 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  markporter Fire over Oxford

Date Joined Oct 2003 Total Posts : 263 | Posted 10/24/2006 4:16 PM (GMT -6) |   | Ok, a puzzle that puzzles me...
So...God's dealt with our sins on the cross - that's it, punishment meted out, nothing left, all the evil dealt with.
But then, perhaps there's a murderer here on earth, he's found by the courts, and brought to trial. During this process he comes to Christ, and is forgiven his wrongdoing. What's left to do on earth? Should there be any punishment? If one were a Christian lawyer what should one do? How does the intersection of these two systems work?
I get a parking ticket, I can't pay it...again, how does the cross relate, what's the story?
Any thoughts? | | Back to Top | | |
  |  markporter Fire over Oxford

Date Joined Oct 2003 Total Posts : 263 | Posted 10/26/2006 4:38 PM (GMT -6) |   | Hmm, interesting thoughts - not sure it gets all the way to answer it, but certainly helps a bit.
M | | Back to Top | | |
  |  Similitude Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2004 Total Posts : 4968 | Posted 10/26/2006 7:34 PM (GMT -6) |   | Mark: If one were a Christian lawyer what should one do? How does the intersection of these two systems work?
Jeff: The second question is answered by "what is the role of the state?" If you think the state serves a public good, I don't see why it would be trumped by theological doctrines. If I remember correctly, Paul said he wouldn't have appealed to Caesar if he had acutally been guilty.
The first question has to do with the nature of prosecution. I tend to question the propriety of the very role of a prosecutor for a Christian. A prosecutor should do his job to the best of his ability. But if the prosecutor does a better job than the defense lawyer, an innocent person can be punished. It seems that a Christian would want to provide the best (and true, of course) DEFENSE for a person, not the other way around.
Post Edited (jefscott) : 10/26/2006 8:03:52 PM (GMT-5) | | Back to Top | | |
  |  markporter Fire over Oxford

Date Joined Oct 2003 Total Posts : 263 | Posted 10/28/2006 4:44 AM (GMT -6) |   | "The second question is answered by "what is the role of the state?" If you think the state serves a public good, I don't see why it would be trumped by theological doctrines."
It would be trumped by theological doctrines, 'cos ultimately the whole thing's God's and about God's way of doing things, surely? | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Similitude Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2004 Total Posts : 4968 | Posted 10/28/2006 9:03 AM (GMT -6) |   | | Mark: It would be trumped by theological doctrines, 'cos ultimately the whole thing's God's and about God's way of doing things, surely?
Jeff: Right. I wasn't clear enough. If the state is authorized by God to deter wrong-doing, then that is, itself, a theological doctrine. Theological doctrines can't be contradictory to other theological doctrines. So while Christians are limited in what they can do to one another, as Christians, the state is not so limited. Therefore, when a Christian acts as an officer of the state, he/she acts under that authority (a God-sanctioned authority), independent of his/her status "outside" that office.
Anyway, that's the way I would see it. Do you see this explanation as problematic? If so, how? Maybe I haven't thought it through enough, myself.
| | Back to Top | | |
 | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:14 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|