Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Theological Q&A > Self-giving Love - what does it mean?  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
30 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Corey
Five with a Four-wing




Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1893
 
   Posted 8/20/2007 9:04 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I interpret these verses through the paradigm of Job. In what sense was Job's life an offering for sin? In the sense that it settled an open question: does Man only love God for his blessings? What if he were cursed? Would he still love? It is our sinfulness that opened this question in first place. In a certain sense, Job was a type of christ.

The "offering" is a willingness on the part of the Father to allow this line questioning by the accuser and is likewise an offering back from Job as a spiritual service of worship. I like this view because it involves all the major players. It's not JUST about satisfying the Father's sense of justice, or JUST about paying a ransom to the devil, etc.

Post Edited (Corey) : 8/20/2007 9:13:43 AM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

Corey
Five with a Four-wing




Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1893
 
   Posted 8/20/2007 9:11 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
VfG: How does this demonstrate the love of the Father? IOW, How does it show the Father is also fully loving?

Corey: The love of the Father and the love of the Son are both sacrifically involved in bringing about reconciliation. God only allowed this to go forward because in his love he wanted the question closed. After this, there would be no need for such an experiment again. God's love was focused on bring about the Good.


 

Back to Top
 

Violin for God
Luke, I am your father. --Nooooooooo!!!!!




Date Joined Dec 2004
Total Posts : 690
 
   Posted 8/20/2007 5:09 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Good point. This is really helping me out. Another thing I thought about last night as well regarding how this may display the Father's love is this:
 
The Son is the perfect display of the Father (if you've seen me, you've seen the Father).
Since we can see what Love is by contemplating the Son, we are also automatically reflecting upon the Love of the Father.
If the Son is fully loving, so must be the Father.
 
But the next question that came to mind was why didn't the Father come Himself? My guess is that He couldn't. But the Son could , primarily because of some metaphysical constraint that didn't apply to the Son (perhaps?)... the Son proceeds from the Father, not vice versa. Because the Son is eternally begotten from the Father, it was the Son who could represent God to us and represent us to God.
 
Hmm... maybe? hmmm If any of this goes against traditional orthodoxy, please let me know.


 

Back to Top
 

One Love
Registered Member




Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 13888
 
   Posted 8/20/2007 5:46 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Violin: (emphasis mine)
But the next question that came to mind was why didn't the Father come Himself? My guess is that He couldn't. But the Son could , primarily because of some metaphysical constraint that didn't apply to the Son (perhaps?)... the Son proceeds from the Father, not vice versa. Because the Son is eternally begotten from the Father, it was the Son who could represent God to us and represent us to God.

YES.

The Father is the Fount of Aseity. And, in my mind, there's some implications to that. (Patripassionism isn't orthodox Christianity. )  However, the Father and Son are in ONE triune Godhead. For the Son to suffer in Jesus is for TRUE God to suffer. Don't forget John 3:16. This whole project was INITIATED by the Father in a real sense.


"Father, the hour has come. Glorify your Son, that your Son may glorify you.  For you granted him authority over all people that he might give eternal life to all those you have given him. Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.  I have brought you glory on earth by finishing the work you gave me to do.  And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began."

"Righteous Father, though the world does not know you, I know you, and they know that you have sent me.  I have made you known to them, and will continue to make you known in order that the love you have for me may be in them and that I myself may be in them."

Back to Top
 

Violin for God
Luke, I am your father. --Nooooooooo!!!!!




Date Joined Dec 2004
Total Posts : 690
 
   Posted 8/23/2007 2:06 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Yeah, cool. But I don't think I'd go so far as to subscribe to patripassionism. I don't want to minimize the reality of the Son as if only he were only a hologram of the Father, but I think it's also important to see them as intimately linked at such a deep level that causes them to be distinct persons so that they could communicate as we see happening at Jesus' baptism and crucifixion.
 
Cool. Good stuff! Yeah, you put it in the right words... "The Father is the Fount of Aseity"... right on!


 

Post Edited (Violin for God) : 9/12/2007 5:02:34 PM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
30 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:07 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads