| Yes, Jones argued against eternal prescience of future possibbilities. Here are a couple chapter headings from the book:
"The popular notion of an eternal Prescience not implied in the Scripture doctrine of Omniscience, nor contained in any rational conception of an infinite intelligence."
"The doctrine of the nunc stans, or eternal now, is perfectly unintelligible; and is inconsistent with sound reason, as it is the plainest declarations of the word of God"
In the Preforatory Dialogue he stated "The object of my book is to disprove the doctrine of an unoriginated ,infinite, and eternal prescience; and I am sure that I could never discover that doctrine in any part of the law or the gospel"
One thing Jones got wrong was that he predicted the doctrine of an eternal prescience was on the eve of extinction in the Christian world!
Tom |