 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  geej Registered Member
 Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 93 | Posted 8/10/2001 4:46 PM (GMT -6) |   | Here's a question. Assuming we all agree that Christ existed prior to his birth on earth, was he fully God and fully man prior to his time on earth or was he just fully God? Also, is he still fully God and fully man now? Is he a guy (meaning what he looks like), hanging out in heaven in an actual body? Explain your answer. GJ
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 8/10/2001 10:08 PM (GMT -6) |   | Your questions geej are hugely important!
quote: Here's a question. Assuming we all agree that Christ existed prior to his birth on earth, was he fully God and fully man prior to his time on earth or was he just fully God? Also, is he still fully God and fully man now? Is he a guy (meaning what he looks like), hanging out in heaven in an actual body? Explain your answer. GJ
First, The Son was the Only-beggoten of the Father from before all ages. But He was not Christ until he was incarnate. Some theologians have even made the intentionally sstriking, but true statement that Christ would not exist without the church. (A head turner.) But what that boils down to is that you can't have a savior without someone being saved; and you can't have an "anointed one" ("Christ" in Greek) without something (humanity0 to anoint. (I think I got that all right. ) Review: the Son/Logos/Wisdom predates the Christ; same Person of the Trinity.
Drum roll...... "In the fullness of time", when the time was right, etc., Christ became incarnate by the Holy Spirit and Mary. quote: Also, is he still fully God and fully man now? Is he a guy (meaning what he looks like), hanging out in heaven in an actual body?
I once did e-mail with a BGC pastor--who will remain annonomous forever--who decided that The Son would eventually strip Himself of his hymanity soas to fit the verse "that God may be all in all." He got THAT one wrong by 180-degrees! he was reacting to the Biblical Equality verses whatever-it-is-verses flap that is ongoing, and so saw Christ's humanity as a "subordination." He saw the Son as thusly "subordined to the Father, temporarily. Bad Trinitariain doctrine, huge lack of evident understanding of the plan of salvation. (All that with an MA from Wheaton College. But re-acting when you aught to be acting will get you every time!)
You wnat someone to give you an answer about whether Christ is fully man now. Yes He is. Let me take one sidestep. Paul says in Romans 4:25 that Christ: "was delivered over to death for our sins and was riased for our justification." Lets let this verse affect our eyesight in how we look at the whole matter of our salvation. The Cross is HUGE! Sin is a huge issue. But our death-liness (Don't tell my wife Im making up words again!) needed to be assumed by Chirst--who took on our humanity...in every aspect except sin...--had to be buried with Him in his death, raised from the dead, AND had to be taken up into heaven. Salvation is not all confined to Good Friday. In Christ human flesh is deified, joined to God's Spirit. And making careful use of all the verbs and prepositions will be beyond this brain that flew from Phoenix to O'Hare today...so I'll cut this short...but EVERY part of this is very important.
In attenting Baptist Sunday School (Lets blame it on the era; I'm not ragging on Baptists here.) as a kid I picked up one good idea, that Christ was at the right hand of the Father "making intersession" for me, as an agvocate, kind of like a laywer.
There is more to it. (So, lets see a bunch of folks dig for some research and "flesh"--pun--this out!) Part of defeating the effects of the fall is to restore mankind to communion/fellowship with the Divine, and to surpass the point which Adam and Eve were at in thier growth. That chapter in the end of Revelations about God dwelling among men IS the plan for all of the cosmos--with mankind as the bridge between material and spirit bringing all to God in worship. So there has historically been good speculation thattThe Son would have become incarnate even if our ancestors hadn't sinned. Speculation--SURE. But based on solid stuff. (Also a "we'll never know...matter.) The "more to it" is that to "dwell" with us, the incarnation is necessary. And the glorification of humanity in the resurrection and assention are also necessary. One addressed sin and the other addresses the creature/creator gap.
So, there you have it, two reasons whey the Christ has to have and keep his humanity in heaven. More than forever.
To bed!!!!!!
Can someone furnish more nuts and bolts for this string? Thanks.
PotOnWheel
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  geej Registered Member
 Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 93 | Posted 8/11/2001 5:24 PM (GMT -6) |   | Pot
In response to your quote:
"In attenting Baptist Sunday School (Lets blame it on the era; I'm not ragging on Baptists here.) as a kid I picked up one good idea, that Christ was at the right hand of the Father "making intersession" for me, as an agvocate, kind of like a laywer."
Bravo! Maybe its a Baptist thing but I got that in my fundamentalist Baptist sunday school too! Shoot, at least they did something right. 
GJ
PS: I'm not sure of this but I think if I would have believed what your unnamed BGC pastor did while I was at Bethel, the theology guys wouldn't have let me graduate. 
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 8/11/2001 6:43 PM (GMT -6) |   | Follow up for geej's: "PS--I'm not sure of this but I think if I would have believed what your unnamed BGC pastor did while I was at Bethel, the theology guys wouldn't have let me graduate."
No doubt!
Ooops. I should have put WHEATON in CAPS; that was his school; It wasn't that school on Lake Valentine that I know so well!) But I won't blame Wheaton. I believe that the "act, don't react" advice is operable for the matter of not insisting that Christ de-incarnate at some point after Judgment Day (the heresy mentioned above). Maybe like folks walking around looking at the ground and finally bumping their head into a wall, one string of equality-reactivists seem to have responded to the idea of "submission" and the multi-lettered group that backs it up with a literal (Nominalistic/Scholaistic?) quoting of Christ submitting, and then someone on either side of the debate--I CAN'T TELL, AND WON'T PRESUME(!)--seems to suggest that this describes the nature of the Trinity. So, to REACT to that some well-written (2 or 3) egalitarian-scholars posited that that "submission" wasn't permanent. So the pastor, who dutifully studied and got his degree, was left with what probably seemed like a liberating nugget--maybe a revelation that had gone un-noticed for centuries, a key to unlock everything that mattered to him.
Reacting gets you every time.
P.S. -- I sent him the interesting narrative that John Chrysostom did commenting on 1 Cor. 15:23-28. Wonderful insight into what he believed to be the different parties Paul had to deal with, at different extremes on opposite sides, and Paul plays to them but then snatches away from them the possibility of twisting his words to their own end. Chrysostom seemed to really identify with what Paul had to deal with, and certainly knew it first hand himself.
A side thought: I think that this story also shows what can happen from assuming that Scripture can be used like LEGO. The poly-lettered group misused scripture for their own ends, and the egalitarian side, rather than noticing, took it in stride (do they do the same LEGO building with Scripture?) and started building the opposite way. Ultimately the whole thing fell down to the light of day. But what if it lay hidden..... (scary movie soundtrack fades in...) 
PotOnWheel
| | Back to Top | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 6:11 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|