Open Theism Discussion Board
  HomeLog InRegisterSearch the ForumHelp
   
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > The raging debate continues here... > (No Subject)
 
Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

Robert Furney
Registered Member


Date Joined Jan 2002
Total Posts : 24
 
   Posted 1/27/2002 7:55 AM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
I know that Calcidius is a fifth century theologian who apparently held to some tenets of Open Theism. Have there been any other findings of similar thinkers in the early church?

Back to Top
 

GregBoyd
Registered Member


Date Joined Jul 2001
Total Posts : 1818
 
   Posted 1/29/2002 2:39 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Hi Robert. Nice to have you join us on line.

"I know that Calcidius is a fifth century theologian who apparently held to some tenets of Open Theism."

The "apparently" qualification isn't necessary. I've studied Calcidius' work "On Fate" and both his views and the ways he defends them are identical to those espoused by Open Theists today.

Have there been any other findings of similar thinkers in the early church?

Doc: No. But I always joke that they probably all belonged to the same yet-as-discovered-early-church-group which believed in *salvation by grace through faith *adult only baptism *the automatic salvation of infants *the symbolic understanding of baptism *the Methodist view of sanctification as a second work of grace *the Pentecostal view of Spirit baptism as a second work of grace *TULIP *the Bible as the sole foundation for faith and *congregation polity.

Doc


"Three is the magic number, oh yes it is, it's the Magic Number" - De La Soul
Back to Top
 

B. Winningham
Registered Member


Date Joined Feb 2002
Total Posts : 15
 
   Posted 2/14/2002 7:42 PM (GMT -6)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
quote:

Doc: No. But I always joke that they probably all belonged to the same yet-as-discovered-early-church-group which believed in *salvation by grace through faith *adult only baptism *the automatic salvation of infants *the symbolic understanding of baptism *the Methodist view of sanctification as a second work of grace *the Pentecostal view of Spirit baptism as a second work of grace *TULIP *the Bible as the sole foundation for faith and *congregation polity.



Doc, are you saying that none of these doctrines have any merit to you? You seem to be saracastic toward them.

BTW, I am not a Calvinist; therfore I do not believe in TULIP. Nor am I Pentecostal. I lean more toward the Anabaptists. Are you implying that I cannot be Anabaptist and Open Theist at the same time?

Thanks & May GOD Bless You,
B. Winningham



Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
   
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 11:37 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads