 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
 |  PhilTheThrill Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2004 Total Posts : 95 | Posted 5/11/2005 1:11 PM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
 |  JEE Registered Member
 Date Joined Jul 2004 Total Posts : 1466 | Posted 5/11/2005 1:32 PM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
 |  markporter Fire over Oxford

Date Joined Oct 2003 Total Posts : 263 | Posted 5/12/2005 5:07 PM (GMT -6) |   | | ooh, if that's what it is I think I saw a cool article by NT Wright linked from somewhere around here a while back http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Bible_Authoritative.htm | | Back to Top | | |
 |  bryan mccarthy Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2005 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 5/30/2005 8:50 AM (GMT -6) |   | hi john.
from what i can tell, these are the big guns: George Lindbeck, Hans W. Frei, Ronald Thiemann, Charles Wood.
I'm interested in this subject myself (see my concurrently running thread on postliberalism). I'm going to amazon now to see what i can find.
bryan
"Being religious means asking passionately the question of the meaning of our existence and being willing to receive answers, even if the answers hurt." -- Paul Tillich | | Back to Top | | |
 |  bryan mccarthy Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2005 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 5/30/2005 9:06 AM (GMT -6) |   | john,
some other names: Placher (i've read a couple articles by this guy -- he's good.), Hunsinger, Tanner, Kelsey, and Hauerwas.
so far as i understand it, john, "postliberalism" and "narrative theology" are interchangeable.
here are what seems to be the difinative works:
frei's "The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative : A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics":
bryan
"Being religious means asking passionately the question of the meaning of our existence and being willing to receive answers, even if the answers hurt." -- Paul Tillich | | Back to Top | | |
 |  JEE Registered Member
 Date Joined Jul 2004 Total Posts : 1466 | Posted 5/31/2005 10:09 AM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
 |  bryan mccarthy Registered Member

Date Joined Jan 2005 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 5/31/2005 5:11 PM (GMT -6) |   | john,
yeah...know whatchya mean bro.
bryan
"Being religious means asking passionately the question of the meaning of our existence and being willing to receive answers, even if the answers hurt." -- Paul Tillich | | Back to Top | | |
  |  markporter Fire over Oxford

Date Joined Oct 2003 Total Posts : 263 | Posted 6/6/2005 4:36 PM (GMT -6) |   | | did I say that? or were you replying to summat else? | | Back to Top | | |
    |  JEE Registered Member
 Date Joined Jul 2004 Total Posts : 1466 | Posted 6/9/2005 9:22 AM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
     |  BBBCanada Registered Member

Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 2763 | Posted 6/12/2005 11:38 AM (GMT -6) |   |
JEE said...Hi Brandon, I will definitely check out "Tracking the Maze." While I have some serious concerns about "postmodern Christianity" in general, I of course must acknowledge that God tends to usually express himself in narratives as opposed to propositional truth per se. By the way, do you happen to know anything about the relationship with Pinnock's Grace Unlimited with The Grace of God and the Will of Man that he edited? Is one an expanded version of the other? If you had to choose between them, which one would you get? Thanks, John
Sorry John,
I didn't see your question. I forgot about the thread and then when I came to back on board I saw it. Ummm..I don't know about "Grace Unlimited." Form what I understand, it is his earlier stuff and so his views have supposedly changed on the subject. I do have "The Grace of God and the Will of Man" and I would recommend that one for stuff that is more up to date. The book I THINK gets you to think about the issues particular to it as a good intro. However, I would suggest further reading along side this for more on these issues.
Brandon "On Plantinga's conception of rationality, a rational belief system will display the characteristic foundationalist structure: there is still a foundation that is noninferentially justified and the relation of rational supports proceeds upward through the higher levels. Where his foundationalism departs from classical foundationalism is in his specifcation of properly basic beliefs. The classical foundationalist has a rather sparse set of properly basic beliefs. Plantinga's foundationalism is much less parsimonious in its specification of properly basic beliefs. He also includes memory beliefs, beliefs about the external world, acceptance of testimony, and belief in God, among others."--Return To Reason, Kelly James Clark Post Edited (BBBCanada) : 6/12/2005 11:41:46 AM (GMT-5) | | Back to Top | | |
 | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:06 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|