thread because I don't believe the answer is here for me. However, I don't mind if you guys take it over and go whereever you want with it. I may hang around or I may not.
I wonder though: if we, as Christians, cannot articulate in some concrete way who God is exactly, then I do truly wonder one of two things: either God has not revealed himself to us enough to get an actual vision of him to tell people about and two, God really doesn't matter that much in the course of salvation.
Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/8/2004 9:47 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
To reiterate, I think that all that is necessary for salvation is to know that we have rejected love, know that God offers love, and accept that love. From God's point of view He knows we screwed up, but He loves us anyway. I think that's the minimum about God that we need to believe in for salvation. I don't think proper understanding of the Trinity is needed. Did Abraham believe in the Trinity? Probably not. At least not the way we believe in the Trinity. But He had faith. His faith demonstrated his belief that God loved him. He had faith in God, because God is deserving of our faith.

lock, this is dispensationalism, right? As opposed to many forms of dispensationalism, yours makes sense to me so far. To me there's two levels of making sense. The first is: is it not self-contradictory or obviously in contradiction with experience? What you've said so far passes that test, I think. The second level is: does it make the most sense given all the other alternatives? This is where I don't think I'll go with you. I'll think about what you've said and see what I think.

My "crisis of faith" looks pretty lame on the outside. I wasn't in a car accident and no one close to me died or anything. I was a Southern Baptist (still am to my embarrassment), and I was taking a class in the fall of 2002 called fundamentals of philosophy, but the class was mostly about religion. We read The Openness of God and talked a lot about Ex 32:14 and 1Sam 15:29. The book wasn't very good IMO, but it, along with the scripture, got me thinking about whether God knew the future. I thought if God didn't know the future, He wasn't much of a God, and if He did, why did He make the world so messed up? He knew we would sin; in fact He made us that way. At the same time one of my closest friends, who was a missionary kid and had renounced his faith, gave me The Jesus Mystery or something (I'm not sure that's the name of the book). Basically, a lot of what I took for granted about God was being challenged by people who made a lot of sense. I decided that I believed open theism, but not the way the book described it, but that wasn't as big a deal as the idea that the gospels got it wrong. I prayed and said, "I really don't know what to believe except that you're there because I can feel you there. I want the truth even if it's painful. I don't want to believe a lie. Please show me how you really are, because the way you've been described doesn't make sense." That was one of the most courageous moments of my life, I think. It's scary to open a door that could have anything behind it. I knew that some people were ostracized by their friends and family when they became Christians. Would something like that happen to me? I don't know how I came to the verses, but I found the opening verses of Luke. I related with him. He was just looking for the truth, and this is what he found. The people Luke got his info from were witnesses. They lived and died not for what they heard, but what they saw with their own eyes. Either these people are nuts, evil, or telling the truth. Kind of like the liar, lunatic, Lord thing only this isn't testimony about one's self. It's the testimony of two or three others. Doc says things very clearly in Letters from a Skeptic. N. T. Wright is also very good on this topic. These guys were great encouragement. I guess the Jesus seminar stuff was the crisis, and the open theism stuff just coincided with it. But I think God could see these things coming and had a purpose for putting the two together. Maybe it was more efficient to introduce the open theism while I was broken, sort of killing two birds with one stone. Anyway I think the open theist's God does more closely resembles Jesus than any other idea that I've seen.


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 1:03 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sahid: I don't believe Abraham needed to believe in the Trinity. He was responsible for the revelation of God that was given to him, just as we are. Do you see the difference? We are responsible for what we know, just as he was. We just know a little more. If we go on the basis of salvation by what Abraham knew, then the Jews would not need Jesus, but would just need faith.
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 3:47 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by feelinahole

If we go on the basis of salvation by what Abraham knew, then the Jews would not need Jesus, but would just need faith.


I bet I'm not understanding you, feelinhole. Abraham, and all jews, and all people absolutely need God to assume human form, and suffer, and die, and raise, and ascend to glory, and come again. Whether they ever hear the name Jesus or not.
Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 9:42 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel

quote:
Originally posted by feelinahole

If we go on the basis of salvation by what Abraham knew, then the Jews would not need Jesus, but would just need faith.


I bet I'm not understanding you, feelinhole. Abraham, and all jews, and all people absolutely need God to assume human form, and suffer, and die, and raise, and ascend to glory, and come again. Whether they ever hear the name Jesus or not.

Yeah, what he said. Do you mean would not need to know about Jesus or do you mean not need Jesus at all? We need to know that God loves us. I don't think Old Testament Jews needed to know this specific way that love was manifested, although it is the important way. They still do need Jesus whether or not they know it.

It just seems to me that if Jesus is the way their can't be other ways. So, there must be some core or minimum to salvation. I'm not sure at all that I've found it, but I'm pretty sure that knowledge of the Trinity is external to it. I think the way they executed heretics back in the day was more about church unity than it was about correct doctrine or rooting out lies.


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

John Earp
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1715
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 1:16 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by feelinahole

Sahid: (Big Smile). You convinced me to share a little of what I am struggling with. Some say the Trinity is not required, others say it is, BUT it seems to me that part of our salvation is to know God (I am talking about the general way of salvation, those who have access to a Bible, can talk to others about God, etc. not the exception to the rule, such as those who have never heard of God, or are ignorant of the scriptures, which is a different subject).
Now John made the statement that to get our theology correct is a lifelong process, and I would agree to an extent. However, I view knowing God like knowing my wife: I may not know everything about her but I do know WHO she is.

God is infinitely more complex and vast than any wife or husband could ever be. It is obvious that throughout all the ages the redeemed will be continuing to learn new things about their Redeemer.

quote:
Also John made the statement that we should know who the God of scriptures is, yet he seemed very hesitant to identify who, exactly, that person is.

Not hesitant at all, fih. It's just such a HUGE question that it could not be adequately covered in a few posts. Massive volumes have been written on theology over the centuries, as you know.

Your question confuses the issue by referring to God in the singular as "who, exactly, that person is." God has revealed himself as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, "one God in three persons," which statement I affirm without hesitation or qualification.

If you want a "short version" I unequivocally affirm the definition of the Trinity as found in the Nicene creed. However, I do not see affirmation of the Nicene Creed as a New Testament condition of salvation.
quote:
It would seem that to know who God is, in some fashion, is important to salvation, because it seems very important to Jesus. However, I do not see much profit for me in this thread because I don't believe the answer is here for me. However, I don't mind if you guys take it over and go whereever you want with it. I may hang around or I may not.
I wonder though: if we, as Christians, cannot articulate in some concrete way who God is exactly, then I do truly wonder one of two things: either God has not revealed himself to us enough to get an actual vision of him to tell people about and two, God really doesn't matter that much in the course of salvation.


I think this really has to do with the basic difference between knowing ABOUT God and KNOWING God personally. When at the tender age of five I asked Jesus to come into my heart, forgive my sins, and save my soul, He did not ask me to perfectly recite the creed, nor whether I understood the doctrine of the Trinity yet. And yet I what I experienced that day is as real to me now as it ever has been.



"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.

revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

lock
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 701
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 3:17 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Sahid


lock, this is dispensationalism, right? As opposed to many forms of dispensationalism, yours makes sense to me so far. To me there's two levels of making sense. The first is: is it not self-contradictory or obviously in contradiction with experience? What you've said so far passes that test, I think. The second level is: does it make the most sense given all the other alternatives? This is where I don't think I'll go with you. I'll think about what you've said and see what I think.





Yes, it does have a dispensationalist flavor, but I think (and I may be wrong) that most dispensationalists believe that the two evangels cannot be proclaimed at the same time; it has to be one or the other. I think that would contradict with Acts 15. Thank you for sharing you crisis of faith. It is refreshing to hear about the journey others are taken with God in order to come to a better realization of who He is.

Lock


His achievement are we, being created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God makes ready beforehand, that we should be walking in them.

Back to Top
 

lock
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 701
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 3:27 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by feelinahole

Sahid: I don't believe Abraham needed to believe in the Trinity. He was responsible for the revelation of God that was given to him, just as we are. Do you see the difference? We are responsible for what we know, just as he was. We just know a little more. If we go on the basis of salvation by what Abraham knew, then the Jews would not need Jesus, but would just need faith.



Feelin'-

Your post brings to mind Hebrews 11, "Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see. This is what the ancients were commended for" (v. 1,2). The writer of Hebrews goes on to list the Old Test. Hall of Fame of faith and these people made the list because they believed what God told them.

Lock


His achievement are we, being created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God makes ready beforehand, that we should be walking in them.

Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 6:21 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
John: the example still holds, regardless of how complex God is. We either can or cannot know WHO God is, even if we don't know all of what God's personality entails. And if you read my post correctly, I specifically made the point that we are responsible for what we know. I also said this was about people who could read the Bible, discern, etc. So I have no doubt what you said is true about being five years old and all. But that is irrelevant to what I was talking about.
Lock: as with John, my point is about those who have the completed revelation of the New Testament. This discussion would not be relevant to the Old Testament believers.
John: we do continue to learn new things about God. And that would change how we view him. But it wouldn't change WHO he is. I sincerely doubt that the God of scripture is suddenly going to become more than one, or suddenly 20 persons, who something of that nature.
Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 6:23 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sahid: I mean Abraham had faith and it was credited to him as righteousness. And yes, he needs Jesus. But he was not responsible for a full revelation of God because he was not given it.
The Jews need Jesus just as everyone does. I am saying that if we make Abraham the text for all of us, then all we would have to do is believe, we wouldn't have to accept Jesus.
Back to Top
 

John Earp
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1715
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 6:29 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by feelinahole
I specifically made the point that we are responsible for what we know.

I completely agree that we are responsible for what we know. This ties in directly to the issue of five year olds, the age of accountability, the destiny of the unevangelized, etc., for everyone is responsible for what they know. (See Romans 1, 2, & 3). This is why "all men are without excuse," and how "every mouth will be stopped" and the whole world made guilty before God. Sin is willful rejection of what one KNOWS to be right.



"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.

revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Sahid
Megistered Rember




Date Joined Jun 2004
Total Posts : 2013
 
   Posted 8/9/2004 8:43 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Ok, I think I see what you mean. I think, churched or not, educated in theology or not, the standard for salvation is knowing we need and accepting God's love. Now, I think if we are talking about theologically educated people, belief in Jesus is necessary. The Jesus of the new testament who actually was born, lived, died, rose, and ascended. I think some things follow from believing in Jesus: we believe that He loves us (because He said so) and we believe that He tells us the truth (because He says so). Jesus considered the Father God. He considered Himself God. I don't know if I could point to a verse where Jesus recognizes the Holy Spirit as God. Hold on I'll check that part in John... Ok, John 16: 13-15 might kinda hint at the divinity of the Spirit. It's harder to make a case for the Spirit.

So now that I've circled around the question... I don't think we need a sophisticated understanding of the Trinity for salvation. I think we need to believe that the Father is God, Jesus is God, and at least that the Spirit comes from God and is in harmony with God. If I looked harder I could probably find a better verse. How 'bout this: believe that all three are God and that's good enough for those with a theological education. Sorry, that was pretty messy.


Watch me fly. Freedom like wings and I will use them. Freedom like wings and I will spread them wide. - Stavesacre

Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 8/10/2004 7:16 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I think, generally, there needs to be some recognition of the various persons involved within the act of salvation. I would agree completely that we don't need an exact formula of who the Trinity is (just look at all the formulas the church has had to take a PEEK at who God is). It would seem to me that adnowledging their roles and who they are within our lives and what they are doing goes a long way to drawing close to God.
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 8/10/2004 7:36 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by feelinahole

I think, generally, there needs to be some recognition of the various persons involved within the act of salvation. I would agree completely that we don't need an exact formula of who the Trinity is (just look at all the formulas the church has had to take a PEEK at who God is). It would seem to me that adnowledging their roles and who they are within our lives and what they are doing goes a long way to drawing close to God.



I agree with feel'n. As Jaroslav Pelekin says, the original Monotheists are the Trinitarians. Otherwise you end up with more than one God.

Another way to say what Feel'n says is to say that EVERYTHING that God does is done BY GOD, and not some demiurge.

I agree with you feel'n.
Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
44 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 1:37 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads