 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Questions about Christianity > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  brandi Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2002 Total Posts : 118 | Posted 8/11/2002 8:57 AM (GMT -6) |   | WHAT IS LOVE? I am going to substitute the word “Jesus” in place of the word ”love" in the following verses from 1Corinthians 13: 4-7
"Jesus is patient, Jesus is kind. He does not envy, he does not boast, he is not proud. Jesus is not rude, he is not self-seeking, he is not easily angered, he keeps no record of wrongs. Jesus does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. He always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Jesus never fails.”
As followers of Christ this is what he wants and commands us to strive for however sometimes it seems as though we can get the idea of “loving our neighbor as ourselves” as being synonymous with accepting and tolerating everything in order that a person might feel loved. But in the above scripture reference I find nowhere that it says Jesus approves of sin in fact it said “Jesus does NOT delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.” Yet I struggle to find the balance at times.
I am struggling to really capture what exactly LOVE looks like as a follower of Christ. The PowerPoint presentation that Greg Boyd had in his sermon this weekend was moving and motivating. The pictures showed people and the people groups that they represent which have sometimes been judged by the church and not accepted and loved i.e.. homosexuals, heavy metal bands, politicians, murderers... The point I gained through this presentation was that we are to see past the act into the person and to see this person through the eyes of Christ. It has helped me to sometimes imagine what a particular person looked liked as small child and to think about the many possible reasons why they went the road they did. This sometimes has helped me to love people who I would otherwise have found unlovable (like a child molester or a murderer) yet to be honest even when I have done this I have found that only Gods love has been able help me find any worth in a person who has committed a horrible act such as a child abduction...
What I have been wondering since Doc’s sermon is that perhaps there may have been an element missing in the photos? You see, God loves each person and wants desperately to have a relationship with everyone but this is a two-way thing. God does not approve of the sinful act that the people groups that were represented display such as homosexuality, rebellion, deceit, murder... God longs for and wishes all would “Follow Him” but people must also be willing to do their part in repenting and turning from their sinful nature. This is where I particularly struggle with knowing how to love without becoming complacent and compromising.
So, what is love? I used the name of Jesus in the Corinthians passage above because He is "The way, the truth, the light" for us to follow. It is true that Jesus had many “undesirable” people flock to him because he did not judge nor discriminate against any person. He invited (and still invites) ALL to follow him! While this is true that Jesus did not discriminate, it is also true that those who followed after him were changed and had transformed lives. They were loved but to be a follower they also had to be willing to turn from their rebellious ways and submit to Gods ways. Mark 3:35 ”Whoever does Gods will is my brother and sister and mother.” God does not want us to be unevenly yoked. Jesus did not remain with people who were unwilling to turn from their sinful ways (to sell everything).
The woman at the well was accepted by Jesus as being worthy to receive love but she was also told by Jesus to “Go and sin no more.” Her lifestyle was NOT accepted hence she was given an instruction to turn from the life she had been living.
Jesus loves everyone and as followers of Christ we are commanded to love everyone too. Yet it’s important to note that love and acceptance are NOT necessarily the same thing. Not everyone will be accepted into heaven even though God loves everyone. Matthew 7:13-14 ”13. Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. 14. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.”
I am struggling to find the balance in all of this. I want to love the way Christ loved yet to also be a “light” for God. I agree with Greg’s sermon that we as a church NEED desperately to become more loving. People need a safe place that will take them as they are BUT people desperately also need a church that does NOT compromise nor become complacent. Just as a child (even when they do not like it) needs direction, boundaries, and consequences; so too do the sheep.
I am open and very interested in reading how other people interpret what it means to love the way God wants us to love. What does Christ like love look like for you?
I'm interested! ~Brandi~
Edited by - brandi on 08/11/2002 2:01:30 PM
Edited by - brandi on 08/11/2002 2:14:16 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 8/11/2002 10:12 AM (GMT -6) |   | Dear Brandi,
Good question.
(I'm going to jump ahead in where I think this might go. Don't invite me to a picnic unless you are OK with someone hitting the desert table first.)
Here is a quote from Nick Wolterstorff. In it he makes two points, that go together. He didn't always know that; but the deth of his son taught him the less obvious. Gratitude and Suffering. Both have to do with Love. (The bold portions are interesting.)
quote:
Lament for a Son
This was all before. I now live after, after the death of our son, Eric. My life has been divided into before and after.
To love is to run the risk of suffering. Or rather, in our world, to love is to suffer; there’s no escaping it. Augustine knew it well; so Augustine recommended playing it safe, loving only what could neither die nor change on one—God and the soul. My whole tradition had taught me to love the world, to love the world as a gift, to love God through and in the world—wife, children, art, plants, learning. It had set me up for suffering. But it didn’t tell me this: it didn’t tell me that the invitation to love is the invitation to suffering. It let me find that out for myself, when it happened. Possibly it’s best that way.
I haven’t anything to say beyond what I’ve already said in Lament for a Son. There’s a lot of silence in the book; no word too much, I hope. In the face of death we must not chatter. And when I spoke, I founcf myself moving often on the edges of language, trying to find images for what only images could say. The book is extremely particular; I do not speak about death, only about Eric’s death. That’s all I could do. But I have discovered, from what readers have told me, that in its particularity lies universality.
I see now, looking back, that in writing it I was struggling to own my grief. The modern Western practice is to disown one’s grief: to get over it, to put it behind one, to get on with life, to put it out of mind, to insure that it not become part of one’s identity. My struggle was to own it, to make it part of my identity: if you want to know who I am, you must know that I am one whose son died. But then, to own it redemptively. It takes a long time to learn how to own one’s suffering redemptively; one never finishes learning.
Though there are strands in the Reformed tradition for which sovereignty is God’s principal attribute, I don’t think I ever thought of God much in terms of sovereignty. God was majesty for me, indescribable majesty. And graciousness, goodness; God is the one who blesses, blessing calling for gratitude. To be human is to be that point in the cosmos where God’s goodness is meant to find its answer in gratitude: John Calvin told me that.
Now everything was different. Who is this God, looming over me? Majesty? I see no majesty. Grace? Can this be grace? I see nothing at all; dark clouds hide the face of God. Slowly the clouds lift. What I saw then was tears, a weeping God, suffering over my suffering. I had not realized that if God loves this world, God suffers; I had thoughtlessly supposed that God loved without suffering. I knew that divine love was the key. But I had not realized that the love that is the key is suffering love.
I do not know what to make of this; it is for me a mystery. But I find I can live with that. The gospel had never been presented to me as best explanation, most complete account; the tradition had always encouraged me to live with unanswered questions. Life eternal doesn’t depend on getting all the questions answered; God is often as much behind the questions as behind the answers. But never had the unanswered question been so painful. Can I live this question with integrity, and without stumbling?
It moved me deeply to discover one day that John Calvin alone among the classical theologians had written of the suffering of God. Whenever he wrote of it, it was, so far as I could discover, in the same context: that of a discussion of injustice. To wreak injustice on one of one’s fellow human beings, said Calvin, is to wound and injure God; he said that the cry of those who suffer injustice is the cry of God.
To Be Human
There’s been a grace that’s shaped my life. It came to me in the form of being inducted into a tradition of the Christian church, and in the form of participating in an institution, and in other ways as well which I haven’t mentioned: in the form of persons such as my wife, my children, my friends.
But was it grace I experienced when I heard God saying to me, in the voice of the Palestinians and the South African blacks, you must speak up for these people? When God confronted the reluctant Jeremiah with his prophetic call, was that grace? And was it grace I experienced when my son was killed? God is more mysterious than I had thought—the world too. There’s more to God than grace; or if it’s grace to one, it’s not grace to the other—grace to Israel but not grace to Jeremiah. And there’s more to being human than being that point in the cosmos where God’s goodness is meant to find its answer in gratitude. To be human is also this: to be that point in the cosmos where the yield of God’s love is suffering.
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Starkman Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1747 | Posted 8/11/2002 1:47 PM (GMT -6) |   | Love. A sensitive subject for me. It is probably the second reason, if not the first, why I am not in ministry; I am only now learning to love more than a manner of simple respect and care for others. (The other reason that I may not be n ministry is because I so messed up my life in the last 17 years--broken marriages--that God had to do the Moses thing with me: "Okay, out in the desert with you until this thing dies down and clears out.")
Anyway, God found a way, a way to make me face myself . . . and think, and learn, and . . . love. I'm at the threshold of it all. THAT is exciting. Matter of fact, the break-through came today at church. I won't go into all the details, but suffice to say that I have been through living hell this last 2 years with regard to love, loving . . . loving because my heart is in it and not just because being respectful, thoughful and caring in normal, simple, everyday matters requires. That I do well. But to love in a way that dies to self beyond any power of one's own? Well, as I say, I'm only now at the threshold.
I have not lost a loved one (accept a wife to a divorce, though I'm remarried), and I have no tragic tails of hurt or pain with regard to love other than my broken marriage of the past. In that regard I know what it is to love and suffer grief because of that loss, but I brought it all on myself, so I have no one to blame for that but me. It's not like Nicholas Woltorstorff has faced.
Love?
Finally, I'm learning what it is at a real, I John level. And maybe ministry isn't so far away!
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  Electra Registered Member

Date Joined Feb 2002 Total Posts : 611 | Posted 8/11/2002 9:13 PM (GMT -6) |   | This is what Christ-like love looks like to me: “Therefore, I tell you, her sins, which were many, have been forgiven; hence she has shown great love. But the one to whom little is forgiven, loves little” (Luke 7:47). The kingdom of God is a kingdom of love, and forgiveness is the key to the kingdom. Electra
~·• kyrie eleison ·~•~· christe eleison ·~•~· kyrie eleison •·~ | | Back to Top | | |
 |  brandi Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2002 Total Posts : 118 | Posted 8/11/2002 11:58 PM (GMT -6) |   | Thank you for your responses so far!
Al2Si2H4O9 quote: What I saw then was tears, a weeping God, suffering over my suffering. I had not realized that if God loves this world, God suffers; I had thoughtlessly supposed that God loved without suffering. I knew that divine love was the key. But I had not realized that the love that is the key is suffering love.
God runs the risk every time he creates a new person that they will reject his love.
I'm curious, what is your personal idea of Christian love?
Starkman quote: Anyway, God found a way, a way to make me face myself . . . and think, and learn, and . . . love. I'm at the threshold of it all. THAT is exciting. Matter of fact, the break-through came today at church.
Praise God! It seems like God many times has to bring us to a point where we are beside ourselves in order to teach us the basics.
Your not going into ministry until you could face this issue of "love" is in itself "loving." I think there are some out there who get into ministry without giving love a lot of thought.
Electra quote: The kingdom of God is a kingdom of love, and forgiveness is the key to the kingdom
This is true but what I am struggling to grasp is that sometimes people are NOT repentant so if forgiveness = love then what about those who don't seek forgiveness? I think that caring for others and treating people as though they were Christ himself are keys to the kingdom, but I also think that love does not necessarily equate with acceptance. God created hell because despite his continual attempts at loving there are some who refuse this love. There are some who refuse to repent and turn.
I agree that the ones who have been forgiven much will love much. The gratitude one feels can be overwhelming and the response is an overwhelming love.
I am still trying to process this out. I appreciate the feedback! ~Brandi~
Edited by - brandi on 08/12/2002 04:59:12 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  pouringagape Registered Member
 Date Joined May 2002 Total Posts : 28 | Posted 8/12/2002 2:02 AM (GMT -6) |   | Brandi,
After hearing that sermon (and Greg's at North Heights) I was so convicted, I thought about changing my name on this site! Wow, what is love?--well I sure know what it is NOT! AND, I'm not so sure I POUR agape!
Love is not fighting (in any way) with worldly weapons. Love does not ever feed self. Love lets go of the hurt that comes our way through others and returns good for evil. Love takes condemning, conclusion drawing, and mean thoughts captive and "imagines a story that could be causing the evil/undesireable actions."
Crazy isn't it. Think about Jesus HEALING the ear that was cut off (out of a worldly way of defense)or Jesus on the cross saying "forgive them, they haven't a clue what they are doing" (when surely He could have been saying [or even thinking] "you'll get it for this." etc.)
Love, the power of love (Jesus) is our best defense in spiritual warfare too. We choose to lay down our carnal weapons, and , I believe, our power is increased. Along with Love, I believe the Fruit of the Spirit (other facets of love) are effective in warfare. Entering a state of patience or self control when tempted to REact toward someone, disarms them, and you, and allows the wisdom of God in. When we put on a sheild of love, which covers us head to toe (clothe yourself in love) it protects us as well as them. The strategies of the enemy bounce right off this sheild, and are made ineffective.
In a warfare view, imagine your "enemy" coming at you with "bullets" (could be slander, or speaking evil against you etc.) although YOU are RIGHT, and have the RIGHT to tell your side to prove it (your carnal weapons)...instead you choose to say something loving like: "I'm sorry if that's the way it seemed to you, that part is MY fault (magnify your LOG) I could have chosen ___________, do you think that would have been better?" Your enemy backs away. When you respond in this way, there is nothing to "shoot" at. I think it works the same on a larger scale as well.
Anyway, I'm learning TONS and trying to process it all too.
Exceeding Blessings, (haven't thought of new ...more acceptable name yet)
John 17:11 And now I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, protect them in your name that you have given me , so that they may be one, as we are one. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Electra Registered Member

Date Joined Feb 2002 Total Posts : 611 | Posted 8/12/2002 4:56 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: This is true but what I am struggling to grasp is that sometimes people are NOT repentant so if forgiveness = love then what about those who don't seek forgiveness?
When Jesus taught his disciples to pray, he taught them to say “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.” So as we ponder whether or not we should extend or withhold forgiveness, we should keep in mind that we will be forgiven as we forgive others. Jesus reminds us that we are blind to the logs of sin in our own eyes, so I hope that I will be forgiven for the sins I confess and repent of but also for the sins—which the Bible suggests are the majority—I’m not even aware of.
Also, when Jesus hung on the cross he looked out over the whole crowd and prayed, “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.” He did not make any distinction between those who were seeking to kill him and those who were seeking repentance (if any).
Forgiveness is the most authentic feedback you can ever give or receive. It speaks the truth about the sin that separates us from God and others, and it speaks the truth about the reconciliation Christ offers. It is the gospel.
Electra
~·• kyrie eleison ·~•~· christe eleison ·~•~· kyrie eleison •·~
Edited by - Electra on 08/12/2002 10:37:07 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Electra Registered Member

Date Joined Feb 2002 Total Posts : 611 | Posted 8/12/2002 5:45 AM (GMT -6) |   | I already posted this on the Bonhoeffer thread, but I think it is appropriate to post it here as well.
This is how Luther describes Christ-like love:
quote: From Christ the good things have flowed and are flowing into us…From us they flow on to those who have need of them so that I should lay before God my faith and my righteousness that they may cover and intercede for the sins of my neighbor which I take upon myself and so labor and serve in them as if they were my very own. That is what Christ did for us. This is true love and the genuine rule of a Christian life.
Electra
~·• kyrie eleison ·~•~· christe eleison ·~•~· kyrie eleison •·~ | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 8/12/2002 7:27 AM (GMT -6) |   | Brandi: I'm curious, what is your personal idea of Christian love?
Thanks. I like what Electra posted from Luther. I noticed a while back (from reading Cyril, Basil and the like) that the "Fruit of the Spirit" is literally that: the "fruit" that the Spirit causes to bear in me. It is surely a VERY 'mixed metaphor', but it dawned on me the pictorial power of the diagram: that the Father's "image" is the Son; and the Son sends the Spirit's mission (technically as to origin the Spirit "proceeds from the Father"; but Jesus said that he was "sending the Spirit." Both are true--they just don't both belong in the same paragraph in any Creed.); and the Spirit causes fruit to grow in us. Before I copy a bit from Electra's quote of Luther, let me say this. What the "Fruit of the Spirit" ISN'T is us trying to copy Jesus out of out own conceptions and effort, and fleshly-oriented feeling of obligation and ethic. That's not it. Here is that Luther quote, as an illustration: "have flowed and are flowing into us". WE are NOT the source. God is. But the verb "flow" is a useful one. (ELECTRA, I USED LUTHER ONLY AS AN ILLUSTRATION TO MAKE MY POINT; NOT HIS. IF I BUTCHERED HIS, CORRECT ME.) And as this is "new growth" in me, the next part of what Luther says makes sense too: "which I take upon myself and so labor and serve in them as if they were my very own" What I might have not cared about in my own (as I said above) conceptions, effort, obligation and ethic, I now find to be more a part of me than what I had identified as being me is (a parasite of what God created me to be). Renewed.
So,
"Love is of God, and everyone who loves is born of God and knoweth God. he that loveth not, knoweth not God. For God is Love."
I think that in your discussion on the Bonhoeffer thread the role of the Holy Spirit needs more play. Not just in service of the Word, either. I read that in Lutheran tradition the Spirit is subordinated to the Word.
For that thread, if I could catch up, I would suggest considering the Eucharist. In loving each other that we may with one mouth confess God as TriUnity... the Spirit does work. THAT is a miracle. Taking communion is a graphic memory for me. The love that I know (not just feel; but "know" and understand -- "illuminating!") is the Love of God. Reflecting on that might help your discussion on that thread.
Al...!@#$%!!#@% (Whatever my name is.)

Edited by - Al2Si2H4O9 on 08/12/2002 2:52:04 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  markus Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2002 Total Posts : 100 | Posted 8/12/2002 9:48 AM (GMT -6) |   | Dear Everyone,
I would just like to say a big thank you for all your moving comments concerning the nature of love, and in particular, Christian love. I think every single thing you have written is true, and yet therein lies maybe only the barest scratching of such an enormous topic as God’s love! How could we ever hope to describe love in multiple combinations of varied selections of 26 characters?
I am very reluctant to interrupt your flow and I hope I do not disturb too much if I add a few childish thoughts to the subject.
It is surely true that God is the source of all love, and that we indeed should feel gratitude when we encounter it in our own hearts. But we also need to recognise that love is not a durable commodity that can be stored away for oneself. If we try to hoard it for ourselves we soon find it has turned sour and putrid and laced with the bitter taste of jealousy and selfishness. It is to be used and applied in a continuing process, flowing through our hearts and out through our deeds towards all humankind. Our gratitude is the return track as the love flows on by and out into the world around us.
It is surely very difficult to feel love towards those exhibiting great wickedness and especially when combined with blatant callousness and without a single waft of regret in the sea of tragedy some people smear across our societies. But God sees the good person that lies deep within each of us – He created each one, and could not have created something evil, but what was created later turned to evil. It is our task to also recognise that good person that lies encrusted beneath the grime and corrosion and barnacles of voluntary sin.
Perhaps our greatest difficulty in doing this is because we only see people as they are today, in a single frame of a lifetime movie. But God sees their whole life potential. We can try to remember that the bad guy today may well become the saint of tomorrow – and then where will we stand when we look back at our reluctance we felt to love them even before their repentance? We surely need to see, not only what people are, but what they could become. Not easy in the face of extreme wickedness!
Maybe there is a seamless drift from loving those without repentance towards an even higher plane of finding true forgiveness. This is maybe one of the hardest tasks for us to achieve, especially when trying to forgive those that have hurt us personally, directly. But I think forgiveness is crucial to maintaining a pure open relationship with God. Why?
Because forgiveness is recognition of God’s greater justice. Whenever we fail to forgive, we are also doubting the perfection of God’s judgment. We are saying that we would prefer to see some worldly justice first to satisfy our yearning for an indirect “eye for an eye” – and only then we will forgive and leave it to God. Until we can fully trust in God’s justice, we cannot forgive in more than token terms – even fooling ourselves that we have forgiven.
I was particularly moved by the posting above concerning “Lament for a Son”. I feel there is so much truth in the statement that “To love is to run the risk of suffering”. Love is vulnerability. And perhaps no greater than in the love of a parent for a child. Grief is in direct inverse proportion to love and can tear great lumps out of one’s heart when love is hurt – especially in the loss of a son or daughter. It is very true that through suffering we open our eyes to God’s own suffering – we see how God is hurt at the way we abuse His creation, the home that He built so carefully for us and so proudly and father-like presented to us when it was finally ready on the sixth day – we didn’t even get a glimpse of it beforehand. But it was not very long, according to the Bible, before God grew weary of our hardness and started to regret having made us. But did we care? Not a hoot!
What DOES go through God’s mind when he sees the piles of refuse, the Brown Haze over India, the permanent damage to the environment, so great that the whole global eco-systems are now clearly our of sync, and all the other damage that we do. There is surely little that hurts us more than our love scorned – and yet that is precisely what we all do to God every day.
But it is not all grim news. Along with finally seeing God’s grieving, we also see His elation when we respond, when we see the light, when another turns and repents, when we show love to those that God also loves. When we turn to Him and say “thank you”. When we pray and ask for our daily bread, and the scope of that bread is huge – there is so much to thank for.
Then also with love comes humility. When we see how much God loves everyone equally, and how perfect is His justice and mercy and grace, we realise how meaningless our own ego is. It doesn’t mean being weak and feeble before all men, it means working only God’s will and on His behalf in everything – a total putting oneself behind God.
And then maybe one huge gift of God through love is compassion. And for me at least, compassion is the essence of Christian love. It means living and feeling the suffering of every other being. When we hear of someone suffering, we feel their pain and cannot stop ourselves from running to their aid. We cry for them in our own tears of empathy. And the greatest thing about compassion is that we don’t even need to know or meet the other people. The US may drop bombs on Afghanistan with great wordly justification, but that does not stop the Christian heart from crying out for the woman sliced to pieces amidst the wreckage of what once was what she called home, and for the children left maimed in the street. Compassion is Christ’s lifeline bonding all souls everywhere, along which the power of our love and works can flow across the borders into every single recess of this world.
But I see I have been rambling on again. My apologies.
Markus
Edited by - markus on 08/12/2002 2:55:45 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  brandi Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2002 Total Posts : 118 | Posted 8/12/2002 12:03 PM (GMT -6) |   | pouringagapequote: Crazy isn't it. Think about Jesus HEALING the ear that was cut off (out of a worldly way of defense)or Jesus on the cross saying "forgive them, they haven't a clue what they are doing" (when surely He could have been saying [or even thinking] "you'll get it for this." etc.)
I get so teary eyed sometimes when I see a movie or play or hear the story read about Christ's crucifixion and get to the part where he cries out "Father, forgive them for they know not what they are doing." Putting it in this conversation helps in understanding how we are to forgive even those who have not yet asked. Thank you for your comments!
Electraquote: Forgiveness is the most authentic feedback you can ever give or receive. It speaks the truth about the sin that separates us from God and others, and it speaks the truth about the reconciliation Christ offers. It is the gospel.
When a person feels and experiences our forgiveness (especially if they've really wronged us bad) then this can open the door for allowing them to be moved and to feel this authentic feedback. I agree this moving experience can be the biggest way we can show and speak God's love and truth, as long as the forgiveness is genuine. I keep thinking of the Prodigal Son. Thank you.
Al2Si2H4O9quote: What the "Fruit of the Spirit" ISN'T is us trying to copy Jesus out of out own conceptions and effort, and fleshly-oriented feeling of obligation and ethic. That's not it. Here is that Luther quote, as an illustration: "have flowed and are flowing into us". WE are NOT the source. God is. But the verb "flow" is a useful one
"Isn't out of our own conception and effort" Yes, I agree that we need the Spirit flowing in us to help us to love the way Christ longs for us to. We need to be open to allowing the Spirit to flow and increase in our love. Thank you -- it's not as much about us doing as about us allowing the Spirit within us to be flowing. Yes!
Markus quote: But we also need to recognise that love is not a durable commodity that can be stored away for oneself. If we try to hoard it for ourselves we soon find it has turned sour and putrid and laced with the bitter taste of jealousy and selfishness. It is to be used and applied in a continuing process, flowing through our hearts and out through our deeds towards all humankind
I thought of trying to hold on to some delicious dessert when I read this. If we try to save it, it loses it's taste over time and becomes putrid. When I got married I remember saving the top of my cake to eat for our first year anniversary. Well, the cake was horrible and we didn't get to enjoy it a year later. If we had just ate it then and there we could have shared more cake with others and everyone could have enjoyed more cake at the wedding (Perhaps a poor analogy but I think you get the gist)
I have found it faith building and AMAZING that the more I give, the more I receive. God gives back to us tenfold everything we give away!
Markus quote: But I think forgiveness is crucial to maintaining a pure open relationship with God. Why?
Because forgiveness is recognition of Gods greater justice. Whenever we fail to forgive, we are also doubting the perfection of God’s judgment
Not only is it doubting the perfection of God's judgment but it is also causing a blockage in us and a brokenness in our relationships. Forgiveness is extremely necessary for our own spiritual and mental health.
Markus quote:
And then maybe one huge gift of God through love is compassion. And for me at least, compassion is the essence of Christian love. It means living and feeling the suffering of every other being
When I read about the life of Christ this is the biggest message I continually receive. Jesus had ENORMOUS compassion for ALL. He would stop everything to attend to a hurting individual. He LOVED in the most compassionate and passionate way! Thank you for sharing and you DID NOT disturb the flow but rather added to it! Your thoughts were anything but childish.
Thank you for all your posts so far. This is helping me to sort through this and to process.  ~Brandi~
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 8/12/2002 12:40 PM (GMT -6) |   | Brandi, what you wrote was a slight bit different than what I had in mind.
You said: quote: "... I agree that we need the Spirit flowing in us to help us to love the way Christ longs for us to. We need to be open to allowing the Spirit to flow and increase in our love. Thank you -- it's not as much about us doing as about us allowing the Spirit within us to be flowing.
I underlined the part that seems so much like how the Westminster Confession has always struck me:
quote: CHAP. XVI. - Of Good Works.
1. Good works are only such as God hath commanded in His holy Word, and not such as, without the warrant thereof, are devised by men, out of blind zeal, or upon any pretence of good intention.
2. These good works, done in obedience to God's commandments, are the fruits and evidences of a true and lively faith: and by them believers manifest their thankfulness, strengthen their assurance, edify their brethren, adorn the profession of the gospel, stop the mouths of the adversaries, and glorify God, whose workmanship they are, created in Christ Jesus thereunto, that, having their fruit unto holiness, they may have the end, eternal life.
3. Their ability to do good works is not at all of themselves, but wholly from the Spirit of Christ. And that they may be enabled thereunto, beside the graces they have already received, there is required an actual influence of the same Holy Spirit to work in them to will, and to do, of His good pleasure: yet are they not hereupon to grow negligent, as if they were not bound to perform any duty unless upon a special motion of the Spirit; but they ought to be diligent in stirring up the grace of God that is in them.
And actually, the 1563 Heidelberg Confesion of Faith uses the word "gratitude" instead of "Thankfulness". The third section of the Heidelberg is refered to as the section on "gratitude."
But in its initial portion, the emphasis seems more balanced: (see bold)
quote: Q & A 1 Q. What is your only comfort in life and in death? A. That I am not my own, but belong--body and soul, in life and in death--to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ. He has fully paid for all my sins with his precious blood, and has set me free from the tyranny of the devil. He also watches over me in such a way that not a hair can fall from my head without the will of my Father in heaven: in fact, all things must work together for my salvation.
Because I belong to him, Christ, by his Holy Spirit, assures me of eternal life and makes me wholeheartedly willing and ready from now on to live for him.
I can't knock that. But in the Westminster Confession's version of almost the same idea it has always struck me as if it was suggested that now that God has done His part, that we now get the gumption up to do out part, "out of gratitude." That's what I feel I should be critical about.
What you wrote, though, Brandy, with all the use of the word "flow" to me needs some more specificity. Know what I mean. It is a word that is just as useable if the flow is entirely from outside (like a water pipe) or is a domino effect (like a copper electrical wire). Its right for Christian Contemporary radio stations, but it leaves un-addressed some VERY important issue.
On the Bon. thread Don was making a comment about how the new life makes a change, and from that change is lived a life that is fruitful. He makes a great point. I'd call that "incarnational", at least poetically. (I'm slow-minded right now.) Many scritpure versus need to be put on the table ON THIS VERY ISSUE.
Edited by - Al2Si2H4O9 on 08/12/2002 6:33:25 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Matthew Timothy Short Huh?

Date Joined Apr 2002 Total Posts : 635 | Posted 8/13/2002 12:02 AM (GMT -6) |   | God knows if I have His love within me; pretending to love others genuinely is impossible, before a God that hates evil and is good.
Knowing genuine love, is the pure kindness of forbearance; to treat others with continuous careful thought; and when provoked, refusing to use doubtful words, or behavior.
Sincere faith in God, gives me power over my own actions, purposes, and affections; warning against and confronting that in me, which is wrong; approving and prompting me, to that which is right.
The purpose of God’s love, is His heart beating within mine, toward others, that they might know, and that we might share, in this purity of God.
God makes me a person, who is patient, and kind, with no ill will toward another's excellence; not to behave in a manner, intended to excite admiration of myself.
God makes me a person, who is not harsh, nor severe, demanding my own way, nor to keep a record, when wronged.
God makes me a person, who is never content, with the gross injustice of wickedness, and always rejoices in the truth.
God, living within my very being, helps me to bear all things, to believe all things, to hope all things, and to endure all things.
Faith in God never fails.
Edited by - Tim on 08/14/2002 04:37:15 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Starkman Registered Member

Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1747 | Posted 8/13/2002 2:03 AM (GMT -6) |   | | | |
 |  brandi Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2002 Total Posts : 118 | Posted 8/13/2002 3:11 PM (GMT -6) |   | Al2Si2H4O9quote: On the Bon. thread Don was making a comment about how the new life makes a change, and from that change is lived a life that is fruitful.
I like what Might-be-Don had to say in the above quote too. Speaking about a life that is fruitful, I read a bible verse today that I am now trying to process regarding LOVE AND BEING FRUITFUL.
Philippians 1:9-11 "And this I pray, that YOUR LOVE MAY ABOUND still more and more in knowledge and all discernment, that you may APPROVE OF THE THINGS THAT ARE EXCELLENT, that you may be sincere and without offense till the day of Christ, being FILLED WITH THE FRUITS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS which are BY JESUS CHRIST, to the glory and praise of God."
Do you have more to say about FLOWING in the Spirit?
TIM quote: God, living within my very being, helps me to bear all things, to believe all things, to hope all things, and to endure all things.
Faith in God never fails.
I thought of Galatians 5:22-24 "But the fruit of the Spirit is LOVE, JOY, PEACE, PATIENCE, KINDNESS, GOODNESS, FAITHFULNESS, GENTLENESS, and SELF-CONTROL. Against these there is NO law."
Yes, we enter into the Fruit of the Spirit and walk in love as God lives in us as and transforms us as you have suggested. Thank you for your post!
~Brandi~
Edited by - brandi on 08/13/2002 8:12:58 PM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  might-be-don Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 830 | Posted 8/14/2002 2:00 AM (GMT -6) |   | Last night I asked my wife to forgive me for the comment I made about her leaving the kids unsupervised to paint the room.
peace and love, don
"It's time to wipe the tears from our eyes time to stop questioning why, 'cos every clipped birds gonna fly the Healing has begun" T.S Taylor | | Back to Top | | |
 |  brandi Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2002 Total Posts : 118 | Posted 8/14/2002 4:34 AM (GMT -6) |   | Might-be-don quote: Last night I asked my wife to forgive me for the comment I made about her leaving the kids unsupervised to paint the room.
Sounds like you did the biblical thing in not allowing the sun to go down without making amends.... 
A lot of people have thus far referred to love with forgiveness. I am struggling to fully understand the correlation. I know that we are to forgive all so that our sins will be forgiven but I am struggling with the fact that NOT ALL enter into heaven even though God loves ALL.
There were two thieves on the cross but Jesus only told one that he would enter into heaven because he repented. Here are a few verses that I am trying to sort out:
Rev. 3:20 "Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and dine with him and he with me."
God knocks but he won't knock the door down. Love must be accepted by the receiver.
Here's another one: Proverbs 8:17 "I love those who love me, and those who seek me diligently will find me."
1John 1:9 " IF we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness."
The key in those verses seem contingent (Those who, If). Does anyone have any insights into this love verses forgiveness verses hell ... thing? I know that we are to be compassionate and kind toward all regardless of whether they seek forgiveness or not. I understand that's it's not about us doing the love but God doing the love in us. We choose to enter into the Fruit of the Spirit. Yet God doesn't forgive until the person repents. I don't fully understand how we can equate love with forgiveness when God is LOVE?
I really appreciate all the help! Any comments? ~Brandi~
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  pouringagapewannabe Registered Member
 Date Joined Aug 2002 Total Posts : 1 | Posted 8/14/2002 5:49 AM (GMT -6) |   | How's this for a new name?!
Love, pouringagapewannabe  
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  BBBCanada Registered Member

Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 2763 | Posted 8/22/2002 5:20 AM (GMT -6) |   | 
Brandon "Sharing a prison cell unites you much more powerfully than sharing a conference table."--Ecumenical Jihad: Ecumenism and the Culture War | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Iconoclast Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1227 | Posted 8/24/2002 5:40 PM (GMT -6) |   | brandi
While this is true that Jesus did not discriminate, it is also true that those who followed after him were changed and had transformed lives. They were loved but to be a follower they also had to be willing to turn from their rebellious ways and submit to Gods ways.
Iconoclast
Or does it mean that to be a follower is to simply accept that they were loved. Isn’t this the only criteria for being a follower of Jesus – that one accepts His love? Isn’t the only real “willing” of the follower that is required is that they choose to accept Jesus’ love for them?
Two issues arise from this:
One) What is the “meaning” of accepting Jesus’ love? What does it result in?
To accept someone’s love is to enter into a relationship with them. It is to love them back. To accept Jesus’ love is to accept God’s unconditional love for us. It is to believe the truth about God – that He loves us – and it is to believe the truth about us – that we are loved by Him.
To believe something is to act on it. If someone says they hold a belief but do not act upon that belief then we know that they do not really believe it.
The meaning (the result) of following Jesus (accepting his love) is that our beliefs (about who God is and who we are) are changed and therefore we change – our lives transform. This change is a “fruit” – a result – and never the “source”.
Two) Why wouldn’t someone be willing to accept Jesus love for them?
Unconditional love violates our own knowledge of good and evil.
Our knowledge of good and evil tells us that love is conditioned on doing good. That we deserve love when we are good and we deserve hate when we are evil.
Out of our own knowledge of good and evil we fundamentally put “love” in terms of “deserve”. Just notice how we talk and think about Jesus dying on the cross for us while we were yet sinners. What are we really saying? We are saying that Jesus died for us “undeserving” sinners. Undeserving of what? Undeserving of love.
Does this then mean that we deserve love? No. This also comes from our knowledge of good and evil.
Thus, to accept Jesus’ unconditional love means that we must die to our conception that love has anything to do with “deserve”. We must die to our own knowledge of good and evil.
To the Pharisee whose very identity is their life’s work of being good in order to “deserve love” this is a very hard thing to do. It means they must die to their “goodness”. They must die to their self-justification.
To the hardened criminal whose very identity is their life’s work of being evil in order to “deserve hate” this is also a very hard thing to do. It means they must die to their “badness”. They must die to their self-justification.
brandi
The woman at the well was accepted by Jesus as being worthy to receive love but she was also told by Jesus to “Go and sin no more.” Her lifestyle was NOT accepted hence she was given an instruction to turn from the life she had been living.
Iconoclast
Minor point. It was not the woman at the well to whom Jesus said “Go and sin no more.” It was the woman who was caught in adultery where Jesus said, “let him who is without sin cast the first stone.” Jesus neither condemned nor condoned the woman at the well’s living situation. He simply mentioned it.
Also, writerdad has commented that “Go and sin no more” may not have actually been said by Jesus but was added later. I don’t have any data on this except to say that it is my understanding that there are other cases of text being added to different passages in the course of the development of the current biblical text.
brandi
I am struggling to find the balance in all of this. I want to love the way Christ loved yet to also be a “light” for God. I agree with Greg’s sermon that we as a church NEED desperately to become more loving. People need a safe place that will take them as they are BUT people desperately also need a church that does NOT compromise nor become complacent. Just as a child (even when they do not like it) needs direction, boundaries, and consequences; so too do the sheep.
Iconoclast
I don’t think of it as a question of “balance”. Loving the way Christ loved IS to be a “light” for God.
A child is in particular kind of relationship to a parent. The parent has authority. When the child is very young the parent has more authority. As the child gets older the parent has less authority. And of course when the child becomes a teen the parent seems to lose ALL authority. And when the child is an adult the parent no longer has authority.
Direction, boundaries and consequences (appropriate ones) are determined by the kind of relationship you are in. If you are a manager you have a certain amount of authority over those you supervise. This authority is of course limited. It is only real to the extent that the ones being supervised assent as they can always quit and go somewhere else. And it only has the power to take effect in the context of an agreed upon mission or set of goals. In short, authority relationships exist for a purpose.
A church is a multi-faceted organization. There are many varied types of relationships among the people in a church. What sort of authority relationships are you thinking about here and toward what purpose? I assume you don’t just mean the message being preached from the pulpit because you then brought up the analogy of a child needing direction.
thanks, Iconoclast
"The benefit overran the merit the first day, and has overrun the merit ever since. The merit itself, so-called, I reckon part of the receiving." - Ralph Waldo Emerson | | Back to Top | | |
 |  Iconoclast Registered Member
 Date Joined Oct 2001 Total Posts : 1227 | Posted 8/25/2002 3:39 PM (GMT -6) |   | brandi
Yet God doesn't forgive until the person repents. I don't fully understand how we can equate love with forgiveness when God is LOVE?
Iconoclast
Great questions brandi.
If I forgive someone but they do not accept it, are they forgiven? I think we would say that from my perspective they ARE forgiven but from their perspective they ARE NOT forgiven. In either case I think we would say that “forgiveness” has not happened. The meaning (the result) of “forgiveness” is a restoration of the relationship. It means that love “flows” again. Forgiveness is a relational concept. It can be blocked by either party.
God is love. This means He is always ready and willing to give or accept forgiveness. He is always trustworthy to hold up His end of the relationship. But it is impossible to be forgiven unless we accept that forgiveness. And it is impossible to accept that forgiveness without (at some level) accepting the truth about who God is and who we are. This is repentence. A change in belief that carries with it the concommitant implicit understanding (again, at some level) of the behavioral changes entailed.
brandi
I know that we are to forgive all so that our sins will be forgiven but I am struggling with the fact that NOT ALL enter into heaven even though God loves ALL.
Iconoclast
What else can this mean except that God loves and fully forgives ALL people. He is there when we die with open and loving arms. And yet when some people encounter this they refuse to be loved, they refuse to be forgiven. In fact, they see God and run in terror believing Him to be Beelzebub. Why? Because God’s perfect love and forgiveness causes them fear and pain. Impossible? Witness the Pharisees. Jesus is so obviously full of love and forgiveness that prostitutes and tax collectors are drawn to Him. Jesus is so obviously full of God’s healing power that a woman just reaches out to touch Him and is healed. And yet, when Jesus lovingly heals a woman the Pharisees say that it is by the power of Beelzebub. They see Him as evil, as a threat, and they kill Him. If God on earth as an unthreatening man from Nazareth causes so much fear and pain that some people see Him as evil and as a threat and seek to kill Him, how much more so will those same people feel fear and pain when face to face with the living God. His perfect love and forgiveness are to them as a burning fire. This is the nature and the power of the stolen knowledge of good and evil. It is everlasting death. It is a death that can only be overcome by dying to ourselves. Which means dying to our judgement of God, ourselves and each other.
thanks, Iconoclast
"The benefit overran the merit the first day, and has overrun the merit ever since. The merit itself, so-called, I reckon part of the receiving." - Ralph Waldo Emerson | | Back to Top | | |
 |  PotOnWheel Registered Member

Date Joined Jul 2001 Total Posts : 9890 | Posted 8/25/2002 5:07 PM (GMT -6) |   | iconoclast: dying to ourselves
brandi: repentance
Al: Sam Ting
Icon, you eventually got around to brandi's point. I'm glad.
Brandi, I'm with you that forgiveness is not the end-all. But maybe Icon is right there with you. his narative seems to say so. Someone can be forgiven, and still be dead. "God so Loved the World..." And yet the world rejected Him, and had him cricified.
Forgiveness as a concept pairs nicely with juridical imagery. But it does not remove the cancer. Mankind needs the Resurrection achieved for us by the "Second Adam." We need the "fruit of the womb" that is "more spacious than the heavens." We need the deified life of the God-man flowing from that True Vine to our bodies.
(Too late to write simply--so I'll quit. )
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  brandi Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2002 Total Posts : 118 | Posted 8/25/2002 7:23 PM (GMT -6) |   | Thanks, Brandon! That picture of Mother Theresa is inspiring. She was indeed a model of Christian love!
Iconoclast quote: What sort of authority relationships are you thinking about here and toward what purpose? I assume you don’t just mean the message being preached from the pulpit because you then brought up the analogy of a child needing direction.
What I meant by this was in general relationships within the church. I had no specific authority positions in mind. I believe that followers of Christ need to be spreading the TRUTH in LOVE to a lost world. What a lost sheep DOES NOT need is complacent, compromising Christians but rather people who are willing to speak the truth about who Christ is and do this through their daily actions. The world needs to SEE and EXPERIENCE Christ through us. We need to uphold God's absolute morals and laws and show the lost sheep the way to the Way, the Truth, and the Life. Actions speak much louder than words.
Iconoclast quote: Minor point. It was not the woman at the well to whom Jesus said “Go and sin no more.” It was the woman who was caught in adultery where Jesus said, “let him who is without sin cast the first stone.” Jesus neither condemned nor condoned the woman at the well’s living situation. He simply mentioned it.
Thank you for correcting my mistake! I got the two stories mixed up. However, through my error I reread the story about the woman at the well and found something interesting. Jesus examined the woman's life and her many relationships and then told the woman that he is THE water that quenches thirst forever....
John 4:13 "Everyone who drinks this water will be thirty again, but whoever drinks the water I give him will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give him will become a spring of water welling up to eternal life."
John 6:35 "I am the bread of life. He who comes to me will never go hungry, and he who believes in me will never be thirsty."
What I became aware of is that Christ is the ONLY source that can fill and satisfy that deep hole within. Many people look to relationships and people (or MANY other things) to satisfy a need that CANNOT be satisfied by any person or thing. The ONLY thing that can fill this deep thirst and hunger is Jesus Christ.
This led me to think about SIN. What is it exactly about sin that God despises so much? If we are finding pleasure then why would God NOT want us to continue with certain things that are called sin in the bible? I began to realize that the reason God calls some acts and deeds sin is NOT because he sets out to hold out an unrealistic standard for us nor to prevent us from happiness. NO! Sin is despised by God rather because it separates us from getting our need, our vacuum filled from the ONLY source that can fill it. Anything that we do or think or act upon that causes us to act in rebellion moves us away from our source of life (God) When we move away from our source of life by moving toward sin we are breaking God's heart because God knows what is best for us and that the only way to find this is through obedience to God's will...
Iconoclast quote: The meaning (the result) of following Jesus (accepting his love) is that our beliefs (about who God is and who we are) are changed and therefore we change - our lives transform. This change is a “fruit” - a result - and never the “source”.
I find it interesting that God chose to create us in such a way that we are continually needing transformation. You know why I believe we are not fully transformed immediately when we turn our lives over to God? Because I believe that it's through our imperfections that we learn and grow and become and through the fruit that is produced by this process we can help others to learn and grow too. This keeps us in need of other people. We are ALL on the path to becoming but we never will fully become on this earth thus this awareness can help keep us humble and sensitive to our brothers and sisters. The Creator is the ONLY source that is able to bring the created into it's perfection thus we are given the "log and speck" analogy.
Iconoclast quote: What else can this mean except that God loves and fully forgives ALL people. He is there when we die with open and loving arms. And yet when some people encounter this they refuse to be loved, they refuse to be forgiven. In fact, they see God and run in terror believing Him to be Beelzebub. Why? Because God’s perfect love and forgiveness causes them fear and pain.
I agree with this. I believe that our hearts are either in the process of becoming more in accord with our Father OR they are becoming harder. "If today you hear His voice, harden not your hearts."
Al2Si2H4O9 quote: Forgiveness as a concept pairs nicely with juridical imagery. But it does not remove the cancer. Mankind needs the Resurrection achieved for us by the "Second Adam." We need the "fruit of the womb" that is "more spacious than the heavens." We need the deified life of the God-man flowing from that True Vine to our bodies.
I agree! He is the vine, we are the branches. He is the ONLY water and bread that satisfies! Here are some words to a song I enjoy that speak to our vulnerable state and to the awesome wonder and majesty of the "Second Adam" Jesus Christ:
Because I'll never hold a picture of the whole horizon in my view. Because I'll never tear the night in two. It makes me wonder who am I? Who am I? Who am I and GREAT are you! Great are you Lord.
Hey, pouringagapewannabe, how about changing your name to the catchy name of: pouringagapeinprocesswiththetransformingpowerofthecreator? You like? 
Thanks so much for the help everyone. ~Brandi~
Edited by - brandi on 08/26/2002 09:54:01 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  BBBCanada Registered Member

Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 2763 | Posted 8/26/2002 3:32 AM (GMT -6) |   | quote: Thanks, Brandon! That picture of Mother Theresa is inspiring. She was indeed a model of Christian love!
I do want to say a couple of things about Mother Teresa.
1. It was not my purpose to put up a picture of a "Super Saint." Someone we cannot relate to. I believe there are many Mother Teresas in the world who go virtually unnoticed. And God will say of them on that day, "Well done, my good and faithful servant."
2. I think what made Mother Teresa so "powerful" was not so much that she was some super-duper Christian, but that she touched humanity. Not a faceless humanity "out there." But real people that she came into "contact" with everyday. People literally right on her doorstep. This is what makes her an example to us all.
And this is why might-be-don's post was extremely well written.
Brandon "Sharing a prison cell unites you much more powerfully than sharing a conference table."--Ecumenical Jihad: Ecumenism and the Culture War
Edited by - BBBCanada on 08/26/2002 08:33:50 AM | | Back to Top | | |
 |  might-be-don Registered Member
 Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 830 | Posted 8/26/2002 4:37 AM (GMT -6) |   | Brandon says:quote: And this is why might-be-don's post was extremely well written.
I came real close to adding more to the post to explain what I was trying to get at, I glad I didn't. And, I'm glad you got it.
peace and love, don
"It's time to wipe the tears from our eyes time to stop questioning why, 'cos every clipped birds gonna fly the Healing has begun" T.S Taylor | | Back to Top | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 1:15 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|