Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > The raging debate continues here... > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

archive
Registered Member


Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 516
 
   Posted 6/26/2001 6:03 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Yo Room-

Does God deliberate between options, or does he just “know” and “choose”? If he possess exhaustive definite foreknowledge of all possibilities, which by definition includes his knowing all possible responses HE could make depending on which possibilities are actualized, then how are we to account for the claim that God “deliberates”? Wherefore deliberate? When one of the billions of possibilities becomes reality, then I would think God’s response would be instantaneous (in divine terms that’s pretty fast!), automatic. What’s there to “think” about? To ponder? In the end, wouldn’t a God who has all possibilities and their possible responses eternally archived and is just waiting to see which eternally foreknown possibilities are actualized so that he could give his eternally foreknown response to that possibility be incredibly bored?

It’s late and I’m in a “let’s try to find some more weaknesses in the OV” mood.

Tom

Back to Top
 

archive
Registered Member


Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 516
 
   Posted 6/26/2001 6:05 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I would say that God deliberated at the act of Creation. At that time, He solidified what reality that He would create and how he would play it out.

But here is my question. The subject is a little disturbing to me, too, to be honest.

How in the WORLD do we know that God gets bored AT ALL? Isn't this an assumption upon which a significant portion of discussion has taken place in the discussion of openness vs. classicalist theology? Don't we just take OUR experiences of boredom and attribute them to God WITHOUT real warrant? Isn't this the quintessential example of our anthropocentrism of theology?

Just my thing...
Meph

Back to Top
 

archive
Registered Member


Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 516
 
   Posted 6/26/2001 6:07 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Meph: How in the WORLD do we know that God gets bored AT ALL? Isn't this an assumption upon which a significant portion of discussion has taken place in the discussion of openness vs. classicalist theology? Don't we just take OUR experiences of boredom and attribute them to God WITHOUT real warrant? Isn't this the quintessential example of our anthropocentrism of theology?

Tom: It was 2:30 AM. What d’ya expect?
In response, the Scriptures never attribute boredom to God. They DO attribute regret, change of mind, surprise, and other emotions to God. So we do have to deal biblically with those. We don’t have to deal biblically with boredom. I suspect the attribution of boredom to God (something I have NOT heard any Over do) might follow logically (or illogically, as the case may be) from the kind of speculation people do at 2 AM while watching Claude van Dam (sp?) fight.

Tom


Back to Top
 

archive
Registered Member


Date Joined Jun 2001
Total Posts : 516
 
   Posted 6/26/2001 6:08 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
"And we only smoke when bored
So we do two packs a day
And we've lost the difference
Between and bored and lonely anyway"

-Alone by The Beautiful South-

MrIndifference

Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 1:17 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads