Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

rb1963b
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 93
 
   Posted 2/13/2002 12:35 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I have a question.

If the context of a passage clearly supports a particular doctrine, can we, should we, use the passage to teach something else, even though we would be skewing what it actually taught.

Also, should we teach strained implications?

Back to Top
 

BJS
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2001
Total Posts : 587
 
   Posted 2/13/2002 1:46 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Your attempt to mask your pedantry in the form of a question is far too obvious.

Brett

"Siste viator et memento mori."
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 2/13/2002 1:49 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Those seem like rhetorical questions to me. You know the answers.

Here is another one. if ONE person has a teaching, should they teach it if they are the only one "being led" to that teaching. Or should they work their teaching and preaching within the "where two or three..." model.

Ooops. That was rhetorical too.
Back to Top
 

GregBoyd
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 1818
 
   Posted 2/13/2002 3:03 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I'm not sure RB is being pedantic or rhetorical. If one accepts the premise that Scripture is consistent, there may be times when, given OTHER THINGS scripture teaches, the apparent meaning of a verse can't be accepted.

Do all of you teach a) women shouldn't talk in church b) wear jewlery c) expensive clothing d) slaves should submit to their masters e) that the Son will be subordinate to the Father (I Cor 15:29), etc... EVERYBODY at some points has to admit there are passages that are difficult for their views.

This shouldn't surprise us, however. Science moves forward by neglecting some evidence. It has to, for ones theory never squares perfectly with ALL the evidence.

Doc

"Three is the magic number, oh yes it is, it's the Magic Number" - De La Soul
Back to Top
 

BJS
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2001
Total Posts : 587
 
   Posted 2/13/2002 4:38 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
If you read this question in context of Rb's other posts, the pedantry and rhetoric are pretty easy to infer.

Brett

"Siste viator et memento mori."
Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 12:58 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads