Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > The raging debate continues here... > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 8/14/2011 10:09 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

http://www.uky.edu/~dbradsh/papers/Christian%20Approach%20to%20Phil%20of%20Time.pdf

 

 A Christian Approach to the Philosophy of Time

David Bradshaw (University of Kentucky)

 

Page 10, 2nd paragraph, starting on the 7th line, “Surely God’s knowledge does undergo temporal sequence….” Wow. And this guy wouldn’t argue something that he didn’t think compatible with EO.

 

Hmmm. I still have questions. It’s SO mind-boggling.

 

Tom


KIXYTΘEMTA

Back to Top
 

Similitude
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2004
Total Posts : 4968
 
   Posted 8/14/2011 10:36 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
At bare minimum, we have no analogy by which to conceive of God's thought if it doesn't involve temporal sequence. And that alone would mean "knowledge" and "thought" language, as applied to God, would be meaningless. I like that about Hartshorne. He's about intelligibility and what that requires.


 

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 2:26 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads