Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Tearing down walls > Position towards Homosexuals  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
68 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

JEE
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 1466
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 4:36 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by MephEternal
If you believe that, at least within SOME people, homosexual intentionality and desire is a powerful, internal, INVOLUNTARY impulse...and this impulse is NOT sin in and of itself...

would this imply that, in your mind, enduring homosexual longing is more a PHYSIOLOGICAL or PSYCHOSOCIAL phenomena than a INDIVIDUAL MORAL CHOICE?



Yes, in some cases that would be a reasonable explanation as to the reason behind their impulses. For instance, two very good friends of mine were horribly molested as childen, and their story is that ever since that happened to them, they have "felt different," and have struggled with impulses to have homosexual sex with others, and have never once experienced heterosexual desires, though they would prefer not to have these desires, and in fact desperately wish to be heterosexual. In such a case, the genesis of their desires was not something they ever consciously willed to happen.

I do hope to help those God leads to me to eventually find total freedom from such involuntary impulses, and I have seen some success, though not as much as I would prefer personally. In my opinion, such bondage is no different in principle than trying to minister deliverance to a demon-possessed person, inasmuch as both situations originated outside of the sufferer due to a violation of their body and soul by another, and are to a large extent beyond his or her volitional control.

John


http://revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Mayflower
Registered Member


Date Joined Mar 2002
Total Posts : 445
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 4:41 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Wow, John.
IMHO, such (inborn) 'orientation' is about as intentional as being born with brown eyes.
.

Back to Top
 

JEE
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 1466
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 4:42 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Mayflower


Wow, John.
IMHO, such (inborn) 'orientation' is about as intentional as being born with brown eyes.
.





Huh?


http://revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Mayflower
Registered Member


Date Joined Mar 2002
Total Posts : 445
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 4:52 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
.

Mephi
wrote:
quote:
would this imply that, in your mind, enduring homosexual longing is more a PHYSIOLOGICAL or PSYCHOSOCIAL phenomena than a INDIVIDUAL MORAL CHOICE?



John:

Do you believe that you chose to be hetrosexual?

Was it conscious 'moral' choice, or were you simply born with a particular orientation?
More akin to being born with, say, brown eyes?
.

Back to Top
 

JEE
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 1466
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 4:58 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Mayflower

.

Mephi
wrote:
quote:
would this imply that, in your mind, enduring homosexual longing is more a PHYSIOLOGICAL or PSYCHOSOCIAL phenomena than a INDIVIDUAL MORAL CHOICE?


Do you believe that you chose to be hetrosexual?


No, because that's normal, and consistent with how God designed the human body to function sexually.

In my earlier posts, I have included some of my own thoughts as to the origin of homosexual impulses. But briefly, in many cases it is a result of molestation. In some cases, it may be chosen; neither you nor I have enough information to say with 100% certainty in all cases what the origin of these unnatural impulses is.

But no, I don't buy into the "born gay" idea at all. It's sheer assertion with no possible way of knowing one way or the other.

That said, I CAN see how a Calvinist would have no problem asserting that some people are born gay.

John


http://revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Mayflower
Registered Member


Date Joined Mar 2002
Total Posts : 445
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 5:00 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
.
quote:
But no, I don't buy into the "born gay" idea at all.


I respectfully disagree.

<><

.
Back to Top
 

JEE
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 1466
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 5:01 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Mayflower

.
quote:
But no, I don't buy into the "born gay" idea at all.


I respectfully disagree.

<><

.



Really? Why then aren't you a Calvinist, if in your view God creates people with an "orientation" necessitating activity that is everywhere condemned in Scripture as sinful?

The following article serves to explain the position I agree on this with far better than I could ever improve upon:

"Defeating "Gay" Arguments with Simple Logic"

http://www.ccofme.org/Defeating%20Gay%20Arguments.htm

Blessings to all who stand in the truth (I obviously can't bless that which God has cursed).

John


http://revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Mayflower
Registered Member


Date Joined Mar 2002
Total Posts : 445
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 5:17 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
.
Excerpt from website:
'By-Pass The Liberal Media Filter, Come Here For Your News'

Hm. Do you suppose this particular site could be biased?



Peace & blessings,
<><
.
Back to Top
 

JEE
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 1466
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 5:24 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Mayflower

.
Excerpt from website:
'By-Pass The Liberal Media Filter, Come Here For Your News'

Hm. Do you suppose this particular site could be biased?



Peace & blessings,
<><
.



Funny how when a liberal has a knee-jerk reaction, it's attributed to their supposedly enlightened opinions. Big Smile

The site is not the author of the article. The author of the article is a lawyer, and his arguments are undefeatable. I originally read the article in a conservative (gasp!) Christian ezine I get.

But by all means, defeat Mr. Lively's arguments if you can. I'd really like to see it done.



John


http://revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Mayflower
Registered Member


Date Joined Mar 2002
Total Posts : 445
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 5:44 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
.

quote:
Excerpt from website:
'By-Pass The Liberal Media Filter, Come Here For Your News'
Hm. Do you suppose this particular site could be biased?


Peace & blessings,
<><





John wrote:
quote:
No more biased that you and the other liberals on this board.

Heh.

John




John wrote:
quote:


But by all means, defeat Mr. Lively's arguments if you can. I'd really like to see it done.





Sorry, John.
I'm not biting.

I'm not interested in such games.

Goodnight.

<><

.
Back to Top
 

JEE
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 1466
 
   Posted 1/4/2005 5:48 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Mayflower
Sorry, John.
I'm not biting.

I'm not interested in such games.

Goodnight.



Funny how when a liberal wants to condemn a conservative for his beliefs, and is simply asked to engage the issues, it's called "games."

May, I'm not playing a game at all; I'm as serious as a heart attack. I suppose I should apologize for standing with God against sin.

Those who suppress the truth in unrighteousness will still stand before their Maker someday to give an account.

John


http://revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Mayflower
Registered Member


Date Joined Mar 2002
Total Posts : 445
 
   Posted 1/5/2005 11:17 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
.
Good Afternoon, John:
.

JEE wrote:
quote:
May, I'm not playing a game at all; I'm as serious as a heart attack.
I suppose I should apologize for standing with God
against sin
.



Just
YOU & GOD coming against "sin," huh?

I think there may be something wrong with that picture.
Where's Jesus?

.
.

------

F.Y.I.:
Inspiring message attached.

Peace & blessings,
<><

------
.
.
.
Woodland Hills Church,
sermon archive:


12/5/2004 – THE FATHER IS ALWAYS WORKING , By Greg Boyd
http://gregboyd.officehiway.com/2004/2004-12-05_Boyd_The-Father-Is-Always-Working_64kbps.mp3

SOURCE:
Woodland Hills Church - Sermons
http://www.whchurch.org/content/page_26.htm


.

Back to Top
 

JEE
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2004
Total Posts : 1466
 
   Posted 1/5/2005 11:25 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
LOL. I never said it was JUST me and God. There are no doubt still many who have not "bowed the knee to Baal."

And last time I checked JESUS was quite strongly against sin. That's the reason He suffered and died, so that people might be saved FROM their sins (Matt. 1:21).

John


http://revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

kingsaint
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2003
Total Posts : 80
 
   Posted 1/5/2005 11:28 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Thanks Mephi for directing the conversation the way you did. I suppose I wouldn't want to say that "homosexual orientation" is o.k. if it is against the intentions of God, for the orientation itself could be a product of a fallen world ("systemic sin"). This could be true even if homosexuality is genetic, psychosociological or whatever. (I can imagine a lot of genetics contrary to God's intentions.) Perhaps the route of making an orientation/act distinction is only an attempt to show grace to those in the grips of this systemic sin. That is, it takes seriously the possibility that one's sexual orientation is not in one's moral control in the same sense as are other things. True, the goal ought to be "new creation" without any orientation to homosexuality, but that new creation might not be heterosexual either. (Jesus did not affirm marriage in the age to come, eunuchs for the kingdom, Jesus and Paul were celibate etc.) Come to think of it, how much "grace" does this disctinction really buy anyway? Are homosexuals who are interested in Christianity relieved to know that their orientation is fine as long as they don't act on it?

In other words, given that homosexuality is a sin, how does the Church reach out to homosexuals without coming across as unloving?


"Nobody who omits doing good works nowadays does so in order not to be tempted to become self-righteous; he omits it because it is easier."

--Philip Merlan, "Toward the Understanding of Kierkegaard"

Back to Top
 

Mayflower
Registered Member


Date Joined Mar 2002
Total Posts : 445
 
   Posted 1/5/2005 11:28 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
.
Greetings, John:

If you have ears to hear,
simply listen:

.


12/5/2004 – THE FATHER IS ALWAYS WORKING , By Greg Boyd
http://gregboyd.officehiway.com/2004/2004-12-05_Boyd_The-Father-Is-Always-Working_64kbps.mp3

SOURCE:
Woodland Hills Church - Sermons
http://www.whchurch.org/content/page_26.htm
Back to Top
 

Violin for God
Luke, I am your father. --Nooooooooo!!!!!




Date Joined Dec 2004
Total Posts : 690
 
   Posted 1/9/2005 1:49 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Just a couple of thoughts about the homosexuality issue…

It seems to be a symptom – not a gene, chemical imbalance, or whatnot – it is a symptom of something else that happened earlier to that person. From what I’ve read and heard about homosexuality, researchers have had some interesting findings. Homosexual men seem to have experienced one or more of the following things in their earlier years (childhood?): 1. they were abused/molested as a child/adolescent, 2. their fathers were very distant from them (non-supportive, non-communicative, etc.), 3. mothers were either the head of the household or over-controlling (i.e., weak father, was there but was not the head of the household).

There are “ex-gays” out there (See www.narth.org, www.pfox.org, www.sbministries.org etc.) and more and more research showing that the “I was born with it” belief previously perpetuated by the APA (Am. Psych. Assn.) is false.

It seems to be a symptom, not a trait. Ignoring it may not make it go away, but realizing that there may be some underlying psychological cause (and understanding God's love and grace) may help them (those who are homosexuals) win the battle if they desire to do so.


"Reality is harsh to the feet of shadows." - C.S.Lewis, The Great Divorce

Post Edited (Violin for God) : 1/9/2005 12:52:20 AM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

Violin for God
Luke, I am your father. --Nooooooooo!!!!!




Date Joined Dec 2004
Total Posts : 690
 
   Posted 1/9/2005 2:06 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

from:
http://narth.com/docs/narthresponse.html

(excerpt from paper)
Concludes psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover:
 "There is no evidence that shows that homosexuality is genetic--and none of the research itself claims there is. Only the press and certain researchers do, when speaking in sound bites to the public."

Contrary to the "born that way" myth, scientific evidence links homosexuality to social and parental influences--including certain family patterns, same-sex peer problems, childhood molestation, and peer labelling--combined in varying degrees with biological predisposition in some people.

Because homosexuality is not simply genetic, it is subject to modification through counseling or psychotherapy.


"Reality is harsh to the feet of shadows." - C.S.Lewis, The Great Divorce

Post Edited (Violin for God) : 1/9/2005 9:55:33 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 

Violin for God
Luke, I am your father. --Nooooooooo!!!!!




Date Joined Dec 2004
Total Posts : 690
 
   Posted 1/9/2005 10:42 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
One last thing about the "I was born this way" theory...

Suppose Jeffrey Dahlmer or Charles Manson were to say this for example...
"I was born with it and had no choice."
Would you buy it?

We still must agree that God desires us to follow Him and His way (His moral law). To do otherwise while making up excuses is actually not following Him. To at least make a persistent attempt... that's following Him. 
 
And about judging others.... we are supposed to IN LOVE inform our brothers and sisters of our concerns about their sin, and support them to recovery.  If they choose to not repent, then let them take that up with God.  (Still love the sinner but hate the sin.)
 
The "judge not lest you be judged" thing is talking about this: if you see someone doing some kind of sin and you're doing the same sin without repenting, don't go up to them to correct them until you have dealt with your own sin.
Read all of Matthew 7:1-5; don't take it out of context (most people quote just 7:1 without seeing how Jesus qualifies it.)


"Reality is harsh to the feet of shadows." - C.S.Lewis, The Great Divorce

Post Edited (Violin for God) : 1/9/2005 9:56:00 PM (GMT-6)

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
68 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2  3 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 5:39 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads