 |
Open Theism Discussion Board > Public Forums > Questions about Christianity > (No Subject) | Forum Quick Jump
|
|  BBBCanada Registered Member

Date Joined Jun 2001 Total Posts : 2763 | Posted 4/28/2006 11:16 PM (GMT -6) |   |
On another discussion board I'm on one of the participants said this:
I've been doing research for a few articles on how Christians are responding to The Da Vinci Code; but what I don't mention there, though it will probably be evident when at least one of those articles comes out soon, is that the evangelical apologists I spoke don't seem particularly fazed by the suggestion that Jesus might have been married and thus sexually active -- they said it wasn't an important issue and had no impact on the faith the way that Da Vinci's claims about Nicea and the formation of the New Testament do -- whereas the Catholics I spoke to, particularly Barbara Nicolosi, said the allegations regarding Jesus' marital status and sexual activity ARE theologically important.
So, is this an important question? Or should we think of it like the question about the atonement: If Christ's death pays a "ransom," who does he pay it to?
That question seems to be a little outside the purview of the metaphorical nature of the ransom analogy. Is the martial and therefore sexuality of Jesus life unimportant? Or is it "theologically important? What say ye?
Brandon
It is the purpose that makes strong the vow, but vows to every purpose must not hold.--A friend.
| | Back to Top | | |
    |  Torkuda Registered Member
 Date Joined May 2006 Total Posts : 34 | Posted 5/13/2006 4:03 PM (GMT -6) |   | |
Actually, I know of no scripture that would indicate why Jesus could not have had a spouse. First off, we all know there would be nothing morally wrong (unless he bedded a halot, which some have tried to suggest). Also, I know of no prophcies declaring the messiah a virgin.
The scriptures give no indication of a marraige, nor activily tries to deny it. In the end, no, I don't see a reason to care. I however would have expected at least a mention of her reaction to his death!
As far as the movie and book goes... I'll have to see it, but from my understanding, this is all much ado about nothing. Da-Vinchi Code is a work of fiction, and whilst it may paint Christianity in an unpleasent light, given that its fiction, people are about as likely to be turned away from the faith by it as they are to believe in fair god mothers because of the Cinderella story.
| | Back to Top | | |
  |  Torkuda Registered Member
 Date Joined May 2006 Total Posts : 34 | Posted 5/13/2006 9:24 PM (GMT -6) |   | | I don't understand. Was anyone implicating Jesus procreates to this day? Was anyone implicating that he procreated at all? | | Back to Top | | |
     | Forum Information | Currently it is Monday, November 09, 2026 3:18 PM (GMT -6) There are a total of 97,718 posts in 6,040 threads. In the last 3 days there were 0 new threads and 0 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2026 |
|
|