Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > The raging debate continues here... > While we were yet sinner: In defense of an open f  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

archive
Registered Member


Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 516
 
   Posted 6/28/2001 5:51 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.


05/04/01 3:09 PM

"While we were yet sinners": In defense of an open future


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another passage for your consideration-

Rom. 5.7-8:

Why, one will hardly die for a righteous man -- though perhaps for a good man one will dare even to die. But God shows his love for us in that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us.
If God possess EDF, then in what sense did Christ die for us “while we were sinners”? The preceding analogy CONTRASTS the rare willingness of a person to die even for somebody who (relatively speaking) deserves to be saved with Christ’s death for people who, in contrast to the righteous man, offered no guarantee of a return on the investment. That is, we may die for a righteous or good man because good men are likely to “pay it forward” via their goodness, that is, good will come out of our death.

But Paul CONTRASTS this with Christ’s death for us “while we were yet sinners.” Seems to me that both a deterministic view of the future and simple foreknowledge take the punch out of this passage. The needed contrast between the analogy of how/why WE die only rarely for good people and how/why Jesus died for us “while we were sinners” is lost, for if a) Christ dies for the elect only, or b) God knows that so-and-so will in fact receive him, become a righteous or good man, and bring forth fruit for God’s glory, and if I know this, then it makes no sense to contrast Christ’s death for me “while I was a sinner” with our willingness to die for people who promise a return on our investment. If God is certain of the return he gets on his investment, then Christ’s death is not dissimilar to the way we die for others. But Paul insists it IS different.

Comments?

Tom

Posted Originally From: Open Theism Information Site



TGB

05/30/01 2:59 PM

RE: "While we were yet sinners": In defense of an open future


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I must be losing my touch guys. Am I that far off base here?

Tom




Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 11:02 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads