Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Tearing down walls > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
30 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

fyodor
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 179
 
   Posted 12/6/2003 12:16 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Do you think of yourselves as belonging to the "white race?"


†††"One rarely finds an exposition of which it holds true that the exposition is that which is expounded." – S. Kierkegaard

Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 12/6/2003 12:17 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I am a member of the Aryan race. I resent being lumped together with those inferior white groups. I have nothing in common with white-trash types like BWH Clown.

dlw


Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes."

Back to Top
 

fyodor
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 179
 
   Posted 12/8/2003 3:55 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
So, I guess the next question is, Do we have a race problem in America?

...and does the poll result suggest that 67% of us don't think were involved in the problem (assuming we think there is one) because we don't see ourselves as being a part of a race?


†††"One rarely finds an exposition of which it holds true that the exposition is that which is expounded." – S. Kierkegaard

Back to Top
 

Tigress
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2003
Total Posts : 1252
 
   Posted 12/8/2003 7:00 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Yes we have a race problem in America and we always will until Christ returns. But, obviously we white Christians need to do all we can to make ourselves aware of the plight of our non-white brothers and sisters and take action in our own personal lives to counter the typical worldly actions against them. But, how best to do that is my question? What do our non-white brethen want and expect us to do in this fight? If you're a non-white person please give me your specific answers because I'm honestly at a loss as to how to approach the race problem.


Tigress Tigress

"Name a shrub after me. Preferably one that's prickly and difficult to eradicate."

-Captain Jack Aubrey
"Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World"

Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 12/8/2003 7:13 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Personal opinion: I dropped out of high-school choir after 10th grade because I was tired of hearing the racist drivel of so many of my basses.

I know at Bethel College, where I used to attend and Boyd used to teach, they have had problems with people writing racist remarks in public areas. I was part of a group of students who stood up publicly and said the college hadn't done enough to deal with a racism situation in the spring of 97. We had some days of prayer and fasting. I don't know if it did any good, but it seemed like the right thing to do.

I don't think racism has gone away. I do think that racism is like the term sin, hard to define exactly. Economically, I don't think employers are as able in the past to discriminate based on race, but that because of the racism of a long-period of time as well as the devastation done by drugs to many african-american communities, as portrayed in "Man-child in the Promised Land" by Claude Brown", there are many african-americans that grow up without the support framework at home and quality schools and are ill-prepared for today's labor markets.

I generally prescribe to the views from "More than Equals" by Spencer Perkins and Chris Rice. Race hasn't gone away, but I've faced situations where (white) people seemed to think it had gone away and were annoyed when I brought it up again. This happened in grad-school. My major field was in Labor Economics, which considers the economics of discrimination. It seems kosher these days to talk about discrimination based on using race as a signal for someone's expected "ability" as opposed to discrimination based on dislike of hiring people from a certain race.

I think the competitiveness of labor-markets affects how blatant racism is. We tend to demean the group of workers that are in competition with us, lowering our wages perhaps. Recently, with the improvements and decrease in expensiveness of computers, higher-skilled workers have done better and low or semi-skilled workers have done worse. The latter group is more likely to face more competitive pressure and be more antagonistic against lower-skilled african-americans, particularly if the perceive that affirmative-action is giving their jobs to others.

dlw


Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes."

Back to Top
 

honorman
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1137
 
   Posted 12/8/2003 9:00 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
OhNO! We have a race problem that the church hasn't dealt effectively enough with...yawn...Eyebrow...tackle that issue there...I would suggest that all our non-white brothers should also try and understand the problems of all the white brothers out there who aren't controling all their actions and getting all these "so called" benefits of racism.
DLW, maybe your "basses" should have spoken a little clearerEyebrow
Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 12/8/2003 9:05 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by honorman

OhNO! We have a race problem that the church hasn't dealt effectively enough with...yawn...Eyebrow...tackle that issue there...I would suggest that all our non-white brothers should also try and understand the problems of all the white brothers out there who aren't controling all their actions and getting all these "so called" benefits of racism.
DLW, maybe your "basses" should have spoken a little clearerEyebrow



I'm sorry.

that sounded rather callous and somewhat incoherent.

Gee, I shouldn't have been so prejudicial against those that like to tell******jokes.

dlw


Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes."

Back to Top
 

fyodor
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 179
 
   Posted 12/10/2003 3:18 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Tigress:
quote:
But, how best to do that is my question? What do our non-white brethen want and expect us to do in this fight? If you're a non-white person please give me your specific answers because I'm honestly at a loss as to how to approach the race problem.


I hear ya Tigress. This is a crazy tough question. I truly wonder how to dig deeper into authentic relationships across ethnic lines. I've been attending and working at a multi-ethnic church for the last several months, and this is truly the first time in my life where I have people of different ethnic backgrounds that are my close friends.Throughout the growing of our relationships, one of the best things to tear down the walls between us has been the "why does it seem like black people do this...." "why are white people always saying this...." types of conversations. Laying it all out on the table and saying the most uncomfortable prejudices you have to someone from that ethnic group can be very healing, especially if there is some base of a confortable relationship first.

I'm trying my best to figure this stuff out, and truly appreciate the questions you have....


†††"One rarely finds an exposition of which it holds true that the exposition is that which is expounded." – S. Kierkegaard

Back to Top
 

Laplace
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 138
 
   Posted 12/11/2003 12:47 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Excuse my slight irritation, but what is the point of this question?

However, I will say that there is a theory that there are 3 primary races analogous to 3 primary colors which all subsequent races are divided: Caucasoid (White), Negroid (Black), and Mongloid (Yellow/Asian).

For example, Native Americans might be a mix of Mongloid with Negroid, with a touch of Caucasoid. People in India have Negroid skin and hair, yet a facial structure much like Caucasoid.

It's also interesting that according to Genesis, only 8 people were saved from the flood and repopulated the earth. Noah, his wife, his THREE sons, and their wives. Hmmm.


"I say we blast the meatbag, Master" -HK-47, Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic

Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 12/11/2003 12:50 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
It is true that there is far more within-race variation in dna than between-race variation in dna. This corroborates somewhat the Noah-story that we all descend from the same source.

However, historically race has taken on an additional meaning in the US. That is why asking whether it still is an issue is a valid question.

dlw


Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes."

Back to Top
 

S.B.G.
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2003
Total Posts : 143
 
   Posted 1/8/2004 5:26 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Racism comes in all forms. Where I work, "white people" are the minorty and many Latinos and Africans (not African Americans) don't want to deal with me unless thay have to. They'll literally sit and wait for half an hour to speak with "the Liberian Girl" rather than let me help them.. and I'm a manager! Part of it has to do with a laguage barrier, another part of it has to do with an understanding of a culture which is so very different than America. From what I've seen among the Liberian culture, so many have suffered and witnessed the violent deaths of their loved ones, that they have a certain comraderie that I could never enter into.

In some ways it has more to do with differing cultures than skin color.

sbg


"We need every different bead on this same string." Nicole Nordeman

Back to Top
 

BBBCanada
Registered Member




Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 2763
 
   Posted 1/10/2004 6:30 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
S.B.G. said:

quote:
In some ways it has more to do with differing cultures than skin color.


And don't forget POWER. When I lived in Dallas, I took an American history class. Lincoln didn't care if slavery was abolished or not. He was more interested in keeping the Union together. Having said that, there was some "racism" by the upper class white folks against the "poor white trash" very much like how they treated the negros. So it didn't matter what the skin colour was. It was an issue of wealth and status and power. We do it today even still.


Brandon

"Corporations are simply the kind of structure that rises when hordes of people need to be managed, and after spending some time in a large church, I've found that our spirituality does not exempt us from these inefficient and dehumanizing practices."--Steve Lansingh's review of "The Office" at The Film Form

Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 1/10/2004 7:10 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by BBBCanada

S.B.G. said:

quote:
In some ways it has more to do with differing cultures than skin color.


And don't forget POWER. When I lived in Dallas, I took an American history class. Lincoln didn't care if slavery was abolished or not. He was more interested in keeping the Union together. Having said that, there was some "racism" by the upper class white folks against the "poor white trash" very much like how they treated the negros. So it didn't matter what the skin colour was. It was an issue of wealth and status and power. We do it today even still.



Abe did care about African-Americans, surprisingly so since he came from a very racist background. Initially, the Civil War was fought primarily to keept the Union together. He was initially in favor of freeing the slaves with some compensation for their former owners and then shipping them back to Africa, primarily because he knew how pervasive racism was in the US and how difficult it would be for them after being freed.

The important thing is that his views changed as he deliberated on the Civil War and its purpose. I recommend the book, "Lincoln's Virtues" or Mark Noll's reflections in "America's God" on the theological reflections of Abraham Lincoln during the war. I wouldn't trust a revisionary southern interpretation of Abraham Lincoln.

dlw


Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes."

Back to Top
 

quest for truth
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 479
 
   Posted 1/10/2004 7:40 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
yodor
quote:
So, I guess the next question is, Do we have a race problem in America?


S.B.G
quote:
In some ways it has more to do with differing cultures than skin color


BBBCanada
quote:
there was some "racism" by the upper class white folks against the "poor white trash"



What is a stronger problem race or culture?

I believe cultural barriers present a heavier problem in America then race and it works on all sides. The majority tend to stay within their comfort zone instead of trying to learn ways of communicating and interacting on a personal basis with those of differing cultures. Let's face it -- it's a lot of work! My bias is that most people do as little work as possible in really understanding different cultures. Perhaps a big reason for this is due to there not being enough education in this area.
Back to Top
 

Iconoclast
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 1227
 
   Posted 1/10/2004 8:50 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
fyodor

So, I guess the next question is, Do we have a race problem in America?

...and does the poll result suggest that 67% of us don't think were involved in the problem (assuming we think there is one) because we don't see ourselves as being a part of a race?

Iconoclast

No it does not. Martin Luther King wanted a society that was color blind. Do you agree with his vision or do you think it is better to have a society that is very sensitive to differences based on race?

thanks,
Iconoclast


"The benefit overran the merit the first day, and has overrun the merit ever since. The merit itself, so-called, I reckon part of the receiving." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 1/10/2004 9:21 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Obviously, the cultural wars are looming large in the US and impacting our politics and virtually everything else as a result. Which isn't to say that racial tensions have gone away.


Icon:No it does not. Martin Luther King wanted a society that was color blind. Do you agree with his vision or do you think it is better to have a society that is very sensitive to differences based on race?

dlw:I think that is not the only understanding of MLKjr. The consequences of the fact that skin color did come to signify much in people's minds over a large portion of US history haven't gone away.

My very understanding of theology is a product of my European heritage. I deal with time differently. I have several different viewpoints, conceptual frameworks for dealing with stuff.

Being sensitive to differences doesn't mean continuation of bigotry. It does take more work, particularly on the part of white-people, since black-people get exposed or come to terms with our culture on a regular basis.


Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes."

Back to Top
 

GregBoyd
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 1818
 
   Posted 1/11/2004 1:03 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.


...and does the poll result suggest that 67% of us don't think were involved in the problem (assuming we think there is one) because we don't see ourselves as being a part of a race?


Doc: I don't see myself as belong to a "white race" because I don't believe "race" divides along color lines. The only "race" is the human "race." The whole "race" category -- something (incoherent) between "species" and "culture" -- is a value laden construct whose only function has been to provide a way of seeing that reenforces social privelege. The "three race" ideology mentioned earlier on this thread is a case in point. When you read some of the texts of the 19th century where this was expounded, it was usually accompanied with value judgments about which race was most advanced -- the caucastion. While I'm not current with this field of study, I have not heard of any specialists in the field continuing to defend this. The paleontological evidence does not support it. Nor is there any other support of it. The dominant theory out now is that the jump to homosapiens happened on ONE tree of the proto-humanoid line of evolution.

The last straw of refutation has been gene research that shows there is no consistent variation of genes along so-called "racial lines." Individual blacks and whites often have more in common with each other than they do with other blacks and other whites.

RACE is a myth, pure and simple.

So I vote NO... I do NOT see myself as part of "the white race."

As a white person, however, I DO see myself as both part of the problem -- and part of the solution -- to "race" problems.

Greg


"The responsibility is with the chooser -- God is blameless." Plato, Republic, 10.

Back to Top
 

quest for truth
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 479
 
   Posted 1/11/2004 5:33 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
As a white person, however, I DO see myself as both part of the problem -- and part of the solution -- to "race" problems.


And the solution, despite our differences, is to LOVE. Love tears down barriers and walls even when we come from very different backgrouds, cultures, races... The more we choose to love the less we will notice.
Back to Top
 

BBBCanada
Registered Member




Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 2763
 
   Posted 1/12/2004 6:57 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by DLWAbe did care about African-Americans, surprisingly so since he came from a very racist background. Initially, the Civil War was fought primarily to keept the Union together. He was initially in favor of freeing the slaves with some compensation for their former owners and then shipping them back to Africa, primarily because he knew how pervasive racism was in the US and how difficult it would be for them after being freed.

The important thing is that his views changed as he deliberated on the Civil War and its purpose. I recommend the book, "Lincoln's Virtues" or Mark Noll's reflections in "America's God" on the theological reflections of Abraham Lincoln during the war. I wouldn't trust a revisionary southern interpretation of Abraham Lincoln.

dlw



Yes, "aye do believe" you are correct here saaar. In "Abraham Lincoln and a New Birth of Freedom" Howard Jones (from the southern University of Alabama) explores the relationship between President Lincoln's wartime diplomacy and his interrelated goals of forming a more perfect Union and abolishing slavery. At the outset of the Civil War, Lincoln's central purpose was to save the Union by defeating the South on the battlefield. But he also wanted to prevent a European intervention that would have facilitated the South's move for independence. Lincoln's goal of preserving the Union, however, soon evolved into an effort to form "a more perfect Union", one that rested on the natural rights principles of the Declaration of Independence and thus necessitated emancipation.

I was highlighting Lincoln's earlier thinking and possibly got it mixed up with his later thinking. My bad.




Brandon

"Corporations are simply the kind of structure that rises when hordes of people need to be managed, and after spending some time in a large church, I've found that our spirituality does not exempt us from these inefficient and dehumanizing practices."--Steve Lansingh's review of "The Office" at The Film Form

Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 1/12/2004 7:27 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I'm sorry if I came across the wrong way and anti-southern. I did live in the South from age 3 to 9 and did absorb some fundy-style thinking during that time.

I also believe that it was very wrong how the North excluded the South from the US governance for such a long period after the Civil War and consequently kept it from experiencing as much economic development.

IMO, the virulent racism that developed in the South was likely a vitiated hatred of the North. I.e., just as we degraded the southern form of speech as an accent, they made African-Americans into sub-citizens. They also mimicked the North's practice of effectively excluding the South or "Democrats" as the non-majority party from having much effective say in the gov't. The Jim Crow laws that denied African-Americans the right to vote in the South served the same effect, to benefit one group disproportionately by effectively removing another groups political voice.

dlw


Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes."

Back to Top
 

fyodor
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 179
 
   Posted 1/12/2004 12:55 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Wow, I haven't been around here in a while and was shocked to see this one sparked up again.

Here is the gist of why I asked the question....

I've been trying to engage in discouse with folks from different ethnic backgrounds than myself lately on the topic of racial healing/reconciliation whatever ya want to call it...

Increasingly, I find that there is a hurdle in the conversation that consists of this: White folks want to frame the conversation by saying "race doesn't exist" "I don't see you as black, I see you as human."

Well....I've found this to be a stab in the back for many black folks who find race to be very real. Race is not a myth. It is a human construct of categorization in which we apply worth to people based on skin tone.

So when some black folks hear that some white folks don't believe in race, it has a tendency to stop a somewhat hopeful conversation dead in its tracks. That is, to suggest that I (being caucasion) don't believe in race can be detrimental to my friends of other ethnicities who in a very real way, experience what we've come to call racism. If I don't believe myself to be a part of a race while desiring to be in a racial healing/reconciliation conversation, it can send me back two steps.

I'll agree that essentially we're all human 99.whatever percent the same, but the social construct of race is very real and not a myth pure and simple.

Iconoclast
No it does not. Martin Luther King wanted a society that was color blind. Do you agree with his vision or do you think it is better to have a society that is very sensitive to differences based on race?


Fyodor-
Absolutely. I would love to be a part of a color blind society, but I think that is were we want to end up, not start. I would suggest that starting from the position that race doesn't exist makes the dialogue towards a colorblind society quite difficult.

I'm just throwing this outthere, but I think the "problem of race" can only go away through dialogue, repentance, forgiveness...But to start from the colorblind perspective limits the dialogue, repentance, forgiveness that is needed to get there.


†††"One rarely finds an exposition of which it holds true that the exposition is that which is expounded." – S. Kierkegaard

Back to Top
 

GregBoyd
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 1818
 
   Posted 1/12/2004 6:18 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Fydor: Race is not a myth. It is a human construct of categorization in which we apply worth to people based on skin tone.

Doc: A human construct of categorization and valuation is exactly what most authors mean by saying it is a myth. The original concept of race was not that it was a human construct but that it reflected historical and empirical realities -- three different origins of human (like) beings... with caucations, of course, on the top.

Fyodor: to suggest that I (being caucasion) don't believe in race can be detrimental to my friends of other ethnicities who in a very real way, experience what we've come to call racism.

Doc: To not believe in "race" is doesn't mean one doesn't believe in racism. To the contrary, its the lynch pin of (in the words of a recent book) Dismantling Racism. What people of color often object to is Whites saying they are "color blind"... they just see people, not phenotypes. This can be a cheap way of bypass real life issues of racism. But to acknowledge differences, and acknowledge ongoing racial realities, and acknowledge historical atrocities, is not to "believe in race." For one of the atrocities is the concept of race itself.

Fyodor: but the social construct of race is very real and not a myth pure and simple.

Doc: Sounds like your saying "the myth is real." Absolutely, which is why its important we STOP BELIEVING IN IT and thereby giving it credibility.

Blessings


"The responsibility is with the chooser -- God is blameless." Plato, Republic, 10.

Back to Top
 

John Earp
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1715
 
   Posted 1/12/2004 6:31 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I think most of us mean we don't believe in racism when we say we don't believe in race(s). It is interesting that some could take offense at what is simply an effort to avoid racism. I'll have to ask some of my non-white friends if they take offense at the notion that races don't exist. Clown

Obviously, ethnicities and subcultures do in fact exist in Western Civilization, but strictly speaking it is quite remarkable how much genetic homogeneity exists among humanity.



"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.

revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

fyodor
Registered Member


Date Joined Dec 2002
Total Posts : 179
 
   Posted 1/12/2004 8:20 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Doc: A human construct of categorization and valuation is exactly what most authors mean by saying it is a myth. The original concept of race was not that it was a human construct but that it reflected historical and empirical realities -- three different origins of human (like) beings... with caucations, of course, on the top.

Fyodor: Hmmm...To my understanding, the concept of race long predates the mongloid, caucasoid, negroid and sometimes australoid classifications of race. The social distinction based on physical or genetic traits appears throughout human history, while the classification into the three sub-species being only a (relatively) recent development in human history.

Doc: To not believe in "race" is doesn't mean one doesn't believe in racism.

Fyodor: Correct, poor word choice on my part (believe).

Doc: Sounds like your saying "the myth is real." Absolutely, which is why its important we STOP BELIEVING IN IT and thereby giving it credibility.

Fyodor: Right, I guess framing race in terms of myth or reality matters very little as long as we operate from the acknowlegement that whether race is a social or scientific concept, the "racial realities" that stem from this problematic concept are indeed real and sometimes that acknowledgement forces a primary discussion by which we engender ourselves as part of a race to acknowledge that we are indeed somewhat trapped inside that race problem trying to work our way out. I can consider myself to be outside of the "racial construct" all I want, but as long as someone else operates from within and suggests that I am of any particular race, than in order to further the discussion either I have to first convince the other person that race doesn't exist, or the other person has to convince me that race does exist. Otherwise the possibility is there that the conversation is at a stand-off from the outset and we are indeed inside the "racial construct."


†††"One rarely finds an exposition of which it holds true that the exposition is that which is expounded." – S. Kierkegaard

Back to Top
 

quest for truth
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 479
 
   Posted 1/13/2004 6:02 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Any prejudice or segregation at this point, in my opinion, is much more about culture than race. Name someone who is of a particular race pure and true. Most people have several blood lines in them at this point in history -- is there really such a thing as race or is it more culture?

I think of myself as belonging to a particular cultural group MUCH more than I do to a particular race. I am a mixed breed.
Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
30 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 1  2 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 12:20 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads