Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > The raging debate continues here... > God’s Two Wills in Openness – March 19 debate  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
262 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 3:40 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel

www.roca.org/OA/143-144/143c.htm
Christ’s Prayer in the Garden
By Saint John (Maximovitch)


quote:
True, even in these moments He is not alone because His Father is always with Him (John 8:29; 10:30). But in order to feel the full weight of the consequences of sin, the Son of God voluntarily allows His human nature to feel the horror of estrangement from God as well. This awful moment will be unbearable for the holy and sinless One. A loud cry will escape Him: My God my God, why hast Thou forsaken Me? (Matt. 27:46). Foreseeing this hour, the holy soul is filled with horror and indignation.

Earlier, when certain Greeks came to see Jesus, He allowed His human nature to experience the approach of this dreadful hour. When these "sheep from another fold" arrived, the God Man knew that the hour was near when people would come to see Him raised up on the Cross. His human nature shuddered, His soul was filled with indignation. But Jesus knew that without His sufferings the salvation of men was impossible, without them His life's work on earth would be as fruitless as a grain of wheat that had been lying on the earth until dried out by the sun. Therefore, He entreated the Father not to allow human weakness to take hold of the thoughts and desires of His human nature: Now is My soul troubled, and what shall I say? Father, save me from this hour; but for this cause came I unto this hour. As if heartened by the remembrance of the purpose of His sojourn on earth, Christ prayed for God's will to be done -- for the salvation of mankind: Father, glorify Thy name -- glorify it on the earth, among men. Show Thyself not only as the Creator, but also as the Saviour (St Basil, "Against Eunomius," Book 4). And the voice from heaven said, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again (John 11:27-28), thus announcing that the time had come for the fulfillment of God's mystery which hath been hid from the ages (I Col 1:26; Eph. 1:9, 3:9).

And now this time has come. If even earlier Christ's human nature had shuddered and felt indignation at the thought of what was to come, what was He feeling now, when, waiting for the arrival of His enemies and His betrayer, He prayed privately to God for the last time? The Lord knew that any prayer of His would be heard (John 11:42). He knew that if He were to entreat His Father to deliver Him from torments and death, more than twelve legions of angels (Matt. 26:53) would appear to defend Him. But is this why He came? To refuse, in the last moment, to fulfill that which was foretold by the Scriptures?
The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak. Even now Jesus' spirit was aflame, desiring only one thing: To accomplish God's will. But as a man, in His human nature, He would have turned away from suffering and death. ( An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, 3:18, 20, 23, 24; Blessed Theophylact; St. John Climacus, The Ladder of Divine Ascent, ch. 6, "On remembrance of death"). The Son of God had voluntarily adopted this weak human nature. So He now offers Himself to death for the salvation of the world. And He is victorious, although overcome bv the feeling of an approaching fear of death and loathing of sufferings (Climacus, Ibid.; Blessed Augustine; Exact Exposition, 3:24). Now these sufferings will be particularly terrible, terrible not as such, but because the soul of the God-Man is shaken to its very depths.

Man's sins, which Jesus has taken upon Himself, are inexpressibly burdensome. They press heavily upon Him, making the imminent sufferings unbearable.

Christ knows that when these sufferings reach their utmost intensity, He will be all alone. Not only will there be no human being capable of alleviating them -- I waited for one to grieve with Me, but there was none; and for one to comfort Me, but I found none (Ps. 68:21; Is. 63:5) -- but in order to feel the full burden of sins, He would be made to experience the torment of separation from the Heavenly Father. At this moment His human will might wish to avoid the sufferings. But let it not be! May His human will not depart from God's will even for a moment. This is what the God-Man prays for to His Father. If it is possible for mankind to reestablish its union with God without this dreadful new crime against the Son of God (St. Basil the Great, Ibid.), may this hour be averted. However, if this is the only way for mankind to be brought to its Creator, let God's will be fulfilled. Let His will be done and may Jesus' human nature in these terrible moments desire nothing but the fulfillment of God's will, the accomplishment of the Divine economy. This, then, is what Christ prayed for in the Garden of Gethsemane, in the days of HIS flesh, when He had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto Him that was able to save Him from death (Heb. 6:7).

Back to Top
 

John Earp
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1715
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 3:42 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel

1. It shows in your earlier post that we all have this unchallenged assumption that theology is a field of Logic. Theology, literally, is "a vision of God."


Actually I think you have confused theology (reasoning about God) with theophany (a direct revelation of God, like a vision).



"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.

revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 3:48 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel
Two things:

1. It shows in your earlier post that we all have this unchallenged assumption that theology is a field of Logic. Theology, literally, is "a vision of God." And THAT is done in the heart. Those at Chalcedon had to USE logic, and defend against what might be done with it, but (I'm thinking of St. Basil and his statement that he KNEW the Holy Spirit was God by his experience of God. That's opposite of an intellectual puzzle.) the Creeds were NOT defending themselves -- they were defenind LIVE FAITH. At issue was how God had revealed himself, and how we encounter God. Contrast Basil to: "this issue seems to me be an unresolvable conflict between logic and Scripture." OUR problem is that we have, at times, conflated Scripture and logic. A.W. Tozer is a good tonic for avoiding that!!! Then: "Dr. Sanders...stated that commentators down through the centuries have simply said "Huh?" when confronted with Christ's prayer in the Garden." THAT is true more often in the West (Not only, and not throughout!) because of Scholastic expectations. TRUE Theology looks at that same scene with the heart.


POW, you seem to be doing two things:

1. chastising us for using reason and logic all the while quoting eastern church ancients who conjured up the trinity, Jesus' dual natures, etc. using what? reason, logic, scripture and "the heart"

2. you credit them with using scripture and "the heart" and seem to be assuming we don't use scripture and "the heart"

credit us with using reason, logic, scripture and "the heart" as well



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 4:18 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by John Earp

Actually I think you have confused theology (reasoning about God) with theophany (a direct revelation of God, like a vision).


Not "I" but--and I'm anticipating Laika's post that followed yours--that is generally what the two traditions stated as their purpose and their method. The Orthodox tradition as a whole (East, West, and Oriental) SAYS what it understands the purpose and method of theology to be. And within the Scholastic tradisions that emulated Thomas Aquinas, etc. they do too. Each speaks for themselves.

OF COURCE their is not a clean divide between East and West. AND THAT'S MY POINT!

Now:
quote:
Originally posted by Laika

POW, you seem to be ... chastising us for using reason and logic ... you credit (eastern church) with using scripture and "the heart" and seem to be assuming we don't use scripture and "the heart."



Laika, THAT's not fair. And insofar as it IGNORES both the content and the intent of what I actually said, its "cheep." We can see that I wrote: "A.W. Tozer is a good tonic for avoiding that!!! . . . THAT is true more often in the West (Not only, and not throughout!) because of Scholastic expectations. TRUE Theology looks at that same scene with the heart."

Plenty praiseworthy examples are in the "old" West, and much academic theology ("school-theology") invaded the East both at sword-point (Poland) and by invitation (Peter the Great). BUT I pointed to A.W. Tozer who writes on page 26 of "The Knowledge of the Holy":

quote:
"...It was the attitude of Anselm, "the second Augustine," one of the greatest thinkers of the Christian era, who held that faith must precede all effort to understand. Reflection upon revealed trugh naturally follows the advent of faith, but faith comes first to the hearing ear, not to the cogitating mind. The believing man does not ponder the Word and arrive at faith by a process of reasoning, nor does he seek confirmation of faith from philosophy or science. His cry is, "0 earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the Lord." "Yea, let God be true, but every man a liar."

Is this to dismiss scholarship as valueless in the sphere of revealed religion? By no means. The scholar has a vitally important task to perform within a carefully prescribed precinct. His task is to guarantee the purity of the text, to get as close as possible to the Word as originally given. He may compare Scripture with Scripture until he has discovered the true meaning of the text. But right there his authority ends. He must never sit in judgment upon what is written. He dare not bring the meaning of the Word before the bar of his reason. He dare not commend or condemn the Word as reasonable or unreasonable, scientific or unscientific. After the meaning is discovered, that meaning judges him; never does he judge it.

The doctrine of the Trinity is truth for the heart. The spirit of man alone can enter through the veil and penetrate into that Holy of Holies. "Let me seek Thee in longing," pleaded Anselm, "let me long for Thee in seeking; let me find Thee in love, and love Thee in finding."i2 Love and faith are at home in the mystery of the Godhead. Let reason kneel in reverence outside.

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 4:35 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
So, John and Laika, with HEAD and HEART what do you see in the Gospel narrative in Gethsemane?



Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 4:38 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 4:53 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
The Word of the Lord:

quote:
Mark 14:34-36

And he saith unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful even unto death: abide ye here, and watch. And he went forward a little, and fell on the ground, and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pass away from him. And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; remove this cup from me: howbeit not what I will, but what thou wilt.


Christ's humanity is plainly evident, and was "showing": He could be "sorrowful even unto death."

And BOTH the vulnerability of his humanity and his faithfulness are plain at the same time--revealed in this passage: He says "remove this cup from me"; but also says "not what I will, but what thou wilt."

And Christ speaks as much to us as to his disciples, saying: "Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak." (Matthew)

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 4:59 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:16 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
We are discussing the TWO WILLS of Christ Jesus. Laika is saying that he only had one. John first said that he had two, and then later seems to say only one. (I'm not sure what he believes.) But the matter that I'd like to explore next is that MOMENT when ONLY Christ's HUMANITY is evident, and only his humanity is at issue. I'm speaking of when he cried out: "My God, my God, why have your forsaken me." Of this St. John of San Francisco writes: "having voluntarily emptied the cup of sufferings of body and soul, Christ glorified God on the earth; He accomplished the task no lesser than the creation of the world itself. He restored fallen human nature, reconciled God and mankind, and made men partakers of the Divine nature (I1 Peter 1:4)."

And of the necessity of Gethsemane the same wrote: "strengthened and encouraged, Jesus rose from His prayer. Now He was sure that His human nature would not waver any more, that soon the burden of human sins would be lifted from Him, and that, through His obedience to God the Father, He would bring to Him errant human nature."


WHAT WONDEROUS LOVE IS THIS?


And Christ's sufferings were voluntary. St. John of San Francisco writes: ""Thou hast prayed that the voluntary cup of the redeeming Passion be removed as if it were not voluntary" (Sunday Matins Liturgy, Tone 5, Canticle 8 of the canon), thus demonstrating two desires of two natures and asking God the Father to render His human will unwavering in its submission to God's will (John of Damascus' Exact Exposition, 3:24). " And Christ himself said: (John 10:17-18) "Therefore doth the Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I may take it again. No one taketh it away from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again." So, Christ, John of San Francsisco reminds us, prays AS IF the Cross were not voluntary FOR OUR BENIFIT so that we might see both his humanity and his divinity.

I can also think of other times in the Gospels where Christ said things or acted for the benifit of those hearing.


Glory to Christ, our Redeemer.
Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:16 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel

So, John and Laika, with HEAD and HEART what do you see in the Gospel narrative in Gethsemane?




Jesus submitting His singular will to that of His Father's singular will.

Of course, that is a rather small picture there.



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:21 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Laika

Jesus submitting His singular will to that of His Father's singular will.


He had only one single human will. No schizophrenia (John mentioned). But Christ all the while, and now too, remains God and shares perichoretically in the single undivided Divine Will.

So, Laika, do you say that Christ was not God? Or do you say that the Father became human too?

Speak up. Explain yourself.

(But read what I just posted ahead of you first!!!!)
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:25 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
In the LINKed quotes on this or the other page, it says:

quote:
Having become the author of eternal salvation for all who obey Him (Heb. 5:9), even after His Ascension into Heaven He remains known "in two natures without confusion" (Sunday dogmatikon, Tone 6), "For Thou hast borne two wills according to each of Thy two natures, O Thou Who art Christ for ever" (Sunday canon, Tone 5, canticle 8).

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:28 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
In order that:

quote:
But His glorified body can no longer suffer and is in no need for anything, and likewise also His human will can in no wise depart from God's will. In this very, body Christ will come on the last day "to judge the living and the dead," after which, as King not only according to His divinity but also in His humanity, He will subject Himself with all His eternal kingdom to God the Father, that God may be all in all (1 Cor. 15:28).


THERE'S THE REASON, THE ETERNAL PURPOSE, FROM BEFORE THE AGES!
Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:33 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW wins by sheer volume...Approve

Frankly, Christ was Christ. Something's are swallowed up in mystery. We can (and should) spectulate on them. But just because you are a "Father" of the church, or part of the church tradition don't mean you are any more correct than a persn living today, not matter propped up on a pestal you are.
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:34 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel

In order that:

quote:
But His glorified body can no longer suffer and is in no need for anything, and likewise also His human will can in no wise depart from God's will. In this very, body Christ will come on the last day "to judge the living and the dead," after which, as King not only according to His divinity but also in His humanity, He will subject Himself with all His eternal kingdom to God the Father, that God may be all in all (1 Cor. 15:28).


THERE'S THE REASON, THE ETERNAL PURPOSE, FROM BEFORE THE AGES!



Not only did Christ assume human body and soul (will's included in that package) IN ORDER THAT as the Council declared, that "what was assumed" might "be healed." But we also have our attention drawn, in the above statement, to the fact that Christ will in the last day submit NOT ONLY human bodies but also human wills to the Glory of the Father.
Back to Top
 

feelinahole
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2004
Total Posts : 754
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:37 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
WOW! Pow quotes Orthodox church fathers at length with pictures. What a novel concept (long enough to read in one sitting even...almostEyebrow).
Back to Top
 

johnmd
Registered Member


Date Joined May 2002
Total Posts : 154
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:41 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
POW
He had only one single human will. No schizophrenia (John mentioned). But Christ all the while, and now too, remains God and shares perichoretically in the single undivided Divine Will.

My reference to "schizophrenia" was IN RESPONSE TO the notion that had been submitted referencincing God's "hidden" will not in reference to God or Jesus having 2 wills

John
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:43 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by feelinahole

Just because you are a "Father" of the church, or part of the church tradition don't mean you are any more correct than a persn living today, not matter propped up on a pestal you are.


"Amen!" to THAT!!!

And similarly just having a good looking arguement does not mean you have the truth. The standard is more like "the faith once delivered to the saints," and what St. Vincent of Lerins' said, "all that which has been believed everywhere, always, and by everyone."


BUT what Laika said about "winning" and you to here, f-h about "wins" is off the mark.

What do you have to contribute in our looking at what the Gospel says about the Will of the Father and the Will(s) of Christ Jesus. And NOT just "about" them technically, but "of" them in what God's will is?

What say you, f-h?
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:49 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
[quote]Originally posted by feelinahole

WOW! Pow quotes Orthodox church fathers at length with pictures.quote]

Orthodox like A.W. Tozer. And as exotic and "eastern" as this painting:



Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 5:57 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel



Jesus, the Celt.

POW, let's say Jesus did have two wills.

His God-will, His man-will. Now He's in the garden and I'll speculate:

His man-will ---> I don't want to die a horrible death, it'll be painful and I'll be separated from my Father, who is holy.

His Father's will ---> I want you to die and take on the sins of the world, alienating Me from your presence during the process due to your load of sin.

So what would His God-will be? The same as one of the others or a third alternative?



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 6:29 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Laika

Now He's in the garden and I'll speculate:

His man-will ---> I don't want to die a horrible death, it'll be painful and I'll be separated from my Father, who is holy.

His Father's will ---> I want you to die and take on the sins of the world, alienating Me from your presence during the process due to your load of sin.

So what would His God-will be? The same as one of the others or a third alternative?


I don't think you asked that the way you wished. His divine will (God-will) is exactly the same as the Father ("If you've seen me, you've seen the Father.") "Jesus came to save the lost." That's his will. I'm not sure that's what you are asking.

But issue is "anthropological." I notice that you did not only mention his body, but also mention his soul--as per its alientation from God. (In his divinity the Son was never separated from the Father, but in his humanity he experienced utter abandonment!) His body and soul "naturally" wanted to avoid the Cross EXCEPT "for the joy set before him..." and THERE IS THE DIFFERENCE.

And that difference says something true about humanity as a whole too. Something that got pushed aside in the fall. Humanity is not created to be a slave to nature: We were created in God's image, as Persons. Even thought Christ was not a human-person, HE DID have humanity personally. Being without sin Christ was FREE to "become sin" for us. (Not having sinned, he nonetheless "knew sin" by taking on himself the consequences of sin.) And for us, WE are reminded through Christ that we are created to be persons. And we are not created to be slaves to the flesh. But dying with Christ we are born unto eternal life, free to will to honor God the Father, by the power of the Holy Spirit -- which is what "Christian" means.
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 6:31 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 6:39 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Laika wrote: His man-will ---> I don't want to die a horrible death, it'll be painful and I'll be separated from my Father, who is holy.


That's PART of what his human will wanted. The OTHER thing his humanity wanted was this: "howbeit not what I will, but what thou wilt."

Importantly (and telling us about what true humanity was created from the beginning to be, and what Christ "recapitulates" it to be) is this: That it is "natural" for man to be in communion with God. Christ in his humanity PERFECTLY willed to do God's will.

He was not schizophrenic, with human will and divine will competing, with one will winning and one will loosing. Both these values are displayed by Christ in the Gospel narrative. And they tell us tons about Christ's love, and somehting about our own calling too.

And likewise, Christ says: "Be perfect even as your Father in heaven is perfect." That's OUR calling too.

Back to Top
 

PotOnWheel
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 9890
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 6:43 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Back to Top
 

John Earp
Registered Member


Date Joined Oct 2002
Total Posts : 1715
 
   Posted 3/25/2004 8:23 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by PotOnWheel

So, John and Laika, with HEAD and HEART what do you see in the Gospel narrative in Gethsemane?




I see Jesus struggling with the greatest trial imaginable. When you refer to "his humanity" (which I agree with) how can you really say his deity was not at the same moment also struggling?

Can someone post a picture of a cat chasing its tail?



"The Discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds in any world." Charles G. Finney, Systematic Theology.

revivaltheology.net

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
262 posts in this thread.
Viewing Page :
 
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 3:49 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads