Is it just me or does anyone else think Greg is "get overly invested in civilian affairs?"  See, Greg wants to endorse some political position on abortion, a third way so to speak, which is exactly what Wallis says: http://blog.beliefnet.com/godspolitics/2008/08/a-step-forward-on-abortion-by.html  Yet, not all think it is a third way:  http://warner.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/14/walking-the-abortion-plank/

 

Don't get too close Greg, you might find that you are endorsing a view that keeps abortion on demand ongoing for years to come.

---