 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Tearing down walls > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/24/2003 1:19 AM (GMT -6) |   | This link is very graphic, and the faint of heart should not go to it… as it has some photos of those dead and tortured service men and women. http://www.drudgereport.com/md323.htm
New York Times, “Channels Struggle on Images of Captured and Slain Soldiers” http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/24/international/worldspecial/24TAPE.html?ex=1049086800&en=d0a97b4d92dd9160&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
******************************

An American servicewoman watched images from Al Jazeera of captured and killed soldiers.
******************************
This conjures up three debates within my conscience.1) Women in service; 2) freedom of press; and 3) the nature of Islam. Now, the woman who was taken captive wasn’t in a fighting unit, she was in a maintenance unit. This being said, I do not feel a woman should be in a fighting unit in our military. The reality is that this poor woman has probably already been violated. The nature of a woman and the nature of a man compartmentalizes this in different ways (and don’t get me wrong, to humiliate the men, I am sure they have been violated as well).
As far as the video goes, I think it should be shown, or at least offered on-line to view. It will show the nay-sayers what they wish to protect by their protests, number one. And number two; it will strengthen the resolve of those who wish to liberate the average folk of Iraq from this horrible, horrible regime.
And finally, a book that I read and thoroughly enjoyed was Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World’s Fastest-Growing Faith, by Robert Spencer. His chapter titles include:“Is Islam a Religion of Peace?”
“Does Islam Promote and Safeguard Sound Moral Values?”
“Does Islam Respect Human Rights?”
“Does Islam Respect Woman?”
“Is Islam Compatible with Liberal Democracy?”
“Can Islam Be Secularized and Made Compatible with the Western Pluralistic Framework?”
“Can Science and Culture Flourish under Islam?”
“Is Islam Tolerant of Non-Muslims?”
“Does the West Really Have Nothing to Fear from Islam?” Out of all the anti-war protests, these would be the best reasons not to go to war, and some of the best reasons to. You will never hear one of the anti-war protestors make any arguments like these against us going to war though. Why? Because to judge another religion is politically-incorrect, and taboo in this “multi-cultural” society of ours.
Our country will attempt to set up a government that will represent the people; this is the moral high road! However, we are doomed to fail, for the reasons stated above in the chapter headings. I suggest all here to get this book and read it… very enlightening.
I brought these three items up for the reason of not debating them, but merely to get a general input from those here as to what they think of the subject.
SeanG!"I quote others only the better to express myself." Michel de Montaigne
Edited by - SeanG on 03/24/2003 06:22:19 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/24/2003 1:44 AM (GMT -6) |   | SeanG!"I quote others only the better to express myself." Michel de Montaigne
Edited by - SeanG on 03/24/2003 06:58:15 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  GregBoyd Registered Member
 Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 1818 | Posted 3/24/2003 5:50 AM (GMT -6) |   | What is the connection between the photos you post and the questions you ask? Unless you assume that Saddem's regime represents the essence of Islam, there's no apparent connection.
Would this not be like showing grizzy photos of killed Iraqi solidiers and critiquing Christianity on this basis?
Doc
"In Christ...the ONLY THING that matters is faith energized by love." Galatians 5:6 | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Modes of Thought Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 817 | Posted 3/24/2003 7:27 AM (GMT -6) |   | Sean, what do you mean by "I thoroughly enjoyed" when referring to that book? That seems a strange thing to take pleasure in. Did you mean you agreed with everything the author said, or that it was funny and entertaining? What?
"I don't feel a real urgent burden to get all the details of my ethics worked out until I've got the profundity of my love worked out in a Christ-like way." --doc
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/24/2003 9:32 AM (GMT -6) |   | Greg, most of the people in Iraq are Muslim… including most of the Iraqi regime.
Modes, at one point I said, “… very enlightening.” And, yes, for the most part I agreed with almost everything the author said. His chapter on the Crusades should be studied in the college setting.
SeanG!"I quote others only the better to express myself." Michel de Montaigne | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Electra Registered Member

Date Joined Feb 2002 Total Posts : 611 | Posted 3/24/2003 9:41 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Greg, most of the people in Iraq are Muslim… including most of the Iraqi regime.
Iraq is a religiously diverse nation. The ruling party is primarily secular, although one of the highest ranking members, Saddam Hussein's spokesperson, is a Christian. This is one of the reasons Osama Bin Laden hates Iraq and will be glad to see it go. It is not Muslim enough. Electra
Love in action is a harsh and dreadful thing. ~ Dostoevsky | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/24/2003 1:05 PM (GMT -6) |   | Electra,
Yes, the regime is socialist – this is equal to "secular" – this being said, Saddam and almost every single person in the cabinet is a practicing religious Islamist. And the “Christian” is fodder for the regime. It is funny, people tell me they believe in Jesus, but some think Jesus is the brother of Lucifer, the first born of a sexual act by Heavenly Father and one of the many Heavenly Mothers (Mormonism)… Lucifer being born by a sexual act as well, although, most assuredly by a different Mother. Or the first creative act by Jehovah was the creation of Michael the archangel, who later became Jesus when he came to earth. It was this angels death on the cross that has allowed the 144,000 thousand to enter into heaven, the remainder of the Jehovah's Witnesses must earn their way into the new earth (“Jesus” wiped Adam’s original sin away only)… heaven being a bygone idea to them. It is like saying Hitler was a Christian, which he may have said he was to keep the Christian vote in tow. However, he practiced a form of occultism that was (still is) anti-thetical to the Biblical view of God and the world.
So when someone says that Saddam’s right hand man is a Christian, he knew undoubtedly about people being thrown into a giant plastic shredder if they disagreed with Saddam. Or the acid baths Saddam personally oversaw, or the rape and torture of the Iraqi people… this isn’t sounding much like a Christian to me.
You are right though, Iraq is a religiously diverse nation, there are many factions of Islam in that country. Most of the Jews and Christian have either been executed or run out for the most part.This country is dominated by Shi'ite Muslims (59.1%) and Sunni Muslims (36.1%). The Christian population is 3.3% with Catholics making up the majority. Anyhow, the point is I have no idea what Tarek Aziz believes, nor do his actions support his verbal contention.
SeanG!"I quote others only the better to express myself." Michel de Montaigne
Edited by - SeanG on 03/24/2003 6:07:02 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  fyodor Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 3/25/2003 4:55 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: As far as the video goes, I think it should be shown, or at least offered on-line to view. It will show the nay-sayers what they wish to protect by their protests, number one. And number two; it will strengthen the resolve of those who wish to liberate the average folk of Iraq from this horrible, horrible regime.
-SeanG!
As far as the video is concerned, I agree. War is horrifying and we should know what it looks like. On the other hand, I haven't seen any video footage of the many Iraqis who have died in this conflict and I highly doubt that those in charge of this war are interested in letting such a video reach the American news outlets as well.
†††"To have a self, to be a self, is the greatest concession, an infinite concession, given to man, but it is also eternity's claim upon him." – S. Kierkegaard
Edited by - fyodor on 03/25/2003 09:56:57 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/25/2003 5:57 AM (GMT -6) |   | Fyodor, thank you for your opinion, I too believe it should be shown.
I do want to offer a distinction though between the soldiers who are POW’s and the Iraqi citizen who may have been caught in the crossfire. America is going out of its way to not incur civilian deaths. We are doing so in ways that are in accord with the Geneva Convention. We even offer the surrender of troops and instead of taking them into custody, we trust they want to be free so much that we tell them to go back to their homes and wait for the regime to be displaced. And when we have the prisoners in custody, we give them medical attention and food, etc.
The distinction lies in the execution (we know this because of the neatly placed bullet holes in our troops foreheads) of the POW’s once they were subdued and in custody. This is the video that needs to be shown with the distinction that we are fighting a war with ethics involved; whereas the other side is not. Some may say – unfortunately – that a war cannot be fought with ethics, because, war, as we know it, is un-ethical to begin with. I disagree, but I can do so respectfully. Knowing that in America, those who do disagree aren’t dragged kicking and screaming to military sites (whole families) in order to be human shields. Or be thrown into plastic shredders or given acid baths, and the like.

SeanG!"I quote others only the better to express myself." Michel de Montaigne | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/25/2003 7:00 AM (GMT -6) |   | Reality Stuns 'Human Shield': 'Saddam Was a Monster' Some of the appeasement activists who went to Iraq as "human shields" got shocked into common sense when reality dashed their passivist fantasies.
Arnaud de Borchgrave, UPI's Editor at Large and a member of NewsMax's board of directors, wrote Friday from Jordan:A group of American anti-war demonstrators who came to Iraq with Japanese human shield volunteers made it across the border today with 14 hours of uncensored video, all shot without Iraqi government minders present.
Kenneth Joseph, a young American pastor with the Assyrian Church of the East, told UPI the trip "had shocked me back to reality."
Some of the Iraqis he interviewed on camera "told me they would commit suicide if American bombing didn't start. They were willing to see their homes demolished to gain their freedom from Saddam's bloody tyranny. They convinced me that Saddam was a monster the likes of which the world had not seen since Stalin and Hitler. He and his sons are sick sadists."
"Their tales of slow torture and killing made me ill, such as people put in a huge shredder for plastic products, feet first so they could hear their screams as bodies got chewed up from foot to head." Susan Sarandon, Michael Moore, Adrien Brody, Chris Cooper and Barbra Streisand, are you listening?
SeanG!"I quote others only the better to express myself." Michel de Montaigne | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Electra Registered Member

Date Joined Feb 2002 Total Posts : 611 | Posted 3/26/2003 12:54 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Anyhow, the point is I have no idea what Tarek Aziz believes…
He is a Chaldean Catholic Christian. Saddam Hussein has made donations to Chaldean churches around the world. He was even given a key to the city of Detroit because of his generosity to the churches there.
Peace, Electra
Love in action is a harsh and dreadful thing. ~ Dostoevsky
Edited by - Electra on 03/26/2003 5:55:21 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/26/2003 5:02 PM (GMT -6) |   | Electra, Hitler gave the church money too? I guess he is a true Christian as well? I don’t mean to confront this issue, because I believe you are just letting me know what kind of faith Aziz claims, but I must confront this issue for the general audience.
I was born and raised in Detroit, and let me tell you, that city has made some horrendous mistakes in the past… I know, I grew up in one of the poorest neighborhoods this country had to offer (and, at the time, was the murder capital of the U. S.). How they chose to run the city, the educational choices (I grew with “values clarification” being heavily taught), etc. It doesn’t surprise me that the city would give such an award to Mr. Aziz.…Saddam gassed Iranian soldiers and civilians. Between 1984 and 1988, six separate teams of U. N. investigators documented instances of Iraq using chemical weapons on Iranians. In 1988, Iraq’s foreign minister, Tariq Aziz, openly admitted that poison gas was enshrined in official war policy. (Kaplan & Kristol, The War over Iraq: Saddam’s Tyranny and America’s Mission, p. 18) [Below is a Detroit site for the ouster of Saddam.] Remember that Tariq Aziz’s son was recently sentenced to 20 years in an Iraqi jail by Saddam Hussein — an effective means of reminding Saddam’s suave envoy who is boss. Now consider the above statement by Aziz, and the below one made by him as well (interview by Tony Snow – FOX News):SNOW: You're a Christian. George W. Bush is a Christian. He often talks about the importance of his religion. Christian to Christian, what would you tell him?
AZIZ: He's a hypocrite, because the Christian, a true Christian would not be a war monger, would not lead — would not push for the destruction of countries and the killing of people. A true Christian would not send tens of thousands of his own young men and women to be killed in a war which does not serve the real interests of the United States as a peaceful-loving nation and which is contrary to the basics of the Christian faith. That's why the Church in the United States is against the war. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,72956,00.html Aziz is nothing more than a criminal who has learned to peddle to the liberal heart in his propaganda war for Iraq. If caught, he should be brought before the Hague!
***********************************
http://www.iraqfoundation.org/index.html

quote:
An estimated 120,000 Chaldeans live in and around Detroit, and 60,000 more — Arabs and Kurds as well as Chaldeans — came in two waves: one after the rise to power of Saddam in 1979 and another after the 1991 Gulf war and the ensuing failed uprisings.
They danced in the aisles when Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz showed up in Dearborn to address them last month.
"He did not expect that. The people were so glad that he came here to talk to us about ending the regime in Iraq" said Mr. Faik, who is part of a national group of Iraqis, called the Iraqi Forum for Democracy, who advocate the removal of Saddam.
Last week, a coalition of mostly Detroit area Iraqis, Muslim and Christian, sent a letter to Miss Rice, thanking her for inviting them to the White House and stressing that "those who are marching for 'peace and justice' in the name of the Iraqi people are unwittingly supporting a totalitarian dictator who promotes terrorism."
"These people, these so-called peace people who support human rights, have never been there for the people of Iraq," said Salam Jafar, a 52-year-old physician, who left Iraq in 1980.
He sits in a suburban Ann Arbor kitchen with several other Iraqi Muslims, gulping coffee and talking about siblings, parents and children who were taken in Saddam-ordered campaigns of ethnic cleansing and brutal suppression of uprisings.
All four of the men, in their 40s and 50s, have made the United States home, raising families, paying mortgages and hoping for the end of the Saddam era so relatives in Iraq can be free to visit and vice versa.
Until now, anti-Saddam statements from Iraqis in the U.S. were rare, they all conceded; Saddam has spies among them in Detroit's Middle Eastern community.
"People are now encouraged by this administration, and we are tired of not being able to tell the truth," Dr. Jafar said, risking retribution against family members in Iraq.
"And we got tired of all those stories from Iraq, where the people tell the news people that they don't want war," he added. "Of course they say that. There are [government police] right there next to them. To tell the truth could mean death."
http://www.iraqfoundation.org/news/2003/cmar/11_saddam.html
Much love Electra, and yes, the Hague.

Edited by - SeanG on 03/26/2003 10:08:14 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  fyodor Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 3/26/2003 5:47 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Fyodor, thank you for your opinion, I too believe it should be shown.
I do want to offer a distinction though between the soldiers who are POW’s and the Iraqi citizen who may have been caught in the crossfire. America is going out of its way to not incur civilian deaths. We are doing so in ways that are in accord with the Geneva Convention. We even offer the surrender of troops and instead of taking them into custody, we trust they want to be free so much that we tell them to go back to their homes and wait for the regime to be displaced. And when we have the prisoners in custody, we give them medical attention and food, etc.
The distinction lies in the execution (we know this because of the neatly placed bullet holes in our troops foreheads) of the POW’s once they were subdued and in custody. This is the video that needs to be shown with the distinction that we are fighting a war with ethics involved; whereas the other side is not. Some may say – unfortunately – that a war cannot be fought with ethics, because, war, as we know it, is un-ethical to begin with. I disagree, but I can do so respectfully. Knowing that in America, those who do disagree aren’t dragged kicking and screaming to military sites (whole families) in order to be human shields. Or be thrown into plastic shredders or given acid baths, and the like. - SeanG!
Why doesn't this go both ways? Your original post, mentioned as one of your concerns, freedom of press. Their shouldn't be a distinction amongst the press as to which images of war to show and which not to show. A free press should also be an unbiased press, a reporter of facts. Why should the press show the American POW's and not show the innocent victims of war, especially as the US maintains, most of these victims are actually victims of Iraqi war crimes. It doesn't seem like a cohesive argument to me. If the press is indeed going to cover the war, they should try to cover multiple perspectives and the sum of images rather than selected images. It seems that the type of coverage you propose, without also including other available images of the causalties of war, could be construed as a propaganda tactic by the press. Fair and accurate reporting could not do what you suggest. I'm not making any claims about the brutality of the actions just a discerned reading of the distinctions you made.
†††"To have a self, to be a self, is the greatest concession, an infinite concession, given to man, but it is also eternity's claim upon him." – S. Kierkegaard | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/26/2003 6:36 PM (GMT -6) |   | Fyodor,
I do think that the war casualties should be shown. Don’t get me wrong, I agree with you here as well. But the distinction should still be drawn. Showing every side of the argument, or perception, is not freedom of press. See for instance: http://www.arabia.com/pina/article/english/0,14183,325819,00.html
Speaking the truth is freedom of the press. But the point is that Al-Jazeera would say American soldiers are killing – on purpose – innocent Iraqi citizens. Whereas the truth of the matter is that we do not aim for, nor want to harm the innocent Iraqi citizen (or the Iraqi soldier who doesn’t want to fight). Al Jazeera refuses to air the truth that Saddam wants to harm innocent Iraqi’s to blame it on the United States (and Israel). This isn’t freedom of press… it is propaganda.
We have enough trouble in our own media with this!
http://www.mediaresearch.org/projects/mww/welcome.asp
 | | Back to Top | | |
 |  fyodor Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 3/26/2003 6:46 PM (GMT -6) |   | Without reading those articles....
Agreed, I should not have said perspectives but rather the truth, or the facts, that surround the issues.
So could we then agree that if both sets of images were available (i.e. the American POW's and the Innocent Iraqi casualties) then to not show one, but to show the other would be a failure to present the truth of the war, and could be construed as propaganda? I'm not assuming that there is video of innocent Iraqi casualties, but I'm guessing with all the reporters in the region right now, there probably are...
†††"To have a self, to be a self, is the greatest concession, an infinite concession, given to man, but it is also eternity's claim upon him." – S. Kierkegaard | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/26/2003 7:42 PM (GMT -6) |   | Okay, what would be the purpose of showing innocent Iraqi casualties? I mean… everyone knows war inevitably involves innocence being stricken down, right? However, showing the POW video informs people (reminds people) as to why we are fighting Iraq in the first place, it is a totalitarian state with a despot for a ruler. It is a violation of the Geneva code, innocent casualties is not a violation of the code of war. What is your purpose in showing the innocent civilians dead for? Al Jazeera shows them and then says America aimed for these people (usually woman and children they say) on purpose, and they use this as a driving force to spur on Muslims to fight us imperialists.
Americans know already that innocent Iraqi’s are going to die, but far less than any other time in history, far less… I think the estimation for d-day was 14,000 innocent lives lost, but they still went forward with the attack. I think everyone knows war is terrible, ultimately.
 | | Back to Top | | |
 |  fyodor Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 3/27/2003 6:13 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Okay, what would be the purpose of showing innocent Iraqi casualties? I mean… everyone knows war inevitably involves innocence being stricken down, right? However, showing the POW video informs people (reminds people) as to why we are fighting Iraq in the first place, it is a totalitarian state with a despot for a ruler.
Ok, Everyone knows Iraq is led by a brutal and torturous regime right? So what then is the point of showing this particular footage? If the war is going to be covered it should be covered on all the facts not just some.
†††"To have a self, to be a self, is the greatest concession, an infinite concession, given to man, but it is also eternity's claim upon him." – S. Kierkegaard | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/27/2003 9:17 AM (GMT -6) |   | Fyodor, you said: “…the war is going to be covered it should be covered on all the facts not just some.” What facts? That the U.S. intentionally bombed civilians? Please! Al-Jazeera says that the bombing of the twin towers was a Jewish conspiracy, and that thousands of Jews left prior to the attack (or didn’t show up to work). Are these facts? Should they be shown in a free press environment? Not at all, it is propaganda with a political end in sight – that is, to foment anti-Americanism. They are lies Fyodor... our soldiers being shot in the groin (yes, blowing a man's balls off for the fun of it while he is alive, in front of fellow Marines [friends]) and forehead while in custody, and playing with the dead bodies like dolls, is sick!!! This isn’t a lie, and it is telling it like it is without spin. Saying we are massacring civilians on purpose is a lie, and is putting a giant spin on the telling of the facts.
Al Jazeera should be taken out in my humble opinion!
*****************

Edited by - SeanG on 03/27/2003 2:22:00 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  fyodor Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 3/27/2003 9:39 AM (GMT -6) |   | Those are also lies I didn't say....
†††"To have a self, to be a self, is the greatest concession, an infinite concession, given to man, but it is also eternity's claim upon him." – S. Kierkegaard | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/27/2003 4:24 PM (GMT -6) |   | Say again? I didn't understand.
*****************
 | | Back to Top | | |
 |  fyodor Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 3/27/2003 5:03 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Fyodor, you said: “…the war is going to be covered it should be covered on all the facts not just some.” What facts? That the U.S. intentionally bombed civilians? Please! Al-Jazeera says that the bombing of the twin towers was a Jewish conspiracy, and that thousands of Jews left prior to the attack (or didn’t show up to work). Are these facts? Should they be shown in a free press environment? Not at all, it is propaganda with a political end in sight – that is, to foment anti-Americanism. They are lies Fyodor... our soldiers being shot in the groin (yes, blowing a man's balls off for the fun of it while he is alive, in front of fellow Marines [friends]) and forehead while in custody, and playing with the dead bodies like dolls, is sick!!! This isn’t a lie, and it is telling it like it is without spin. Saying we are massacring civilians on purpose is a lie, and is putting a giant spin on the telling of the facts.
Al Jazeera should be taken out in my humble opinion!
It seems as though you are trying to make a rebuttal here by telling me that I was somehow supporting the spreading of lies. I never maintained that the US was intentionally bombing civillians. To which your response was, "Please!"
I didn't say that, but you gave a rebuttal as though I did. Perhaps I'm reading in to this wrong....I'm not sure how your remarks about the Jewish conspiracy surrounding 9/11 on Al Jazeera fit in to the argument either. I haven't been talking about asking the American media to report on conspiracy theories.
"Saying we are massacring civilians on purpose is a lie, and is putting a giant spin on the telling of the facts." --------Where do you get this from? It's irrelevant to what has been discussed thus far....
†††"To have a self, to be a self, is the greatest concession, an infinite concession, given to man, but it is also eternity's claim upon him." – S. Kierkegaard | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/27/2003 5:33 PM (GMT -6) |   | Did you want American media to show civilians dead? What will this accomplish? I did watch a CENTCOM briefing where a dude was running by a tank when a thousand pounder hit it. The guy was obliterated. Mind you, I like the raw stuff, I own every “Banned From TV!” But showing civilians being hit by Iraqi ground to air missiles that fall back to earth, or a misguided bomb would accomplish what again? Would it solidify the nation to back our men and go towards quickly ending the war? I don’t think so. If you want to see civilian death, get the XYZ Clothing Demo Video (skate, dirt-bike, surfing video), or Faces of Death. DO you want to see what our men are giving up by going over to a foreign land to sacrifice their lives for the innocent Iraqi citizen, show the POW video.
By the way, I thought those of you who are listening to us would enjoy this photo:

Marines search Iraqi military HQ in Nasiriyah where a sick mural celebrates 9/11.
*****************

Edited by - SeanG on 03/27/2003 10:34:31 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  fyodor Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 3/27/2003 5:45 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: But showing civilians being hit by Iraqi ground to air missiles that fall back to earth, or a misguided bomb would accomplish what again? Would it solidify the nation to back our men and go towards quickly ending the war? I don’t think so.
Your response here says it all. You don't want fair and accurate reporting, You want reporting that supports your specific notion and purpose of supporting the war. Is the job of the media to report the war or to report how the American forces are doing, or how horrible the Iraqis are? You seem to want freedom of the press as long as it supports your agenda!
†††"To have a self, to be a self, is the greatest concession, an infinite concession, given to man, but it is also eternity's claim upon him." – S. Kierkegaard | | Back to Top | | |
 |  SeanG Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 278 | Posted 3/27/2003 7:29 PM (GMT -6) |   | I think we should show how awful the Iraqi people have been treated. However, American forces have done nothing but treat these people with the utmost honor and respect. What could you show that would incriminate us? Nothing. So by all means, show it (because we fight with honor, ethics, and dignity... something Saddam knows nothing about). However, as we know, reporters who weren’t embedded have been killed. So right now all we see is what our fighting boys and women see. A time is coming where reporters will be able to report all sides of the war. And the stories of how Saddam’s henchmen forced normal people to fight by threatening their family’s lives. Or how they forced women and children to be shields while they fired on our troops. And I wouldn’t mind if they showed the mangled bodies of Iraqi citizens. But you still haven’t answered what this will accomplish? What does the freedom of press have to do with showing dead civilians caught in the crossfire of war?
*****************

Edited by - SeanG on 03/28/2003 12:30:50 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  fyodor Registered Member
 Date Joined Dec 2002 Total Posts : 179 | Posted 3/28/2003 3:05 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: What could you show that would incriminate us?........But you still haven’t answered what this will accomplish? What does the freedom of press have to do with showing dead civilians caught in the crossfire of war?
The answer is obvious. The accomplishment would be fair and unbiased coverage of the war. The intention is not to incriminate us. The intention is to report on the war, without catering to one particular set of images that supports one side or the other. If there is coverage that is being withheld based on its graphic representation showing negative effects of US military intervention, than the coverage is biased. It's not an anti-war agenda is you seem to want me to say. It's an unbiased agenda.
†††"To have a self, to be a self, is the greatest concession, an infinite concession, given to man, but it is also eternity's claim upon him." – S. Kierkegaard | | Back to Top | | |
 | 30 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 12:36 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|