 |
| Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Tearing down walls > Decline of Xty in Europe | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  Tigress Registered Member
 Date Joined Feb 2003 Total Posts : 1252 | Posted 10/15/2003 10:33 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by DLW
quote: What I'm saying is that there were what you call constitutional homosexuals in Paul's day, whether they were recognized as such or not, and they were still expected to not engage in sexual behavior of any kind in a homosexual way. To do so, would have been sin - just as it would be for straight people who chose to engage in gay and lesbian acts. No one can help who they're aroused by, so people who are mainly heterosexual and yet who sometimes get aroused by their same sex, are doing so because of something innate - just like those who are born strictly (constitutional) gay or lesbian. It's all the same - it's all sin. Stop trying to rationalize sin based on worldly pop psychology
Anybody else wanna handle Tigress for awhile?
I don't know the statistics for Roman times(I doubt there are any), but constitutional homosexuality occurs for a rather small fraction of individuals, I'm sure that homosexual acts were far more common in Roman times.
All I'm saying is that Paul didn't know about how some people were constitutional homosexuals and would have taken into account that fact if he had known about it. This is not pop-psychology but rigorous science.
dlw
I know it's "rigorous science" but that doesn't make it all right for people to live in sin. Pedophiles are born pedophiles but that doesn't make it alright. Sociopaths are born sociopaths but that doesn't make it alright. Homosexuals who are born homosexuals are still not allowed to just go ahead and sin. They just have to accept that their bodies or brains, or whatever caused them to be homosexual is a part of the Fall, and celibacy is a cross they have to bear if they want to be like Christ.
Having ANY other sexual relationships outside of God's original plan of one man and one woman in marriage causes people's spirits to decay, they grow farther apart from God and each other, and it opens doors to Satan and his demons to attack them and keep them from being fruitful in God's Kingdom. Homosexual unions under any and all circumstances cause this, regardless of how you want to set it up. There's only one type of marital union that glorifies God and edifies the souls and spirits of those partaking of it, and that's between one man and one woman. Tigress 
"Name a shrub after me. Preferably one that's prickly and difficult to eradicate."
-Captain Jack Aubrey "Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World" | | Back to Top | | |
 |  DLW Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2003 Total Posts : 2457 | Posted 10/15/2003 3:44 PM (GMT -6) |   | sigh ,
quote: I know it's "rigorous science" but that doesn't make it all right for people to live in sin. Pedophiles are born pedophiles but that doesn't make it alright. Sociopaths are born sociopaths but that doesn't make it alright. Homosexuals who are born homosexuals are still not allowed to just go ahead and sin. They just have to accept that their bodies or brains, or whatever caused them to be homosexual is a part of the Fall, and celibacy is a cross they have to bear if they want to be like Christ.
I wouldn't say that pedophilia is the same as is the case with constitutional homosexuality. I haven't read any research to that extent. I mean there are heterosexual pedophiles.
As for whether they must be celibate, not everyone has the gift of lifelong celibacy and longterm relationship can serve to ward off other very sinful desires.
There is nothing in the Bible that says this must be the case for constitutional homosexuals.
quote: Having ANY other sexual relationships outside of God's original plan of one man and one woman in marriage causes people's spirits to decay, they grow farther apart from God and each other, and it opens doors to Satan and his demons to attack them and keep them from being fruitful in God's Kingdom. Homosexual unions under any and all circumstances cause this, regardless of how you want to set it up. There's only one type of marital union that glorifies God and edifies the souls and spirits of those partaking of it, and that's between one man and one woman.
These are pretty strong words for what would likely be an empirical question.
dlw Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes." | | Back to Top | | |
 | 27 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 1:39 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|