 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  lbeck Registered Member
 Date Joined Aug 2004 Total Posts : 11 | Posted 8/24/2004 6:18 AM (GMT -6) |   | Okay, I'll admit up front that I've got an agenda here. My church is asking those of us taking leadership positions to sign a "covenant" as a prerequisite to holding leadership positions. This is something new. Sheets to sign were distributed without much fanfare during a recent leadership conference put on by church staff. There are a dozen or so points that, by signing, we acknowledge our belief and concurrence. About half of these items are things that I believe to be essential to our faith, like belief that Christ died for our sins, rose from the grave, etc. However there are some items which I believe are open to interpretation and "non-essential." I didn't sign the covenant and have not been approached by anyone about it.
Well, I guess that I'm going to need to get into some specifics here. The church in question is a large Southern Baptist church. As many of you probably know, the issue of women in leadership roles has come into question at the Southern Baptist Convention. I don't want to debate that issue here, but that is one of the items in the "covenant." It's also an issue that is open to some interpretation (e.g., which positions are leadership?). There are other non-essential items on the list.
The issue that I do want to raise is whether signing something like the "covenant" is tantamount to taking an "oath," in Mt. 5:33-37 (Sermon on the mount). Here Jesus says not to make an oath (NIV).
I'm not normally a confrontational person, but I'm considering making this an issue on a personal basis in the following way. I am an ordained deacon and have served several terms in our church. A requirement that we have is that deacons have to rotate off after 3 consecutive years and, if nominated after the "fallow" year, go through an interview just like new deacons. I'm planning (if nominated) on revealing that I didn't sign the covenant and consequently believe that I am ineligible for the office of deacon.
My problem with the covenant is that I interpret it as an oath. Is this correct? My underlying concern is that I’m seeing a drift towards legalism in our church. I’m willing to debate any issue on its merits, but balk at the idea of having to sign a covenant containing non-essential generalities that I’m not sure that I agree with en-toto.
I’d like to limit responses to the “is it an oath, and is it okay” question, rather than responses that present alternatives to signing the covenant, perceptions of my “hidden agenda,” etc.
I’m enjoying this forum and have come to respect the theological perspectives that I read here. Your help is appreciated. <><><><><><><><><><><><>
Lee | | Back to Top | | |
    | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 1:57 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|