 |
|  spenlake Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2004 Total Posts : 1050 | Posted 4/2/2004 3:19 AM (GMT -6) |   | I am working on a paper that you may wish to criticize and whack it because it is wierd. I welcome your whacks. I believe that it has application to the Jesus of our imagination and the Jesus who came in the flesh. I know much hinges on the interpretation of Genesis 6:3, but Dr. Boyd in his book God at War refers to the "Watcher" understanding of the Jews to support his premise. The interpretation that I base the following paper on is also part of the "Watcher" understanding. I have criticized Dr. Boyd where I believed his arguments to be weak. Please expose the weaknesses in what I wrote below.
Reconsidering Genesis 6:3quote: Then the LORD said, "My spirit shall not abide in man for ever, for he is flesh, but his days shall be a hundred and twenty years."
Genesis 6:3 has been a difficult verse to understand, and scholars since the Septuagint have been presenting various interpretations. The problems revolve around two issues. Firstly, what is the nature of the problem between the Spirit and man? Secondly, what is the 120 years referring to? Does the 120 years refer to the time between God’s decree until the flood, or does it refer to the lifespan of man? I maintain that Genesis 6:3 presents both the problem and God’s solution.
This verse is sandwiched between two references to the Nephilim, suggesting the problem is somehow connected with the Nephilim as well as the endemic corruption of mankind. Considering the Nephilim, I am supporting a historical interpretation they are either the fallen angels themselves or “hybrid” beings, offspring that resulted from tangible sexual intercourse between fallen angels and women . quote: Genesis 6:1, 2 “When men began to multiply on the face of the ground, and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were fair; and they took to wife such of them as they chose.”
While there are other interpretations, that this has to do with angels seems strongest in view of the context, the original Hebrew, ancient Jewish texts including Septuagint, and parallels in written records of the major early civilizations. I am going farther maintaining that these Nephilim were not the root problem themselves but simply the manifestation of an even larger issue that God wished to address – man’s capacity for tangible physical interaction with the spiritual dimension. The ability for mankind to physically interact with the spiritual resulted only in increased wickedness. The temptation and fall in the garden led to physical adultery with fallen angels and women giving birth to corrupted hybrids. Ultimately, man’s capability for physical/spirit interaction led to every intent of the thoughts of man’s hearts being only evil continually, provoking God to make His decree.
Question: If, as many scholars maintain, the Nephilim are linked with fallen angel/human hybrids, they are the objective proof of this physical interaction with the spiritual dimension. Why did these corrupted hybrids exist then and why don’t they exist now? What has changed? Many have answered the question of, “Why then and not now?” with the arrival of the flood. They simply say that the flood killed these beings and eliminated them from the earth. It doesn’t answer the question “Why not now?” but does provide a partial answer to, “What happened to them?” The main problem with this answer is that Scriptures explicitly state that these Nephilim offspring existed both pre-flood and post-flood. Gen 6:4 speaks about the pre-flood period “and also afterward.” quote: “The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown.”
The existence of post-flood Nephilim is also confirmed in Numbers 13:33 when speaking of the report of the 12 spies Moses sent into Canaan. quote: “And there we saw the Nephilim (the sons of Anak, who come from the Nephilim); and we seemed to ourselves like grasshoppers, and so we seemed to them."
Because the Nephilim offspring reappeared after the flood, the capacity to create fallen angel/human hybrids still existed after the flood as well. Thus we are still left with, “Why then and not now?” I believe that the answer is found in the decree from the second half of Genesis 6:3. I maintain that the ability for physical intercourse with fallen angels continued after the flood and then ceased. Why? The text states that God decided to limit the age of man with a radical shift from hundreds of years to a mere 120 . I propose that the capacity to physically interact with the spiritual dimension was linked to this lifespan, perhaps something genetic, and that it disappeared when man’s lifespan fell below the 120 years. I further propose that this physical capacity, and the outworking of God’s decree limiting this capability, is fundamental to properly understand the dynamics between God and man within Genesis. We must understand that from the creation, and for a defined limited time, mankind could objectively and physically interact with both God and the broader spiritual dimension, including fallen angels. Then this capacity ended and mankind’s interaction with the spiritual dimension changed forever moving from objective to subjective.
In Genesis, we find that God physically walked and spoke with Adam and Eve in the garden. God gave them tangible promises heard by their ears and witnessed by each other. Cain objectively knew that Abel’s sacrifice had been accepted and his refused, and God physically spoke with Cain after he murdered his brother. Enoch really did walk with God. God tangibly spoke to Noah concerning the flood. Abraham spoke with and physically served a hot meal to God and angels, with Sarah hearing their conversation from inside the tent. The men of Sodom wanted to physically rape the angels who later tangibly grabbed Lot by the arm to bring him to safety. Jacob physically wrestled with God while the actual hand of God injured his hip. The promises given to the Patriarchs, “the fathers,” were tangible words heard and witnessed by men with their physical senses. The fathers of our faith were not mystics but objective witnesses. Their fight of faith wasn’t wondering whether their subjective spiritual perceptions were accurate but whether God’s objective words heard with their physical ears were true and would be accomplished.
This record of God/man interactions in Genesis is consistent with a general capacity in humanity for physical sexual interaction with the spiritual dimension that created the pre/post-flood Nephilim. I maintain that this capacity for the people of Israel ended with Moses in fulfillment of Genesis 6:3. Moses was the last of God’s chosen people who had an unbroken genealogy from father to son back to Adam with every man living longer than 120 years. Age Ref. Adam 930 Gen 5 Seth 912 Gen 5 Enosh 905 Gen 5 Kenan 910 Gen 5 Mahalale 895 Gen 5 Jared 962 Gen 5 Enoch 365 Gen 5 Methuselah 969 Gen 5 Lamech 777 Gen 5 Noah 950 Gen 9, 11 Shem 600 Gen 11 Apachshad 438 Gen 11 Shelah 420 Gen 11 Age Ref. Eber 464 Gen 11 Peleg 239 Gen 11 Rue 239 Gen 11 Serug 230 Gen 11 Nahor 148 Gen 11 Terah 205 Gen 11 Abraham 175 Gen 25:7 Isaac 180 Gen 35:28 Jacob 147 Gen 47:28 Levi 137 Ex 6 Kohath 133 Ex 6 Amram 137 Ex 6 Moses 120 Deut 34:7
We find that after Moses, God limited direct interaction with the spiritual dimension. Mystical practices to interact with the spiritual and spiritism of any kind are strongly condemned in Deuteronomy 18:9. Instead, through Moses God gives the objective Torah as His word, the Urim and Thummim for guidance, and creates the office of “prophet” to be His indirect voice to men. God now interacted with His people through the Torah, priests, and prophets. These prophets and priests were subject to and judged by the objective message written by Moses; the last of the line to have the capability to physically and objectively communicate with God. Interestingly, after this time, the Nephilim and giants decline and disappear as Israel carries out God’s command to utterly destroy them . Thereafter, there is no record of additional Nephilim, mankind losing the capacity to physically interact with the spiritual dimension as they declined in lifespan. Genesis 15:16 appears to hint at this concept when God tells Abraham that his descendents will return to the land only after the fourth generation because “the iniquity of the Amorite is not yet complete.” Once this capacity to interact with the evil spiritual dimension was completed and fully over, it was Israel’s mandate to obliterate the memory of it from the land so the evil practices associated with it and the spiritism/mystical practices that evolved from it would never be recovered and perpetuated.
Returning to the first point of Genesis 6:3, I maintain that a literal reading of the Hebrew provides us with a clue that supports this paradigm. The Hebrew word translated “abide in” in the Revised Standard Version from the phrase “My spirit shall not abide in man for ever” is difficult, with scholars proposing various Hebrew roots to understand the meaning. Dr. Thomas F. McDaniel, Professor Emeritus of the Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary proposes, “My spirit will not abide in men and women forever.” This Hebrew verb describes the activity of Spirit with man’s corporal flesh, which I maintain is somehow linked to whatever genetically occurred with man’s degraded lifespan. I propose that somehow God’s decree affected the capability of the Spirit to “abide in” and interact directly and tangibly with the physical body. “Normal” was different for the men of this time, spirit was active in flesh and they lived for hundreds of years. Jacob alludes to this degradation of humanity in Genesis 47:8 quote: “Pharaoh said to Jacob, “How many years have you lived?” So Jacob said to Pharaoh, “The years of my sojourning are one hundred and thirty; few and unpleasant have been the years of my life, nor have they attained the years that my fathers lived during the days of their sojourning.””
After Moses, we see God’s Spirit now begins resting on certain men or coming upon certain men at certain times, particularly the prophets. quote: Deuteronomy 34:9, 10 And Joshua the son of Nun was full of the spirit of wisdom, for Moses had laid his hands upon him; so the people of Israel obeyed him, and did as the LORD had commanded Moses. And there has not arisen a prophet since in Israel like Moses, whom the LORD knew face to face,
Never again do we see this same kind of tangible physical capacity to touch and eat with spiritual beings that is recorded pre-Moses. Angels may appear in thoughts, sight, sounds, dreams, and while sleeping but objective physical contact ceased. (Two recorded contacts, Elijah in 1 Kings 19:5-8 and Peter in Acts 12:7, both mention the men sleeping when struck and then awaking. This is consistent with angels appearing in dreams Gen 31:11; Matt 1:20, 2:13, 2:19 and God speaking in dreams.) The resurrected Jesus addresses this when He speaks to His disciples. quote: Luke 24:39 “See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself; handle me, and see; for a spirit has not flesh and bones as you see that I have." And while they still disbelieved for joy, and wondered, he said to them, "Have you anything here to eat?" They gave him a piece of broiled fish, and he took it and ate before them.”
Conclusion: This approach to Genesis 6:3, as far as I am aware of, offers the only explanation that resolves the enigma of the Nephilim. Regarding “Why then?” I propose mankind had the capacity to commit real physical adultery with fallen angels. Regarding “Why not now?” I propose mankind lost this ability with the fulfillment of God’s decree to reduce their lifespan to 120 years. The Patriarchs from Adam through to Moses were truly unique. Mankind no longer has the capacity to emulate them or their experiences any more than we have the capability to live to their amazing lifespan. Considerations: I propose that it was to bridge the gulf (objective becoming subjective) God decreed between spirit and flesh that God, who is a spirit, became flesh and dwelt among men. He objectively came in the flesh to deliver real words explaining the path of eternal life and the revealed promise of God - tangibly to men as a man. Jesus was born of a virgin proving that He was NOT the result of the tangible spirit/man intercourse described in Genesis 6. Jesus was wholly man and wholly God, not 50% man and 50% angel or the product of a synergistic genetic “union” with Mary. God actually became man and was born of a virgin. When we consider that Jesus IS the Word of God it is because He physically was a tangible objective message we could experience in this world in front of witnesses. Without the incarnation, the mystery God wished to reveal would have been only in subjective revelations. In Jesus, the tangible Word, mankind heard and saw the mystery of salvation revealed to flesh by flesh. It was a tangible Jesus that was resurrected to prove that the message He brought was the very words of God whom we could not see, touch or experience objectively without dying.
In Jesus, God became the great prophet that Moses predicted in Deuteronomy 18:15-19 quote: "The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your brethren--him you shall heed-- just as you desired of the LORD your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly, when you said, 'Let me not hear again the voice of the LORD my God, or see this great fire any more, lest I die.' And the LORD said to me, 'They have rightly said all that they have spoken. I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brethren; and I will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command him. And whoever will not give heed to my words which he shall speak in my name, I myself will require it of him.”
God, who in the past spoke directly to the fathers and indirectly in the prophets, returns and speaks directly to us Himself again as a man speaking to mankind. quote: Hebrews 1:1 God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world.
Instead of angels or spiritual intermediaries, in Jesus God comes as the tangible one whom John spoke of; bridging the gulf and speaking the words of the Spirit directly in the flesh to the flesh. quote: 1 John 1:1 What was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked at and touched with our hands, concerning the Word of Life - and the life was manifested, and we have seen and testify and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was manifested to us.
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Similitude Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2004 Total Posts : 4968 | Posted 4/10/2004 9:29 AM (GMT -6) |   | SPENLAKE,
I didn't read all of your post due to time constraints, but I think I got the gist of it. I have a couple of problems with your thesis, though. 1) Since the "son of perdition" is believed by many to be the very "seed" of Satan, this would seem to imply that he (son of perdition) is a hybrid also. 2) Moreover, the verse in Hebrews which speaks of "entertaining angels unaware," seems to suggest that such is possible, even now. And if so, the context seems to suggest that such entertainment would be analagous to past occurrences - i.e., eating, etc. wjs | | Back to Top | | |
  |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 4/10/2004 12:12 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Matthew 11 10This is the one about whom it is written: " 'I will send my messenger ahead of you, who will prepare your way before you.'
Messenger <===> Angel
Icon of John the Baptist: 
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 4/10/2004 12:20 PM (GMT -6) |   | Interesting. And I have some thoughts. But will have to return later...
PoW | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 4/10/2004 3:26 PM (GMT -6) |   | Look for the Son/Word to be physically manifest in the OT too -- just not "incarnate."
Throw out the victorian facinations about sex with spirit beings. That's vulgar--which seems to be its actractability (sex sells).
Look at how the Christian Church has interpreted the OT through the ages. Particularly Origin, who really put great weight on literal/historical apsects of every passage because he also valued three other aspects too. Among them was the allegorical. In your passage the "sons of God" may be a comment on the spirituality (God-centered/focused) versus "fallen-flesh-centered" carnality. (I hope that we can agree that the flesh is as good as everything elxe that God created "very good"; but the "sinful flesh" says something that we do recognize--the evil of our own desires ruling us for their own sake!)
As a figure of speech, then, the "sons of..." and the "daughters of..." don't have to even just refer to all guys in the first group and all gals in the second group. Do they? The shoe fits for both genders!
"Sons" probably denotes something that cannot be said with "daughters" -- in that sonship is different from daughterhood. That's sufficient reason for the choice. (E.g., Christ being the "son"--the image of the Father--is different from a mother-daughter relationship because the daughter is then the mother of another...which seems more Mormon in concept.) | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 4/10/2004 3:55 PM (GMT -6) |   | As to the Son in the OT, there are many ways this has been seen. But realize that the references to Word and Spirit are not unique to Abrahams' people. That was common religios-speak in that area. God used elements of culture to reveal himself (animal sacrifice included, and later dropped). In the oldest OT scriptures it is not even definite that the "spirit" or the "word" sent are personified. People struggled between Sun-god religions with an un-approachable deity (like in Persia and Egypt) and agricultur-gods (like Baal and Istaar). The former incouraged people to appeal to lesser gods. Word and Spirit were avenues God used to draw his own people into knowing that He was BOTH the lord of heaven and earth, and also "their" God. (Eventually in Christ God was revealed as "Abba"/Father.)
Christ, the Word, by the will of the Father, is the Speech that created the Cosmos. and the Word/Divine Son did so by the Spirit. THAT'S A TRINITARIAN ACT!!!
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 4/10/2004 4:03 PM (GMT -6) |   | 
The King of Peace Episcopal Church pastor, has a seromon called "On Fire for God - John 1:1-18" where he uses this icon of the Virgin.

He points out the similarity and contrast between Mary and Moses:
quote: God then called Moses to lead the children of Israel out of Egypt and into the Promised Land. God said that he had not been blend to the oppression of the Hebrews and he would act through Moses to deliver them.
God, who was present in the whole world, came all the way down to earth in one particular place and time in fullness in order to act in history. The bush, which caught Moses eye that day in the wilderness, fully experienced God’s presence and was set afire by God and yet God comes to bring life, not to consume it, so though the bush blazed brightly, the fire did not consume it.
Gregory, the fourth century Bishop of Nyssa, seems to have been the first to connect the idea of Moses and the burning bush to Mary, the mother of Jesus. Gregory wrote in his On the Birth of Christ that as the bush was in flames, but not consumed, so Mary had God present inside her and was not consumed. Mary is herself like the burning bush. God is fully present and yet she is unharmed.
A tradition developed in art from the imagery Gregory offered. Mary is sometimes portrayed in or as the burning bush. The oldest work is an icon at St. Catherine’s Monastery at the foot of Mount Sinai which offered a highly stylized version of the flames and surrounded Mary with a host of Old Testament scenes. Later art centered on Mary in the midst of the flaming bush or as herself set afire but not consumed.
| | Back to Top | | |
  |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 4/11/2004 2:48 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by spenlake
POW,
As I see it, the argument actually hinges on the definition of the sons of God/daughters of men.
I didn't read the blueletterbible link. Sorry. I just did a word search for "daughters of men" at www.ccel.org.
Here is a very good treatment, from the heart of the Church's piety!
quote: John Cassian VIII. The Second Conference of Abbot Serenus.
On Principalities. Chapter XX. A question about the fallen angels who are said in Genesis to have had intercourse with the daughters of men.
Germanus: Since a passage of Genesis was a little while ago by the providence of God brought forward in our midst, and happily reminded us that we can now conveniently ask about a point which we have always longed to learn, we want to know what view we ought to take about those fallen angels who are said to have had intercourse with the daughters of men, and whether such a thing can literally take place with a spiritual nature. And also with regard to this passage of the gospel which you quoted of the devil a little while back, "for he is a liar and his father," we should like in the same way to hear who is to be understood by "his father."
Chapter XXI. The answer to the question raised. Serenus: You have propounded two not unimportant questions, to which I will reply, to the best of my ability, in the order in which you have raised them. We cannot possibly believe that spiritual existences can have carnal intercourse with women. But if this could ever have literally happened how is it that it does not now also sometimes take place, and that we do not see some in the same way born of women by the agency of demons without intercourse with men? especially when it is clear that they delight in the pollution of lust, which they would certainly prefer to bring about through their own agency rather than through that of men, if they could possibly manage it, as Ecclesiastes declares: "What is it that hath been? The same that is. And what is it that hath been done? The same that is done. And there is nothing new that can be said under the sun, so that a man can say: Behold this is new; for it hath already been in the ages which were before us." But the question raised may be resolved in this way. After the death of righteous Abel, in order that the whole human race might not spring from a wicked fratricide, Seth was born in the place of his brother who was slain, to take the place of his brother not only as regards posterity, but also as regards justice and goodness. And his offspring, following the example of their father's goodness, always remained separate from intercourse with and the society of their kindred descended from the wicked Cain, as the difference of the genealogy very clearly tells us, where it says: "Adam begat Seth, Seth begat Enos, Enos begat Cainan, but Cainan begat Mahalaleel, but Mahalaleel begat Jared, Jared begat Enoch, Enoch begat Methuselah, Methuselah begat Lamech, Lamech begat Noah." And the genealogy of Cain is given separately as follows: "Cain begat Enoch, Enoch begat Cainan, Cainan begat Mahalaleel, Mahalaleel begat Methuselah, Methuselah begat Lamech, Lamech begat Jabal and Jubal." And so the line which sprang from the seed of righteous Seth always mixed with its own kith and kin, and continued for a long while in the holiness of its fathers and ancestors, untouched by the blasphemies and the wickedness of an evil offspring, which had implanted in it a seed of sin as it were transmitted by its ancestors. As long then as there continued that separation of the lines between them, the seed of Seth, as it sprang from an excellent root, was by reason of its sanctity termed "angels of God," or as some copies have it "sons of God;" and on the contrary the others by reason of their own and their fathers' wickedness and their earthly deeds were termed "children of men." Though then there was up to this time that holy and salutary separation between them, yet after this the sons of Seth who were the sons of God saw the daughters of those who were born of the line of Cain, and inflamed with the desire for their beauty took to themselves from them wives who taught their husbands the wickedness of their fathers, and at once led them astray from their innate holiness and the single-mindedness of their forefathers. To whom this saying applies with sufficient accuracy: "I have said: Ye are Gods, and ye are all the children of the Most High. But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes;" who fell away from that true study of natural philosophy, handed down to them by their ancestors, which the first man who forthwith traced out the study of all nature, could clearly attain to, and transmit to his descendants on sure grounds, inasmuch as he had seen the infancy of this world, while still as it were tender and throbbing and unorganized; and as there was in him not only such fulness of wisdom, but also the grace of prophecy given by the Divine inspiration, so that while he was still an untaught inhabitant of this world he gave names to all living creatures, and not only knew about the fury and poison of all kinds of beasts and serpents, but also distinguished between the virtues of plants and trees and the natures of stones, and the changes of seasons of which he had as vet no experience, so that he could well say: "The Lord hath given me the true knowledge of the things that are, to know the disposition of the whole world, and the virtues of the elements, the beginning and the ending and the midst of times, the alterations of their courses and the changes of their seasons, the revolutions of the year and the disposition of the stars, the natures of living creatures and the rage of wild beasts, the force of winds, and the reasonings of men, the diversities of plants and the virtues of roots, and all such things as are hid and open I have learnt." This knowledge then of all nature the seed of Seth received through successive generations, handed down from the fathers, so long as it remained separate from the wicked line, and as it had received it in holiness, so it made use of it to promote the glory of God and the needs of everyday life. But when it had been mingled with the evil generation, it drew aside at the suggestion of devils to profane and harmful uses what it had innocently learnt, and audaciously taught by it the curious arts of wizards and enchantments and magical superstitions, teaching its posterity to forsake the holy worship of the Divinity and to honour and worship either the elements or fire or the demons of the air. How it was then that this knowledge of curious arts of which we have spoken, did not perish in the deluge, but became known to the ages that followed, should, I think, be briefly explained, as the occasion of this discussion suggests, although the answer to the question raised scarcely requires it. And so, as ancient traditions tell us, Ham the son of Noah, who had been taught these superstitions and wicked and profane arts, as he knew that he could not possibly bring any handbook on these subjects into the ark, into which he was to enter with his good father and holy brothers, inscribed these nefarious arts and profane devices on plates of various metals which could not be destroyed by the flood of waters, and on hard rocks, and when the flood was over he hunted for them with the same inquisitiveness with which he had concealed them, and so transmitted to his descendants a seed-bed of profanity and perpetual sin. In this way then that common notion, according to which men believe that angels delivered to men enchantments and diverse arts, is in truth fulfilled. From these sons of Seth then and daughters of Cain, as we have said, there were I born still worse children who became mighty, hunters, violent and most fierce men who were termed giants by reason of the size of their bodies and their cruelty and wickedness. For these first began to harass their neighbours and to practise pillaging among men, getting their living rather by rapine than by being contented with the sweat and labour of toil, and their wickedness increased to such a pitch that the world could only be purified by the flood and deluge. So then when the sons of Seth at the instigation of their lust had transgressed that command which had been for a long while kept by a natural instinct from the beginning of the world, it was needful that it should afterwards be restored by the letter of the law: "Thou shalt not give thy daughter to his son to wife, nor shalt thou take a wife of his daughters to thy son; for they shall seduce your hearts to depart from your God, and to follow their gods and serve them."
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  spenlake Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2004 Total Posts : 1050 | Posted 4/11/2004 2:55 AM (GMT -6) |   | POW
quote: How it was then that this knowledge of curious arts of which we have spoken, did not perish in the deluge, but became known to the ages that followed, should, I think, be briefly explained, as the occasion of this discussion suggests, although the answer to the question raised scarcely requires it. And so, as ancient traditions tell us, Ham the son of Noah, who had been taught these superstitions and wicked and profane arts, as he knew that he could not possibly bring any handbook on these subjects into the ark, into which he was to enter with his good father and holy brothers, inscribed these nefarious arts and profane devices on plates of various metals which could not be destroyed by the flood of waters, and on hard rocks, and when the flood was over he hunted for them with the same inquisitiveness with which he had concealed them, and so transmitted to his descendants a seed-bed of profanity and perpetual sin. In this way then that common notion, according to which men believe that angels delivered to men enchantments and diverse arts, is in truth fulfilled.
I understand the argument, but it seems weak. There isn't a shred of evidence in Scripture supporting "tablets" and the closest thing we have are the gold plates of Moroni. He may be right, but the evidence is thin. What is especially weak is the line of Cain would have perished entirely as Noah was pure/righteous in his generations - not poluted as the others. The Nephilim were physical products, not products of bad teaching that was written on plates. They were genetic creatures according to the Scriptures and this explanation seems weaker than the one I propose. Spen Lake
| | Back to Top | | |
  |  spenlake Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2004 Total Posts : 1050 | Posted 4/11/2004 12:40 PM (GMT -6) |   | Jef,
quote: Jef says: I'm with you on your interpretation of Genesis. After all, God's Spirit caused Mary to conceive Christ. That settles the fact that it is possible for a spirit to produce physical offspring as far as I'm concerned.
I need to be clear that what I am stating makes Jesus "unique" and not another Nephilim. If what I have written is true, then the Nephilim were not "miracles" but the hybrids resulting from the acts of tangible beings. Their mothers were not "virgins." This is dramatically different in that Mary didn't have sex with the Holy Spirit and Jesus wasn't a hybrid of half man/half God. Jesus was ALL MAN and ALL GOD. If spirits could sexually interact directly with women now then there would be additional Nephilim, which is what we don't find.
I am intrigued with the reference to the serpent's seed and Revelation. I believe that Judas was a man. Regarding the Beast, I am less certain. He is described as coming up out of the sea in Revelations 13:1, which was a bad place in the OT. The name "beast" is perhaps something different than a common man? There is a second beast that comes up from the earth in 13:11. I am not a scholar on Revelations and this goes over my head. It is weird, that's all I can say. If someone can help explain this, they are welcome. I know that there are scholars that link the locusts that come out of the pit in Revelations 9 with the fallen angels that Peter and Jude speak of. These could possibly be linked to the Nephilim if what I have stated is true.
I agree with you that the point about the fish is equivocal. I think that there is an implication, but it goes too far to say that the text proves it as I understand it now.
Regarding "demon possession" which I will refer to as "demonizing," I believe that this existed in the Old Testament (see Saul), in the New Testament which is recorded in the Gospels, and continues to exist today. I do not dispute that demonizing exists and that spirits can continue to exert influence in the lives of men. I very much believe that they do. 1 John warns us of evil spirits and how to recognize them as well as how to identify the Spirit of God. Angels continue to exist and can be "seen" and "heard" today. Satan can appear as an angel of light. I actually believe in this. My premise allows for all of this as well. What I am stating is that the "way" or "method" of interaction has been limited somehow since Moses and that they no longer have the same capacity to interact physically with bodies and touch humans directly that existed before Moses. They have become more subjective when they were objective. I am not sure of the limits of this interaction and I don't know if it is well defined in Scripture other than angels are "messengers." I am simply maintaining that the limitation in physical interaction between men/spirits is such that sexual intercourse and tangible offspring no longer are possible as they once were.
Spen Lake
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 4/11/2004 12:51 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by spenlake
I understand the argument, but it seems weak. There isn't a shred of evidence in Scripture supporting "tablets" and the closest thing we have are the gold plates of Moroni.
I have NO idea who you are talking to here. I'm not Mormon; are you? Nor did I say anything about tablets! Once I made an off-hand remark referencing Mormanism as a religion where an Adam (created by God) is thought to become another God with his own world, having his own people in turn. But that was all. Christianity is very different from that!!!
????? | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Similitude Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2004 Total Posts : 4968 | Posted 4/11/2004 1:52 PM (GMT -6) |   | SpenLake,
I agree that Christ is unique. I was referring to this post:
Germanus: Since a passage of Genesis was a little while ago by the providence of God brought forward in our midst, and happily reminded us that we can now conveniently ask about a point which we have always longed to learn, we want to know what view we ought to take about those fallen angels who are said to have had intercourse with the daughters of men, and whether such a thing can literally take place with a spiritual nature.
My point was simply that the virgin conception of Jesus by the Holy Spirit proves that "such a thing can literally take place." It is mysterious to me, but no more mysterious than how my own spirit controls my physical body. I'm just not ready to assume that IF spirits could POSSIBLY still produce hybrids, that they necessarily WOULD be doing so NOW. They may have reasons of their own for abstaining or God may prevent them.
In the first place, even Genesis seems to indicate that the "sons of God" that took human wives didn't do so from the beginning of creation. It may be that they did so when the earth became VERY corrupt. Consequently, I see no reason for assuming that other "sons of God" hybridized immediately after Noah's flood either. They probably waited for the human race to corrupt again. If it was going on all the time and all over the world, it seems as though we should have as many ancient legends of giants as we do creation myths and flood legends, etc.
With respect to God's prevention, we know that Satan was allowed to do things to Job that God had previously prevented him from doing. Also, 2nd Thessalonians seems to suggest that the "son of perdition" was being "restrained" (2:6) from appearing on the scene. So God may restrict angelic activity at different times for reasons unbeknownst to us.
I agree with you about the demonizing, but it does seem that it was more frequently public in the New Testament.
But my main point is that unless we know that the "seed" of the serpent/Satan prophecy does not refer to hybridizing, or that it occurred before the life-span of humans fell below 120 years, your thesis may not be correct. So that prophecy and the time of it's fulfillment should be given due consideration.
wjs | | Back to Top | | |
    |  Calvin_and_Hops Registered Member
 Date Joined Apr 2004 Total Posts : 21 | Posted 4/11/2004 3:57 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by jefscott
My point was simply that the virgin conception of Jesus by the Holy Spirit proves that "such a thing can literally take place."
I'd hate to see Christology developed along the "hybred" avenue.
Do you really mean to open that door? | | Back to Top | | |
   |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 4/11/2004 4:19 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by jefscott
Spenlake,
That provokes a couple more questions:
1) Do you know of any good books that deal with the subject of the legends about giants/hybrids?
2) How would I go about finding your correspondence on infidels.org? You've got me interested in pursuing this topic further.
Jeff, I like to reduce things down to something simple. I spent part of the afternoon OFFLINE looking up "daughters of men" on the CD from www.ccel.org I got two kinds of reponses. And remember: I like things simple.
First, from JEWISH tradition, from the "Book of Enoch" comes the notion you want to look at. Pretty much anyone -- even one of my favorite theolgians, Iraneaus, got swept up in that...depending on geogrpahical influences and date; so can't blame him.
Second, some other's, like even John Chrysostome use it as a minor example based on familiarity to illustrate a point -- but not relying on it to prove points.
Third, many others simply say that the "Sons of God" were God-seeking/following persons who in their very lives were "messengers" (the Evangelical term would be (Ambasadors"), and they "lost it" when they got entertained by those who were "servants of the flesh."
Search the www.ccel.org site for instances of "daughters of men" and you will net in everything you are looking for--that's worth considering. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  spenlake Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2004 Total Posts : 1050 | Posted 4/11/2004 4:22 PM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 4/11/2004 4:28 PM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Originally posted by spenlake
JESUS WAS NOT A HYBRID!!! Jesus was 100% God AND 100% human. I hope this is explained, do you think it is?
Hope so.
I like Kallistos Ware in one of the threads I just opened up. I put a lot of Quotes from his book The Orthodox Way. (He's a Bishop, and a former Oxford Univ. prof.
AS TO: "Mary was a virgin, even after she was pregnant.
Yes. Before, during and after. Ever-Virgin. That's doctrine.
But we also MUST say that Mary was conceived BOTH of the Holy Spirit AND the Virgin Mary! (It looked like you slipped on that.)I know that there is a recent Protestant move to reduce Mary's contribution. But THAT is 2000 years late! | | Back to Top | | |
 |  spenlake Registered Member
 Date Joined Jan 2004 Total Posts : 1050 | Posted 4/11/2004 4:30 PM (GMT -6) |   | Jef,
The word to look for is myths. Be careful, however, because Paul says things about myths to Timothy.
1 Timothy 1:3 "As I urged you upon my departure for Macedonia, remain on at Ephesus so that you may instruct certain men not to teach strange doctrines, nor to pay attention to myths and endless genealogies, which give rise to mere speculation rather than furthering the administration of God which is by faith. But the goal of our instruction is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith."
I believe that what I am saying brings the empahsis back to the gospel and away from the myths. We have the words of God given to us by a man who was God.
1 Timothy 4:1 "I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by His appearing and His kingdom: preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and instruction. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, and will turn away their ears from the truth and will turn aside to myths."
The gospel is the source of truth and life. The myths are corruptions and the stories of evil things.
As for infidels.org that is the name of the site and it is weird, enter at your own risk. Spen Lake
| | Back to Top | | |
 | 69 posts in this thread. Viewing Page : 1 2 3 | | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 6:16 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|