Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

BJS
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2001
Total Posts : 587
 
   Posted 12/10/2003 4:02 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I have strong inclusivist tendencies. I would like to believe that hell is, as CS Lewis described it, a place “locked from the inside.” That is, it is a place that is affirmatively chosen by those who occupy it, and not a place for anyone who would truly prefer to be with God.

Here’s my question, though. If hell is a place that is chosen by its occupants, how do we explain the following parable from Christ in which the “rich man” does not appear at all to prefer being in hell.

quote:
Luk 16:19 "Now there was a rich man, and he habitually dressed in purple and fine linen, joyously living in splendor every day.
Luk 16:20 "And a poor man named Lazarus was laid at his gate, covered with sores,
Luk 16:21 and longing to be fed with the {crumbs} which were falling from the rich man's table; besides, even the dogs were coming and licking his sores.
Luk 16:22 "Now the poor man died and was carried away by the angels to Abraham's bosom; and the rich man also died and was buried.
Luk 16:23 "In Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and *saw Abraham far away and Lazarus in his bosom.
Luk 16:24 "And he cried out and said, 'Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus so that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool off my tongue, for I am in agony in this flame.'
Luk 16:25 "But Abraham said, 'Child, remember that during your life you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus bad things; but now he is being comforted here, and you are in agony.
Luk 16:26 'And besides all this, between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and {that} none may cross over from there to us.'
Luk 16:27 "And he said, 'Then I beg you, father, that you send him to my father's house--
Luk 16:28 for I have five brothers--in order that he may warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.'
Luk 16:29 "But Abraham *said, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.'
Luk 16:30 "But he said, 'No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!'
Luk 16:31 "But he said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.' "


What do you think? Is hell truly a place that is “locked from the inside,” a place that people choose to be? And does this parable make sense in light of that belief?


Brett

"Siste viator et memento mori."

Back to Top
 

johnmd
Registered Member


Date Joined May 2002
Total Posts : 154
 
   Posted 12/10/2003 7:09 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I think Dr Boyd addresses this topic in his latest book IS GOD TO BLAME. Maybe someone out there can recall the details. I have loaned out my copy.

John
Back to Top
 

borg
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 324
 
   Posted 12/10/2003 11:34 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Sure hell is locked from the inside. Everyone who is there wants to be there because God hasn't unveiled their eyes and delivered grace to them to want anything else in their depraved state of being. we would only want to ever choose hell if it weren't for God's grace.
grace and peace,
borg


"So it is a more glorious work of power to uphold a soul in a state of grace and holiness, and to carry it on till it is brought to glory, when there is so much sin remaining in the heart resisting, and Satan with all his might opposing, than it would have been to have kept manfrom falling at first, when Satan had nothing in man." Edwards

Back to Top
 

Tigress
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1252
 
   Posted 12/10/2003 11:40 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Maybe it's simply a misunderstanding of what hell is. Hell is simply being apart from God. Those who choose to live their lives on this Earth completely severed from God, have chosen to do so after they physically die as well. If you don't want to have anything to do with God in this life, why would you want to in the next? You can't have it both ways. It's like trying to serve two masters. Each one will always being vying for first place in your life, but only one can be in first place. If you chose to reject God in this life, you automatically choose to be without him in the next. He's not going to force you to be close to him in the afterlife when you didn't want to be close to Him on Earth. It would be hypocritical of you to expect to go to heaven (and all heaven is is simply to be close to God - which is the most wonderful thing ever!) when you didn't want to be close to God on Earth.

The parable of the rich man in hell is meant to show how your Earthly actions can affect your position in the afterlife. I don't think it was meant to be a complete description of the attitude of the heart of a person in hell.


Tigress Tigress

"Name a shrub after me. Preferably one that's prickly and difficult to eradicate."

-Captain Jack Aubrey
"Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World"

Back to Top
 

timlings
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2002
Total Posts : 130
 
   Posted 12/10/2003 12:25 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
What I reckon is...

My understanding of hell is that it is locked from the inside, in that everyone who ends up there has done so by there choice. However, I would say that nobody would want to go to hell or be there.

The reason people will end up in this horrible place is a consequence of their choices. Nobody wants toothache, yet by chosing to eat sweets and not brush one's teeth properly, one is choosing toothache. Hell is the consequence of living life with me at the centre as opposed to Jesus. Living for me in this life might actually be quite fun at times and have a few benefits. However, the cost of not following Jesus is FAR greater, in this life and also in the next.

Does that make sense?

If someone would truly prefer to be with God, then they will die to themselves and become a Christian. But if they truly don't want to be with God, God will give them the dignity of making that decision for themselves and honour that choice by sending them to hell.

In our postmodern world, that seems really unfair. But it's the same as saying "Well son, you are free to play with matches, but if you choose to use them wrongly, you will have chosen to get burnt". It's not unfair that fire hurts if used wrongly, it's just a built-in consequence. The same with hell...if you sow in the flesh you reap destruction.

That's not to say that people won't be surprised when they get there...

...but the same sort of thing happens now.

love

timlings
Back to Top
 

Laplace
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 138
 
   Posted 12/11/2003 11:53 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
If I may just throw a monkeywrench into things, an objection brought up by many is that some will note that many people on earth WANT to please God. It's just that their view of God is not the Christian view, or they are ignorant of even who Christ is. Therefore, how is it fair that you have a sincere Jew/Muslim/etc. be condemned to Hell simply because he tried to live a "good" life and according to the tenents of what he believes?

So the question is not simply, "Do people want to be apart from God?" but just as importantly, "Which God is the right one to not be apart from?" Both the Christian and the Muslim certainly don't want to end up in Hell, but both have differing views of God's path to be with God in the afterlife and state that doing otherwise would not qualify you.

The Bible speaks that people going to Hell will be judged according to how they lived their lives and how they responded to the amount of light they received. Jesus said that someone who does not know the Master's will and does wrong will still be beaten, but with less blows. He also gives evidence of comparative judgement when he says that it will be easier on Sodom and Gomorrah (not exactly your holy cities) on the day of judgement than one which rejected Christ while He was on earth.

My speculation is that the rich man lived a pretty selfish and deplorable life not at all interested in Heavenly things or loving his fellow man. That is probably why he ended up with such a harsh punishment.

The Bible does not give any specifics on the severity or punishments of sin in relation to actual transgressions. Personally, I don't believe Hell will be for everyone a universal, literal burning where everyone will scream in agony for eternity. I agree more with Lewis' speculation that people will essentially will remain as sinful and self-absorbed as they were in life. And that they will have a sour grapes attitude towards God and others with Him ("How could God save THAT person? He must not be all that great after all...")

I also believe that it is possible for someone not to specifically know of Christ to be saved. It happened many times in the OT, and believe it can happen in today's world. If someone in their heart truly reaches out to God seeking truth, and knows they cannot save themselves by what they do, I believe God may indeed save that person based upon the condition of their hearts (interesting that Lewis' also shares this belief as noted in his Chronicles of Narnia book, "The Last Battle"). This does not mean that evangelism is unnecessary or that everyone who doesn't hear the name of Jesus automatically is saved, simply that God will judge all men fairly.


"I say we blast the meatbag, Master" -HK-47, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic

Back to Top
 

timlings
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2002
Total Posts : 130
 
   Posted 12/11/2003 12:25 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
You don't get into heaven for believing the right thing...

...otherwise demons would be there! After all, they believe there is one true God.

It's all about surrendering to God's will and trusting God to save you. Trying to do it religiously doesn't please good. A righteous life does, but that's a different thing.

Just some more spanners for the works!

timlings

ps. I also do believe that people will get saved without hearing the name of Jesus. However, they do miss out on a lot! I was a Christian for years before I met Jesus properly. I think I would still have made it to heaven should I have died, however I was missing out on the best person in the universe, and the most fulfilling life too.
Back to Top
 

Laplace
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 138
 
   Posted 12/11/2003 12:41 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
timlings,

True, knowing ABOUT something is not the same as truly KNOWING something. We don't have that distinction in English (but other languages like German do).

But the root question again is, "How do I know which of these choices is true and which ones are false?" Unless you are a Universalist (which has it's own fallacies), then that question is of prime importance.


"I say we blast the meatbag, Master" -HK-47, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic

Back to Top
 

BJS
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2001
Total Posts : 587
 
   Posted 12/12/2003 9:33 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks for all the responses, guys. I'll be mulling this over.Researching


Brett

"Siste viator et memento mori."

Back to Top
 

GregBoyd
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 1818
 
   Posted 12/14/2003 7:40 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I don't see that the original question was addressed. The issue, I thought, was
-- how can hell be a place/state people choose to be in if
-- the rich man is in hell and doesn't want to be there?

Its a good and fair question. Two points...
a) Lk 16 is a parable. Like all parables the point is the punchline. Everything is a prop for this one point. The point of this parable doesn't have anything to do with the nature of hell. It is that we all have enough revelation to go on ( Luk 16:31). Ancients frequently told stories/parables about conversations betwene people in heaven and hell (or rough equivalents) to draw out moral lessons. This is what Jesus is doing here.

b) There are two strands of teaching about judgment in Scripture. One emphasizes it as the natural consequence of peoples decisions... and in this sense is "what they want" (Jn 3:19... they love darkness rather than light), the other stresses GOD'S justice.... he judges them... and in this is NOT what they want.

Hope this helps BJ.

Doc


"The responsibility is with the chooser -- God is blameless." Plato, Republic, 10.

Back to Top
 

Laplace
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 138
 
   Posted 12/15/2003 4:42 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Just a qualification on Dr. Boyd's comments:

There are quite a number who believe a) is an actual account and not simply a parable, stating that it is the only story which uses proper nouns (Lazarus and Abraham). However, this does not negate the questions nor speculations about Hell.


"I say we blast the meatbag, Master" -HK-47, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic

Back to Top
 

chiam
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 41
 
   Posted 12/15/2003 9:33 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
timlings you said:
quote:

ps. I also do believe that people will get saved without hearing the name of Jesus. However, they do miss out on a lot! I was a Christian for years before I met Jesus properly. I think I would still have made it to heaven should I have died, however I was missing out on the best person in the universe, and the most fulfilling life too.


Timlings:
What did you mean that you were a Christian for years before I met Jesus properly?
Do you believe that Muslims are saved and heaven bound?
Do you believe that if a (non-messianic) Jew denies that Jesus is the Messiah and dies with that belief, that he or she will go to hell?


Back to Top
 

chiam
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 41
 
   Posted 12/15/2003 9:40 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Laplace you wrote:
quote:
If I may just throw a monkeywrench into things, an objection brought up by many is that some will note that many people on earth WANT to please God. It's just that their view of God is not the Christian view, or they are ignorant of even who Christ is. Therefore, how is it fair that you have a sincere Jew/Muslim/etc. be condemned to Hell simply because he tried to live a "good" life and according to the tenents of what he believes?


Do you believe that Muslims are saved and heaven bound?
Do you believe that if a (non-messianic) Jew denies that Jesus is the Messiah and dies with that belief, that he or she will go to hell?


Back to Top
 

Laplace
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 138
 
   Posted 12/15/2003 10:30 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
chaim,

"This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world." 1 John 4:2-3

I think this answers the question about someone who knows of Jesus and yet willfully denies Him.


"I say we blast the meatbag, Master" -HK-47, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic

Back to Top
 

chiam
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 41
 
   Posted 12/15/2003 11:11 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
But Laplace you said
quote:
I also believe that it is possible for someone not to specifically know of Christ to be saved. It happened many times in the OT, and believe it can happen in today's world. If someone in their heart truly reaches out to God seeking truth, and knows they cannot save themselves by what they do, I believe God may indeed save that person based upon the condition of their hearts (interesting that Lewis' also shares this belief as noted in his Chronicles of Narnia book, "The Last Battle"). This does not mean that evangelism is unnecessary or that everyone who doesn't hear the name of Jesus automatically is saved, simply that God will judge all men fairly.



Please explain....
Back to Top
 

Laplace
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 138
 
   Posted 12/15/2003 11:29 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
chiam,

The difference is reflected in passages in Romans 1 and Jesus' own words about receiving punishment based upon how much knowledge about God they have received.

My first words were referring mainly to those who are ignorant of who Jesus is. These I would include are those who have never heard of the Bible and often are in remote areas of the world, as well as people who existed before Jesus arrived on Earth. In Romans it says that everyone has some knowledge of God through what they observe in creation (modern terminology refers to this as "general" revalation), however they may lack "special" revalation (when God actually speaks to individuals). Still, the general revalation is sufficient for salvation, based upon the condition of people's hearts. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to quantify who "gets it" and who doesn't. Only God knows.

The second group of people are those who know of God's plan and know of the name of Jesus yet reject Him as who He said He was (the Messiah). The Muslims believe He was simply a prophet and a good teacher, and many Jews don't even believe He was from God at all.

Those who claim that rejecting Jesus doesn't automatically reject God are essentially calling Jesus (and God) a liar, because Jesus said:

"He who listens to you listens to me; he who rejects you rejects me; but he who rejects me rejects him who sent me." (Luke 10:16)

This implies of course that Islam and Christianity are incompatible since their views of Jesus diverge so much (including denying His death on the cross and subsequent resurrection).

Hope this clears things up a bit.


"I say we blast the meatbag, Master" -HK-47, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic

Back to Top
 

BJS
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2001
Total Posts : 587
 
   Posted 12/15/2003 4:15 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by GregBoyd

I don't see that the original question was addressed. The issue, I thought, was
-- how can hell be a place/state people choose to be in if
-- the rich man is in hell and doesn't want to be there?

Its a good and fair question. Two points...
a) Lk 16 is a parable. Like all parables the point is the punchline. Everything is a prop for this one point. The point of this parable doesn't have anything to do with the nature of hell. It is that we all have enough revelation to go on ( Luk 16:31). Ancients frequently told stories/parables about conversations betwene people in heaven and hell (or rough equivalents) to draw out moral lessons. This is what Jesus is doing here.

b) There are two strands of teaching about judgment in Scripture. One emphasizes it as the natural consequence of peoples decisions... and in this sense is "what they want" (Jn 3:19... they love darkness rather than light), the other stresses GOD'S justice.... he judges them... and in this is NOT what they want.

Hope this helps BJ.

Doc



Yes, Doc, you nailed the point of my question. Gracias. That definitely helps.


Brett

"Siste viator et memento mori."

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 12:06 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads