Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > The raging debate continues here... > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 10/5/2003 9:35 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
There is a good overview of the issues plus a history of OVTheism at the following link...

http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=50f485d4a08975980e2f37719776a91c&threadid=9089

dlw


Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes."

Back to Top
 

Blood Washed Heretic
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 167
 
   Posted 10/8/2003 6:53 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
If you put your ear to the ground, you can hear it...

The rumble of change approaching the American conservangelical church. The OV is on the front end theologically, and God is using this "debate" to awaken us to the fact that evangelical unity is about to end, and a new synthetic paradigm will replace it. The old guard sees a serious threat to the Calvinist monolith, and has reacted strongly, pigeonholing serious discussion and even pulling the heresy card in an attempt to squelch this movement before it gains much steam.

In this mobilization, they have even recruited Arminian scholars to the cause of classical theism. One of these is Robert C. Kurka, president of the Midwest Region of the ETS, and my theology teacher. I have a great deal of respect for Dr. Kurka, but he vehemently opposes a view I now am beginning to hold. 2004's Midwest Regional Meeting of the ETS is at my school, and Millard Erickson is the keynote speaker. There is no programmed discussion on the OV, but I'm sure it will come up somehow. Another prof at my school, who is a close friend of mine, is a strong Open Theist and has been instrumental in my "conversion". I am thankful that he and Dr. Kurka have not allowed their disagreement to poison the school, but I fear that this ETS meeting could turn into a "rattling of the sabers" of sorts, and that confrontation could be imminent.

Am I anxious about nothing? I hope that, for the time being, I am. However, I firmly believe that God is preparing for the next big movement in His church, and the openness debate could be the first real battleground. I fear that the ETS is set to lose whatever relevance it may have had, and that deep divisions could arise over the heresy charges forthcoming. Again, I may be wrong, but every revolution in the church has been triggered by theological debate, and this could very well be the next one.


In essentials, unity; In matters of opinion, liberty; In all things, love.

Back to Top
 

Ochuk
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 102
 
   Posted 10/8/2003 7:05 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I still don't understand how Roger Nicole could make the case that Open Theists deny inerrancy.

If that goes through, then I would be very scared about having an "inerrant interpretation."


Read my blog at ochuk.gizzar.com

Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 10/8/2003 7:06 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Have I told you about the book, "The Remaking of Evangelical Theology" by Gary dorrien? It is the only history of Evangelical Theology that has been written by a non-evangelical. He is an Anglican Social Gospelist.

A lot of the past reasons for divisions within Christian groups have broken down and some obvious new ones have risen up.

anyways,

within OVTheism there is plenty room for disagreement about what is open and what isn't.

I focus on politics, because I think that is an important venue for openness and that historically Church-State relations have been one of the most important ongoing debates we have had.

Also, the higher likelihood of "evangelicals" to vote and their general absence of habits of extensive political reflection have made us easier to manipulate by our leaders and wrt the abortion issue managed to slowly poison the US's democracy over the past thirty years.

In my view, the current PBA legislation will be likely overturned by the Sup Court. I think it is likely that Republicans formed it to make this more likely. Why? Well if we finally get abortion legislation passed and it gets overturned then pro-lifers will turn out in droves in the next election and provide the votes Republicans need to stay in power.

We are being manipulated. A political agenda is being presented to us as apolitical. We must choose whether we are going to deliberate and reconsider our options or spend our time/energy on other things and maintain our status-quo political behavior.

dlw
Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 10/8/2003 7:11 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I post my ideas in more detail over at TheoWeb at the following link...

www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=237640#post237640
Back to Top
 

Tom
Registered Member




Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 10353
 
   Posted 10/8/2003 9:29 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
BWH: One of these is Robert C. Kurka, president of the Midwest Region of the ETS, and my theology teacher. I have a great deal of respect for Dr. Kurka...

Tom: Hmm. "Kurka" in Arabic means "Turtle."

Bandit
Back to Top
 

Starkman
Registered Member




Date Joined Oct 2001
Total Posts : 1747
 
   Posted 10/8/2003 10:02 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Yeah, TGB, but ... Dr. Turtle?

"Good evening, Dr. Turtle. Is Mr. Owl in?"
"No sir, he's still licking the lollypop."

I mean, I'd go with English instead of Arabic too!

Starkman (which, by the way, backwards is yekrats)
Back to Top
 

Blood Washed Heretic
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 167
 
   Posted 10/9/2003 6:40 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Could Doc or someone explain to me the exact charges or whatever being brought against Sanders and Pinnock? Also, why aren't you included, Doc? Is the issue something that somehow excludes you? Or are you simply not a member of the ETS, and subsequently immune to expulsion?

I know you went through some controversy with the BGC a few years back, so I was wondering if you're free and clear now, or if more storm clouds are on the horizon?


In essentials, unity; In matters of opinion, liberty; In all things, love.

Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 10/9/2003 7:01 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Blood Washed Heretic

Could Doc or someone explain to me the exact charges or whatever being brought against Sanders and Pinnock? Also, why aren't you included, Doc? Is the issue something that somehow excludes you? Or are you simply not a member of the ETS, and subsequently immune to expulsion?

I know you went through some controversy with the BGC a few years back, so I was wondering if you're free and clear now, or if more storm clouds are on the horizon?



Doc isn't a member of ETS, unlike the others. He gave up on them a while back.

The BGC thing ended with them amending their constitution saying that the open-view was outside the historical understanding of God within the BGC. Him no longer teaching at Bethel College also immunized him to that.

Although, now an open theist like myself couldn't get a job teaching at BC, unless we just said we were neo-armeniansBandit2.

dlw


Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes."

Back to Top
 

Blood Washed Heretic
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 167
 
   Posted 10/9/2003 7:08 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
So Woodland Hills is no longer affiliated with the BGC? Or was it ever?

Also, I've heard that Pinnock and Sanders are being called on "denying scriptural inerrancy" or something like that. What does this have to do with their OV beliefs?


In essentials, unity; In matters of opinion, liberty; In all things, love.

Back to Top
 

DLW
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 2457
 
   Posted 10/9/2003 7:14 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Blood Washed Heretic

So Woodland Hills is no longer affiliated with the BGC? Or was it ever?

Also, I've heard that Pinnock and Sanders are being called on "denying scriptural inerrancy" or something like that. What does this have to do with their OV beliefs?



It still is, but you know among Baptists they never impose that much on individual churches. Its a relatively loose arrangement.

Apparently inerrancy has something to do with the passages that calvinists use to corroborate their view of predestination...

Its stupid and not going anywhere, the arminians, thinking maybe we're next, saw to that, I believe.
dlw


Niebuhr thought that sustained moral energy in politics depended on religion's power to mobilize reason along with self-transcending love. The prophetic tradition, meanwhile, gave Jews and Christians some protection against the temptation to identify their social causes with God's will. Lincoln's second inaugural address expressed the prophetic insight, "The almighty has His own purposes."

Back to Top
 

Ochuk
Registered Member


Date Joined Apr 2003
Total Posts : 102
 
   Posted 10/9/2003 12:48 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Blood Washed Heretic

So Woodland Hills is no longer affiliated with the BGC? Or was it ever?

Also, I've heard that Pinnock and Sanders are being called on "denying scriptural inerrancy" or something like that. What does this have to do with their OV beliefs?



Good question, BWH.

The inerrancy argument works off the logical argument for inerrancy.

1) God cannot err
2) What he inspires through people cannot err
3) Scripture is inspired by God
4) Scripture cannot err.

Now the critics of the OV believe that God is subject to err and can give "bad advice" to people. Take Doc's story in God of the Possible about "Susane:"

A woman prays earnestly to God about the man she marries being the right person. Years later they divorce after much abuse. Susane is taught by the OV that her marriage has "right" at the time. But it turned out bad.

I'm not convinced of the argument because Pinnock and Sanders do not come to bible thinking it is full of errors.


Read my blog at ochuk.gizzar.com

Back to Top
 

Blood Washed Heretic
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 167
 
   Posted 10/10/2003 4:41 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I have yet to come to a conclusive decision on the idea of inerrancy (what it REALLY is, not whether or not God is "inerrant"), so I would dismiss point 2 and probably even point 4. Despite any serious training in formal logic, I see already the challenge of making points 1 and 3 (which I do believe) stand on their own...

What do you think about this inerrancy business, Doc?


In essentials, unity; In matters of opinion, liberty; In all things, love.

Back to Top
 

Laika
Registered Member




Date Joined Mar 2003
Total Posts : 2433
 
   Posted 10/13/2003 8:28 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:
Originally posted by Blood Washed Heretic
What do you think about this inerrancy business, Doc?



http://www.christusvictorministries.org/gbfront/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1601

izza start



inside you the time moves and she don't fade
the ghost in you she don't fade

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 11:23 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads